Polyamory: Difference between revisions
→Further reading: Added parameters to "Weitzman 2019" |
|||
(912 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Intimacy for multiple partners}} |
|||
{{Redirect|Polyamorous|the Breaking Benjamin song|Polyamorous (song)|the reality TV show|Polyamory: Married & Dating}} |
|||
{{about||the reality TV show|Polyamory: Married & Dating|the Breaking Benjamin song|Polyamorous (song)}} |
|||
{{Short description| Practice of or desire for intimate relationships with more than one partner}} |
|||
{{distinguish|Polygamy|Polyromantic|Polysexuality}} |
|||
{{more citations needed|date=May 2018}} |
|||
{{Use mdy dates|date=February 2015}} |
{{Use mdy dates|date=February 2015}} |
||
{{Infobox sexuality|image=Malmö Pride 2017 (35639406753).jpg|caption=A demonstrator (left) with a polyamorous pride flag in [[Malmö]], Sweden, August 2017|parent=[[Non-monogamy]]|subcategories=[[Polyfidelity]]|associated_terms={{hlist|[[Relationship anarchy]]|[[ethical non-monogamy]]|[[ambiamory]]|[[free love]]}}}} |
|||
{{Polyamory sidebar|all}} |
{{Polyamory sidebar|all}} |
||
'''Polyamory''' (from [[Ancient Greek|Greek]] {{lang|el|πολύ}} ''{{lang|el-Latn|poly}}'', "many, several", and [[Latin]] ''{{lang|la|amor}}'', "[[love]]") is the practice of, or desire for, [[intimate relationship]]s with more than one partner, with the informed [[Sexual consent|consent]] of all partners involved.<ref name=":0">{{cite book | last = Sheff | first = Elisabeth | title = When Someone You Love Is Polyamorous: Understanding Poly People and Relationships | publisher = Thorntree Press | location = Portland, Oregon | year = 2016 | url = https://books.google.com/books?isbn=0996460195}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=Haritaworn|first=J.|last2=Lin|first2=C.-j.|last3=Klesse|first3=C.|date=2016-08-15|title=Poly/logue: A Critical Introduction to Polyamory|journal=Sexualities|volume=9|issue=5|pages=515–529|doi=10.1177/1363460706069963}}</ref> It has been described as "consensual, [[Ethics|ethical]], and [[Moral responsibility|responsible]] [[non-monogamy]]".<ref>Morning Glory Zell-Ravenheart. ''A Bouquet of Lovers'' (1990)</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Klesse|first=C. |date=2016-08-15|title=Polyamory and its 'Others': Contesting the Terms of Non-Monogamy|journal=Sexualities |volume=9|issue=5|pages=565–583|doi=10.1177/1363460706069986|url=https://semanticscholar.org/paper/f73533375bbef88749737d5234f533fc4bab0158}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first= Jillian |last= Keenan |date= June 13, 2013 |title= Marry Me. And Me: The case for polyamory. And while we're at it, let's privatize marriage. |url= http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2013/06/polyamory_should_be_legal_it_s_consensual_and_fine_for_children.html |journal= [[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] |access-date= January 28, 2015 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150128182254/http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2013/06/polyamory_should_be_legal_it_s_consensual_and_fine_for_children.html |archive-date= January 28, 2015 |url-status= live }}</ref> People who identify as polyamorous believe in an [[open relationship]] with a conscious management of jealousy; they reject the view that sexual and relational exclusivity are necessary for deep, committed, long-term [[Love|loving]] relationships.<ref name=":3">{{cite journal|author= Klesse, C.|year= 2011|title= Notions of love in polyamory—Elements in a discourse on multiple loving|journal= Laboratorium|volume= 3|issue= 2|pages= 4–25|url= http://www.soclabo.org/index.php/laboratorium/article/view/250/588|access-date= December 27, 2016|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20170317114933/http://www.soclabo.org/index.php/laboratorium/article/view/250/588|archive-date= March 17, 2017|url-status= live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.healthline.com/health/polyamorous/|title=What Does It Mean to Be Polyamorous?|website=healthline.com}}</ref> |
|||
'''Polyamory''' ({{etymology|grc|''{{wikt-lang|grc|πολύς}}'' ({{grc-transl|πολῠ́ς}})|many|la|{{wikt-lang|la|amor}}|[[love]]}}) is the practice of, or the desire for, [[romance (love)|romantic relationship]]s with more than one partner at the same time, with the informed consent of all partners involved. Some people who identify as polyamorous believe in [[consensual non-monogamy]] with a conscious management of [[jealousy]] and reject the view that sexual and relational exclusivity ([[monogamy]]) are prerequisite for deep, committed, long-term, loving relationships.<ref name=":3">{{cite journal |last=Klesse|first=C. |year=2011 |title=Notions of love in polyamory: Elements in a discourse on multiple loving |journal=Laboratorium |volume=3 |issue=2 |pages=4–25 |url=http://www.soclabo.org/index.php/laboratorium/article/view/250/588 |access-date=December 27, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170317114933/http://www.soclabo.org/index.php/laboratorium/article/view/250/588 |archive-date=March 17, 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref> Others prefer to restrict their sexual activity to only members of the group, a closed polyamorous relationship that is usually referred to as [[polyfidelity]].<ref name="Miller1999">{{cite book|last=Miller|first=Timothy|author-link=Timothy Miller|title=The 60s communes: hippies and beyond|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wVLu4F1aOgcC&pg=PA135|access-date=12 March 2011|year=1999|publisher=Syracuse University Press|isbn=978-0-8156-0601-7|page=135|archive-date=November 7, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131107113857/http://books.google.com/books?id=wVLu4F1aOgcC&pg=PA135|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Pines|first1=Ayala|last2=Aronson|first2=Elliot|title=Polyfidelity: An alternative lifestyle without jealousy?|journal=Journal of Family and Economic Issues|date=1981|volume=4|issue=3|pages=373–392|doi=10.1007/BF01257945}}</ref> |
|||
''Polyamory'' has come to be an [[umbrella term]] for various forms of non-monogamous, multi-partner relationships, or non-exclusive sexual or [[Romance (love)|romantic]] relationships.<ref>{{cite web|title=Poly glossary|url=https://www.polymatchmaker.com/main.mvc?Screen=HTML&Page=polyglossary|website=PolyMatchMaker.com|accessdate=24 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170706220211/http://www.polymatchmaker.com/main.mvc?Screen=HTML&Page=polyglossary|archive-date=July 6, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="guardian1">{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/nov/14/gender.uk|title=When two just won't do|date=November 14, 2003|newspaper=The Guardian|author=Helen Echlin|accessdate=March 27, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130827175507/http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/nov/14/gender.uk|archive-date=August 27, 2013|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://nyupress.org/books/9781479886227/|title=Beyond Monogamy: Polyamory and the Future of Polyqueer Sexualities|last=Schippers|first=Mimi|publisher=NYU Press|year=2017|isbn=|location=|pages=|access-date=August 6, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170807023446/https://nyupress.org/books/9781479886227/|archive-date=August 7, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Its usage reflects the choices and [[Philosophy of life|philosophies]] of the individuals involved, but with recurring [[Theme (narrative)|themes]] or [[Value (ethics)|values]], such as love, intimacy, [[honesty]], [[integrity]], [[Egalitarianism|equality]], [[Interpersonal communication|communication]], and [[Promise|commitment]].<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> |
|||
''Polyamory'' has come to be an [[umbrella term]] for various forms of non-monogamous, multi-partner relationships, or non-exclusive sexual or romantic relationships.<ref>{{cite web|title=Poly glossary|url=https://www.polymatchmaker.com/main.mvc?Screen=HTML&Page=polyglossary|website=PolyMatchMaker.com|access-date=24 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170706220211/http://www.polymatchmaker.com/main.mvc?Screen=HTML&Page=polyglossary|archive-date=July 6, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="guardian1">{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/nov/14/gender.uk|title=When two just won't do|date=November 14, 2003|newspaper=The Guardian|author=Helen Echlin|access-date=March 27, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130827175507/http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/nov/14/gender.uk|archive-date=August 27, 2013|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://nyupress.org/books/9781479886227/|title=Beyond Monogamy: Polyamory and the Future of Polyqueer Sexualities|last=Schippers|first=Mimi|publisher=NYU Press|year=2017|access-date=August 6, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170807023446/https://nyupress.org/books/9781479886227/|archive-date=August 7, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Its usage reflects the choices and [[Philosophy of love|philosophies]] of the individuals involved, but with recurring themes or [[Value (ethics and social sciences)|values]], such as love, intimacy, [[honesty]], [[integrity]], [[Egalitarianism|equality]], [[Interpersonal communication|communication]], and [[Promise|commitment]].<ref name=":2">{{cite journal |last1=Haritaworn|first1=J. |last2=Lin|first2=C.-J. |last3=Klesse|first3=C. |s2cid=145274479 |date=2016-08-15 |title=Poly/logue: A Critical Introduction to Polyamory |journal=[[Sexualities (journal)|Sexualities]] |volume=9 |issue=5 |pages=515–29 |doi=10.1177/1363460706069963 |quote=Polyamory describes a form of relationship where it is possible, valid and worthwhile to maintain (usually long-term) intimate and sexual relationships with multiple partners simultaneously.}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Klesse|first=C.|s2cid=143812369|date=2016-08-15|title=Polyamory and its 'Others': Contesting the Terms of Non-Monogamy|journal=Sexualities|volume=9|issue=5|pages=565–583|doi=10.1177/1363460706069986}}</ref> It can often be distinguished from some other forms of [[Consensual non-monogamy|ethical non-monogamy]] in that the relationships involved are loving intimate relationships, as opposed to purely sexual relationships.<ref name="Brunning 2016"/> |
|||
{{TOC limit|3}} |
{{TOC limit|3}} |
||
Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
{{Main|Terminology within polyamory}} |
{{Main|Terminology within polyamory}} |
||
The word ''polyamorous'' first appeared in an article by [[Morning Glory Zell-Ravenheart]], "A Bouquet of Lovers", published in May 1990 in ''[[Green Egg|Green Egg Magazine]]'', as "poly-amorous".<ref name="pitn">{{cite web|url=http://polyinthemedia.blogspot.co.uk/2007/01/polyamory-enters-oxford-english.html|title="Polyamory" enters the Oxford English Dictionary, and tracking the word's origins|date=6 January 2007|work=Polyamory in the News!|author=Alan| |
The word ''polyamorous'' first appeared in an article by [[Morning Glory Zell-Ravenheart]], "A Bouquet of Lovers", published in May 1990 in ''[[Green Egg|Green Egg Magazine]]'', as "poly-amorous".<ref name="pitn">{{cite web|url=http://polyinthemedia.blogspot.co.uk/2007/01/polyamory-enters-oxford-english.html|title="Polyamory" enters the Oxford English Dictionary, and tracking the word's origins|date=6 January 2007|work=Polyamory in the News!|author=Alan|access-date=27 Jan 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160131204258/http://polyinthemedia.blogspot.co.uk/2007/01/polyamory-enters-oxford-english.html|archive-date=January 31, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> In May 1992, Jennifer L. Wesp created the [[Usenet]] [[newsgroup]] ''alt.polyamory'', and the [[Oxford English Dictionary]] (OED) cites the proposal to create that group as the first verified appearance of the word.<ref name="pitn"/> In 1999, Zell-Ravenheart was asked by the editor of the OED to provide a definition of the term, and she provided it for the UK version as "the practice, state or ability of having more than one sexual loving relationship at the same time, with the full knowledge and [[Sexual consent|consent]] of all partners involved."<ref>{{cite web|author=The Ravenhearts |title=Frequently Asked Questions re: Polyamory |url=http://www.mithrilstar.org/Polyamory-FAQ-Ravenhearts.htm|access-date=July 6, 2011|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100324124641/http://www.mithrilstar.org/Polyamory-FAQ-Ravenhearts.htm |archive-date=March 24, 2010 }}</ref> The words ''polyamory'', ''polyamorous'', and ''polyamorist'' were added to the OED in 2006.<ref name="oed.com">{{cite web|url=http://public.oed.com/the-oed-today/recent-updates-to-the-oed/previous-updates/september-2006-update/|title=September 2006 update|date=14 September 2006|work=The OED today|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|access-date=January 27, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151228141710/http://public.oed.com/the-oed-today/recent-updates-to-the-oed/previous-updates/september-2006-update/|archive-date=December 28, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
Although some reference works define "polyamory" as a relational form (whether [[Interpersonal relationship|interpersonal]] or [[Romance (love)|romantic]] or [[Intimate relationship|sexual]]) that involves multiple people with the consent of all the people involved,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/us/polyamory |title=Definition of polyamory in US English |work=Oxford Living Dictionaries |author=<!--Not Stated--> |publisher=Oxford University Press |accessdate=29 January 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180130013807/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/us/polyamory |archive-date=January 30, 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/polyamory |title=Definition of polyamory in English |work=Oxford Living Dictionaries |author=<!--Not Stated--> |publisher=Oxford University Press |accessdate=29 January 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180130013728/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/polyamory |archive-date=January 30, 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/polyamory |title=Definition of "polyamory" – English Dictionary |work=Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary & Thesaurus |author=<!--Not Stated--> |publisher=Cambridge University Press |accessdate=29 January 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180130091245/https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/polyamory |archive-date=January 30, 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> the North American version of the OED declares it a [[philosophy of life]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://public.oed.com/search/polyamory/?post_type=any/|title=What Does It Mean to Be Polyamorous?|website=.oed.com}}</ref> |
|||
Some reference works define ''polyamory'' as a relational form (whether [[Interpersonal relationship|interpersonal]] or [[Romance (love)|romantic]] or [[Intimate relationship|sexual]]) that involves multiple people with the consent of all the people involved, like [[Oxford Living Dictionaries]], ''[[Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary]]'' and [[Thesaurus]], and [[Dictionary.com]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/us/polyamory |title=Definition of polyamory in US English |work=Oxford Living Dictionaries |author=<!--Not Stated--> |publisher=Oxford University Press |access-date=29 January 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180130013807/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/us/polyamory |archive-date=January 30, 2018 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/polyamory |title=Definition of polyamory in English |work=Oxford Living Dictionaries |author=<!--Not Stated--> |publisher=Oxford University Press |access-date=29 January 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180130013728/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/polyamory |archive-date=January 30, 2018 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/polyamory |title=Definition of "polyamory" – English Dictionary |work=Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary & Thesaurus |author=<!--Not Stated--> |publisher=Cambridge University Press |access-date=29 January 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180130091245/https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/polyamory |archive-date=January 30, 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.dictionary.com/browse/polyamory?s=t |title=Polyamory -- Definition of Polyamory at Dictionary.com |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=2020 |website=[[Dictionary.com]] |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111235336/https://www.dictionary.com/browse/polyamory |archive-date=November 11, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> Some criticized the [[Merriam-Webster]] definition of polyamory, which defines the term as "the state or practice of having more than one open romantic relationship at a time,"<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/polyamory |title=Polyamory--Definition of Polyamory by Merriam-Webster |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=2020 |website=[[Merriam-Webster]] |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200803164124/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/polyamory |archive-date=August 3, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> as missing a "vital component": consent.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.shape.com/lifestyle/sex-and-love/what-polyamorous-relationship-actually-is |title=Here's What a Polyamorous Relationship Actually Is—and What It Isn't |last=Kassel |first=Gabrielle |date=July 24, 2019 |website=Shape magazine |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200606131415/https://www.shape.com/lifestyle/sex-and-love/what-polyamorous-relationship-actually-is |archive-date=June 6, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
== Styles == |
|||
Consensual non-monogamy, which polyamory falls under, can take many different forms, depending on the needs and preferences of the individual(s) involved in any specific relationship or set of relationships. As of 2019 fully one fifth of the United States population has, at some point in their lives, engaged in some sort of consensual non-monogamy.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Haupert|first=M. L.|last2=Gesselman|first2=Amanda N.|last3=Moors|first3=Amy C.|last4=Fisher|first4=Helen E.|last5=Garcia|first5=Justin R.|date=2017-07-04|title=Prevalence of Experiences With Consensual Nonmonogamous Relationships: Findings From Two National Samples of Single Americans|journal=Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy|volume=43|issue=5|pages=424–440|doi=10.1080/0092623X.2016.1178675|issn=0092-623X|pmid=27096488}}</ref> |
|||
The word ''polyamory'' combines the Greek word for "many" (''poly'') and the Latin word for "love" (''amor'').<ref>{{Cite book|chapter-url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27771-9_200097-1|chapter=Polyamory (Polygamy and Polyandry)|first=Georgios A.|last=Orfanidis|title=Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion|editor-first=David A.|editor-last=Leeming|date=December 27, 2019|publisher=Springer|pages=1–4|via=Springer Link|doi=10.1007/978-3-642-27771-9_200097-1|isbn=978-3-642-27771-9|s2cid=239527267|access-date=December 27, 2020|archive-date=March 10, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220310100820/https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-642-27771-9_200097-1|url-status=live}}</ref> Polyamory is not generally included in the [[LGBT]] [[Hypernymy and hyponymy|umbrella]] because it's not a sexuality or a gender identity.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2018-07-06 |title=Why isn't polyamory included in LGBTQ? |url=https://www.askpolyamory.com/home/2018/7/6/why-isnt-polyamory-included-in-lgbtq |access-date=2024-03-05 |website=Polyamory Advice |language=en-US}}</ref> |
|||
* '''Kitchen table polyamory:''' Kitchen table polyamory is a style in which all members of a particular [[wikt:polycule|polycule]] are comfortable and connected enough with each other that it is not uncommon for them to literally gather around the kitchen table. Practitioners of this style may spend holidays, birthdays, or other important times together as a large group. This style places an emphasis on family-style connections, not all members are necessarily sexually or romantically involved with every other person in the group.<ref name=":6">{{Cite journal|last=Bergdall|first=Melissa K.|last2=Blumer|first2=Markie L. C.|date=2015-01-02|title=More Than Two: A Practical Guide to Ethical Polyamory, by Franklin Veaux and Eve Rickert|journal=Journal of Feminist Family Therapy|volume=27|issue=1|pages=40–45|doi=10.1080/08952833.2015.1005963|issn=0895-2833}}</ref><ref name=":7">{{Cite book|title=More than two : a practical guide to ethical polyamory|last=Veaux|first=Franklin|isbn=9780991399703|oclc=878396611|year=2014}}</ref> |
|||
* '''Parallel polyamory:''' Parallel polyamory is a style in which members of individual relationships prefer not to meet or know details of their partners' other relationships. This is a companion term to kitchen table polyamory and one in which metamours may or may not ever interact.<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":7" /> |
|||
* '''Solo poly:''' Solo polyamory is a style in which the individual has or is comfortable with having multiple intimate (romantic or sexual) relationships without wanting to cohabit or "nest" with any one partner. They eschew the "relationship escalator" which holds that relationships must follow a progression, or "escalator" from dating, to being exclusive, to becoming engaged, getting married and having children.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-polyamorists-next-door/201310/solo-polyamory-singleish-single-poly|title=Solo Polyamory, Singleish, Single & Poly|last=Sheff|first=Elisabeth A.|date=October 14, 2013|website=Psychology Today|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.insider.com/dark-side-of-polyamory-2019-2|title=There's a dark side of polyamory that nobody talks about|access-date=2019-10-03}}</ref> |
|||
==As a practice== |
==As a practice== |
||
{{See also|Polyamory in the United States}} |
|||
{{Close Relationships}} |
|||
[[File:Pride in London 2016 - Polyamorous people in the parade.png|thumb|left|Polyamorous people parading under their banner with two [[Furry fandom|furries]] in front of them at Pride in London 2016]] |
|||
Separate from polyamory as a philosophical basis for relationships are the practical ways in which people who live polyamorously arrange their lives and handle certain issues, as compared to those of a more conventional monogamous arrangement.<ref name=":3"/> |
|||
[[Consensual non-monogamy]], which polyamory falls under,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/the-polyamorists-next-door/201807/what-is-the-difference-between-polyamory-and-polygamy |title=What Is the Difference Between Polyamory and Polygamy? |last=Sheff |first=Elisabeth A. |date=July 26, 2018 |website=[[Psychology Today]] |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20201225020408/https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/the-polyamorists-next-door/201807/what-is-the-difference-between-polyamory-and-polygamy |archive-date=December 25, 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref> can take many different forms, depending on the needs and preferences of the individual(s) involved in any specific relationship(s). As of 2019, over one fifth of the United States population has, at some point in their lives, engaged in some sort of consensual non-monogamy.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Haupert|first1=M. L.|last2=Gesselman|first2=Amanda N.|last3=Moors|first3=Amy C.|last4=Fisher|first4=Helen E.|last5=Garcia|first5=Justin R.|s2cid=6855648|date=2017-07-04|title=Prevalence of Experiences With Consensual Nonmonogamous Relationships: Findings From Two National Samples of Single Americans|journal=Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy|volume=43|issue=5|pages=424–440|doi=10.1080/0092623X.2016.1178675|issn=0092-623X|pmid=27096488}}</ref> |
|||
Separate from polyamory as a philosophical basis for relationships are the practical ways in which people who live polyamorously arrange their lives and handle certain issues, as compared to those of a more conventional monogamous arrangement.<ref name=":3"/> People of different [[sexual orientations]] are a part of the community and form networks of relationships, with consent and agreement of their partners.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Introducing the New Sexuality Studies|publisher=Routledge|year=2016|editor-last=Ficher|editor-first=Nancy|edition=third|location=New York, NY|page=326|chapter=Contesting the Culture of Monogamy|editor-last2=Seidman|editor-first2=Steven}}</ref><ref name="weiger">{{cite journal|last1=Weitzman|first1=Geri|title=Therapy with Clients Who Are Bisexual and Polyamorous|journal=Journal of Bisexuality|date=2006|volume=6|issue=1–2|pages=137–164|doi=10.1300/J159v06n01_08|s2cid=143967318|url=http://www.numenor.org/~gdw/psychologist/bipolycounseling.html|access-date=December 4, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150318053259/http://www.numenor.org/~gdw/psychologist/bipolycounseling.html|archive-date=March 18, 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Strassberg |first1=Maura I. |url=https://culsnet.law.capital.edu/LawReview/BackIssues/31-3/Strassberg14.pdf |title=The Challenge Of Post-Modern Polygamy: Considering Polyamory |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060524030716/https://culsnet.law.capital.edu/LawReview/BackIssues/31-3/Strassberg14.pdf |archive-date=May 24, 2006}}</ref> Many things differentiate polyamory from other types of non-monogamous relationships. It is common for [[Swinging (sexual practice)|swinging]] and [[Open relationship|open couples]] to maintain emotional monogamy while engaging in extra-dyadic sexual relations.{{sfn |Barker |Langdridge |2012 |loc=Swinging: Pushing the Boundaries of Monogamy?|p=71}} |
|||
Polyamorous communities have been booming in countries within Europe, North America, and Oceania. In other parts of the world, such as, South America, Asia, and Africa there is a small growth in polyamory practices. There is not any particular gendered partner choice to polyamorous relationships. People of different sexual preferences are a part of the community.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Introducing the New Sexuality Studies|last=|first=|publisher=Routledge|year=2016|isbn=|editor-last=Ficher|editor-first=Nancy|edition=third|location=New York, NY|page=326|chapter=Contesting the Culture of Monogamy|editor-last2=Seidman|editor-first2=Steven}}</ref> |
|||
The friend or partner boundary in monogamous relationships and other forms of non-monogamy is typically fairly clear. Unlike other forms of non-monogamy, though, "polyamory is notable for privileging emotional intimacy with others."<ref name="Brunning 2016"/> Benefits of a polyamorous relationship might include:<ref>{{cite web |website=PolyamoryOnline |url=http://www.polyamoryonline.org/articles/polyamoury_101.html |title=Polyamory 101 |access-date=April 27, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928045712/http://www.polyamoryonline.org/articles/polyamoury_101.html |archive-date=September 28, 2007 |url-status=live |date=2007 }}</ref> the ability of individuals to discuss issues with multiple partners, potentially mediating and thus stabilizing a relationship, and reducing polarization of viewpoints, and emotional support and structure from other committed adults within the familial unit. Other benefits include a wider range of adult experience, skills, resources, and perspective and support for companionate marriages, which can be satisfying even if no longer sexually vital, since romantic needs are met elsewhere. This acts to preserve existing relationships.<ref>{{cite web|title = The Chicago School of Professional Psychology|url = http://ego.thechicagoschool.edu/s/843/images/editor_documents/What%2520therapists%2520should%2520know%2520about%2520Polyamory.pdf|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130919142325/http://ego.thechicagoschool.edu/s/843/images/editor_documents/What%20therapists%20should%20know%20about%20Polyamory.pdf|url-status = dead|archive-date = September 19, 2013|website = ego.thechicagoschool.edu|access-date = August 30, 2015}}</ref> |
