User talk:Dracostav1325: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 15:37, 5 October 2021

Welcome!

Hello, Dracostav1325, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to K. B. Hedgewar. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 18:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is about the wikipedia article on jawaharlal nehru. amidst reports of vandalism on that article, it has been made semi protected for the time being, as I notice. however, a further vandalism and lie has been posted by the user Dominator1453 which you can check here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Jawaharlal_Nehru&type=revision&diff=669475137&oldid=669447925

This was the edit(check right side of the page) : "According to a spokesperson from the Indian Congress, this page was edited to remove any citations of Jawaharlal Nehru being Muslim, by an account traced to the National Informatics Centre or NIC, the software provider of the government." which is now being shown on the wiki page. It is another malicious vandalism which states that the government of india treid to remove citations of nehru being a muslim, while the reality is that vandals(associated with the current government in India tried to insert lies about nehru BEING A MUSLIM(which he was not). check this link :

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Wiki-entries-on-Nehru-family-edited-from-NIC-IP/articleshow/47888589.cms

It is well known that Nehru was a high caste kashmiri brahmin.

Request the wikipedia moderators to correct the malicious edits.

Dracostav1325 (talk) 13:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

This is about the wikipedia article on jawaharlal nehru. amidst reports of vandalism on that article, it has been made semi protected for the time being, as I notice. however, a further vandalism and lie has been posted by the user Dominator1453 which you can check here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Jawaharlal_Nehru&type=revision&diff=669475137&oldid=669447925

This was the edit(check right side of the page) : "According to a spokesperson from the Indian Congress, this page was edited to remove any citations of Jawaharlal Nehru being Muslim, by an account traced to the National Informatics Centre or NIC, the software provider of the government." which is now being shown on the wiki page. It is another malicious vandalism which states that the government of india treid to remove citations of nehru being a muslim, while the reality is that vandals(associated with the current government in India tried to insert lies about nehru BEING A MUSLIM(which he was not). check this link :

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Wiki-entries-on-Nehru-family-edited-from-NIC-IP/articleshow/47888589.cms

It is well known that Nehru was a high caste kashmiri brahmin.

Request the wikipedia moderators to correct the malicious edits. Dracostav1325 (talk) 13:43, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dracostav1325, this is a discussion for the article's Talk page, not your own userspace. Primefac (talk) 13:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh does not have an edit summary. Many of your edits need justifications that should normally be provided in the edit summaries.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 22:28, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh is problematic, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:36, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to M. S. Golwalkar, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You have reverted a recent clean-up of the article without explanation, and added synthesis from primary sources. Please refrain from doing this. Kautilya3 (talk) 13:06, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA notification

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

13:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vinayak Damodar Savarkar may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:59, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 05:24, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dracostav1325. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dracostav1325. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mercy Petitions of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mercy Petitions of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercy Petitions of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Girdlast888 (talk) 22:17, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 86: / Line 86: @@
 Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics.  This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
-}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> 13:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
+}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> 13:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 == January 2016 ==
@@ Line 145: / Line 145: @@
 Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> [[User:Girdlast888|Girdlast888]] ([[User talk:Girdlast888|talk]]) 22:17, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
+== ArbCom 2019 election voter message ==
+<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
+<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2019|2019 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019#Election_timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
+The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
+If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|poll}}|voting page]]'''.  If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
+</td></tr>
+</table>
+<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/06&oldid=926750430 -->