Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apricot, Washington

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 02:07, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apricot, Washington

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The name origins piece says that "It was once a siding for the Northern Pacific Railroad northeast of Prosser." From what I can tell, that was all it was. No topo or aerial shows a town here, and while there is a census-based document which give "Apricot" a population, reading the preface indicates that this number comes from two block groups put together according to a scheme of the authors; there's no claim that this area was intended to represent a distinct settlement. Mangoe (talk) 01:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 14:36, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 14:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence of a community or anything else that would meet GNG/GEOLAND. –dlthewave ☎ 05:03, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.