|||
===Values=== |
|||
{{Main|Values within polyamory}} |
|||
The [[Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction]] estimated that there were half-a-million "openly polyamorous families" in the United States in July 2009.<ref name="bennett">{{cite web |url=https://www.newsweek.com/polyamory-next-sexual-revolution-82053 |title=Polyamory: The Next Sexual Revolution? |last=Bennett |first=Jessica |date=July 29, 2009 |website=[[Newsweek]] |access-date=December 23, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201104142851/https://www.newsweek.com/polyamory-next-sexual-revolution-82053 |archive-date=November 4, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19125591-800-love-unlimited-the-polyamorists/ |title=Love Unlimited: The Polyamorists |author=[[Annalee Newitz|Newitz, Annalee]] |date=July 7, 2006 |website=[[New Scientist]] |access-date=December 23, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201109025921/https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19125591-800-love-unlimited-the-polyamorists/ |archive-date=November 9, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> Additionally, 15–28% of heterosexual couples and about half of gay and bisexual people have a "non-traditional" arrangement of some kind as reported in ''[[The Guardian]]'' in August 2013.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/20/polyamorous-shows-no-traditional-way-live |title=Being polyamorous shows there's no 'traditional' way to live |last=Penny |first=Laurie |date=August 20, 2013 |website=[[The Guardian]] |access-date=December 23, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112015040/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/20/polyamorous-shows-no-traditional-way-live |archive-date=November 12, 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref> Polyamorous communities have been said to be outwardly [[feminist]] as women were central to the creation of such communities and [[gender equality]] is a central tenet.<ref name="bennett" /> For those who are polyamorous, [[social distancing]], as a result of the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], created ripples in existing relationships, leading some to split apart and others to struggle to maintain their connections with one another.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://mashable.com/article/polyamory-during-quarantine-coronavirus/ |title=What it's like to be polyamorous during the coronavirus quarantine |last=Iovine |first=Anna |date=April 19, 2020 |website=[[Mashable]] |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200419155421/https://mashable.com/article/polyamory-during-quarantine-coronavirus/ |archive-date=April 19, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.self.com/story/non-monogamous-pandemic-dating |title=9 Ways Non-Monogamous People Are Dealing With the Pandemic |last=Smith |first=Gabrielle |date=August 7, 2020 |website=[[Self (magazine)|Self]] |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201129144827/https://www.self.com/story/non-monogamous-pandemic-dating |archive-date=November 29, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/polyamory-pandemic-1.5608920 |title=Polyamory during a pandemic? It's complicated |last=Migdal |first=Alex |date=2020-06-14 |website=[[CBC News]] |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200809093453/https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/polyamory-pandemic-1.5608920 |archive-date=August 9, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
==== Fidelity and loyalty ==== |
|||
A large percentage of polyamorists define ''fidelity'' not as sexual exclusivity, but as faithfulness to the promises and agreements made about a relationship.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Zhu|first=Jingshu|date=January 2018|title=We're Not Cheaters: Polyamory, Mixed-Orientation Marriage and the Construction of Radical Honesty|url=|journal=Social Science|volume=|pages=|via=}}</ref> As a relational practice, polyamory sustains a vast variety of open relationship or multi-partner constellations, which can differ in definition and grades of intensity, closeness and commitment.<ref name="Fidelity">{{cite journal|last1=Klesse|first1=Christian|title=Polyamory: Intimate practice, identity or sexual orientation?|journal=Sexualities|date=February 5, 2014|volume=17|issue=1–2|page=81|doi=10.1177/1363460713511096|url=https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/607287/2/Polyorientation%20CK%20110102013final..pdf}}</ref> For some, polyamory functions as an umbrella term for the multiple approaches of 'responsible non-monogamy'.<ref name="Fidelity" /> A secret sexual relationship that violates those accords would be seen as a breach of fidelity. Polyamorists generally base definitions of ''commitment'' on considerations other than sexual exclusivity, e.g. "trust and honesty" or "growing old together".<ref>{{cite web |first=Elaine |last=Cook |title=Commitment in Polyamorous Relationships |url=http://www.aphroweb.net/papers/thesis/index.htm |year=2005 |accessdate=July 10, 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061004143344/http://aphroweb.net/papers/thesis/index.htm |archive-date=October 4, 2006 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
=== Fidelity and loyalty === |
|||
[[File:Polyamorie.jpg|thumb|left|Three people in a polyamorous relationship.]] |
|||
Because there is no "standard model" for polyamorous relationships, and reliance upon common expectations may not be realistic, polyamorists often{{how often|date=March 2018}} advocate explicitly negotiating with all involved to establish the terms of their relationships, and often emphasize that this should be an ongoing process of honest communication and respect. Polyamorists will usually take a pragmatic approach to their relationships; many accept that sometimes they and their partners will make mistakes and fail to live up to these ideals, and that communication is important for repairing any breaches.<ref name="polyoz_values" /><ref name="s.org" /> |
|||
A large percentage of polyamorists define ''fidelity'' not as sexual exclusivity, but as faithfulness to the promises and agreements made about a relationship.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Zhu|first=Jingshu|date=January 2018|title=We're Not Cheaters: Polyamory, Mixed-Orientation Marriage and the Construction of Radical Honesty|journal=Social Science|url=http://gjss.org/sites/default/files/issues/chapters/papers/GjSS%20Vol%2014-1%20Zhu.pdf|access-date=December 24, 2020|volume=14|issue=1|archive-date=February 28, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210228062959/http://gjss.org/sites/default/files/issues/chapters/papers/GjSS%20Vol%2014-1%20Zhu.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Sudeep |first=Theres |date=November 28, 2020 |title=In Bengaluru, many couples are exploring polyamory |url=https://www.deccanherald.com/metrolife/metrolife-your-bond-with-bengaluru/in-bengaluru-many-couples-are-exploring-polyamory-920842.html |work=[[Deccan Herald]] |location=[[Bangalore]], [[Karnataka]], [[India]] |access-date=December 11, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201204102811/https://www.deccanherald.com/metrolife/metrolife-your-bond-with-bengaluru/in-bengaluru-many-couples-are-exploring-polyamory-920842.html |archive-date=December 4, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="cook">{{cite journal |last1=Cook |first1=Elaine |date=December 12, 2005 |title=Commitment in Polyamory |url=http://www.ejhs.org/volume8/cook1.htm |journal=[[Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality]] |volume=8 |access-date=December 23, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201127014452/http://www.ejhs.org/volume8/cook1.htm |archive-date=November 27, 2020 }}</ref> As a relational practice, polyamory sustains a vast variety of open relationship or multi-partner constellations, which can differ in definition and grades of intensity, closeness and commitment.<ref name="Fidelity">{{cite journal|last1=Klesse|first1=Christian|s2cid=144546531|title=Polyamory: Intimate practice, identity or sexual orientation?|journal=Sexualities|date=February 5, 2014|volume=17|issue=1–2|page=81|doi=10.1177/1363460713511096|url=https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/607287/2/Polyorientation%20CK%20110102013final..pdf|access-date=March 12, 2020|archive-date=June 29, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210629232415/https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/607287/2/Polyorientation%20CK%20110102013final..pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> Specifically, |
|||
polyamory can take the forms of a [[Ménage à trois|triad]]{{efn|The term "triad" for this type of arrangement was coined by [[Isaac Asimov]] in his 1972 novel ''[[The Gods Themselves]]''.}} of three people in an intimate relationship, a poly family of more than three people, one person as the pivot point of a relationship (a "vee"), a couple in a two-person relationship which portrays other relationships on their own, and various other intimate networks of individuals.<ref name="weiger" /><ref name="bennett" /><ref name="davidson">{{cite journal |last1=Davidson |first1=Joy |date=April 16, 2002 |title=Working with Polyamorous Clients in the Clinical Setting |url=http://www.ejhs.org/volume5/polyoutline.html |journal=[[Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality]] |volume=5 |access-date=December 23, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200919075803/http://www.ejhs.org/volume5/polyoutline.html |archive-date=September 19, 2020 }} Also delivered to the [[Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality]], Western Regional Conference, April 2002.</ref> There are also those who are swingers and engage in polyamory, or engage in poly-dating.<ref name="davidson" /> A poly family is sometimes called '''kitchen table polyamory''',<ref>{{cite web |url=https://torontolife.com/city/how-a-polyamorous-toronto-man-is-managing-his-four-romantic-relationships-remotely/ |title=How a polyamorous Toronto man is managing his four romantic relationships remotely |last=Slone |first=Isabel B. |date=June 9, 2020 |website=Toronto Life |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200702082808/https://torontolife.com/city/how-a-polyamorous-toronto-man-is-managing-his-four-romantic-relationships-remotely/ |archive-date=July 2, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> a style of polyamory in which all members of a particular [[polycule]] are comfortable and connected enough with each other that it is not uncommon for them to literally gather around the kitchen table, as they may spend holidays, birthdays, or other important times together as a large group. This style places an emphasis on family-style connections, and not all members are necessarily sexually or romantically involved with every other person in the group.<ref name=":6">{{Cite journal|last1=Bergdall|first1=Melissa K.|last2=Blumer|first2=Markie L. C.|s2cid=143233814|date=January 2, 2015|title=More Than Two: A Practical Guide to Ethical Polyamory, by Franklin Veaux and Eve Rickert|journal=Journal of Feminist Family Therapy|volume=27|issue=1|pages=40–45|doi=10.1080/08952833.2015.1005963|issn=0895-2833}}</ref><ref name=":7">{{Cite book|title=More than two : a practical guide to ethical polyamory|last1=Veaux|first1=Franklin|last2=Rickert|first2=Eve|isbn=9780991399703|oclc=878396611|year=2014|publisher=Thorntree Press }}</ref> Other styles of polyamory include '''parallel polyamory''', where members of individual relationships prefer not to meet or know details of their partners' other relationships,<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":7" /> '''solo polyamory''' defines non-monogamous individuals who do not want a primary partner<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Zimmerman |first=Kevin J. |date=July 2012 |title=Clients in Sexually Open Relationships: Considerations for Therapists |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08952833.2012.648143 |journal=Journal of Feminist Family Therapy |language=en |volume=24 |issue=3 |pages=272–289 |doi=10.1080/08952833.2012.648143 |issn=0895-2833}}</ref> and may resist the "relationship escalator" (an idea that relationships must follow a progression, or "escalator" from dating, to being exclusive, to becoming engaged, getting married, and having children).<ref name="auto">{{cite web|url=https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-polyamorists-next-door/201310/solo-polyamory-singleish-single-poly|title=Solo Polyamory, Singleish, Single & Poly|last=Sheff|first=Elisabeth A.|date=October 14, 2013|website=[[Psychology Today]]|archive-url=https://archive.today/20201224202156/https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-polyamorists-next-door/201310/solo-polyamory-singleish-single-poly|archive-date=December 24, 2020|url-status=live|access-date=December 24, 2020}}</ref><ref name="auto5">{{cite web |last=Dodgson |first=Lindsay |url=https://www.insider.com/dark-side-of-polyamory-2019-2 |title=There's a dark side of polyamory that nobody talks about |date=February 19, 2019 |website=[[Insider Inc.|Insider]] |archive-url=https://archive.today/20200625233415/https://www.insider.com/dark-side-of-polyamory-2019-2 |archive-date=June 25, 2020 |url-status=live |access-date=December 24, 2020 }}</ref> For some, polyamory functions as an umbrella term for the multiple approaches of 'responsible non-monogamy'.<ref name="Fidelity" /> A secret sexual relationship that violates those accords would be seen as a breach of fidelity. Polyamorists generally base definitions of ''commitment'' on considerations other than sexual exclusivity, e.g., "trust and honesty" or "growing old together".<ref>{{cite web |first=Elaine |last=Cook |title=Commitment in Polyamorous Relationships |url=http://www.aphroweb.net/papers/thesis/index.htm |year=2005 |access-date=July 10, 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061004143344/http://aphroweb.net/papers/thesis/index.htm |archive-date=October 4, 2006 |url-status=live }}</ref> In an article in ''[[Men's Health]]'', Zachary Zane states that commitment in a polyamorous relationship means that "you will be there for that person", supporting them, taking care of them, and loving them.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.menshealth.com/sex-women/a34823557/commitment-polyamorous-relationship/ |title=I'm in a Loving, Committed Relationship. I'm Also Polyamorous |last=Zane |first=Zachary |date=December 9, 2020 |website=[[Men's Health]] |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201216233451/https://www.menshealth.com/sex-women/a34823557/commitment-polyamorous-relationship/ |archive-date=December 16, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
=== Communication and negotiation === |
|||
Because there is no "standard model" for polyamorous relationships, and reliance upon common expectations may not be realistic, polyamorists advocate explicitly negotiating with all involved to establish the terms of their relationships, and often emphasize that this should be an ongoing process of honest communication and respect. Polyamorists typically take a pragmatic approach to their relationships; many accept that sometimes they and their partners will make mistakes and fail to live up to these ideals, and that communication is important for repairing any breaches.<ref name="polyoz_values" /><ref name="s.org" /> They also argue that polyamory is a response to challenges of relationships of a monogamous nature.<ref name="bennett" /> |
|||
Most{{original research inline|date=March 2018}} polyamorists emphasize respect, trust, and honesty for all partners.<ref name="polyoz_values">From PolyOz glossary: "Not in the [linguistic roots of the term] but very important is the commitment to honesty with all partners, and openly negotiated ground rules." [http://polyoz.scm-rpg.com.au/postnuke2/index.php?module=ContentExpress&func=display&ceid=8&meid=-1 Scm-rpg.com] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090227071434/http://polyoz.scm-rpg.com.au/postnuke2/index.php?module=ContentExpress&func=display&ceid=8&meid=-1 |date=February 27, 2009 }}</ref><ref name="s.org">From [https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20160310195736/http://www.sexuality.org/book/ sexuality.org]: "Two of the cultural cornerstones of the polyamory community are honesty and communication: it's expected that you and your existing long-term partner(s) will have talked over what you're comfortable with and what you aren't comfortable with, and that nobody is going around behind anyone else's back."</ref> Ideally, a partner's partners are accepted as part of that person's life rather than merely tolerated, and usually a relationship that requires deception or a "don't ask don't tell" policy is seen as a less than ideal model. |
|||
=== Trust, honesty, dignity, and respect === |
|||
==== Non-possessiveness ==== |
|||
Polyamory has been defined as loving more than one person at once, with respect, trust, and honesty for all partners involved.<ref name="polyoz_values">From PolyOz glossary: "Not in the [linguistic roots of the term] but very important is the commitment to honesty with all partners, and openly negotiated ground rules." [http://polyoz.scm-rpg.com.au/postnuke2/index.php?module=ContentExpress&func=display&ceid=8&meid=-1 Scm-rpg.com] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090227071434/http://polyoz.scm-rpg.com.au/postnuke2/index.php?module=ContentExpress&func=display&ceid=8&meid=-1 |date=February 27, 2009 }}</ref><ref name="s.org">From [https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20160310195736/http://www.sexuality.org/book/ sexuality.org]: "Two of the cultural cornerstones of the polyamory community are honesty and communication: it's expected that you and your existing long-term partner(s) will have talked over what you're comfortable with and what you aren't comfortable with, and that nobody is going around behind anyone else's back."</ref><ref name="mcchal">{{cite journal |last1=McCullough |first1=Derek |last2=Hall |first2=David S. |date=February 27, 2003 |title=Polyamory – What it is and what it isn't |url=http://www.ejhs.org/volume6/polyamory.htm |journal=[[Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality]] |volume=6 |access-date=December 23, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201210093927/http://www.ejhs.org/volume6/polyamory.htm |archive-date=December 10, 2020 }}</ref> Ideally, a partner's partners are accepted as part of that person's life rather than merely tolerated, and usually a relationship that requires deception or a "don't-ask-don't-tell" policy is seen as a less than ideal model. |
|||
Many polyamorists{{Who|date=January 2017}} view excessive restrictions on other deep relationships as less than desirable, as such restrictions can be used to replace trust with a framework of ownership and control. It is usually preferred or encouraged that a polyamorist strive to view their partners' other significant others (often referred to as metamours or OSOs)<ref name="More Than Two 2013">{{cite web |title=Glossary of Polyamory Terms |website=More Than Two |date=2013-01-22 |url=https://www.morethantwo.com/polyglossary.html |access-date=2018-11-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181120135740/https://www.morethantwo.com/polyglossary.html |archive-date=November 20, 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> in terms of the gain to their partners' lives rather than a threat to their own (see [[#Compersion|compersion]]). Therefore, jealousy and possessiveness are generally viewed not so much as something to avoid or structure the relationships around, but as responses that should be explored, understood, and resolved within each individual, with compersion as a goal.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Attridge|first=Mark|date=2013-02-04|title=Jealousy and Relationship Closeness|journal=SAGE Open|volume=3|issue=1|page=215824401347605|doi=10.1177/2158244013476054|doi-access=free}}</ref> |
|||
''[[Out (magazine)|Out]]'' additionally described polyamory as "not a sexuality" but as actually "having multiple intimate relationships".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.out.com/music/2020/12/03/yungblud-opens-about-sexuality-talks-male-hookups |title=YungBlud Opens Up About Sexuality, Talks Male Hookups |last=Street |first=Mikelle |date=December 3, 2020 |website=[[Out (magazine)|Out]] |access-date=December 14, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201203154115/https://www.out.com/music/2020/12/03/yungblud-opens-about-sexuality-talks-male-hookups |archive-date=December 3, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
=== |
=== Non-possessiveness === |
||
Some polyamorists view excessive restrictions on other deep relationships as less than desirable, as such restrictions can be used to replace trust with a framework of ownership and control. It is usually preferred or encouraged that a polyamorist strive to view their partners' other significant others, often referred to as metamours or OSOs,<ref name="Black and Poly 2017">{{cite web |title=Black and Poly Dictionary |website=Black and Poly |date=November 13, 2017 |url=http://blackandpoly.org/dictionary |access-date=May 10, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190701004527/http://blackandpoly.org/dictionary/ |archive-date=July 1, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> in terms of the gain to their partners' lives rather than a threat to their own ([[#Compersion|compersion]]). Therefore, jealousy and possessiveness are generally viewed not so much as something to avoid or structure the relationships around, but as responses that should be explored, understood, and resolved within each individual, with compersion as a goal.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Attridge|first=Mark|date=February 4, 2013|title=Jealousy and Relationship Closeness|journal=SAGE Open|volume=3|issue=1|page=215824401347605|doi=10.1177/2158244013476054|doi-access=free}}</ref> This is related to one of the types of polyamory, which is non-hierarchical, where "no one relationship is prioritized above the rest"<ref name="weiger" /> and the fact that polyamorists insist on working through problems in their relationships "through open communication, patience, and honesty."<ref name="bennett" /> |
|||
Many things differentiate polyamory from other types of non-monogamous relationships. It is common for swinging and open couples to maintain emotional monogamy while engaging in extra-dyadic sexual relations.<ref name=":5">{{Cite book|last=McDonald|first=Dee|title=Understanding non-monogamies|date=2010|publisher=Routledge|others=Barker, Meg., Langdridge, Darren.|isbn=978-0-203-86980-2|location=New York|page=71|chapter=Swinging: Pushing the Boundaries of Monogamy?|oclc=574760499}}</ref> |
|||
===Compersion<!--'Compersion' redirects here-->=== |
|||
Similarly, the friend/partner boundary in monogamous relationships and other forms of non-monogamy is typically fairly clear. Unlike other forms of non-monogamy, though, "polyamory is notable for privileging emotional intimacy with others."<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Brunning|first=Luke|date=August 2018|title=The Distinctiveness of Polyamory|journal=Journal of Applied Philosophy|language=en|volume=35|issue=3|pages=513–531|doi=10.1111/japp.12240}}</ref> |
|||
{{See also|Mudita}} |
|||
'''Compersion'''<!--boldface per WP:R#PLA--> is a term coined by members of the polyamorous community to describe an [[empathetic]] state of happiness and joy experienced when another individual experiences happiness and joy.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Balzarini |first1=Rhonda N. |last2=McDonald |first2=James N. |last3=Kohut |first3=Taylor |last4=Lehmiller |first4=Justin J. |last5=Holmes |first5=Bjarne M. |last6=Harman |first6=Jennifer J. |date=2021-05-01 |title=Compersion: When Jealousy-Inducing Situations Don't (Just) Induce Jealousy |url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-020-01853-1 |journal=Archives of Sexual Behavior |volume=50 |issue=4 |pages=1311–1324 |doi=10.1007/s10508-020-01853-1 |pmid=34041641 |issn=1573-2800}}</ref><ref>{{cite encyclopedia |last1=Thouin-Savard |first1=Marie I. |title=Compersion |date=2023 |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Sexual Psychology and Behavior |pages=1–7 |editor-last=Shackelford |editor-first=Todd K. |url=https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-031-08956-5_2472-1 |access-date=2024-08-17 |location=Cham |publisher=Springer International Publishing |doi=10.1007/978-3-031-08956-5_2472-1 |isbn=978-3-031-08956-5 |last2=Flicker |first2=Sharon M.}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Buczel |first1=Klara Austeja |last2=Szyszka |first2=Paulina D. |last3=Mara |first3=Izu |date=2024-07-01 |title=Exploring Compersion: A Study on Polish Consensually Non-Monogamous Individuals and Adaptation of the COMPERSe Questionnaire |journal=Archives of Sexual Behavior |volume=53 |issue=8 |pages=3285–3307 |doi=10.1007/s10508-024-02930-5 |pmid=38951409 |issn=1573-2800|pmc=11335843 }}</ref> In the context of polyamorous relationships, it describes positive feelings experienced by an individual when their intimate partner is enjoying another relationship.<ref name="mcchal" /><ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-polyamorists-next-door/201312/jealousy-and-compersion-multiple-partners-1 |title=Jealousy and Compersion with Multiple Partners – How polys deal with jealousy and feel happy when their lover loves someone else |last=Sheff |first=Elisabeth |date=December 17, 2013 |journal=[[Psychology Today]] |access-date=June 28, 2014 |archive-date=October 31, 2019 |archive-url=https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20191031193030/https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the%2Dpolyamorists%2Dnext%2Ddoor/201312/jealousy%2Dand%2Dcompersion%2Dmultiple%2Dpartners%2D1 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="PolySoc" /> It has been variously described as "the opposite or flip side of jealousy",<ref name="PolyOz">{{Cite web|url=http://polyoz.net.au/component/glossary/Poly-Terms-and-Concepts-1/C/Compersion-5/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121101141159/http://polyoz.net.au/component/glossary/Poly-Terms-and-Concepts-1/C/Compersion-5/|url-status=dead|title=PolyOz | Compersion | Poly Terms and Concepts|archive-date=November 1, 2012}}</ref> analogous to the "joy parents feel when their children get married",<ref>{{cite web | title = The Inn Between | url = http://www.theinnbetween.net/polyterms.html | first = Joreth | last = InnKeeper | access-date = March 31, 2014 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140410071143/http://www.theinnbetween.net/polyterms.html | archive-date = April 10, 2014 | url-status = live }}</ref> and a "positive emotional reaction to a lover's other relationship".<ref name=":7" /> The term is traced to the [[Kerista Commune]] in [[San Francisco]].<ref name="PolySoc">{{cite web |title=Polyamory Society Glossary |url=http://www.polyamorysociety.org/glossary.html |access-date=December 26, 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130807030556/http://www.polyamorysociety.org/glossary.html |archive-date=August 7, 2013 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Anapol">{{Cite book |last=Anapol |first=Deborah M |year=1997 |title=Polyamory: The New Love Without Limits |publisher=IntinNet Resource Center |location=San Rafael, CA |pages=49–64}}</ref>{{sfn |Taormino |2008 |p=217}} |
|||
===Favorable preexisting conditions before non-monogamy=== |
|||
Michael Shernoff cites two studies in his report on same-sex couples considering non-monogamy.<ref name="Shernoff">{{cite journal | last=Shernoff | first=M | title=Negotiated nonmonogamy and male couples. | journal=Family Process | volume=45 | issue=4 | year=2006 | issn=0014-7370 | pmid=17220111 | pages=407–18 | url=http://www.familyprocess.org/Data/featured_articles/65_shernoff.pdf | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130429022859/http://www.familyprocess.org/Data/featured_articles/65_shernoff.pdf |archive-date=2013-04-29| doi=10.1111/j.1545-5300.2006.00179.x }}</ref> |
|||
===Difficulties=== |
|||
Morin (1999) stated that a couple has a very good chance of adjusting to non-exclusivity if at least some of the following conditions exist:<ref name="Shernoff"/> |
|||
Morin (1999) and Fleckenstein (2014) noted that certain conditions are favorable to good experiences with polyamory, but that these differ from the general population.<ref name="Shernoff">{{cite journal | last=Shernoff | first=M | title=Negotiated nonmonogamy and male couples. | journal=Family Process | volume=45 | issue=4 | year=2006 | issn=0014-7370 | pmid=17220111 | pages=407–18 | url=http://www.familyprocess.org/Data/featured_articles/65_shernoff.pdf | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130429022859/http://www.familyprocess.org/Data/featured_articles/65_shernoff.pdf |archive-date=2013-04-29| doi=10.1111/j.1545-5300.2006.00179.x }}</ref><ref name="Fleckenstein Cox pp. 94–116">{{cite journal | last1=Fleckenstein | first1=James R. | last2=Cox | first2=Derrell W. | s2cid=144311126 | title=The association of an open relationship orientation with health and happiness in a sample of older US adults | journal=Sexual and Relationship Therapy | volume=30 | issue=1 | date=November 18, 2014 | issn=1468-1994 | doi=10.1080/14681994.2014.976997 | pages=94–116 | quote=Regression analyses suggest that the factors which predict better health and happiness differ between the general population and those who participate in consensually non-exclusive sexual relationships}}</ref> Heavy public promotion of polyamory can have the unintended effect of attracting people to it for whom it is not well-suited. Unequal power-dynamics, such as financial dependence, can also inappropriately influence a person to agree to a polyamorous relationship against their true desires. Even in more equal power-dynamic relationships, the reluctant partner may feel coerced into a proposed non-monogamous arrangement due to the implication that if they refuse, the proposer will pursue other partners anyway, will break off the relationship, or that the one refusing will be accused of intolerance and not being open-minded.<ref name="Sizemore">{{cite journal | last1=Sizemore | first1=Kayla M. | last2=Olmstead | first2=Spencer B. | s2cid=4030065 | title=Willingness of Emerging Adults to Engage in Consensual Non-Monogamy: A Mixed-Methods Analysis | journal=Archives of Sexual Behavior | volume=47 | issue=5 | date=October 6, 2017 | issn=0004-0002 | doi=10.1007/s10508-017-1075-5 | pmid=28986760 | pages=1423–1438 | quote= The final reason given by those in the 'Willing' group was that their engagement in CNM would be a sacrifice for their partner or for their relationship. This group of participants indicated that despite their own lack of desire to engage in CNM, they would be willing to try CNM for their partner or their relationship.}}</ref> |
|||
Polyamorous relationships present practical pitfalls. One common complaint from participants is time management, as more partners means one must divide one's time and attention between them, leaving less for each.<ref name="Masters">{{cite book | last=Masters | first=Robert | title=Transformation through intimacy : the journey toward awakened monogamy | publisher=North Atlantic Books | location=Berkeley, Calif | year=2011 | isbn=978-1-58394-388-5 | oclc=793850748 | pages=23–25}}</ref> Related is that the complexity of the arrangement can lead to so much effort being spent on the relationship that personal, individual needs can be overlooked.<ref name="Brunning 2016">{{cite journal | last=Brunning | first=Luke | title=The Distinctiveness of Polyamory | journal=Journal of Applied Philosophy | volume=35 | issue=3 | year=2018 | issn=0264-3758 | doi=10.1111/japp.12240 | pages=15–16 | s2cid=147982689 | url=https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:355c60d9-818c-454c-8ed2-7320ccf540f9 | access-date=August 18, 2020 | archive-date=October 25, 2020 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201025054226/https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:355c60d9-818c-454c-8ed2-7320ccf540f9 | url-status=live }}</ref> The strong emphasis on communication can unintentionally marginalize partners who are less articulate.<ref name="Brunning 2016"/> Finally, negotiating the sometimes complex rules and boundaries of these relationships can be emotionally taxing, as can reconciling situations where one partner goes outside those boundaries.<ref name="Brunning 2016"/><ref name="Masters"/> |
|||
:* Both partners want their relationship to remain primary. |
|||
:* The couple has an established reservoir of good will. |
|||
:* There is a minimum of lingering resentments from past hurts and betrayals. |
|||
:* The partners are in agreement on the question of monogamy/non-monogamy. |
|||
:* The partners are feeling similarly powerful and autonomous. |
|||
Scientific study of psychological well-being and relationship satisfaction for participants in polyamory has been limited due to mostly being a "hidden population". While some results could be interpreted as positive, these findings often suffer from bias and methodological issues.<ref name="Rubel Bogaert">{{cite journal | last1=Rubel | first1=Alicia N. | last2=Bogaert | first2=Anthony F. | s2cid=36510972 | title=Consensual Nonmonogamy: Psychological Well-Being and Relationship Quality Correlates | journal=The Journal of Sex Research | volume=52 | issue=9 | date=September 4, 2014 | issn=0022-4499 | doi=10.1080/00224499.2014.942722 | pmid=25189189 | pages=961–982}}</ref> A significant number of studies rely on [[Sample size determination|small samples]], often recruited from referrals, [[snowball sampling|snowball-sampling]], and websites devoted to polyamory.<ref name="Rubel Bogaert"/> Individuals recruited in this manner tend to be relatively homogeneous in terms of values, beliefs, and demographics, which limits the generalizability of the findings. These samples also tend to be [[Self-selection bias|self-selecting]] toward individuals with positive experiences, whereas those who found polyamory to be distressing or hurtful might be more reluctant to participate in the research.<ref name="Rubel Bogaert"/> Most of the studies rely entirely on [[self-report study|self-report measures]]. Generally, self-reports of the degree of well-being and relationship satisfaction over time are flawed, and are often based on belief rather than actual experience.<ref name="Rubel Bogaert"/> Self-report measures are also at risk of [[self-enhancement]] bias, as subjects may feel pressure to give positive responses about their well-being and relationship satisfaction in the face of [[stereotype threat]].<ref name="Rubel Bogaert"/> |
|||
Green and Mitchell (2002) stated that direct discussion of the following issues can provide the basis for honest and important conversations:<ref name="Shernoff"/> |
|||
:* Openness versus secrecy |
|||
:* Volition and equality versus coercion and inequality |
|||
:* Clarity and specificity of agreements versus confusion/vagueness |
|||
:* Honoring keeping agreements versus violating them |
|||
:* How each partner views non-monogamy. |
|||
==Legal issues== |
|||
According to Shernoff,<ref name="Shernoff"/> if the matter is discussed with a third party, such as a therapist, the task of the therapist is to "engage couples in conversations that let them decide for themselves whether sexual exclusivity or non-exclusivity is functional or dysfunctional for the relationship." |
|||
===Parenting=== |
|||
===Effects upon domesticity=== |
|||
In 1998, a [[Tennessee]] court granted guardianship of a child to her grandmother and step-grandfather, after the child's mother April Divilbiss and partners [[outing|outed]] themselves as polyamorous on [[MTV]]. After contesting the decision for two years, Divilbiss eventually agreed to relinquish her daughter, acknowledging that she was unable to adequately care for her child and that this, rather than her polyamory, had been the grandparents' real motivation in seeking custody.<ref name="society">{{cite web |url=http://www.polyamorysociety.org/Divilbiss_Families_Case_Ends.html |title=PolyFamily Child Custody Case Ends After 2 Year Battle... |last=Divilbiss |first=April |date=October 2000 |website=Polyamory Society |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050826112228/http://www.polyamorysociety.org/Divilbiss_Families_Case_Ends.html |archive-date=August 26, 2005 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
* The ability of individuals to discuss issues with multiple partners, potentially mediating and thus stabilizing a relationship, and reducing polarization of viewpoints. |
|||
* Emotional support and structure from other committed adults within the familial unit. |
|||
* A wider range of adult experience, skills, resources, and perspective. |
|||
* Support for companionate marriages, which can be satisfying even if no longer sexually vital, since romantic needs are met elsewhere. This acts to preserve existing relationships.<ref>{{cite web|title = The Chicago School of Professional Psychology|url = http://ego.thechicagoschool.edu/s/843/images/editor_documents/What%2520therapists%2520should%2520know%2520about%2520Polyamory.pdf|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130919142325/http://ego.thechicagoschool.edu/s/843/images/editor_documents/What%20therapists%20should%20know%20about%20Polyamory.pdf|url-status = dead|archive-date = 2013-09-19|website = ego.thechicagoschool.edu|accessdate = 2015-08-30}}</ref> |
|||
* More emotional, intellectual and sexual needs met as part of the understanding that one person cannot be expected to provide them all. Conversely, polyamory offers release from the monogamist expectation that one person must meet all of an individual's needs (sex, emotional support, primary friendship, intellectual stimulation, companionship, social presentation). |
|||
In 2017, three men became the first family in the state of [[California]] to have names of three fathers on their child's birth certificate.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/poly-relationship-adoption-embryo-surrogate_n_5fc92247c5b6d7412e5f4026 |title=This Throuple Made History With Their First Child. Here's What Their Lives Are Like. |last=Feldman |first=Jamie |date=December 23, 2020 |website=[[HuffPost]] |access-date=March 13, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210302022803/https://www.huffpost.com/entry/poly-relationship-adoption-embryo-surrogate_n_5fc92247c5b6d7412e5f4026 |archive-date=March 2, 2021 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
====Custody ramifications==== |
|||
In 1998, a [[Tennessee]] court granted guardianship of a child to her grandmother and step-grandfather after the child's mother April Divilbiss and partners [[outing|outed]] themselves as polyamorous on [[MTV]]. After contesting the decision for two years, Divilbiss eventually agreed to relinquish her daughter, acknowledging that she was unable to adequately care for her child and that this, rather than her polyamory, had been the grandparents' real motivation in seeking custody.<ref name="society">[http://www.polyamorysociety.org/Divilbiss_Families_Case_Ends.html Divilbiss Families Case Ends] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050826112228/http://www.polyamorysociety.org/Divilbiss_Families_Case_Ends.html |date=August 26, 2005 }}, Polyamory Society.</ref> |
|||
In June 2018, a court in [[Newfoundland and Labrador]] recognized three unmarried adults as legal parents of a child who was born within the polyamorous family they had formed; this was believed to be a first for Canadian law. The three adults included the child's mother and two men; the child's biological father was unknown.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/polyamourous-relationship-three-parents-1.4706560 |title=3 adults in polyamorous relationship declared legal parents by N. L. court |last=MacDonald |first=Michael |date=June 14, 2018 |website=[[CBC News]] |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201224192515/https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/polyamourous-relationship-three-parents-1.4706560 |archive-date=December 24, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
===Compersion<!--'Compersion' redirects here-->=== |
|||
{{See also|Mudita}} |
|||
In November 2020, the issue of polyamory came to the [[Supreme Court of Vermont]] in the form of a dispute between two men and a woman in a polyamorous relationship.<ref>{{cite web |author= |date=November 6, 2020 |title=SCOV Law Blog: Court decides parentage issue in divorce involving polyamory |url=https://vtdigger.org/2020/11/06/scov-law-blog-court-decides-parentage-issue-in-divorce-involving-polyamory/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201124145223/https://vtdigger.org/2020/11/06/scov-law-blog-court-decides-parentage-issue-in-divorce-involving-polyamory/ |archive-date=November 24, 2020 |access-date=December 14, 2020 |website=[[VTDigger]]}}</ref> |
|||
'''Compersion'''<!--boldface per WP:R#PLA--> is an empathetic state of happiness and joy experienced when another individual experiences happiness and joy. In the context of polyamorous relationships, it describes positive feelings experienced by an individual when their intimate partner is enjoying another relationship.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-polyamorists-next-door/201312/jealousy-and-compersion-multiple-partners-1 |title=Jealousy and Compersion with Multiple Partners – How polys deal with jealousy and feel happy when their lover loves someone else |last=Sheff |first=Elisabeth |date=December 17, 2013 |journal=Psychology Today}}</ref> |
|||
In April 2021, a British Columbia Supreme Court justice declared a woman was the third legal parent in a polyamorous "triad".<ref name="Labbé 2021">{{cite web |last=Labbé |first=Stefan |title=B.C. judge declares woman third legal parent in polyamorous 'triad' |website=Times Colonist |date=2021-04-28 |url=https://www.timescolonist.com/news/local/b-c-judge-declares-woman-third-legal-parent-in-polyamorous-triad-1.24312700 |access-date=2021-08-28 |archive-date=August 28, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210828060212/https://www.timescolonist.com/news/local/b-c-judge-declares-woman-third-legal-parent-in-polyamorous-triad-1.24312700 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
The concept of compersion was originally coined by the [[Kerista Commune]] in [[San Francisco]].<ref name="PolySoc">{{cite web |title=Polyamory Society Glossary |url=http://www.polyamorysociety.org/glossary.html |accessdate=December 26, 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130807030556/http://www.polyamorysociety.org/glossary.html |archive-date=August 7, 2013 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Anapol">{{Cite book |last=Anapol |first=Deborah M |year=1997 |title=Polyamory: The New Love Without Limits |publisher=IntinNet Resource Center |location=San Rafael, CA |pages=49–64}}</ref><ref name="Taormino">{{Cite book |last=Taormino |first=Tristan |year=2008 |title=Opening Up: A Guide to Creating and Sustaining Open Relationships |publisher=Cleis Press, Inc. |location=San Francisco}}</ref> |
|||
=== |
===Domestic partnerships=== |
||
In 2016, writer [[Rebecca Ruth Gould]] called for [[non-monogamy]], including polyamory, to receive "the legal recognition it deserves", saying that polyamory remains a "negative identity".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.opendemocracy.net/transformation/rebecca-gould/love-without-monogamy |title=Love Without Monogamy |last=Gould |first=Rebecca Ruth |date=August 15, 2016 |website=[[OpenDemocracy]] |access-date=December 23, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190829051151/https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/transformation/love-without-monogamy/ |archive-date=August 29, 2019 |url-status=dead}}</ref> |
|||
* PolyOz—"the positive feelings one gets when a lover is enjoying another relationship. Sometimes called the opposite or flip side of jealousy."<ref name="PolyOz">[http://polyoz.net.au/component/glossary/Poly-Terms-and-Concepts-1/C/Compersion-5/ PolyOz | Compersion | Poly Terms and Concepts] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121101141159/http://polyoz.net.au/component/glossary/Poly-Terms-and-Concepts-1/C/Compersion-5/ |date=November 1, 2012 }}</ref> |
|||
* The Polyamory society—"the feeling of taking joy in the joy that others you love share among themselves, especially taking joy in the knowledge that your beloveds are expressing their love for one another".<ref name="PolySoc" /> |
|||
* The InnKeeper—"A feeling of joy when a loved one invests in and takes pleasure from another romantic or sexual relationship. … It's analogous to the joy parents feel when their children get married, or to the happiness felt between best friends when they find a partner."<ref>{{cite web | title = The Inn Between | url = http://www.theinnbetween.net/polyterms.html | first = Joreth | last = InnKeeper | access-date = March 31, 2014 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140410071143/http://www.theinnbetween.net/polyterms.html | archive-date = April 10, 2014 | url-status = live }}</ref> |
|||
*More Than Two - "A feeling of joy when a partner invests in and takes pleasure from another romantic or sexual relationship. ''Commentary:'' '''Compersion''' can be thought of as the opposite of “jealousy;” it is a positive emotional reaction to a lover’s other relationship."<ref name=":7" /> |
|||
In June 2020, the city council of [[Somerville, Massachusetts]], voted to recognize polyamorous domestic partnerships in the city, becoming the first American city to do so. This measure was passed so that those in a polyamorous relationship would have access to their partners' health insurance amid the [[COVID-19 pandemic]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.masslive.com/boston/2020/07/somerville-city-council-passes-ordinance-recognizing-polyamorous-domestic-partnerships.html|last=Stening|first=Tanner|title=Somerville City Council passes ordinance recognizing polyamorous domestic partnerships|date=July 1, 2020|website=masslive|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200702030919/https://www.masslive.com/boston/2020/07/somerville-city-council-passes-ordinance-recognizing-polyamorous-domestic-partnerships.html|archive-date=July 2, 2020|url-status=live|access-date=December 24, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.metrowestdailynews.com/news/20200701/somerville-votes-to-recognize-polyamorous-domestic-partnerships-it-is-one-of-first-in-nation|title=Somerville votes to recognize polyamorous domestic partnerships. It is one of the first in nation.|first=Julia|last=Taliesin|website=MetroWest Daily News, Framingham, MA|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200701205132/https://www.metrowestdailynews.com/news/20200701/somerville-votes-to-recognize-polyamorous-domestic-partnerships-it-is-one-of-first-in-nation|archive-date=July 1, 2020|url-status=live|access-date=December 24, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/somerville-massachusetts-recognizes-polyamorous-relationships/ |title=Massachusetts city officially recognizes polyamorous relationships |last=McNamara |first=Audrey |date=July 3, 2020 |website=[[CBS News]] |access-date=December 14, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201107032850/https://www.cbsnews.com/news/somerville-massachusetts-recognizes-polyamorous-relationships/ |archive-date=November 7, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/07/02/metro/somervilles-polyamory-ordinance-is-first-nation/ |title=Somerville's new polyamory-friendly policy a 'turning point' |last=Greenberg |first=Zoe |date=July 2, 2020 |website=[[Boston Globe]] |access-date=December 14, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201025002452/https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/07/02/metro/somervilles-polyamory-ordinance-is-first-nation/ |archive-date=October 25, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
==Philosophical aspects== |
|||
[[Bertrand Russell]] published ''[[Marriage and Morals]]'' in 1929, questioning contemporary notions of morality regarding monogamy in sex and marriage.<ref name="SexEdPioneers">{{cite web|title=Pioneers of Sex Education |url=http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/ATLAS_EN/html/pioneers_of_sex_education.html |author=Haeberle, Erwin J. |year=1983 |accessdate=February 17, 2008 |publisher=The Continuum Publishing Company |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080313020717/http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/ATLAS_EN/html/pioneers_of_sex_education.html |archivedate=March 13, 2008 }}</ref> This viewpoint was criticized by [[John Dewey]].<ref name="Denied">{{Cite news|title=Appointment Denied: The Inquisition of Bertrand Russell |author=Leberstein, Stephen |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3860/is_200111/ai_n9008065 |publisher=Academe |date=November–December 2001 |accessdate=February 17, 2008 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20081004082928/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3860/is_200111/ai_n9008065 |archivedate=October 4, 2008 }}</ref> |
|||
In March 2021, the [[Cambridge, Massachusetts]] City Council approved an ordinance amending the city's laws, stipulating that "a domestic partnership needn't only include two partners."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://reason.com/2021/03/10/cambridge-will-recognize-polyamorous-partnerships-and-other-domestic-arrangements-with-more-than-2-adults/ |title=Cambridge Will Recognize Polyamorous Partnerships and Other Domestic Arrangements With More Than 2 Adults |last=Brown |first=Elizabeth Nolan |date=March 10, 2021 |website=[[Reason.com]] |access-date=March 13, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210310210412/https://reason.com/2021/03/10/cambridge-will-recognize-polyamorous-partnerships-and-other-domestic-arrangements-with-more-than-2-adults/ |archive-date=March 10, 2021 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://rwinters.com/council/030821.htm |title=Cambridge City Council meeting - March 8, 2021 - AGENDA |author= |date=March 8, 2021 |website=Cambridge Civic Journal |access-date=March 13, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210310150749/http://rwinters.com/council/030821.htm |archive-date=March 10, 2021 |url-status=live}} This is a publication run by a man named Robert Winters, who is a civic watcher of the Cambridge, MA government.</ref><ref>{{cite press release |last1=Adams |first1=Diana |last2=Chen |first2=Alexander |date=March 9, 2021 |title=Cambridge Becomes 2nd US City to Legalize Polyamorous Domestic Partnerships |url=https://static1.squarespace.com/enwiki/static/602abeb0ede5cc16ae72cc3a/t/604747971135b1744e8a4002/1615284120965/2021-03-08+PLAC+Press+Release.pdf |location=Cambridge, Massachusetts |publisher=Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition |agency= |access-date=March 13, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210309192938/https://static1.squarespace.com/enwiki/static/602abeb0ede5cc16ae72cc3a/t/604747971135b1744e8a4002/1615284120965/2021-03-08+PLAC+Press+Release.pdf |archive-date=March 9, 2021 |url-status=live}}</ref> The measure was supported by the Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition, also known as PLAC, composed of the Chosen Family Law Center, Harvard Law School LGBTQ+ Advocacy Clinic, and some members on the [[American Psychological Association]]'s Committee on Consensual Non-Monogamy. This ordinance was originally proposed in July 2020.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cambridgeday.com/2020/07/28/law-acknowledging-polyamorous-relationships-takes-step-forward-two-councillors-holding-back/ |title=Law acknowledging polyamorous relationships takes step forward, two councillors holding back |last=Levy |first=Marc |date=July 28, 2020 |website=Cambridge Day |access-date=December 14, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201101074216/https://www.cambridgeday.com/2020/07/28/law-acknowledging-polyamorous-relationships-takes-step-forward-two-councillors-holding-back/ |archive-date=November 1, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://cambridgema.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_LegiFile.aspx?Frame=&MeetingID=2656&MediaPosition=&ID=12316&CssClass= |title=POR 2020 #180 The City Manager be and hereby is requested to confer with the City of Cambridge Law Department to review the above changes to the language of the Domestic Partnerships Ordinance and report back to the Council. Passed to a Second Reading in Council July 27, 2020. To Be Ordained on or After September 14, 2020 |date=2020 |website=[[Cambridge, Massachusetts]] |access-date=December 14, 2020 |archive-date=December 14, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201214222512/https://cambridgema.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_LegiFile.aspx?Frame=&MeetingID=2656&MediaPosition=&ID=12316&CssClass= |url-status=live }}</ref> In April 2021, the adjacent town of [[Arlington, Massachusetts]], approved domestic partnerships of more than two people through a motion at Town Meeting. Any motion approved at Arlington's Town Meeting is subject to review and approval from the state Attorney General's office;<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.wickedlocal.com/story/arlington-advocate/2021/04/30/arlington-approves-domestic-partnerships-polyamorous-relationships/7410640002/|title=Town Meeting approves domestic partnership for relationships with more than two people|first=Jesse|last=Collings|website=Wicked Local|access-date=May 13, 2021|archive-date=May 13, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210513163139/https://www.wickedlocal.com/story/arlington-advocate/2021/04/30/arlington-approves-domestic-partnerships-polyamorous-relationships/7410640002/|url-status=live}}</ref> by early January 2022 that office (the office of [[Maura Healey]]) approved it.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://masslawyersweekly.com/2022/01/06/ag-upholds-towns-recognition-of-polyamorous-relationships/|title=AG upholds town's recognition of 'polyamorous' relationships | Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly|first=Pat|last=Murphy|date=January 6, 2022|access-date=December 25, 2022|archive-date=December 25, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221225210954/https://masslawyersweekly.com/2022/01/06/ag-upholds-towns-recognition-of-polyamorous-relationships/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
A 2003 article in ''[[The Guardian]]''<ref name="Guardian Women">{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/nov/14/gender.uk |title=When two just won't do |newspaper=The Guardian |date=November 14, 2003 |author=Helen Echlin |accessdate=March 27, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130827175507/http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/nov/14/gender.uk |archive-date=August 27, 2013 |url-status=live }}</ref> proposed six primary reasons for choosing polyamory: |
|||
*a drive towards female independence and equality driven by [[feminism]] — Jim Fleckenstein, Chair of the Board of Directors and Research Director of The Institute for 21st Century Relationships - The Foundation of the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom, states that "Increased financial independence means that women can build relationships the way they want to." |
|||
*disillusionment with monogamy — "because of widespread cheating and divorce." |
|||
*a yearning for community — a felt need for the richness of "complex and deep relationships through extended networks" in response to the replacement and fragmentation of the [[extended family]] by [[nuclear family|nuclear families]]: "[W]e have become increasingly alienated, partly because of the 20th century's replacement of the extended family with the nuclear family. As a result, many of us are striving to create complex and deep relationships through extended networks of multiple lovers and extended families…. Polys agree that some people are monogamous by nature. But some of us are not, and more and more are refusing to be shoehorned into monogamy." |
|||
*honesty and realism in respect of relational nature of human beings — "since so many people are already non-monogamous, why not develop a non-monogamy that is honest, responsible and socially acceptable? … It seems weird that having affairs is OK but being upfront about it is rocking the boat."<ref>''Women's Infidelity'' by Michelle Langley ({{ISBN|0-9767726-0-4}}) Straight talk about why women choose non-monogamy, 2005 [http://womensinfidelity.com Womensinfidelity.com] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190817221006/http://womensinfidelity.com/ |date=August 17, 2019 }}</ref> |
|||
*human nature; and |
|||
*individual non-matching of the traditional monogamous stereotype — a couple's response to a failure of monogamy, by reaching a consensus to accept the additional relationship.<ref>''Polyamory: The New Love without Limits'' by Deborah Anapol ({{ISBN|1-880789-08-6}}) has a chapter called "Making the transition to polyamorous relating", which deals with broken monogamous commitments from both perspectives.</ref> |
|||
===Anti-discrimination law=== |
|||
==Prevalence== |
|||
People in polyamorous relationships sometimes receive punishment at work when they are open about their relationships.<ref name="Goldstein">{{cite news |title=Somerville celebrates another first for polyamorous people |url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/03/23/lifestyle/somerville-celebrates-another-first-polyamorous-people/ |author=Meredith Goldstein |date=March 23, 2023 |newspaper=[[The Boston Globe]] |access-date=March 24, 2023 |archive-date=March 24, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230324234803/https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/03/23/lifestyle/somerville-celebrates-another-first-polyamorous-people/ |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
In 2010, Ann Tweedy, a legal scholar, argued that polyamory could be considered a sexual orientation under existing [[Law of the United States|United States law]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Tweedy |first1=Ann |date=October 2011 |title=Polyamory as a sexual orientation |url=https://scholarship.law.uc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=uclr |journal=University of Cincinnati Law Review |volume=79 |issue=4 |pages=1461–1515 |access-date=December 23, 2020 |archive-date=August 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200824042848/https://scholarship.law.uc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=uclr |url-status=live }}</ref> This argument was opposed by Christian Keese, who wrote in 2016 that advocating a "sexual orientation model of polyamory is likely to reduce the complexity and transformative potential of poly intimacies," while also limiting the reach and scope of possible litigation, obstructing the ability of poly activists to form alliances with other groups, and increasing the possibility that poly activists will have to settle for legal solutions which are "exclusive and reproductive of a culture of privilege".<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Keese |first1=Christian |date=2016 |title=Marriage, Law and Polyamory. Rebutting Mononormativity with Sexual Orientation Discourse? |url=http://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/viewFile/734/960 |journal=Oñati Socio-legal Series |volume=6 |issue=6 |page=1348 |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-date=April 22, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180422221600/http://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/viewFile/734/960 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
Research into the prevalence of polyamory has been limited. A comprehensive government study of sexual attitudes, behaviors and relationships in [[Finland]] in 1992 (age 18–75, around 50% female and male) found that around 200 out of 2250 (8.9%) respondents "agreed or strongly agreed" with the statement ''"I could maintain several sexual relationships at the same time"'' and 8.2% indicated a relationship type "that best suits" at the present stage of life would involve multiple partners. By contrast, when asked about other relationships at the same time as a steady relationship, around 17% stated they had had other partners while in a steady relationship (50% no, 17% yes, 33% refused to answer).<ref>[http://www.fsd.uta.fi/english/data/catalogue/FSD1243/cbF1243e.pdf Finnish Sex Survey 1992] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080910170542/http://www.fsd.uta.fi/english/data/catalogue/FSD1243/cbf1243e.pdf |date=September 10, 2008 }} (PDF)</ref> |
|||
In March 2023, the city of [[Somerville, Massachusetts]] passed an ordinance prohibiting discrimination against polyamorous people in employment and policing.<ref name="Goldstein" /> |
|||
The article ''What Psychology Professionals Should Know About Polyamory'', based on a paper presented at the 8th Annual Diversity Conference in March 1999 in [[Albany, New York]], states the following: |
|||
In April 2024, [[Oakland City Council]] passed legislation banning discrimination based on family and relationship structure in businesses, civil services, and housing.<ref name="McClurg 2024">{{cite news |last=McClurg |first=Lesley |title=Polyamorous families are recognized and protected in Oakland, CA |website=NPR |date=2024-05-31 |url=https://www.npr.org/2024/05/31/nx-s1-4966296/polyamorous-families-are-recognized-and-protected-in-oakland-ca |access-date=2024-06-01}}</ref> |
|||
{{quote|While openly polyamorous relationships are relatively rare (Rubin, 1982), there are indications that private polyamorous arrangements within relationships are actually quite common. Blumstein and Schwartz (1983, cited in Rubin & Adams, 1986) noted that of 3,574 married couples in their sample, 15–28% had an understanding that allows nonmonogamy under some circumstances. The percentages are higher among cohabitating couples (28%), lesbian couples (29%) and gay male couples (65%) (p. 312).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.polyamory.org/~joe/polypaper.htm#Demographic|title=What Psychology Professionals Should Know About Polyamory|work=polyamory.org|access-date=March 26, 2005|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050409084841/http://www.polyamory.org/~joe/polypaper.htm#Demographic|archive-date=April 9, 2005|url-status=live}}</ref>}} |
|||
In May 2024, [[Berkeley, California]] passed a law banning discrimination on the basis of relationship and family structure in businesses, city services, and housing.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.berkeleyside.org/2024/05/22/berkeley-law-antidiscrimination-relationship-family-structure-polyamory|title=Berkeley law extends legal protections to polyamorous people and non-nuclear families|first=Ally|last=Markovich|date=May 22, 2024|website=Berkeleyside}}</ref> |
|||
==Acceptance by religious organizations== |
|||
{{See also|Fornication|Polygamy#Contemporary religious attitudes to polygamy|Polyandry#Religious attitudes}} |
|||
The [[Oneida Community]] in the 1800s in New York (a Christian religious commune) believed strongly in a system of [[free love]] known as [[complex marriage]],<ref>Foster, Lawrence (2010). "Free Love and Community: John Humphrey Noyes and the Oneida Perfectionists." In: Donald E. Pitzer (ed.), ''America's Communal Utopias''. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 253–278.</ref> where any member was free to have sex with any other who consented.<ref>Stoehr, Taylor (1979). ''Free Love in America: A Documentary History''. New York: AMS Press, Inc.</ref> Possessiveness and exclusive relationships were frowned upon.<ref>DeMaria, Richard (1978). ''Communal Love at Oneida: A Perfectionist Vision of Authority, Property and Sexual Order''. New York: The Edwin Mellen Press, p. 83.</ref> |
|||
===Marriage implications=== |
|||
Some people consider themselves Christian and polyamorous, but mainstream Christianity [[Porneia|does not accept polyamory]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Multiple intimate relationships: a summary of liberated Christians' views|url=http://www.libchrist.com/bible/polygamy.html|website=Liberated Christians|accessdate=August 25, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151015090448/http://www.libchrist.com/bible/polygamy.html|archive-date=October 15, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
{{See also|Group marriage|Legality of polygamy|List of polygamy court cases}} |
|||
Most [[Western world|western]] countries do not recognize [[polygamous]] marriages, and consider [[bigamy#Legal situation|bigamy a crime]]. Several countries also prohibit people from living a polygamous lifestyle. This is the case in some states of the United States where [[Legality of polygamy in the United States|the criminalization of a polygamous lifestyle]] originated as [[Anti-Mormonism|anti-Mormon]] laws, although they are rarely enforced.<ref>{{cite news |url = https://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/2004-10-03-turley_x.htm |last= Turley |first = Jonathan |title = Polygamy laws expose our own hypocrisy |newspaper = [[USA Today]] |date = 3 October 2004 |access-date = December 24, 2020 |url-status = live |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120722135630/http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/2004-10-03-turley_x.htm |archive-date = 22 July 2012 }}</ref> Having multiple non-marital partners, even if married to one, is legal in most U.S. jurisdictions; at most it constitutes grounds for [[divorce]] if the spouse is non-consenting, or feels that the interest in a further partner has destabilized the marriage. In some jurisdictions, like [[North Carolina]], a spouse can sue a third party for causing "loss of affection" in or "criminal conversation" ([[adultery]]) with their spouse,<ref>{{cite court |litigants=Ruby Deaton Pharr, v. Joyce W. Beck |vol=554 |reporter=S.E.2d |opinion=COA01-3 |court=North Carolina Court of Appeals |date=November 20, 2001 |url=https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1323723/pharr-v-beck/ |access-date=December 24, 2020 }}</ref> while more than twenty states in the US have laws against adultery, although they are infrequently enforced; the Supreme Court's ruling in ''[[Lawrence v. Texas]]'' did not explicitly hold such laws to be unconstitutional but its [[ratio decidendi|reasoning]] may imply that conclusion.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/punishing-adultery-in-virginia.html |title=Punishing Adultery in Virginia |last=Grossman |first=Joanna |date=December 16, 2003 |website=[[Findlaw]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181127111953/https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/punishing-adultery-in-virginia.html |archive-date=November 27, 2018 |access-date=December 24, 2020}}</ref> |
|||
In 2017, the [[Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood]], an evangelical Christian organization, released a manifesto on human sexuality known as the "[[Nashville Statement]]". The statement was signed by 150 evangelical leaders, and includes 14 points of belief.<ref>{{cite web |last=Meyer |first=Holly |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/08/29/evangelical-manifesto-human-sexuality/614201001/ |title=More than 150 evangelical religious leaders sign 'Christian manifesto' on human sexuality |date=August 29, 2017 |work=USA Today |accessdate=August 30, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170830024517/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/08/29/evangelical-manifesto-human-sexuality/614201001/ |archive-date=August 30, 2017 |url-status=live }}</ref> Among other things, it states, "We deny that God has designed marriage to be a homosexual, polygamous, or polyamorous relationship."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/08/30/what-nashville-statement-and-why-people-talking-it/619009001/ |title=What is the Nashville Statement and why are people talking about it? |publisher=Usatoday.com |date= |accessdate=2017-08-31 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170831214949/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/08/30/what-nashville-statement-and-why-people-talking-it/619009001/ |archive-date=August 31, 2017 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Mikelionis |first=Lukas |url=http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/08/30/evangelicals-draw-critics-with-nashville-statement-on-sexuality.html |title=Evangelicals draw critics with 'Nashville Statement' on sexuality |publisher=Fox News |date=2017-08-30 |accessdate=2017-08-31 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170831114843/http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/08/30/evangelicals-draw-critics-with-nashville-statement-on-sexuality.html |archive-date=August 31, 2017 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
Polyamory, however, is on a continuum of family-bonds that includes group marriage<ref>{{cite book |last1=Francoeur |first1=Robert T. |year=2004 |chapter=United States: Interpersonal Heterosexual Behaviors |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dciuj1-F3fYC&pg=PA1205 |editor1-last=Francoeur |editor1-first=Robert T. |editor2-last=Noonan |editor2-first=Raymond J. |title=[[International Encyclopedia of Sexuality|The Continuum Complete International Encyclopedia of Sexuality]] |location=London |publisher=A&C Black |pages=1205–1206 |isbn=9780826414885 |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-date=March 10, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220310100816/https://books.google.com/books?id=dciuj1-F3fYC&pg=PA1205 |url-status=live }}</ref> and it does not refer to [[bigamy]] as long as no claim to being married in formal legal terms is made.<ref>{{cite book |last=Constantine |first=Larry L. |title=Group Marriage: A Study of Contemporary Multilateral Marriage |year=1974 |publisher=Collier Books |isbn=978-0020759102 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=N0ZBAAAAIAAJ |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-date=March 10, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220310100804/https://books.google.com/books?id=N0ZBAAAAIAAJ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/polyamorous-families-legal-challenges-1.3758621 |title=Canadian polyamorists face unique legal challenges, research reveals |last=Crawford |first=Alison |date=September 14, 2016 |website=[[Canadian Broadcasting Corporation|CBC]] |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201224191147/https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/polyamorous-families-legal-challenges-1.3758621 |archive-date=December 24, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> ''The Social History of the American Family: An Encyclopedia'' (2014, edited by Marilyn J. Coleman and Lawrence H. Ganong) stated that under existing U.S. federal law, a polyamorous relationship is legal in all 50 states while polygamy is not.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Martinez |first1=Michelle |year=2014 |chapter=Polygamy |editor1-last=Ganong |editor1-first=Lawrence H. |editor2-last=Coleman |editor2-first=Marilyn J. |title=The Social History of the American Family: An Encyclopedia |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=R3VpBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA1048 |location=[[Thousand Oaks, California]] |publisher=[[SAGE Publishing|SAGE Publications]] |page=1048 |isbn=978-1452286150 |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-date=March 10, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220310100814/https://books.google.com/books?id=R3VpBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA1048 |url-status=live }}</ref> On November 23, 2011, the Supreme Court of British Columbia ruled that the anti-polygamy law of Canada does not affect unformalized polyamorous households; this is why Polyamory Day is celebrated every year on November 23.<ref name="auto3">{{Cite web|url=http://polyadvocacy.ca/polyamory-day-faq/|title=Polyamory Day - Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association|access-date=December 26, 2020|archive-date=January 22, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210122225910/http://polyadvocacy.ca/polyamory-day-faq/|url-status=live}}</ref> Even so, those in polyamorous relationships often face legal challenges when it comes to custody, morality clauses, adultery and bigamy laws, housing, and where they live.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-polyamorists-next-door/201401/the-five-most-common-legal-issues-facing-polyamorists |title=The Five Most Common Legal Issues Facing Polyamorists |last=Sheff |first=Elisabeth A. |date=January 18, 2014 |website=[[Psychology Today]] |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20201224191956/https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-polyamorists-next-door/201401/the-five-most-common-legal-issues-facing-polyamorists |archive-date=December 24, 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
Some Jews are polyamorous, but mainstream Judaism does not accept polyamory; however, [[Sharon Kleinbaum]], the senior rabbi at [[Congregation Beit Simchat Torah]] in New York, said in 2013 that polyamory is a choice that does not preclude a Jewishly observant and socially conscious life.<ref name="haaretz.com">{{cite news |title=Polyamorous Jews seek acceptance |agency=Jewish Telegraphic Agency |date=October 12, 2013 |newspaper=[[Haaretz]] |url=http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/1.551971 |accessdate=November 21, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150319053821/http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/1.551971 |archive-date=March 19, 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref> In his book "A Guide to Jewish Practice: Volume 1 – Everyday Living," Rabbi David Teutsch wrote, “It is not obvious that monogamy is automatically a morally higher form of relationship than polygamy,” and that if practiced with honesty, flexibility, egalitarian rules, and trust, practitioners may "live enriched lives as a result".<ref>{{cite book|last=Teutsch|first=David|title=A Guide to Jewish Practice: Volume 1 – Everyday Living|date=2011|publisher=RRC Press|isbn=978-0938945185|pages=217–227}}</ref> |
|||
In 2012, legal scholar Deborah Anapol called for the revision of existing U.S. laws against bigamy to permit married persons to enter into additional marriages, provided that they have first given legal notice to their existing marital partner or partners, with a "dyadic networks" model.<ref>{{cite book |last=Anapol |first=Deborah |url=https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781442200227/Polyamory-in-the-21st-Century-Love-and-Intimacy-with-Multiple-Partners |title=''Polyamory in the 21st Century: Love and Intimacy with Multiple Partners'' |publisher=[[Rowman & Littlefield]] |year=2012 |isbn=9781442200227 |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-date=September 26, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200926084419/https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781442200227/Polyamory-in-the-21st-Century-Love-and-Intimacy-with-Multiple-Partners |url-status=live }}</ref> In 2015, another legal scholar, Ronald C. Den Otter, wrote in the ''Emory Law Journal'' (in the article "Three May Not Be a Crowd: The Case for a Constitutional Right to Plural Marriage") that in the United States the constitutional rights of [[due process]] and [[equal protection]] fully support marriage rights for polyamorous families.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Den Otter|first1=Ron|title=Three May Not Be a Crowd: The Case for a Constitutional Right to Plural Marriage|url= https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1200&context=elj|access-date=June 27, 2015|journal=Emory Law Journal|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150630022240/http://law.emory.edu/elj/_documents/volumes/64/6/den-otter.pdf|archive-date=June 30, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Some polyamorous Jews point to biblical patriarchs having multiple wives and concubines as evidence that polyamorous relationships can be sacred in Judaism.<ref>{{cite web |last=Lavin |first=Talia |url=http://www.jta.org/2013/10/10/news-opinion/united-states/ahava-raba-polyamorous-jews-engage-with-multiple-loves-and-their-jewish-traditions |title=Married and dating: Polyamorous Jews share love, seek acceptance | Jewish Telegraphic Agency |publisher=Jta.org |date=2013-10-10 |accessdate=2017-06-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131012154959/http://www.jta.org/2013/10/10/news-opinion/united-states/ahava-raba-polyamorous-jews-engage-with-multiple-loves-and-their-jewish-traditions |archive-date=October 12, 2013 |url-status=live }}</ref> An email list was founded dedicated to polyamorous Jews, called ''AhavaRaba'', which roughly translates to "big love" in Hebrew,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jta.org/2013/10/10/news-opinion/united-states/ahava-raba-polyamorous-jews-engage-with-multiple-loves-and-their-jewish-traditions#ixzz2hcUsvBTx|title=Married and dating: Polyamorous Jews share love, seek acceptance|work=Jewish Telegraphic Agency|date=2013-10-10|access-date=October 13, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131012154959/http://www.jta.org/2013/10/10/news-opinion/united-states/ahava-raba-polyamorous-jews-engage-with-multiple-loves-and-their-jewish-traditions#ixzz2hcUsvBTx|archive-date=October 12, 2013|url-status=live}}</ref> and whose name echoes God's "great" or "abounding" love mentioned in the [[Ahava rabbah]] prayer.<ref>{{cite book|editor1-last=Hoffman|editor1-first=Lawrence|title=My People's Prayer Book: The Sh'ma and its blessings|url=https://archive.org/details/mypeoplesprayerb02hoff|url-access=registration|date=1997|publisher=Jewish Lights Publishing|isbn=9781879045798|page=[https://archive.org/details/mypeoplesprayerb02hoff/page/69 69]}}</ref> |
|||
During a [[PinkNews]] question-and-answer session in May 2015, Redfern Jon Barrett questioned [[Natalie Bennett]], leader of the [[Green Party of England and Wales]], about her party's stance toward polyamorous marriage rights. Bennett responded by saying that her party is "open" to discussion on the idea of civil partnership or marriages between three people.<ref>{{cite news|last1=McCormick|first1=Joseph|title=Natalie Bennett is 'open' to polyamorous marriages and civil partnerships|url=http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/05/01/natalie-bennett-is-open-to-polyamorous-marriages-and-civil-partnerships/|access-date=20 June 2015|work=[[PinkNews]]|date=May 1, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150620162802/http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/05/01/natalie-bennett-is-open-to-polyamorous-marriages-and-civil-partnerships/|archive-date=June 20, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> Bennett's announcement aroused media controversy on the topic and led to major international news outlets covering her answer.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Holehouse|first1=Matthew|title=Greens 'open' to three-person marriage, says Natalie Bennett|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general-election-2015/11576818/Greens-open-to-three-person-marriage-says-Natalie-Bennett.html|access-date=June 20, 2015|work=[[Daily Telegraph]]|date=May 1, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180316055039/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general-election-2015/11576818/Greens-open-to-three-person-marriage-says-Natalie-Bennett.html|archive-date=March 16, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Ashton|first1=Emily|title=The Green Party Is "Open" To Legalizing Three-Way Marriages|url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/emilyashton/the-green-party-is-open-to-legalising-three-way-marriages|access-date=20 June 2015|work=[[BuzzFeed]]|date=May 1, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161224134246/https://www.buzzfeed.com/emilyashton/the-green-party-is-open-to-legalising-three-way-marriages|archive-date=December 24, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> A follow-up article written by Barrett was published by PinkNews on May 4, 2015, further exploring the topic.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Barrett|first1=Redfern|title=Comment: Why polyamorous marriages are the next step to equality|url=http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/05/04/comment-why-polyamorous-marriages-are-the-next-step-to-equality/|access-date=June 20, 2015|work=[[PinkNews]]|date=May 4, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150702191101/http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/05/04/comment-why-polyamorous-marriages-are-the-next-step-to-equality/|archive-date=July 2, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
[[LaVeyan Satanism]] is critical of Abrahamic sexual mores, considering them narrow, restrictive and hypocritical. Satanists are pluralists, accepting polyamorists, bisexuals, lesbians, gays, BDSM, transgender people, and asexuals. Sex is viewed as an indulgence, but one that should only be freely entered into with consent. [[LaVeyan Satanism#The Eleven Satanic Rules of the Earth|The Eleven Satanic Rules of the Earth]] only give two instructions regarding sex: "Do not make sexual advances unless you are given the mating signal" and "Do not harm little children," though the latter is much broader and encompasses physical and other abuse. This has always been consistent part of CoS policy since its inception in 1966, as Peter H. Gillmore wrote in an essay supporting [[same-sex marriage]]: |
|||
In most countries, it is legal for three or more people to form and share a sexual relationship (subject sometimes to laws against [[homosexuality]] or [[adultery]] if two of the three are married). With only minor exceptions no developed countries permit ''marriage'' among more than two people, nor do the majority of countries give legal protection (e.g., of rights relating to children) to non-married partners. Individuals involved in polyamorous relationships are generally considered by the law to be no different from people who live together, or "[[Dating|date]]", under other circumstances. In 2017, John Alejandro Rodriguez, Victor Hugo Prada, and Manuel Jose Bermudez became [[Colombia]]'s first polyamorous family to have a legally recognized relationship,<ref name="advocate1">{{cite web |last=Reynolds |first=Daniel |url=https://www.advocate.com/world/2017/6/15/three-gay-men-make-history-marrying-colombia |title=Three Gay Men Make History by Marrying in Colombia |publisher=[[The Advocate (LGBT magazine)|The Advocate]] |date=June 15, 2017 |access-date=June 16, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170616012510/https://www.advocate.com/world/2017/6/15/three-gay-men-make-history-marrying-colombia |archive-date=June 16, 2017 |url-status=live }}</ref> though not a marriage, as by Colombian law, marriage is between two people, so they instead called it a "special patrimonial union".<ref name="Guard01">{{cite news|last=Brodzinski|first=Sibylla|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/03/colombia-three-men-union-alejandro-rodriguez-manuel-bermudez-victor-hugo-prada|newspaper=The Guardian|title=Colombia legally recognizes union between three men|date=July 3, 2017|access-date=September 13, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180913045912/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/03/colombia-three-men-union-alejandro-rodriguez-manuel-bermudez-victor-hugo-prada|archive-date=September 13, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-40655103 |title=Polyamorous marriage: Is there a future for three-way weddings? |last=Taylor-Coleman |first=Jasmine |date=July 20, 2017 |website=[[BBC News]] |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201224192800/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-40655103 |archive-date=December 24, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> Some have called for [[domestic partnership]] laws to be expanded to include polyamorous couples<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Dryden |first1=J. Boone |date=2015 |title=This Is the Family I Chose: Broadening DomesticPartnership Law to Include Polyamory |url=https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=jplp |journal=Hamline University's School of Law's Journal of Public Law and Policy |volume=36 |issue=1 |pages=162–188 |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-date=March 6, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220306040123/https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=jplp |url-status=live }}</ref> and have said that marriage-like entitlements should apply to such couples.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Brake |first1=Elizabeth |date=2013 |title=Recognizing Care: The Case for Friendship and Polyamory |url=https://slace.syr.edu/issue-1-2013-14-on-equality/recognizing-care-the-case-for-friendship-and-polyamory/ |journal=Syracuse Journal of Law & Civic Engagement |volume=14 |issue=1 |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-date=April 8, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200408125205/https://slace.syr.edu/issue-1-2013-14-on-equality/recognizing-care-the-case-for-friendship-and-polyamory/ |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
==Prevalence== |
|||
{{quote| Finally, since certain people try to suggest that our attitude on sexuality is "anything goes" despite our stated base principle of "responsibility to the responsible", we must reiterate another fundamental dictate: The Church of Satan's philosophy strictly forbids sexual activity with children as well as with non-human animals.|Magister Peter H. Gilmore<ref>[http://www.churchofsatan.com/Pages/FoundingFamily.html "Founding Family: 'Morality' versus Same-Sex Marriage"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131027075819/http://www.churchofsatan.com/Pages/FoundingFamily.html |date=October 27, 2013 }}</ref>}} |
|||
[[File:Polyamory Pride at CSD Parade Graz 03.jpg|thumb|Preparations for Polyamory Pride at CSD Parade in [[Graz, Austria]], in June 2017]] |
|||
Research into the prevalence of polyamory has been limited. A comprehensive government study of sexual attitudes, behaviors and relationships in [[Finland]] in 1992 (age 18–75, around 50% female and male) found that around 200 out of 2250 (8.9%) respondents "agreed or strongly agreed" with the statement "I could maintain several sexual relationships at the same time" and 8.2% indicated a relationship type "that best suits" at the present stage of life would involve multiple partners. By contrast, when asked about other relationships at the same time as a steady relationship, around 17% stated they had had other partners while in a steady relationship (50% no, 17% yes, 33% refused to answer).<ref>[http://www.fsd.uta.fi/english/data/catalogue/FSD1243/cbF1243e.pdf Finnish Sex Survey 1992] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080910170542/http://www.fsd.uta.fi/english/data/catalogue/FSD1243/cbf1243e.pdf |date=September 10, 2008 }} (PDF)</ref> |
|||
The article ''What Psychology Professionals Should Know About Polyamory'' (by Geri Weitzman) based on a paper presented at the 8th Annual Diversity Conference in March 1999 in [[Albany, New York]], states that while openly polyamorous relationships are relatively rare there are "indications that private polyamorous arrangements within relationships are actually quite common."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.polyamory.org/~joe/polypaper.htm#Demographic|title=What Psychology Professionals Should Know About Polyamory|work=polyamory.org|access-date=March 26, 2005|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050409084841/http://www.polyamory.org/~joe/polypaper.htm#Demographic|archive-date=April 9, 2005|url-status=live}}</ref> They also note, citing 1983 study of 3,574 married couples in their sample that "15–28% had an understanding that allows nonmonogamy under some circumstances," with percentages are higher among "cohabitating couples (28%), lesbian couples (29%) and gay male couples (65%)." According to Jessica Fern, a psychologist and the author of ''Polysecure: Attachment, Trauma and Consensual Nonmonogamy'', as of September 2020, about 4% of Americans, nearly 16 million people, are "practising a [[Non-monogamy|non-monogamous]] style of relationship".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/people/building-bridges-how-polyamory-made-me-a-better-friend-lover-and-person-1.4358418 |title=Building bridges: How polyamory made me a better friend, lover and person |last=Kavanagh |first=Jess |date=September 19, 2020 |website=[[Irish Times]] |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201003180651/https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/people/building-bridges-how-polyamory-made-me-a-better-friend-lover-and-person-1.4358418?mode=sample&auth-failed=1&pw-origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.irishtimes.com%2Flife-and-style%2Fpeople%2Fbuilding-bridges-how-polyamory-made-me-a-better-friend-lover-and-person-1.4358418 |archive-date=October 3, 2020 }}</ref> A study by Amy C. Moors, Amanda N. Gesselman and Justin R. Garcia published on 23 March 2021 and using a sample of 3,438 individuals has shown that 10.7% of the sample were engaged in a polyamorous relationship at some point in their life, and 16.8% reported a desire to try or be in one. The study also revelated a correlation between educational background and polyamory, showing lesser-educated male individuals were more likely to engage or having been engaged in polyamorous relationships. These findings indicate that the number of Americans who have engaged in polyamorous relationships is significantly higher than previously thought.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Desire, Familiarity, and Engagement in Polyamory: Results From a National Sample of Single Adults in the United States|last=Moors|first=Amy|journal=Frontiers in Psychology|date=March 23, 2021 |volume=12|page=619640|doi=10.3389/fpsyg.2021.619640|pmid=33833712|pmc=8023325|doi-access=free}}</ref> |
|||
==Acceptance by religions== |
|||
[[Unitarian Universalists for Polyamory Awareness]], founded in 2001, has engaged in ongoing education and advocacy for greater understanding and acceptance of polyamory within the [[Unitarian Universalist Association]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://uupa.org |title=UUPA website |access-date=December 17, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191205181452/http://uupa.org/ |archive-date=December 5, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> At the 2014 [[General Assembly (Unitarian Universalist Association)|General Assembly]], two UUPA members moved to include the category of "family and relationship structures" in the UUA's nondiscrimination rule, along with other amendments; the package of proposed amendments was ratified by the GA delegates.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.uua.org/uuagovernance/bylaws/ruleii/section-c-23-non-discrimination |title=Unitarian Universalist Association: Rule II, Section C-2.3.: Non-discrimination |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150518103753/http://www.uua.org/uuagovernance/bylaws/ruleii/section-c-23-non-discrimination |archivedate=May 18, 2015 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> |
|||
{{See also|Fornication|Polygamy#Religious attitudes to polygamy|Polyandry#Religious attitudes}} |
|||
[[File:Oneida Commune.png|thumb|left|Land of Oneida Community between 1865 and 1875]] |
|||
==Marriage implications== |
|||
The [[Oneida Community]] in the 1800s in New York (a Christian religious commune) believed strongly in a system of [[free love]] known as a [[complex marriage]],<ref>{{cite book |last=Foster |first=Lawrence |editor1-last=Pitzer |editor1-first=Donald E. |date=January 2010 |chapter=Free Love and Community: John Humphrey Noyes and the Oneida Perfectionists |title=America's Communal Utopias |url=https://uncpress.org/book/9780807846094/americas-communal-utopias/ |location=Chapel Hill, NC |publisher=University of North Carolina Press |pages=253–278 |isbn=978-0807846094 |access-date=December 25, 2020 |archive-date=January 30, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220130022503/https://uncpress.org/book/9780807846094/americas-communal-utopias/ |url-status=live }}</ref> where any member was free to have sex with any other who consented.<ref>{{cite book |last=Stoehr |first=Taylor |date=1979 |title=Free Love in America: A Documentary History |location=New York |publisher=AMS Press, Inc |isbn=9780404160340}}</ref> In 1993, the archives of the community were made available to scholars for the first time. Contained within the archives was the journal of Tirzah Miller,<ref>{{cite book |last1=Herrick |first1=Tirzah Miller |last2=Fogarty |first2=Robert S. |editor-last=Fogarty |editor-first=Robert S.|title=Desire and Duty at Oneida: Tirzah Miller's Intimate Memoir |publisher=Indiana University Press |location=Bloomington Indianapolis |year=2000 |isbn=9780253213624 |oclc=247762494}}</ref> Noyes' niece, who wrote extensively about her romantic and sexual relations with other members of Oneida.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Chmielewski|first=Wendy E.|title=Reviewed work: Desire and Duty at Oneida: Tirzah Miller's Intimate Memoir, Robert S. Fogarty |date=2001|journal=Utopian Studies|volume=12|issue=1|pages=[https://archive.org/details/mutualcriticism0000onei/page/176 176–178]|jstor=20718260|isbn=9780815621690|oclc=5542766034|url=https://archive.org/details/mutualcriticism0000onei}}</ref> |
|||
{{more citations needed section|date=August 2018}} |
|||
[[File:Polyamory pride in San Francisco 2004.jpg|thumb|right|Start of polyamory contingent at [[San Francisco Pride]] 2004]] |
|||
[[Bigamy]] is the act of marrying one person while already being married to another, and is legally prohibited in most countries in which monogamy is the cultural norm. Some bigamy statutes are broad enough to potentially encompass polyamorous relationships involving [[cohabitation]], even if none of the participants claim marriage to more than one partner. |
|||
Some Christians are polyamorous, but mainstream Christianity [[Porneia|does not accept polyamory]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Multiple intimate relationships: a summary of liberated Christians' views|url=http://www.libchrist.com/bible/polygamy.html|website=Liberated Christians|access-date=August 25, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151015090448/http://www.libchrist.com/bible/polygamy.html|archive-date=October 15, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2017, the [[Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood]], an evangelical Christian organization, released a manifesto on human sexuality known as the "[[Nashville Statement]]". The statement was signed by 150 evangelical leaders, and includes 14 points of belief.<ref>{{cite web |last=Meyer |first=Holly |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/08/29/evangelical-manifesto-human-sexuality/614201001/ |title=More than 150 evangelical religious leaders sign 'Christian manifesto' on human sexuality |date=August 29, 2017 |work=[[USA Today]] |access-date=August 30, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170830024517/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/08/29/evangelical-manifesto-human-sexuality/614201001/ |archive-date=August 30, 2017 |url-status=live }}</ref> Among other things, it states, "We deny that God has designed marriage to be a homosexual, polygamous, or polyamorous relationship."<ref>{{cite web |last=Meyer |first=Holly |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/08/30/what-nashville-statement-and-why-people-talking-it/619009001/ |title=What is the Nashville Statement and why are people talking about it? |publisher=[[USA Today]] |date=August 30, 2017 |access-date=August 31, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170831214949/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/08/30/what-nashville-statement-and-why-people-talking-it/619009001/ |archive-date=August 31, 2017 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
Some Jews are polyamorous, but mainstream Judaism does not accept polyamory. However, in 2000, Rabbi Jacob Levin came out as polyamorous to his synagogue's board in California without losing his job as rabbi.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Goldstein|first=Sarah|url=http://heebmagazine.com/an-unlikely-solution-to-the-vanishing-american-jew/58123|title=A Modest Proposal for the "Vanishing American Jew"|website=Heeb Magazine|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200819003149/http://heebmagazine.com/an-unlikely-solution-to-the-vanishing-american-jew/58123|archive-date=August 19, 2020|url-status=live|date=February 2007|quote=Rabbi Jacob Levin, 62, is an exception. When he came out to his synagogue's board seven years ago, his disclosure was met with a mix of confusion and dismay.}}</ref> As well, in his book ''A Guide to Jewish Practice: Volume 1 – Everyday Living'' (2011), Rabbi David Teutsch wrote, "It is not obvious that monogamy is automatically a morally higher form of relationship than polygamy," and that if practiced with honesty, flexibility, egalitarian rules, and trust, practitioners may "live enriched lives as a result".<ref>{{cite book|last=Teutsch|first=David|title=A Guide to Jewish Practice: Volume 1 – Everyday Living|date=2011|publisher=RRC Press|isbn=978-0938945185|pages=217–227}}</ref> In 2013, [[Sharon Kleinbaum]], the senior rabbi at [[Congregation Beit Simchat Torah]] in New York, said that polyamory is a choice that does not preclude a Jewishly observant and socially conscious life.<ref name="haaretz.com">{{cite news |title=Polyamorous Jews seek acceptance |agency=[[Jewish Telegraphic Agency]] |date=October 12, 2013 |newspaper=[[Haaretz]] |url=http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/1.551971 |access-date=November 21, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150319053821/http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/1.551971 |archive-date=March 19, 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref> Some polyamorous Jews point to biblical patriarchs having multiple wives and concubines as evidence that polyamorous relationships can be sacred in Judaism.<ref>{{cite web |last=Lavin |first=Talia |url=http://www.jta.org/2013/10/10/news-opinion/united-states/ahava-raba-polyamorous-jews-engage-with-multiple-loves-and-their-jewish-traditions |title=Married and dating: Polyamorous Jews share love, seek acceptance |website=[[Jewish Telegraphic Agency]] |date=March 10, 2013 |access-date=June 16, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131012154959/http://www.jta.org/2013/10/10/news-opinion/united-states/ahava-raba-polyamorous-jews-engage-with-multiple-loves-and-their-jewish-traditions |archive-date=October 12, 2013 |url-status=live }}</ref> An email list is dedicated to polyamorous Jews; it is called ''AhavaRaba'', which roughly translates to "big love" in Hebrew,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jta.org/2013/10/10/news-opinion/united-states/ahava-raba-polyamorous-jews-engage-with-multiple-loves-and-their-jewish-traditions#ixzz2hcUsvBTx|title=Married and dating: Polyamorous Jews share love, seek acceptance|work=Jewish Telegraphic Agency|date=October 10, 2013|access-date=October 13, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131012154959/http://www.jta.org/2013/10/10/news-opinion/united-states/ahava-raba-polyamorous-jews-engage-with-multiple-loves-and-their-jewish-traditions#ixzz2hcUsvBTx|archive-date=October 12, 2013|url-status=live}}</ref> and which echoes God's "great" or "abounding" love mentioned in the [[Ahava rabbah]] prayer.<ref>{{cite book|editor1-last=Hoffman|editor1-first=Lawrence|title=My People's Prayer Book: The Sh'ma and its blessings|url=https://archive.org/details/mypeoplesprayerb02hoff|url-access=registration|date=1997|publisher=Jewish Lights Publishing|isbn=9781879045798|page=[https://archive.org/details/mypeoplesprayerb02hoff/page/69 69]}}</ref> |
|||
In many jurisdictions where same-sex couples can access [[civil unions]] or [[registered partnerships]], these are often intended as parallel institutions to that of heterosexual monogamous marriage. Accordingly, they include parallel entitlements, obligations, and limitations. Among the latter, as in the case of the New Zealand Civil Union Act 2005, there are parallel prohibitions on civil unions with more than one partner, which is considered bigamy, or dual marriage/civil union hybrids with more than one person. Both are banned under Sections 205–206 of the Crimes Act 1961. In jurisdictions where [[same-sex marriage]] proper exists, bigamous same-sex marriages fall under the same set of legal prohibitions as bigamous heterosexual marriages. As yet, there is no case law applicable to these issues.<ref>Andrew Webb ''et al.'' (eds) Butterworths Guide to Family Law in New Zealand: (13th Edition): Wellington: Lexis/Nexis: 2007</ref> |
|||
[[LaVeyan Satanism]] is critical of Abrahamic sexual mores, considering them narrow, restrictive and hypocritical. Satanists are pluralists, accepting polyamorists, bisexuals, lesbians, gays, [[BDSM]], transgender people, and [[asexuality|asexuals]]. Sex is viewed as an indulgence, but one that should only be freely entered into with consent. [[LaVeyan Satanism#The Eleven Satanic Rules of the Earth|The Eleven Satanic Rules of the Earth]] only give two instructions regarding sex: "Do not make sexual advances unless you are given the mating signal" and "Do not harm little children", though the latter is much broader and encompasses physical and other abuse. This has always been a consistent part of CoS policy since its inception in 1966. Magister Peter H. Gillmore wrote in an essay supporting [[same-sex marriage]] that some people try to suggest that their attitude on sexuality is "anything goes" even though they have a principle of "responsibility to the responsible".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.churchofsatan.com/founding-family-morality/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131027075819/http://www.churchofsatan.com/Pages/FoundingFamily.html|url-status=dead|title=Founding Family: "Morality" versus Same-Sex Marriage|archive-date=October 27, 2013|website=Church of Satan|access-date=December 24, 2020}}</ref> |
|||
Having multiple non-marital partners, even if married to one, is legal in most U.S. jurisdictions; at most it constitutes grounds for [[divorce]] if the spouse is non-consenting, or feels that the interest in a further partner has destabilized the marriage. In jurisdictions where civil unions or registered partnerships are recognized, the same principle applies to divorce in those contexts. There are exceptions to this: in [[North Carolina]], a spouse can sue a third party for causing "loss of affection" in or "criminal conversation" ([[adultery]]) with their spouse,<ref>[http://www.aoc.state.nc.us/www/public/coa/opinions/2001/010003-1.htm RUBY DEATON PHARR, Plaintiff, v. JOYCE W. BECK, Defendant] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050514053051/http://www.aoc.state.nc.us/www/public/coa/opinions/2001/010003-1.htm |date=May 14, 2005 }}</ref> and more than twenty states in the US have laws against adultery<ref>[https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/punishing-adultery-in-virginia.html Punishing Adultery in Virginia] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181127111953/https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/punishing-adultery-in-virginia.html |date=November 27, 2018 }} by Joanna Grossman</ref> although they are infrequently enforced. Some states were prompted to review their laws criminalizing consensual sexual activity in the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling in ''[[Lawrence v. Texas]]''. |
|||
[[Unitarian Universalists for Polyamory Awareness]], founded in 2001, has engaged in ongoing education and advocacy for greater understanding and acceptance of polyamory within the [[Unitarian Universalist Association]].<ref name="auto1">{{cite web |url=http://uupa.org |title=UUPA website |access-date=December 17, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191205181452/http://uupa.org/ |archive-date=December 5, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> At the 2014 [[General Assembly (Unitarian Universalist Association)|General Assembly]], two UUPA members moved to include the category of "family and relationship structures" in the UUA's nondiscrimination rule, along with other amendments; the package of proposed amendments was ratified by the GA delegates.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.uua.org/uuagovernance/bylaws/ruleii/section-c-23-non-discrimination |title=Unitarian Universalist Association: Rule II, Section C-2.3.: Non-discrimination |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150518103753/http://www.uua.org/uuagovernance/bylaws/ruleii/section-c-23-non-discrimination |archive-date=May 18, 2015 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> |
|||
If marriage is intended, some countries provide for both a religious marriage and a civil ceremony (sometimes combined). These recognize and formalize the relationship. Few countries outside of Africa or Asia give [[Legality of polygamy|legal recognition]] to marriages with three or more partners. While a recent case in the [[Netherlands]] was commonly read as demonstrating that Dutch law permitted multiple-partner [[civil union]]s,<ref>[http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/301 First Trio "Married" in The Netherlands] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051004135831/http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/301 |date=October 4, 2005 }} by Paul Belien, Brussels Journal Online</ref> the relationship in question was a ''[[:nl:samenlevingscontract|samenlevingscontract]]'', or "cohabitation contract", and not a registered partnership or marriage.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.refdag.nl/artikel/1230743/&bdquo%3BHuwelijk+wordt+steeds+verder+opgerekt&rdquo%3B.html|title=Huwelijk wordt steeds verder opgerekt|author=Ewout van der Staaij|work=refdag.nl|access-date=March 13, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090319041902/http://www.refdag.nl/artikel/1230743/%26bdquo%3BHuwelijk+wordt+steeds+verder+opgerekt%26rdquo%3B.html|archive-date=March 19, 2009|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/006/494pqobc.asp?pg=2|title=Here Come the Brides|work=weeklystandard.com|access-date=December 28, 2005|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060104090408/http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/006/494pqobc.asp?pg=2|archive-date=January 4, 2006|url-status=live}}</ref> The Netherlands' law concerning registered partnerships provides that |
|||
#a person may be involved in one only registered partnership with one other person whether of the same or of opposite sex at any one time. |
|||
#persons who enter into a registered partnership may not at the same time be married. |
|||
==Acceptance by non-religious organizations== |
|||
Authors have explored legalistic ramifications of polyamorous marriage. |
|||
In 2018, the Association of [[Humanistic Judaism|Humanistic]] Rabbis issued "A Statement on Sexual Ethics for the 21st Century", which states in part, "We commit to the freedom and empowerment of all adults to full consensual sexual expression, be it monogamous or polyamorous."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.humanisticrabbis.org/sexual-ethics-for-the-21st-century|title=A Statement on Sexual Ethics for the 21st Century|website=humanisticrabbis|access-date=February 11, 2021|archive-date=January 27, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210127000335/https://www.humanisticrabbis.org/sexual-ethics-for-the-21st-century|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
*The "dyadic networks" model<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=BkhLnjvweL8C&dq= ''Polyamory in the twenty-first century: love and intimacy with multiple partners''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150910150745/https://books.google.com/books?id=BkhLnjvweL8C&dq= |date=September 10, 2015 }} by Deborah Anapol, 2010, pp. 181–182.</ref> calls for the revision of existing laws against bigamy to permit married persons to enter into additional marriages, provided that they have first given legal notice to their existing marital partner or partners. |
|||
*Ronald C. Den Otter has stated that in the United States the Constitutional rights of [[due process]] and [[equal protection]] fully support marriage rights for polyamorous families.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Den Otter|first1=Ron|title=Three May Not Be a Crowd: The Case for a Constitutional Right to Plural Marriage|url=http://law.emory.edu/elj/_documents/volumes/64/6/den-otter.pdf|accessdate=27 June 2015|work=Emory Law Journal|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150630022240/http://law.emory.edu/elj/_documents/volumes/64/6/den-otter.pdf|archive-date=June 30, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
==In a clinical setting== |
==In a clinical setting== |
||
In 2002, a paper titled ''Working with polyamorous clients in the clinical setting'' (by Joy Davidson) addressed various areas of inquiry. This included the importance of talking about alternatives to monogamy, how therapists can work with those who are exploring polyamory, basic understandings of polyamory, and key issues that therapists need to watch for in the course of working with polyamorous clients. Its conclusions were that "Sweeping changes are occurring in the sexual and relational landscape" (including "dissatisfaction with limitations of serial monogamy, i.e. exchanging one partner for another in the hope of a better outcome"); that clinicians need to start by "recognizing the array of possibilities that 'polyamory' encompasses" and "examine our culturally-based assumption that 'only monogamy is acceptable'" and how this bias impacts on the practice of therapy; the need for self-education about polyamory, basic understandings about the "rewards of the poly lifestyle" and the common social and relationship challenges faced by those involved, and the "shadow side" of polyamory, the potential existing for coercion, strong emotions in opposition, and jealousy. The paper also states that the configurations a therapist would be "most likely to see in practice" are individuals involved in primary-plus arrangements, monogamous couples wishing to explore non-monogamy for the first time, and "poly singles".<ref name="davidson" /> |
|||
In 2002, a paper titled ''Working with polyamorous clients in the clinical setting'' (Davidson)<ref>{{cite journal | last = Davidson | first = Joy | title = Working with polyamorous clients in the clinical setting | journal = [[Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality]] | volume = 5 | date = April 16, 2002 | url = http://www.ejhs.org/volume5/polyoutline.html | ref = harv | access-date = June 21, 2007 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070611011632/http://www.ejhs.org/volume5/polyoutline.html | archive-date = June 11, 2007 | url-status = live }} Paper delivered to the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, Western Regional Conference, April 2002.</ref> addressed the following areas of inquiry: |
|||
In 2002, the rights of polyamorous people were added to the mission of the [[National Coalition for Sexual Freedom]], an American [[sex-positive]] advocacy and educational organization;<ref name="ncsf">{{cite web |url=https://ncsfreedom.org/who-we-are/the-history-of-the-ncsf/ |title=History of NCSF |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=2020 |website=[[National Coalition for Sexual Freedom]] |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201224181322/https://ncsfreedom.org/who-we-are/the-history-of-the-ncsf/ |archive-date=December 24, 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref> a manual for psychotherapists who deal with polyamorous clients was published by them in September 2009, called ''What Psychotherapists Should Know About Polyamory'' (written by Geri Weitzman and others).<ref>{{cite book | last1 = Weitzman | first1 = Geri | display-authors = etal | title = What psychotherapists should know about polyamory | url = https://ncsfreedom.org/images/stories/pdfs/KAP/2010_poly_web.pdf | publisher = [[National Coalition for Sexual Freedom]] | location = Baltimore, Maryland | year = 2009 | access-date = September 8, 2010 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131126173943/https://ncsfreedom.org/images/stories/pdfs/KAP/2010_poly_web.pdf | archive-date = November 26, 2013 | url-status = live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pinktherapy.com/portals/0/CourseResources/WhatPsychologistsShouldKnowaboutPolyRelationships.pdf|title=Counseling the Polyamorous Client: Implications for Competent Practice|author=Adrianne L. Johnson|date=2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201225024238/http://www.pinktherapy.com/portals/0/CourseResources/WhatPsychologistsShouldKnowaboutPolyRelationships.pdf|archive-date=December 25, 2020|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
# Why is it important that we talk about alternatives to monogamy now? |
|||
# How can therapists prepare to work with people who are exploring polyamory? |
|||
# What basic understandings about polyamory are needed? |
|||
# What key issues do therapists need to watch for in the course of working with polyamorous clients? |
|||
The [[National Coalition for Sexual Freedom]] manages the Kink And Poly Aware Professionals Directory, which consists of an Internet directory of psychotherapeutic, medical, and other professionals who have volunteered to be contacted by people who are involved in polyamory (and/or [[BDSM]], etc.).<ref name="OrtmannCommunities2012">{{cite book|author1=David M. Ortmann|author2=Richard A. Sprott|title=Sexual Outsiders: Understanding BDSM Sexualities and Communities|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OSY3uy8xcogC&pg=PA137|date=15 November 2012|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield Publishers|isbn=978-1-4422-1737-9|pages=137–|access-date=March 3, 2021|archive-date=March 10, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220310100817/https://books.google.com/books?id=OSY3uy8xcogC&pg=PA137|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.kapprofessionals.org/|title=Kink Aware Professionals (KAP) – Sex-Positive Support for Kink and Nonmonogamy|access-date=March 3, 2021|archive-date=March 27, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210327210101/https://kapprofessionals.org/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.kapprofessionals.org/|title=Welcome to the New Kink And Poly Aware Professionals Directory (KAP)|website=Kink Aware Professionals (KAP)|access-date=March 3, 2021|archive-date=March 27, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210327210101/https://kapprofessionals.org/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Its conclusions were that "Sweeping changes are occurring in the sexual and relational landscape" (including "dissatisfaction with limitations of serial monogamy, i.e. exchanging one partner for another in the hope of a better outcome"); that clinicians need to start by "recognizing the array of possibilities that 'polyamory' encompasses" and "examine our culturally-based assumption that 'only monogamy is acceptable'" and how this bias impacts on the practice of therapy; the need for self-education about polyamory, basic understandings about the "rewards of the poly lifestyle" and the common social and relationship challenges faced by those involved, and the "shadow side" of polyamory, the potential existing for coercion, strong emotions in opposition, and jealousy. |
|||
The Polyamory-Friendly Professionals Directory is a directory on the Internet "of professionals who are sensitive to the unique needs of polyamorous clientele"; it includes psychologists, therapists, medical professionals, and other professionals.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Polyamory-Friendly Professionals Directory: Search|url=https://www.polyfriendly.org/|access-date=2021-03-26|website=www.polyfriendly.org|archive-date=May 6, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210506013204/https://www.polyfriendly.org/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
The paper also states that the configurations a therapist would be "most likely to see in practice" are individuals involved in primary-plus arrangements, monogamous couples wishing to explore non-monogamy for the first time, and "poly singles". |
|||
==Media representation== |
|||
A manual for psychotherapists who deal with polyamorous clients was published in September 2009 by the [[National Coalition for Sexual Freedom]], called ''What Psychotherapists Should Know About Polyamory''.<ref>{{cite book | last1 = Weitzman | first1 = Geri | display-authors = etal | title = What psychotherapists should know about polyamory | url = https://ncsfreedom.org/images/stories/pdfs/KAP/2010_poly_web.pdf | publisher = [[National Coalition for Sexual Freedom]] | location = Baltimore, Maryland | year = 2009 | access-date = September 8, 2010 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131126173943/https://ncsfreedom.org/images/stories/pdfs/KAP/2010_poly_web.pdf | archive-date = November 26, 2013 | url-status = live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.counseling.org/docs%2Fdefault-source%2Fvistas%2Fcounseling-the-polyamorous-client-implications.pdf%3Fsfvrsn%3Dc193a1e7_11&usg=AOvVaw1eU912N8FEmmlEyzzEsv4o|title=Counseling the Polyamorous Client: Implications for Competent Practice|author=Adrianne L. Johnson}}</ref> |
|||
{{See also|List of fictional polyamorous characters}} |
|||
== |
=== 1970s to 2000s === |
||
<!-- Do not add examples of one or more polyamorous fictional characters without reliable reference sources, otherwise they will be deleted. Additionally, you need [[WP:Secondary sources]] to show that your addition is a significant depiction of polyamory in the media.--> |
|||
{{See also|List of polyamorous characters in fiction}} |
|||
''[[The Gods Themselves]]'' is a 1972 novel by [[Isaac Asimov]], a third of which is devoted to describing an alien race in an alien dimension where romantic relationships are usually composed of ''three'' individuals and where conception, and orgasm, is only possible during sexual intercourse between all three partners at the same time (i.e., a threesome).<ref>Asimov, Isaac (1972). ''The Gods Themselves''. New York: Doubleday. ISBN 0-385-02701-X</ref> |
|||
''[[Polyamory: Married & Dating]]'' was an American [[reality television]] series on the American [[pay television]] [[cable channel|network]] [[Showtime (TV network)|Showtime]]. The series followed polyamorous families as they navigated the challenges presented by polyamory. The series ran in 2012 and 2013. |
|||
[[File:Cosplay of Starfire, Fanime 2015 (18142422915).jpg|thumb|upright|Cosplay of the superhero Starfire at FanimeCon 2015]] |
|||
During a [[PinkNews]] question-and-answer session in May 2015, Redfern Jon Barrett questioned [[Natalie Bennett]], leader of the [[Green Party of England and Wales]], about her party's stance towards polyamorous marriage rights. Bennett responded by saying that her party is "open" to discussion on the idea of civil partnership or marriages between three people.<ref>{{cite news|last1=McCormick|first1=Joseph|title=Natalie Bennett is 'open' to polyamorous marriages and civil partnerships|url=http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/05/01/natalie-bennett-is-open-to-polyamorous-marriages-and-civil-partnerships/|accessdate=20 June 2015|work=PinkNews|date=1 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150620162802/http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/05/01/natalie-bennett-is-open-to-polyamorous-marriages-and-civil-partnerships/|archive-date=June 20, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> Bennett's announcement aroused media controversy on the topic and led to major international news outlets covering her answer.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Holehouse|first1=Matthew|title=Greens 'open' to three-person marriage, says Natalie Bennett|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general-election-2015/11576818/Greens-open-to-three-person-marriage-says-Natalie-Bennett.html|accessdate=20 June 2015|work=The Telegraph|date=1 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180316055039/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general-election-2015/11576818/Greens-open-to-three-person-marriage-says-Natalie-Bennett.html|archive-date=March 16, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Ashton|first1=Emily|title=The Green Party Is "Open" To Legalising Three-Way Marriages|url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/emilyashton/the-green-party-is-open-to-legalising-three-way-marriages|accessdate=20 June 2015|work=BuzzFeed|date=1 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161224134246/https://www.buzzfeed.com/emilyashton/the-green-party-is-open-to-legalising-three-way-marriages|archive-date=December 24, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> A follow-up article written by Barrett was published by PinkNews on May 4, 2015, further exploring the topic.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Barrett|first1=Redfern|title=Comment: Why polyamorous marriages are the next step to equality|url=http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/05/04/comment-why-polyamorous-marriages-are-the-next-step-to-equality/|accessdate=20 June 2015|work=PinkNews|date=4 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150702191101/http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/05/04/comment-why-polyamorous-marriages-are-the-next-step-to-equality/|archive-date=July 2, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> ''[[You Me Her]]'' is an American-Canadian comedy-drama television series that revolves around a suburban married couple who is entering a three-way romantic relationship. |
|||
[[Starfire (Teen Titans)|Starfire]], also known as Princess Koriand'r, is a fictional [[superhero]] appearing in books published by [[DC Comics]], who debuted in a [[DC Comics insert previews|preview story inserted]] within ''[[DC Comics Presents]]'' #26 (October 1980) and was created by [[Marv Wolfman]] and [[George Pérez]];<ref>{{cite book |last1=Cowsill |first1=Alan |last2=Irvine |first2=Alex |last3=Korte |first3=Steve |last4=Manning |first4=Matt |last5=Wiacek |first5=Win |last6=Wilson |first6=Sven |title=The DC Comics Encyclopedia: The Definitive Guide to the Characters of the DC Universe |date=2016 |publisher=DK Publishing |isbn=978-1-4654-5357-0 |page=284}}</ref> she was shown to be a polyamorous character. Starfire was raised on the world of Tamaran where it was acceptable to have an [[open marriage]]. Some critics argue that after arriving on Earth, she remained sex-positive and free-thinking, remaining open to [[polygamous]] relationships, open sex, and [[pansexual]] "free-love" with anyone, often leading to conflict with Earth's more reserved culture and customs.<ref name="Century">{{cite web |last1=Century |first1=Sara |title=Why Starfire's polyamory matters |url=https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/why-starfires-polyamory-matters |website=[[Syfy|Syfy Wire]] |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200203182225/https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/why-starfires-polyamory-matters |archive-date=February 3, 2020 |date=October 18, 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Starfire Pansexual">{{cite web |last1=Schenkel |first1=Katie |title=The Case For Pansexual Starfire [Pride Week] |url=https://comicsalliance.com/pansexual-starfire-pride-week/ |website=[[ComicsAlliance]] |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200203180724/https://comicsalliance.com/pansexual-starfire-pride-week/ |archive-date=February 3, 2020 |date=June 24, 2016 |url-status=live}}</ref> For Starfire, polyamory was a personal and cultural preference.<ref name="Century" /> |
|||
On May 29, 2017, in the last season of [[Steven Universe]], Fluorite, a member of the [[Off Colors]], a fusion of six different gems into one being, with fusion as the physical manifestation of a relationship, was introduced.<ref>{{cite episode|title=Off Colors|series=[[Steven Universe]]|network=[[Cartoon Network]]|date=May 29, 2017|season=5|number=3}}</ref> This character reappeared in various episodes in the show's fifth season, along with one in [[Steven Universe Future]] ("Little Graduation") and in [[Steven Universe: The Movie]], with the latter two as non-speaking appearances.<ref>{{cite episode|title=Lars Head|series=[[Steven Universe]]|network=[[Cartoon Network]]|date=May 29, 2017|season=5|number=4}}</ref><ref>{{cite episode|title=Lars of the Stars|series=[[Steven Universe]]|network=[[Cartoon Network]]|date=January 5, 2018|season=5|number=11}}</ref><ref>{{cite episode|title=Your Mother and Mine|series=[[Steven Universe]]|network=[[Cartoon Network]]|date=April 8, 2018|season=5|number=13}}</ref><ref>{{cite episode|title=Change Your Mind|series=[[Steven Universe]]|network=[[Cartoon Network]]|date=January 21, 2019|season=5|number=29-32}}</ref><ref>{{cite episode|title=Little Graduation|series=[[Steven Universe Future]]|network=[[Cartoon Network]]|date=December 28, 2019|number=9}}</ref><ref>{{cite AV media |people=Sugar, Rebecca (director), Jones-Quartey, Ian (Writer), Brewster, Miki (Writer), Abrams, Lamar (Writer) |date=September 2, 2019 |title=Steven Universe: The Movie |trans-title=Steven Universe: The Movie |medium=TV Movie |language=English |url=https://www.amazon.com/Cartoon-Network-Steven-Universe-Movie/dp/B07W8HR413/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Steven+Universe%3A+The+Movie&qid=1577818294&sr=8-1 |access-date=December 31, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191231185355/https://www.amazon.com/Cartoon-Network-Steven-Universe-Movie/dp/B07W8HR413/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Steven+Universe%3A+The+Movie&qid=1577818294&sr=8-1 |archive-date=December 31, 2019 |format=Prime video |time=8 PM |location=United States |publisher=[[Cartoon Network]] |id=B07W8HR413 |isbn= |oclc= |quote= |ref= }}</ref> The series creator, [[Rebecca Sugar]], confirmed that Flourite is a representation of a polyamorous relationship at the show's [[Comic Con]] panel in [[San Diego]].<ref name="tracybrown">{{cite news|last1=Brown|first1=Tracy|title='Steven Universe's' Rebecca Sugar confirms Fluorite is a representation of a polyamorous relationship|url=https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la-et-comic-con-2017-updates-htmlstory.html#steven-universes-rebecca-sugar-confirms-fluorite-is-a-representation-of-a-polyamorous-relationship|accessdate=31 December 2019|work=L.A. Times|date=21 July 2017|archive-url=http://archive.is/paYkm/|archive-date=December 31, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="shamuskelley">{{cite news|last1=Kelley|first1=Shamus|title=Steven Universe: 9 Things We Learned|url=https://www.denofgeek.com/us/tv/steven-universe/266722/steven-universe-9-things-we-learned|accessdate=31 December 2019|work=Den of Geek|date=1 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191231182319/https://www.denofgeek.com/us/tv/steven-universe/266722/steven-universe-9-things-we-learned|archive-date=December 31, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> Sugar said at the panel, and at another conference, that she was inspired after talking with children at an LBGTQ+ center in [[Long Beach]], California, who wanted a polyamorous character in the show.<ref name="tracybrown" /><ref>{{cite web|url=https://animesuperhero.com/sdcc-2017-steven-universe-panel/|title=SDCC 2017: The "Steven Universe" Panel|author=slai|date=August 9, 2017|website=Anime Superhero|accessdate=December 31, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191231182021/https://animesuperhero.com/sdcc-2017-steven-universe-panel/|archive-date=December 21, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="shamuskelley" /> |
|||
In 1989, the anime series ''[[Ranma ½]]'' included a polyamorous character, Tatewaki, who is in love with both Akane and the "Pigtail Girl" (Ranma's female form) and proposes to date both, but they do not return his feelings.<ref>{{cite book |last=Yadao |first=Jason S. |date=2009 |title=The Rough Guide to Manga |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WcYex0sGmQ0C&pg=PA178 |location=[[London]] |publisher=Rough Guides |page=178 |isbn=9781858285610 |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-date=March 10, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220310100840/https://books.google.com/books?id=WcYex0sGmQ0C&pg=PA178 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
Polyamory was the subject of the 2018 [[Louis Theroux]] documentary ''Love Without Limits'', where Theroux travels to [[Portland, Oregon|Portland]], [[Oregon]] to meet a number of people engaged in polyamorous relationships.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2018/nov/04/altered-states-love-without-limits-review-louis-theroux-treads-his-tightrope|title=Altered States: Love Without Limits review – Louis Theroux treads his tightrope|first=Lucy|last=Mangan|date=November 4, 2018|website=the Guardian|accessdate=November 7, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181107034216/https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2018/nov/04/altered-states-love-without-limits-review-louis-theroux-treads-his-tightrope|archive-date=November 7, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
[[Robert Jordan]]'s fantasy book series ''[[The Wheel of Time]]'', which began its run in 1990, is notable for its inclusion of various polyamorous relationships throughout the narrative. This includes the protagonist [[List of The Wheel of Time characters#Rand al'Thor|Rand al’Thor]], who enters a romantic relationship with three women, [[List of The Wheel of Time characters#Min Farshaw|Min]], [[List of The Wheel of Time characters#Aviendha|Aviendha]] and [[List of The Wheel of Time characters#Elayne Trakand|Elayne]]. The Aiel culture in the series also practice polyamory commonly.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Butler |first1=Leigh |title=The Wheel of Time Reread Redux: The Shadow Rising, Part 10 |url=https://reactormag.com/the-wheel-of-time-reread-redux-the-shadow-rising-part-10/ |website=Reactor |date=13 December 2016}}</ref> The books also hinted at a relationship between [[List of The Wheel of Time characters#Alanna Mosvani|Alanna]] and her (male) warders Ihvon and Maksim, but it was not explored in detail until the [[The Wheel of Time (TV series)|2021 television adaptation]].<ref>{{cite web |title=The Wheel of Time boss talks exploring polyamory in season 2 and beyond |url=https://winteriscoming.net/2022/05/04/wheel-of-time-boss-on-expanding-romances-in-season-2-beyond/ |website=Winter is Coming |date=4 May 2022}}</ref> |
|||
Also in 2018, "195 Lewis," a web series about a black lesbian couple dealing with their relationship being newly polyamorous, received the Breakthrough Series – Short Form award from the [[Gotham Awards]].<ref>{{cite web |author=Rachel Montpelier |url=https://womenandhollywood.com/2018-gotham-awards-wins-for-chloe-zhaos-the-rider-killing-eve-elsie-fisher-more/ |title=2018 Gotham Awards: Wins for Chloé Zhao's "The Rider," "Killing Eve," Elsie Fisher, & More |publisher=Women and Hollywood |date= |accessdate=2018-11-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181128034845/https://womenandhollywood.com/2018-gotham-awards-wins-for-chloe-zhaos-the-rider-killing-eve-elsie-fisher-more/ |archive-date=November 28, 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> The series premiered in 2017 and ran for five episodes.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.195lewis.com/events/2017/11/16/195-lewis-online-premiere |title=195 Lewis Online Premiere!! — 195 Lewis |publisher=195lewis.com |date=2017-11-16 |accessdate=2018-11-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181127234333/http://www.195lewis.com/events/2017/11/16/195-lewis-online-premiere |archive-date=November 27, 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
In 2002, the ''[[Futurama]]'' episode "[[A Taste of Freedom]]" showed Old Man Waterfall, who is Zoidberg's defense attorney until killed by a giant crab warship, having seven wives and one husband.<ref>{{cite news|last=Handlen |first=Zack|title=''Futurama'': "A Taste Of Freedom"/"Bender Should Not Be Allowed On Television"|url=http://www.avclub.com/tvclub/futurama-taste-freedombender-should-not-be-allowed-221359|newspaper=[[The A.V. Club]]|date=June 25, 2015|access-date=December 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191104094358/https://tv.avclub.com/futurama-a-taste-of-freedom-bender-should-not-be-al-1798184181|archive-date=November 4, 2019}}</ref> While Waterfall's case for Zoidberg is unsuccessful, the Supreme Court holds polygamy as legal, though this leads to jeers from spectators. The made-for-TV ''[[Futurama]]'' film, ''[[Futurama: The Beast with a Billion Backs|The Beast with a Billion Backs]]'' (published 2008), featured two polyamorous characters: Colleen O'Hallahan and Yivo. Colleen had five boyfriends, Fry, Chu, Ndulu, Schlomo and Bolt Rolands,<ref>{{cite news|last=O'Connor|first=Stuart|date=May 16, 2008|title=Futurama: The Beast With a Billion Backs (DVD)|newspaper=ScreenJabber|url=https://screenjabber.com/reviews/futurama_beastbillionbacksDVD/|access-date=December 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170604211035/https://screenjabber.com/reviews/futurama_beastbillionbacksDVD/|archive-date=June 4, 2017|url-status=usurped|quote=Fry decides to move in with Colleen [despite]...after making the horrifying discovery that he is merely one of the five boyfriends she shares her apartment with.}}</ref>{{efn|Fry breaks up with Colleen and becomes the messenger of Yivo after he states that their relationship is not working out.}} while Yivo is a planet-sized alien with no determinable gender, dating, then marrying all people of the universe at once.<ref name="Callan">{{cite news|last=Callan|first=Jonathan|date=June 25, 2008|title=REVIEW - Futurama: The Beast with a Billion Backs|newspaper=[[Comic Book Resources|CBR]]|url=https://www.cbr.com/review-futurama-the-beast-with-a-billion-backs//|access-date=December 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801025333/https://www.cbr.com/review-futurama-the-beast-with-a-billion-backs/|archive-date=August 1, 2020|quote=The first act parallels the rip in space with the introduction of Fry's new girlfriend, Colleen (voiced by Brittany Murphy), whom Fry soon discovers has four **other** boyfriends. This serves as a thematic lead-in to the plot that tackles notions of polygamous love head-on...It's in the third act, where humanity moves in with Yeevo, that the film really becomes something special...after being exposed as a randy bachelor, Yevo confesses: "Granted, at first I wished only to bang out a cheap one with your universe. But it's your own fault. Your universe dresses provocatively.""}}</ref> Fry and Colleen eventually break up. Afterwards, Yivo remains in a relationship with Colleen.<ref name="Handlen">{{cite news|last=Handlen|first=Zack|date=August 27, 2015|title=Futurama: The Beast With A Billion Backs|newspaper=[[The A.V. Club]]|url=https://www.avclub.com/futurama-the-beast-with-a-billion-backs-1798184720|access-date=December 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191225132057/https://tv.avclub.com/futurama-the-beast-with-a-billion-backs-1798184720|archive-date=December 25, 2019|url-status=live|quote=...while it's neat for Fry's relationship to Colleen to eventually end with Yivo deciding Colleen, with her group relationships, is the only person to really understand him, that doesn't make Colleen into a better written character, and it doesn't make Fry's romantic struggles more interesting in their own right.}}</ref> |
|||
In 2019, ''[[Simpsons]]'' showrunner [[Al Jean]] said he saw [[Lisa Simpson]] as being "possibly polyamorous" in the future.<ref name="inmagazine1">{{cite web|url=http://inmagazine.ca/2019/04/the-simpsons-showrunner-says-lisa-is-possibly-polyamorous/|title=The Simpsons Showrunner Says Lisa Is "Possibly Polyamorous"|work=IN Magazine|date=2019-04-08|accessdate=2019-04-17|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190417144317/http://inmagazine.ca/2019/04/the-simpsons-showrunner-says-lisa-is-possibly-polyamorous/|archive-date=April 17, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
The 21st century brought various new forms of representation of polyamory. In 2007, Daniel Help Justice's book ''Dreyd'' featured Tarsa, a priestess, warrior, and bisexual woman, as part of a polyamorous love triad.<ref name="Stepaniuk" /> In 2009, [[Graham Nicholls]] founded www.polyamory.org.uk, the United Kingdom's first website about polyamory<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/taboo-tolerance/meet-the-polyamorists-ndash-a-growing-band-of-people-who-believe-that-more-lovers-equals-more-love-1785263.html|title=Meet the polyamorists – a growing band of people who believe|date=October 22, 2011|website=[[The Independent]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201224210024/https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/taboo-tolerance/meet-the-polyamorists-ndash-a-growing-band-of-people-who-believe-that-more-lovers-equals-more-love-1785263.html |archive-date=December 24, 2020 |url-status=live |access-date=December 24, 2020}}</ref> and the Mom of Pina in Maria Pallotta-Chiarolli's novel, ''Love You Two'' was shown to be polyamorous and bisexual, leading Pina on a journey to explore the "complex spectrum of sex and love" in humanity itself.<ref name="Stepaniuk" /> In 2010, the series ''[[Lost Girl]]'' began. It included [[Bo (Lost Girl)|Bo Dennis]], a bisexual [[succubus]] which must sustain herself by feeding from the [[Qi|life force]] of male and female Fae and humans, via oral intake or the energy created through sex. In the first two seasons she was involved romantically with Dyson (a heterosexual [[shapeshifter]]) and Lauren (a [[lesbian]] human). Later on, Bo tried to have a [[Monogamy|monogamous]] relationship with Lauren, with Bo and Lauren remaining in love with each other through ups and downs, and later accepting each other as a couple by the end of the series.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Igarashi|first1=Hayley|title=The ABCs of Doccubus, TV's Steamy Succubus Romance|url=http://www.zimbio.com/Beyond+the+Tube/articles/yJF-eSjopRg/ABCs+Doccubus+TV+Steamy+Succubus+Romance|website=Zimbio|date=March 25, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200629185241/https://www.zimbio.com/Beyond+the+Tube/articles/yJF-eSjopRg/ABCs+Doccubus+TV+Steamy+Succubus+Romance|archive-date=June 29, 2020|access-date=December 24, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Liszewski|first1=Bridget|title=Lost Girl's Anna Silk is Eager to Reunite with Cast Mates and Meet Fans at ClexaCon 2018|url=http://www.thetvjunkies.com/clexacon-anna-silk-interview/|website=The TV Junkies|date=March 12, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181007040334/https://www.thetvjunkies.com/clexacon-anna-silk-interview/|archive-date=October 7, 2018|access-date=December 24, 2020}}</ref> |
|||
==Difficulties== |
|||
Polyamory, along with other forms of consensual non-monogamy, is not without drawbacks. Morin (1999) and Fleckenstein (2014) noted that certain conditions are favorable to good experiences with polyamory, but that these differ from the general population.<ref name="Shernoff"/><ref name="Fleckenstein Cox pp. 94–116">{{cite journal | last=Fleckenstein | first=James R. | last2=Cox | first2=Derrell W. | title=The association of an open relationship orientation with health and happiness in a sample of older US adults | journal=Sexual and Relationship Therapy | volume=30 | issue=1 | date=2014-11-18 | issn=1468-1994 | doi=10.1080/14681994.2014.976997 | pages=94–116 | quote=Regression analyses suggest that the factors which predict better health and happiness differ between the general population and those who participate in consensually non-exclusive sexual relationships}}</ref> Heavy public promotion of polyamory can have the unintended effect of attracting people to it for whom it is not well-suited. Unequal power dynamics, such as financial dependence, can also inappropriately influence a person to agree to a polyamorous relationship against their true desires. Even in more equal power dynamic relationships, the reluctant partner may feel coerced into a proposed non-monogamous arrangement due to the implication that if they refuse, the proposer will pursue other partners anyway, will break off the relationship, or that the one refusing will be accused of intolerance.<ref name="Sizemore">{{cite journal | last=Sizemore | first=Kayla M. | last2=Olmstead | first2=Spencer B. | title=Willingness of Emerging Adults to Engage in Consensual Non-Monogamy: A Mixed-Methods Analysis | journal=Archives of Sexual Behavior | volume=47 | issue=5 | date=2017-10-06 | issn=0004-0002 | doi=10.1007/s10508-017-1075-5 | pmid=28986760 | pages=1423–1438 | quote= The final reason given by those in the 'Willing' group was that their engagement in CNM would be a sacrifice for their partner or for their relationship. This group of participants indicated that despite their own lack of desire to engage in CNM, they would be willing to try CNM for their partner or their relationship.}}</ref><ref name="Hawkins">{{cite news |last=Hawkins |first=Alan J. |authorlink=Alan J. Hawkins |last2=VanDenBerghe |first2=Betsy |url=https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/12/consensual-non-monogamy-bad-math/ |title=The New Math of 'Consensual Nonmonogamy' |work=[[National Review]] |date=2017-12-07 |accessdate=2018-07-26 }}</ref> |
|||
===Increased representation in the 2010s=== |
|||
To date, scientific study of polyamory has run into bias and methodological issues. |
|||
<!-- Do not add examples of one or more polyamorous fictional characters without reliable reference sources, otherwise they will be deleted. Additionally, you need [[WP:Secondary sources]] to show that your addition is a significant depiction of polyamory in the media.--> |
|||
* A significant number of studies rely on [[Sample size determination|small samples]], often recruited from referrals, [[snowball sampling]], and websites devoted to polyamory. Individuals recruited in this manner tend to be relatively homogeneous in terms of values, beliefs, and demographics, which limits the generalizability of the findings.<ref name="Rubel Bogaert">{{cite journal | last=Rubel | first=Alicia N. | last2=Bogaert | first2=Anthony F. | title=Consensual Nonmonogamy: Psychological Well-Being and Relationship Quality Correlates | journal=The Journal of Sex Research | volume=52 | issue=9 | date=2014-09-04 | issn=0022-4499 | doi=10.1080/00224499.2014.942722 | pmid=25189189 | pages=961–982}}</ref> |
|||
Polyamorous characters appeared in various media in the 2010s. In the 2010 television show ''[[Caprica]]'', several main characters are portrayed as being in a [[Polyfidelity|polyfidelitous]]-style marriage consisting of multiple men and women, with each member being equal socially and legally.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://io9.gizmodo.com/is-caprica-the-big-love-of-science-fiction-5476787 |title=Is Caprica the Big Love Of Science Fiction? |last=Newitz |first=Annalee |date=February 22, 2010 |access-date=March 15, 2021 |archive-date=April 11, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210411105041/https://io9.gizmodo.com/is-caprica-the-big-love-of-science-fiction-5476787 |url-status=live }}</ref> From 2012 to 2013, the American [[reality television]] series on the American [[pay television]] [[cable channel|network]] [[Showtime (TV network)|Showtime]], ''[[Polyamory: Married & Dating]]'', was broadcast. It followed polyamorous families as they navigated the challenges presented by polyamory.<ref>{{cite web|last=Juzwiak|first=Rich|url=http://gawker.com/5929318/showtimes-polyamory-is-trashy-profound-and-the-best-reality-show-on-tv|website=[[Gawker]]|title=Showtime's Polyamory Is Trashy, Profound and the Best Reality Show on TV|date=June 26, 2013|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130123204528/http://gawker.com/5929318/showtimes-polyamory-is-trashy-profound-and-the-best-reality-show-on-tv|archive-date=January 23, 2013|url-status=live|access-date=December 24, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/relationships/polyamory-exploring-the-ins-and-outs-of-multiple-partners/article4560587/?page=all|title=Polyamory: Exploring the ins and outs of multiple partners|last=Fraser|first=Jeff|date=September 21, 2012|work=[[The Globe and Mail]]|access-date=December 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181028060423/https://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/relationships/polyamory-exploring-the-ins-and-outs-of-multiple-partners/article4560587/?page=all|archive-date=October 28, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.sho.com/polyamory-married-and-dating|title=Polyamory: Married & Dating official website|date=2020|work=[[Showtime (TV network)|Showtime]]|access-date=August 1, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180604060839/https://www.sho.com/polyamory-married-and-dating/cast/kamala|archive-date=June 4, 2018|url-status=dead}}</ref> Around the same time, the webcomic ''Kimchi Cuddles'' began, which portrayed polyamorous people like other characters, "only with more partners to steal their blankets."<ref name="Wong">{{cite web |last1=Wong |first1=Britany |title=10 Comics That Show What Polyamorous Love Is Really Like |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/polyamory-comics_n_586c1ea2e4b0de3a08f9f240 |website=[[HuffPost]] |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190208193505/https://www.huffpost.com/entry/polyamory-comics_n_586c1ea2e4b0de3a08f9f240 |archive-date=February 8, 2019 |date=January 5, 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref> The following years featured a polyamorous captain in Jacqueline Koyanagi's novel, ''Ascension'',<ref name="Stepaniuk">{{cite web |last1=Stepaniuk |first1=Casey |url=https://bookriot.com/eight-books-with-queer-polyamorous-characters/ |title=8 Books with Queer Polyamorous Characters |publisher=Book Riot |date=November 16, 2016 |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801034800/https://bookriot.com/eight-books-with-queer-polyamorous-characters/ |archive-date=August 1, 2020 }}</ref> and three characters (Reese, David, and Amber) in a relationship in [[Malinda Lo]]'s novel, ''Inheritance''.<ref name="Stepaniuk" /> In 2011, ''[[American Horror Story: Hotel]]'' began, with Countess Elizabeth Johnson, played by [[Lady Gaga]], beginning a relationship with famed film actor [[Rudolph Valentino]] and his wife, [[Natacha Rambova]], as seen in episode seven.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/19/arts/television/american-horror-story-season-5-episode-7-gods-and-monsters.html|title='American Horror Story' Season 5, Episode 7: Gods and Monsters|last=Hanks|first=E. A.|date=November 19, 2015|work=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=December 24, 2020|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171128014611/https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/19/arts/television/american-horror-story-season-5-episode-7-gods-and-monsters.html|archive-date=November 28, 2017}}</ref> The following year, the YouTube show ''The Gay and Wondrous Life of Caleb Gallo'' would show a couple working through their decision to convert from monogamy to polyamory,<ref>{{cite news|last=Byrne|first=Catie|title=The Gay and Wondrous Life of Caleb Gallo|url=https://carolinianuncg.com/2017/08/23/the-gay-and-wondrous-life-of-caleb-gallo/|newspaper=The Carolinian (newspaper)|date=June 26, 2016|access-date=December 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801031739/https://carolinianuncg.com/2017/08/23/the-gay-and-wondrous-life-of-caleb-gallo/|archive-date=August 1, 2020|quote=Dubbed by fans as the “throuple scene,” this unusual sort of tit for tat homoerotic and polyamorous sexuality encapsulates the dynamic humor and sexual fluidity between characters on the show.}}</ref> like Brian Jordan Alvarez, who considers himself polyamorous.<ref>{{cite news|last=Horowitz|first=Steven J.|title=Chatting With "Gay and Wondrous Life of Caleb Gallo" Creator Brian Jordan Alvarez|url=https://www.papermag.com/brian-jordan-alvarez-gay-wondrous-life-caleb-gallo-1891129577.html|newspaper=Paper Magazine|date=June 26, 2016|access-date=December 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191024014951/https://www.papermag.com/brian-jordan-alvarez-gay-wondrous-life-caleb-gallo-1891129577.html|archive-date=October 24, 2019|quote=I never want to be monogamous and I'm always falling into this super lovey-dovey kind of love with guys, and then they think that it's implied monogamy when in fact, the texture of my love is monogamous, but my mental and sexual desires are polyamorous.}}</ref> |
|||
* These samples also tend to be [[Self-selection bias|self-selecting]] toward individuals with positive experiences, whereas those who found polyamory to be distressing or hurtful might be more reluctant to participate in the research.<ref name="Rubel Bogaert"/> |
|||
* Most of the studies rely entirely on [[self-report study|self-report measures]]. Generally, self-reports of the degree of well-being and relationship satisfaction over time are flawed, and are often based on belief rather than actual experience.<ref name="Rubel Bogaert"/><ref name="Hawkins"/> |
|||
* Self-report measures are also at risk of [[self-enhancement]] bias, as subjects may feel pressure to give positive responses about their well-being and relationship satisfaction in the face of [[stereotype threat]].<ref name="Rubel Bogaert"/> This disparity was noted by Moors et al. (2014), who compared respondents expressing interest in consensual non-monogamy drawn from the general population to those drawn from online communities devoted to discussing positive aspects of non-monogamy.<ref name="MoorsConley2014">{{cite journal|last1=Moors|first1=A. C.|last2=Conley|first2=T. D.|last3=Edelstein|first3=R. S.|last4=Chopik|first4=W. J.|title=Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage (but not actual engagement) in consensual non-monogamy|journal=Journal of Social and Personal Relationships|volume=32|issue=2|year=2014|pages=222–240|issn=0265-4075|doi=10.1177/0265407514529065}}</ref> |
|||
* In academic works involving volunteer interviews, the participant is almost always a single partner of such relationships or a small group where certain partners are not present, resulting in one-sided views being recorded about the relationship.<ref name="Hawkins"/> |
|||
From 2015 to 2017, in the webcomic ''Always Human'' by Ari North, the parents of Sunati (Nisa and Prav) were shown to be in a polyamorous relationship with a man named Vish, who Nisa calls "our boyfriend".<ref>{{Cite comic | cartoonist = Ari North | story = Here Goes Nothing | title = Always Human | volume = 2 | issue = 69 | date = April 7, 2017 | publisher = [[Line Webtoon|Webtoon]] | url = https://www.webtoons.com/en/romance/always-human/season-2-69-here-goes-nothing/viewer?title_no=557&episode_no=75 | access-date = December 24, 2020 | archive-date = April 11, 2021 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210411194805/https://www.webtoons.com/en/romance/always-human/season-2-69-here-goes-nothing/viewer?title_no=557&episode_no=75 | url-status = live }} {{Cite web |url=https://www.webtoons.com/en/romance/always-human/season-2-69-here-goes-nothing/viewer?title_no=557&episode_no=75 |title=Always Human - [Season 2] 69 - Here Goes Nothing |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-date=April 11, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210411194805/https://www.webtoons.com/en/romance/always-human/season-2-69-here-goes-nothing/viewer?title_no=557&episode_no=75 |url-status=bot: unknown }}</ref> In another webcomic, ''Unknown Lands'', which began in 2015, Vard is shown to be polyamorous,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://unknownlands.thecomicseries.com/cast/|title=Cast |website=Unknown Lands the comic series |last=Rosi |first=Kämpe |date=September 11, 2015|access-date=December 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200222102803/http://unknownlands.thecomicseries.com/cast/|archive-date=February 22, 2020|url-status=live}}</ref> along with most of the cast having a queer sexual identity. The webcomic itself has environmental, feminist, and LGBTQ+ themes.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://stripshowcomicrevu.blogspot.com/2016/09/|title=Backstage Pass September: Rosi Kampe|date=September 23, 2016|access-date=December 24, 2020|website=The Strip Show, a Webcomic Revue|last=otterchild|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200202201910/http://stripshowcomicrevu.blogspot.com/2016/09/|archive-date=February 2, 2020|url-status=live}}</ref> A few years later, the 2017 film ''[[Professor Marston and the Wonder Women]]'' focuses on the real-life polyamorous relationship between the professor, psychologist [[William Moulton Marston]] (the creator of [[Wonder Woman]]), his wife and research partner [[Elizabeth Holloway Marston]], and their student, [[Olive Byrne]], as they share a "workplace, a bed, a home and eventually a family."<ref>{{cite news|last=Smith|first=Anna|title=How movies brought polyamory into the mainstream|url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2017/nov/16/sex-wonder-women-threesomes-polyamory-film-professor-marston|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]|date=November 16, 2017|access-date=December 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190616034327/https://www.theguardian.com/film/2017/nov/16/sex-wonder-women-threesomes-polyamory-film-professor-marston|archive-date=June 16, 2019}}</ref> Furthermore, fiction writer [[Cassandra Clare]] stated that Mark Blackthorn in ''[[The Dark Artifices]]'' book series would "definitely be open to a polyamorous relationship",<ref>{{cite web |last1=Clare |first1=Cassandra |url=https://cassandraclare.tumblr.com/post/123604632919/hi-cassie-i-wanted-to-say-thank-you-for-these |title=Hi Cassie, I wanted to say thank you for these... |publisher=Cassandra Clare's official [[Tumblr]] |date=July 11, 2015 |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170530185748/https://cassandraclare.tumblr.com/post/123604632919/hi-cassie-i-wanted-to-say-thank-you-for-these |archive-date=May 30, 2017 }}</ref> but would not cheat or lie, while noting that another such relationship between other characters would not be possible.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Clare |first1=Cassandra |url=https://cassandraclare.tumblr.com/post/103475114209/clockworks-and-triads |title=Clockworks and triads |publisher=Cassandra Clare's official [[Tumblr]] |date=July 18, 2015 |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150718052533/https://cassandraclare.tumblr.com/post/103475114209/clockworks-and-triads |archive-date=July 18, 2015 }}</ref> Eventually, he ends up in a polyamorous triangle, with a girlfriend and a boyfriend who are dating each other. Additionally, writer K. Ancrum confirmed that polyamorous characters were in two of her books (''The Wicker King'' and ''The Weight of the Stars''), but did not name any specific characters.<ref>{{cite web |author=K. Ancrum |url=https://kancrum.com/book-f-a-q/ |title=Author F.A.Q |publisher=K. Ancrum's official website |date=2020 |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201002015113/https://kancrum.com/book-f-a-q/ |archive-date=October 2, 2020 }}</ref> At the same time, Em, best friend of the protagonist in two books by Leigh Matthews (''Don't Bang the Barista'' and ''Go Deep'') is a bisexual woman dating a man in the first book, but by the second book she has "happily settled into a poly triad", wondering how she will get married.<ref name="Stepaniuk" /> |
|||
Polyamorous relationships present practical pitfalls. |
|||
* One common complaint from participants is time management, as more partners means one must divide one's time and attention up between them, leaving less for each.<ref name="Hawkins"/><ref name="Masters">{{cite book | last=Masters | first=Robert | title=Transformation through intimacy : the journey toward awakened monogamy | publisher=North Atlantic Books | location=Berkeley, Calif | year=2011 | isbn=978-1-58394-388-5 | oclc=793850748 | pages=23–25}}</ref> |
|||
* Related is that the complexity of the arrangement can lead to so much effort being spent on the relationship that personal, individual needs can be overlooked.<ref name="Brunning 2016">{{cite journal | last=Brunning | first=Luke | title=The Distinctiveness of Polyamory | journal=Journal of Applied Philosophy | volume=35 | issue=3 | year=2018 | issn=0264-3758 | doi=10.1111/japp.12240 | pages=15–16}}</ref> |
|||
* Another potential issue is lopsided power dynamics, such as one partner having significantly more resources, being more attractive or being much better at initiating new relationships, making the arrangement clearly more beneficial to that partner than the others.<ref name="Hawkins"/> |
|||
* The strong emphasis on communication can unintentionally marginalize partners who are less articulate.<ref name="Brunning 2016"/> |
|||
* Finally, negotiating the sometimes complex rules and boundaries of these relationships can be emotionally taxing, as can reconciling situations where one partner goes outside those boundaries.<ref name="Brunning 2016"/><ref name="Hawkins"/><ref name="Masters"/> |
|||
On May 29, 2017, in the last season of ''[[Steven Universe]]'', Fluorite, a member of the [[Off Colors]], a fusion of six different gems into one being, with fusion as the physical manifestation of a relationship, was introduced. This character reappeared in various episodes in the show's fifth season ("Lars Head", "Lars of the Stars", "Your Mother and Mine"), the season 5 finale, "[[Change Your Mind (Steven Universe)|Change Your Mind]]", along with one in ''[[Steven Universe Future]]'' ("Little Graduation") and in ''[[Steven Universe: The Movie]]'',<ref>{{cite AV media |people=Sugar, Rebecca (director), Jones-Quartey, Ian (Writer), Brewster, Miki (Writer), Abrams, Lamar (Writer) |date=September 2, 2019 |title=Steven Universe: The Movie |trans-title=Steven Universe: The Movie |medium=TV Movie |language=en |url=https://www.amazon.com/Cartoon-Network-Steven-Universe-Movie/dp/B07W8HR413/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Steven+Universe%3A+The+Movie&qid=1577818294&sr=8-1 |access-date=December 31, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191231185355/https://www.amazon.com/Cartoon-Network-Steven-Universe-Movie/dp/B07W8HR413/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Steven+Universe%3A+The+Movie&qid=1577818294&sr=8-1 |archive-date=December 31, 2019 |format=Prime video |time=8 PM |location=United States |publisher=[[Cartoon Network]] |id=B07W8HR413 }}</ref> with the latter two as non-speaking appearances. The series creator, [[Rebecca Sugar]], confirmed that Fluorite is a representation of a polyamorous relationship at the show's [[Comic Con]] panel in [[San Diego]].<ref name="tracybrown">{{cite news|last1=Brown|first1=Tracy|title='Steven Universe's' Rebecca Sugar confirms Fluorite is a representation of a polyamorous relationship|url=https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la-et-comic-con-2017-updates-htmlstory.html#steven-universes-rebecca-sugar-confirms-fluorite-is-a-representation-of-a-polyamorous-relationship|access-date=31 December 2019|work=L.A. Times|date=21 July 2017|archive-url=https://archive.today/20191231181547/https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la-et-comic-con-2017-updates-htmlstory.html%23steven-universes-rebecca-sugar-confirms-fluorite-is-a-representation-of-a-polyamorous-relationship|archive-date=December 31, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="shamuskelley">{{cite news|last1=Kelley|first1=Shamus|title=Steven Universe: 9 Things We Learned|url=https://www.denofgeek.com/us/tv/steven-universe/266722/steven-universe-9-things-we-learned|access-date=31 December 2019|work=[[Den of Geek]]|date=August 1, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191231182319/https://www.denofgeek.com/us/tv/steven-universe/266722/steven-universe-9-things-we-learned|archive-date=December 31, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> Sugar said at the panel, and at another conference, that she was inspired after talking with children at an LGBTQ+ center in [[Long Beach]], California, who wanted a polyamorous character in the show.<ref name="tracybrown" /><ref>{{cite web|url=https://animesuperhero.com/sdcc-2017-steven-universe-panel/|title=SDCC 2017: The "Steven Universe" Panel|author=slai|date=August 9, 2017|website=Anime Superhero|access-date=December 31, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191231182021/https://animesuperhero.com/sdcc-2017-steven-universe-panel/|archive-date=December 31, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="shamuskelley" /> ''Steven Universe'' was not alone in this regard. The [[BoJack Horseman season 4|fourth season]] of ''[[BoJack Horseman]]'', a [[Adult animation in the United States|mature animated series]], featured a character named Hollyhock, the sister of the protagonist, who has eight adoptive fathers{{efn|Dashawn Manheim, Steve Mannheim, Jose Guerrero, Cupe Robinson III, Otto Zilberschlag, Arturo "Ice Man" Fonzerelli, Gregory Hsung, and Quackers McQuack}} in a polyamorous gay relationship.<ref>{{cite news|last=Nickalls|first=Sammy|title=The Tricky Problem With Hollyhock in 'BoJack Horseman' Season 4|url=https://dotandline.net/hollyhock-bojack-horseman-season-4-456f9384f8b9/|newspaper=Dot and Line|date=September 21, 2017|access-date=December 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200327045505/https://dotandline.net/hollyhock-bojack-horseman-season-4-456f9384f8b9/|archive-date=March 27, 2020|quote=The adopted daughter of eight polyamorous fathers, she [Hollyhock] informs him [Bojack] right off the bat that she's not looking for a ninth dad in BoJack—who, thanks to the results of a Todd-facilitated DNA test, she believes to be her biological father.}}</ref> The same year, ''Unicornland'' premiered, with eight-episode web series focusing on Annie's exploration into polyamory after her divorce.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/vvk5q9/tv-is-finally-starting-to-get-polyamory-right|title=TV Is Finally Starting to Get Polyamory Right|last=Novick|first=Ilana|date=April 10, 2017|website=[[Vice News]] |language=en-US|access-date=December 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200507213037/https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/vvk5q9/tv-is-finally-starting-to-get-polyamory-right|archive-date=May 7, 2020}}</ref> |
|||
==Groups advocating for polyamory rights== |
|||
In 2001 [[Unitarian Universalists for Polyamory Awareness]]‘s first official membership meeting was held.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.uupa.org/beginnings.htm |title=UUPA Website: UUPA's Beginnings }}</ref> |
|||
===2018–present=== |
|||
In 2002 the rights of polyamorous people were added to the mission of the [American] [[National Coalition for Sexual Freedom]].<ref>https://ncsfreedom.org/who-we-are/the-history-of-the-ncsf/</ref> |
|||
<!-- Do not add examples of one or more polyamorous fictional characters without reliable reference sources, otherwise they will be deleted. Additionally, you need [[WP:Secondary sources]] to show that your addition is a significant depiction of polyamory in the media.--> |
|||
Polyamory was the subject of the 2018 [[Louis Theroux]] documentary ''Love Without Limits'', where Theroux travels to [[Portland, Oregon|Portland]], [[Oregon]], to meet a number of people engaged in polyamorous relationships.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2018/nov/04/altered-states-love-without-limits-review-louis-theroux-treads-his-tightrope|title=Altered States: Love Without Limits review – Louis Theroux treads his tightrope|first=Lucy|last=Mangan|date=November 4, 2018|website=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=November 7, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181107034216/https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2018/nov/04/altered-states-love-without-limits-review-louis-theroux-treads-his-tightrope|archive-date=November 7, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> Also in 2018, ''[[195 Lewis]]'', a web series about a [[Black lesbian literature in the United States|black lesbian]] couple dealing with their relationship being newly polyamorous,<ref>{{cite web |last1=Lao |first1=Sameer |url=https://www.colorlines.com/articles/black-queer-couple-candidly-explores-polyamory-195-lewis |title=A Black Queer Couple Candidly Explores Polyamory in '195 Lewis' |publisher=[[ColorLines]] |date=November 17, 2017 |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190417183726/https://www.colorlines.com/articles/black-queer-couple-candidly-explores-polyamory-195-lewis|archive-date=April 17, 2019}}</ref> received the Breakthrough Series – Short Form award from the [[Gotham Awards]].<ref>{{cite web |author=Rachel Montpelier |url=https://womenandhollywood.com/2018-gotham-awards-wins-for-chloe-zhaos-the-rider-killing-eve-elsie-fisher-more/ |title=2018 Gotham Awards: Wins for Chloé Zhao's "The Rider," "Killing Eve," Elsie Fisher, & More |publisher=Women and Hollywood |access-date=November 27, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181128034845/https://womenandhollywood.com/2018-gotham-awards-wins-for-chloe-zhaos-the-rider-killing-eve-elsie-fisher-more/ |archive-date=November 28, 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> The series premiered in 2017 and ran for five episodes.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.195lewis.com/events/2017/11/16/195-lewis-online-premiere |title=195 Lewis Online Premiere!! — 195 Lewis |publisher=195lewis.com |date=November 16, 2017 |access-date=November 27, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181127234333/http://www.195lewis.com/events/2017/11/16/195-lewis-online-premiere |archive-date=November 27, 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> The same year, the comic ''Open Earth'' premiered. The comic is set in the future and monogamous relationships are seen as outdated to all the young people on board the space station, all of whom are polyamorous. Author [[Sarah Mirk]] said that she wanted to write a story where "open relationships can be really positive and wonderful" and said that it is realistic to believe that people would "explore multiple relationships".<ref>{{cite interview |last=Mirk |first=Sarah |interviewer=Isabel |title=Erotic Sci-Fi Graphic Novel "Open Earth" Explores Polyamory In Space |type=Online |url=https://bust.com/books/195382-open-earth-interview.html |publisher=[[Bust (magazine)|Bust]] |date=January 30, 2019 |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190130171318/https://bust.com/books/195382-open-earth-interview.html |archive-date=January 30, 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
''[[Trigonometry (TV series)|Trigonometry]]'' is an eight-part [[BBC]] TV drama series which started on March 15, 2020, and is about an existing couple being joined by a third person and forming a polyamorous relationship. The BBC said that ''Trigonometry'' is "A love story about three people who are made for each other."<ref>{{cite web |title=Trigonometry |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episodes/p0840zbt/trigonometry |website=[[BBC News]] |access-date=August 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201224200517/https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episodes/p0840zbt/trigonometry |archive-date=December 24, 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=When is polyamory drama Trigonometry on BBC Two? What is it about? |url=https://www.radiotimes.com/news/tv/2020-03-15/trigonometry-air-date/ |website=[[Radio Times]] |date=March 15, 2020 |access-date=August 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201224200746/https://www.radiotimes.com/news/tv/2020-03-15/trigonometry-air-date/ |archive-date=December 24, 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref> In July 2021, Australian soap opera ''[[Neighbours]]'' explored polyamory with three of its main characters. Actress [[Jacinta Stapleton]] was proud to be involved in the story arc, stating: "I think we should always try to reflect real intimate relationships in our society. Polyamory certainly is a part of that. The more we represent the beautifully diverse nature and uniqueness of humans, the more people will feel accepted and seen."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.digitalspy.com/soaps/neighbours/a37066297/neighbours-spoilers-ned-amy-levi-polyamorous/|title=Neighbours' Ned Willis suggests polyamorous relationship in new storyline|last=Lee|first=Jess|date=July 19, 2021|publisher=[[Digital Spy]]|access-date=August 16, 2021|archive-date=August 16, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210816132349/https://www.digitalspy.com/soaps/neighbours/a37066297/neighbours-spoilers-ned-amy-levi-polyamorous/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
In 2010 the Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association was founded.<ref>{{cite web|author=Alan |url=https://polyinthemedia.blogspot.com/2010/11/as-canadian-poly-case-nears-publicity.html?m=1 |title=Polyamory in the News: As Canadian poly case nears, publicity ramps up |publisher=Polyinthemedia.blogspot.com |date=2010-11-11 |accessdate=2020-04-29}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://polyadvocacy.ca/ |title=Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association » A right to live with those we love |publisher=Polyadvocacy.ca |date= |accessdate=2020-04-29}}</ref> |
|||
==Polyamory-related observances== |
|||
==Symbols== |
|||
[[File:Polyamory pride in San Francisco 2004.jpg|thumb|left|Start of polyamory contingent at [[San Francisco Pride]] 2004]] |
|||
A number of symbols have been created to represent polyamory. These include a [[parrot]] (a pun, as "Polly" is a common name for domesticated parrots)<ref name="poly parrot">{{cite web |url=http://www.polyamory.org/ |title=alt.polyamory home page |accessdate=October 9, 2007 |last=Dillinger |first=Ray |date=June 8, 1997 |quote=Parrot graphic by Ray Dillinger, placed in the public domain for use as a poly mascot. |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110221093553/http://www.polyamory.org/ |archive-date=February 21, 2011 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Guardian">{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/nov/14/gender.uk |title=When two just won't do |newspaper=The Guardian |date=November 14, 2003 |author=Helen Echlin |accessdate=March 27, 2007 |quote=Today America has more than 100 poly email lists and support groups. Their emblem, which marks the table when they meet in restaurants, is the parrot (because of their nickname Polly) |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130827175507/http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/nov/14/gender.uk |archive-date=August 27, 2013 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Spiritual">Mystic Life (December 2003) in [http://www.spiritualpolyamory.com/ "Spiritual Polyamory"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110716120211/http://www.spiritualpolyamory.com/ |date=July 16, 2011 }} {{ISBN|978-0-595-30541-4}}</ref> and the ''infinity heart''. The "infinity heart" symbol has appeared on pins, T-shirts, [[bumper sticker]]s and other media.<ref>{{cite web|title=Poly jewelry, clothing, and personal displays|url=http://polyinthemedia.blogspot.com/2010/04/poly-jewelry-clothing-and-other.html|author=Alan|work=Polyamory in the News!|date=April 28, 2010|accessdate=26 October 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131029210600/http://polyinthemedia.blogspot.com/2010/04/poly-jewelry-clothing-and-other.html|archive-date=October 29, 2013|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Grinberg">{{cite news|last=Grinberg|first=Emanuella|title=Polyamory: When Three Isn't a Crowd|url=http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/26/living/relationships-polyamory/|work=CNN Living|publisher=CNN|accessdate=November 20, 2013|date=October 26, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131202185644/http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/26/living/relationships-polyamory|archive-date=December 2, 2013|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
The polyamory [[pride flag]], designed by Jim Evans in 1995, has stripes of blue (representing openness and honesty among all partners), red (representing love and passion), and black (representing solidarity with those who must hide their polyamorous relationships from the outside world). In the center of the flag is a gold Greek lowercase letter "[[Pi (letter)|pi]]", as the first letter of "polyamory". Gold represents "the value that we place on the emotional attachment to others... as opposed to merely primarily physical relationships".<ref>{{cite web|title=Jim Evans' Polyamory Pride Flag|url=http://homepage.isomedia.com/~jene/flag.html|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141110021410/http://homepage.isomedia.com/~jene/flag.html|archivedate=November 10, 2014}}</ref> There is also a similar ribbon.<ref>{{cite web|last1=West|first1=Alex|title=A List of Poly Symbols... with a little bit of their history|url=http://www.hevanet.com/alexwest/parrots/symbolist.html|accessdate=December 20, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110608074130/http://www.hevanet.com/alexwest/parrots/symbolist.html|archive-date=June 8, 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> There have been a number of alternative flags developed by the polyamory community since 1995 that incorporate both the original colors and the infinity heart sign. |
|||
Metamour Day is celebrated every year on February 28. It celebrates the relationships people have with their metamours (partners' other significant others, often referred to as metamours or OSOs.<ref name="Black and Poly 2017"/>)<ref>{{cite web |url=https://ncsfreedom.org/metamour-day-2/ |title=Metamour Day is February 28! |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=2020 |website=[[National Coalition for Sexual Freedom]] |access-date=December 26, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200730174747/https://ncsfreedom.org/metamour-day-2/ |archive-date=July 30, 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
==Pictures of symbols== |
|||
<gallery> |
|||
Polyamory Pride Day is celebrated every year on a day in [[Pride Month]].<ref name="auto3"/> |
|||
File:Polyamory_woven.svg|"Infinity Heart" |
|||
File:Polyamory parrot.svg|A parrot, a symbol used to represent polyamory, saying “pi”, the first letter of polyamory |
|||
Polyamory groups sometimes participate in [[pride parade]]s.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theconversation.com/amp/when-you-have-2-lovers-the-holidays-can-be-tricky-108392|title=When you have 2 lovers, the holidays can be tricky|website=www.theconversation.com|date=December 18, 2018 |access-date=December 30, 2020|archive-date=June 2, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200602201230/https://theconversation.com/amp/when-you-have-2-lovers-the-holidays-can-be-tricky-108392|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theshorthorn.com/life_and_entertainment/studies-find-polyamory-appeals-to-some/article_33bdd840-1994-11e7-83db-bb1545531b30.html|title=Studies find polyamory appeals to some|first=Renee Yan, The Shorthorn|last=staff|website=The Shorthorn|date=April 5, 2017 |access-date=December 30, 2020|archive-date=February 13, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210213191634/https://www.theshorthorn.com/life_and_entertainment/studies-find-polyamory-appeals-to-some/article_33bdd840-1994-11e7-83db-bb1545531b30.html|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
File:Polyamory Pride Flag.svg|Polyamory [[pride flag]] |
|||
File:Pi-symbol.svg|[[Pi (letter)|Pi]], the first letter of polyamory |
|||
International Solo Polyamory Day is celebrated every year on September 24.<ref name="auto3"/> |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
Polyamory Day is celebrated every year on November 23; that day was chosen because on November 23, 2011, the Supreme Court of British Columbia ruled that the anti-polygamy law of Canada does not affect unformalized polyamorous households.<ref name="auto3"/> |
|||
==Polyamory rights organizations== |
|||
[[File:Bridgette Garozzo, spokesperson for the Polyamory Action Lobby.JPG|thumb|Bridgette Garozzo, spokesperson for the Polyamory Action Lobby, in May 2013]] |
|||
The Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association (CPAA) was founded in 2009. It "advocates on behalf of Canadians who practice polyamory. It [also] promotes legal, social, government, and institutional acceptance and support of polyamory, and advances the interests of the Canadian polyamorous community generally."<ref name="auto2">{{cite web|author=Alan M. |url=https://polyinthemedia.blogspot.com/2010/11/as-canadian-poly-case-nears-publicity.html |title=Polyamory in the News: As Canadian poly case nears, publicity ramps up |publisher=Polyinthemedia |date=November 11, 2010 |access-date=April 29, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201224181534/https://polyinthemedia.blogspot.com/2010/11/as-canadian-poly-case-nears-publicity.html |archive-date=December 24, 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="auto4">{{cite web|url=http://polyadvocacy.ca/about/ |title=About |publisher=Polyadvocacy.ca |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201224181915/http://polyadvocacy.ca/about/ |archive-date=December 24, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
The Organization for Polyamory and Ethical Non-monogamy (OPEN) was founded in the United States in 2022 as "a nonprofit organization dedicated to normalizing and empowering non-monogamous individuals and communities."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.open-love.org/mission|title=Mission|website=OPEN|access-date=June 21, 2022|archive-date=April 4, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230404081454/https://www.open-love.org/mission|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/17/style/non-monogamy-facebook-relationship-status.html|title=Non-Monogamy Advocates Ask Facebook to Be More Open|first=Valeriya|last=Safronova|newspaper=The New York Times|date=June 17, 2022|access-date=June 22, 2022|archive-date=June 14, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230614054226/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/17/style/non-monogamy-facebook-relationship-status.html|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
The Polyamory Action Lobby (PAL) was founded in 2013 in Australia to fight cultural misconceptions about polyamorous people and to fight for their legal rights.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://cityhubsydney.com.au/2013/02/polyamorists-get-organised/|title=Polyamorists set up lobby group|first=Jason|last=Marshall|date=February 6, 2013|access-date=December 30, 2020|archive-date=August 4, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210804014244/https://cityhubsydney.com.au/2013/02/polyamorists-get-organised/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
The Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition (PLAC), based in the United States, "seeks to advance the civil and human rights of polyamorous individuals, communities, and families through legislative advocacy, public policy, and public education."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://polyamorylegal.org/|title=Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition|website=Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition|access-date=March 24, 2021|archive-date=March 24, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210324014951/https://polyamorylegal.org/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.facebook.com/pages/category/Legal/PolyamoryLegal/about/|title=Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition|website=www.facebook.com|access-date=April 29, 2021|archive-date=April 29, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210429155256/https://www.facebook.com/pages/category/Legal/PolyamoryLegal/about/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
The [[United Kingdom|UK]] Polyamory Association (UKPA) was founded by Giulia Smith.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/society/62157/from-open-relationships-to-polycules-polyamory-is-monogamy-over#:~:text=She%27s%20a%20trustee%20of%20the,of%20reliable%20information%20about%20polyamory | title=From open relationships to polycules: Is monogamy over? }}</ref> Its mission statement is, “The UK Polyamory Association exists to support the needs of polyamorous people and communities across the UK. We aim to increase public awareness and acceptance of polyamory, and challenge stigma through advocacy, positive representation, and education.”<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://ukpolyamory.org/|title=Welcome to the UK Polyamory Association - UKPA|date=June 27, 2022}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://ukpolyamory.org/index.php/ukpa-mission-statement-and-what-we-do/|title=UKPA Mission Statement & What We Do - UKPA|date=June 27, 2022}}</ref> |
|||
[[Unitarian Universalists for Polyamory Awareness]] (UUPA) was founded in 2001. It "has as its mission to serve the Unitarian Universalist Association and the community of polyamorous people within and outside the UUA by providing support, promoting education, and encouraging spiritual wholeness regarding polyamory."<ref name="auto1"/> |
|||
==Opposition== |
|||
Yasmin Nair, a co-founder of [[Against Equality]], has criticized polyamory. She has stated that polyamorists are not inherently [[Radical politics|radical]],<ref>{{cite podcast |url=https://www.listennotes.com/id/podcasts/unpopular-front/content-warning-bunker-w-8DwlKoRmy-G/ |title=Content Warning: Bunker w/ Yasmin Nair (3.2.19) |website=Unpopular Front |publisher=Listen Notes |host=Ben Udashen |date=March 2, 2019 |access-date=December 27, 2020 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20201227163502/https://www.listennotes.com/id/podcasts/unpopular-front/content-warning-bunker-w-8DwlKoRmy-G/ |archive-date=December 27, 2020 }}</ref> and said that the discourse around polyamory is unengaging and not liberating, only [[Fetishism|fetishizing]] a "peculiar form of monogamy...and long-term relationships".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://yasminnair.com/newt-gingrich-polyamorist/ |title=Newt Gingrich: Polyamorist? |last=Nair |first=Yasmin |date=January 19, 2012 |website=Yasmin Nair's official website |publisher=[[WordPress]] |access-date=December 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201227163051/https://yasminnair.com/newt-gingrich-polyamorist/ |archive-date=December 27, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> In a 2013 article in ''[[The Guardian]]'', [[Julie Bindel]] described polyamory a "co-opting and rebranding of polygamy". She argued that contemporary proponents of polyamory often overlooked gender dynamics and characterized it as a choice predominantly made by "overwhelmingly white, affluent, university-educated, and privileged folk".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/26/polyamory-no-favours-for-women |title=Rebranding polyamory does women no favors |last=Bindel |first=Julie |author-link=Julie Bindel|date=August 26, 2013 |website=[[The Guardian]] |access-date=December 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201227170332/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/26/polyamory-no-favours-for-women |archive-date=December 27, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> The [[conservative]] ''[[National Review]]'' claimed that "widespread acceptance of polyamory could make society worse off" with supposed false notions of [[honesty]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/01/polyamory-elevating-sexual-desires-over-obligations-has-predictable-consequences/ |title=The Counterfeit 'Honesty' of Polyamory |last1=Frost |first1=Daniel |last2=Boyd |first2=Hal |date=January 7, 2010 |website=[[National Review]] |access-date=December 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201227170833/https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/01/polyamory-elevating-sexual-desires-over-obligations-has-predictable-consequences/ |archive-date=December 27, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> [[Conor Friedersdorf]], writing in ''[[The Atlantic]]'' in 2015, expressed his opposition to polyamorous [[Civil marriage|civil marriages]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/case-against-polygamy/397823/ |title=The Case Against Encouraging Polygamy |last1=Friedersdorf |first1=Conor |date=July 9, 2015 |website=[[The Atlantic]] |access-date=December 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201227171638/https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/case-against-polygamy/397823/ |archive-date=December 27, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
==Notable practitioners of polyamory== |
|||
<!-- When adding people to this list a reliable source must be added that explicitly identifies the subject as "polyamorous". Living people added to this list without such a source may violate our [[WP:BLP]], our policy on biographies of living people, and may be reverted. --> |
|||
{{Main|List of polyamorists}} |
|||
* [[Dossie Easton]], co-author of ''[[The Ethical Slut]]'' and other works<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2009/04/23/the-ethical-slut-returns.html |title=The Ethical Slut Returns |last=Beckerman |first=Marty |date=23 April 2009 |work=The Daily Beast |accessdate=29 June 2012 |archive-date=May 13, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170513133806/http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2009/04/23/the-ethical-slut-returns.html |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
* [[Terisa Greenan]], writer, actress, filmmaker, and creator of ''[[Family: the web series]]''<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/seattle-based-family-webisodes-no-ordinary-sexy-sitcom/ |title=Seattle-based 'Family' webisodes no ordinary sexy sitcom |first=Mark |last=Rahner |work=[[The Seattle Times]] |date=March 9, 2009 |accessdate=2020-06-14 |archive-date=June 12, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220612181933/https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/seattle-based-family-webisodes-no-ordinary-sexy-sitcom/ |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
* [[Laurell K. Hamilton]], writer, known for ''[[Anita Blake: Vampire Hunter]]''<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.laurellkhamilton.com/what-polyamory-is-and-what-polyamory-isnt/ |title=What Polyamory is, and What Polyamory isn't |date=April 1, 2015 |access-date=June 12, 2022 |archive-date=October 6, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221006131040/https://www.laurellkhamilton.com/what-polyamory-is-and-what-polyamory-isnt/ |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
* [[Janet Hardy]], writer and sex educator, and founder of [[Greenery Press]]<ref>Sachie Godwin, ''[[Clamor (magazine)|Clamor Magazine]]'', {{cite web |url=http://clamormagazine.org/issues/17/feature1.php |title=Perfect Bound |access-date=2010-03-20 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100405081037/http://clamormagazine.org/issues/17/feature1.php |archive-date=2010-04-05 }}, issue 17, 2002</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://slutandsons.com/about/ |title=about the author |publisher=slutandsons.com |date=2020-07-14 |accessdate=2021-03-03 |archive-date=July 6, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220706202923/https://slutandsons.com/about/ |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
* [[Brenda Howard]], bisexual rights activist<ref name="lgbthistorymonth2">{{cite web |url=http://lgbthistorymonth.com/brenda-howard?tab=biography |title=Brenda Howard | LGBTHistoryMonth.com |publisher=lgbthistorymonth.com |accessdate=4 October 2014 |archive-date=July 12, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150712044732/http://lgbthistorymonth.com/brenda-howard?tab=biography |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
* [[Willow Smith]], American musician<ref>{{Cite web |title=Willow Smith comes out as polyamorous — and reveals the 'only' reason she'd get married |url=https://www.today.com/popculture/willow-smith-comes-out-polyamorous-red-table-talk-t216783 |access-date=2022-11-23 |website=TODAY.com |date=April 28, 2021 |language=en |archive-date=January 17, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240117172323/https://www.today.com/popculture/willow-smith-comes-out-polyamorous-red-table-talk-t216783 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
==Gallery== |
|||
{{gallery |
|||
|File:Polyamory Pride Flag.svg |
|||
|The earliest polyamory [[pride flag]] design, created by Jim Evans in 1995.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2022/06/polyamorous-flag-look-like/|title=What does the polyamorous flag look like?|first=Matthias|last=Walsh|website=LGBTQ Nation|date=June 17, 2022|access-date=June 25, 2022|archive-date=June 25, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220625193539/https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2022/06/polyamorous-flag-look-like/|url-status=live}}</ref> The [[Greek alphabet|Greek]] letter [[pi (letter)|Pi]] stands for the first letter in the word ''polyamory.'' Evans wanted a symbol that could be used without drawing wider attention.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/life/g39944774/lgbtq-flags/|title=21 LGBTQ Flags and What They Symbolize|first=Lizz|last=Schumer|date=May 16, 2022|website=Good Housekeeping|access-date=June 25, 2022|archive-date=June 23, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220623055041/http://www.goodhousekeeping.com/life/g39944774/lgbtq-flags/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
|File:Tricolor Polyamory Pride Flag.svg |
|||
|A polyamory [[pride flag]] designed by Red Howell. The design was chosen in 2022, selected from four candidates via an online survey conducted by the blog PolyamProud.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ebar.com/story.php?321532|title=LGBTQ Agenda: New polyamorous flag is revealed|website=Bay Area Reporter}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.polyamproud.com/flag/|title=New Tricolor Polyamory Pride Flag|date=November 23, 2022|access-date=November 27, 2022|archive-date=November 23, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221123105339/https://www.polyamproud.com/flag/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
|File:Polyamory woven.svg |
|||
|The "infinity heart" is a widely used symbol of polyamory.<ref name="ILIC">{{cite web |url=http://www.hevanet.com/alexwest/parrots/symbolist.html |title=A List of Poly Symbols |access-date=2002-05-11 |author=West, Alex |date=2001-02-06 |quote=variations on Pi-and-the-three-colors the ILIC symbol ... The symbol that started this category, Jim Evans' Poly Pride Flag. He has put this image in the public domain ... "ILIC" stands for Infinite Love in Infinite Combinations (a reference to Star Trek's IDIC credo --- the D in the Star Trek version stands for "Diversity"). |archive-date=June 8, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110608074130/http://www.hevanet.com/alexwest/parrots/symbolist.html |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
}} |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
{{columns-list|colwidth=35em| |
|||
* [[Adultery]] |
|||
*{{Annotated link|Amatonormativity}} |
|||
* ''[[Family: the web series]]'' |
|||
*{{Annotated link|Mononormativity}} |
|||
* [[Group marriage]] |
|||
*{{Annotated link|Free love}} |
|||
* [[Group sex]] |
|||
*{{Annotated link|Group marriage}} |
|||
* [[List of polyamorists]] |
|||
*{{Annotated link|Group sex}} |
|||
* [[List of polyamorous characters in fiction]] |
|||
* |
*{{Annotated link|Ménage à trois}} |
||
* |
*{{Annotated link|Non-monogamy}} |
||
* |
*{{Annotated link|Open relationship}} |
||
*{{Annotated link|Polyamory in the United States}} |
|||
* [[Polyday]] |
|||
*{{Annotated link|Polyday}} |
|||
* [[Polyfidelity]] |
|||
*{{Annotated link|Polyfidelity}} |
|||
* [[Relationship anarchy]] |
|||
*{{Annotated link|Relationship anarchy}} |
|||
* [[Romantic orientation]] |
|||
* |
*{{Annotated link|Romantic orientation}} |
||
*{{Annotated link|Sociosexual orientation}} |
|||
*{{Annotated link|Terminology within polyamory}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==Notes== |
|||
{{Clear}} |
|||
{{notelist}} |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{Reflist|30em}} |
{{Reflist|30em}} |
||
===Sources=== |
|||
*{{cite book |last1=Barker |first1=Meg |last2=Langdridge |first2=Darren |title=Understanding non-monogamies |publisher=Routledge |publication-place=New York |year=2012 |isbn=9780415652964 |id={{OCLC|574760499|1107788606}} |url=https://www.routledge.com/Understanding-Non-Monogamies/Barker-Langdridge/p/book/9780415652964 |url-access=subscription}} |
|||
*{{cite book |last=Taormino |first=Tristan |author-link=Tristan Taormino|title=Opening Up: A Guide to Creating and Sustaining Open Relationships |publisher=Cleis Press |publication-place=San Francisco, Calif |year=2008 |isbn=978-1573444972 |oclc=701109107}} |
|||
==Further reading== |
==Further reading== |
||
*{{cite book |last1=Anapol |first1=Deborah M. |author-link=Deborah Anapol |title=Polyamory: The New Love Without Limits: Secrets of Sustainable Intimate Relationships |date=1997 |publisher=IntiNet Resource Center |publication-place=San Rafael |isbn=978-1-880789-08-7}} |
|||
*[[Dossie Easton|Easton, Dossie]], and [[Janet Hardy|Liszt, Catherine]]. 1997. ''[[The Ethical Slut|The Ethical Slut: A Guide to Infinite Sexual Possibilities]]''. {{ISBN|1890159018}}. |
|||
*{{cite journal |last1=Antalffy |first1=Nikó |last2=Houston |first2=Lola D. |title=Polyamory |journal=The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies |date=2016 |isbn=978-1-4051-9694-9 |doi=10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss136 |oclc=933432480}} |
|||
*{{cite book |last=Labriola |first=Kathy |url=http://www.kathylabriola.com/Love-in-Abundance |title=''Love in Abundance: A Counselor's Advice on Open Relationships'' |publisher=[[Greenery Press]] |year=2010}} |
|||
*{{cite book |last1=Bloedel |first1=Abbi |last2=Manning |first2=Jimmie |chapter=Exploring polyamory online: Ethics, relationships and understanding |editor-last=Nixon |editor-first=Paul G. |editor-last2=Düsterhöft |editor-first2=Isabel K. |title=Sex in the Digital Age |date=2017 |publisher=Routledge |location=London |isbn=978-1-315-44622-6 |oclc=1001338082 |doi=10.4324/9781315446240-15 |pages=195–211}} [{{GBurl|id=NR0xDwAAQBAJ|pg=PT195}} Partial preview] at [[Google Books]]. |
|||
*Ravenscroft, Anthony. 2004. ''Polyamory: roadmaps for the clueless and hopeful.'' {{ISBN|1890109533}}. |
|||
*{{cite journal |last1=Brunning |first1=Luke |title=The Distinctiveness of Polyamory |journal=Journal of Applied Philosophy |date=2018 |volume=35 |issue=3 |pages=513–531 |doi=10.1111/japp.12240 |issn=0264-3758 |jstor=26811073 |oclc=7799693841}} |
|||
*Stewart, Kate. 2013. [http://katelstewart.com/books/ ''The Open Relationship Handbook''] {{ISBN|9781483501512}} |
|||
*{{cite book |last1=Brunning |first1=Luke |chapter=Polyamory: The Future of Love? |editor-last=Grahle |editor-first=André |editor-last2=McKeever |editor-first2=Natasha |editor-last3=Saunders |editor-first3=Joe |title=Philosophy of Love in the Past, Present, and Future |date=2022 |publisher=Routledge |location=New York |isbn=978-1-003-01433-1 |oclc=1273727672 |doi=10.4324/9781003014331 |page=150–163}} [{{GBurl|id=0YlUEAAAQBAJ|pg=PT150}} Partial preview] at [[Google Books]]. |
|||
*[[Tristan Taormino|Taormino, Tristan]]. 2008. [http://openingup.net/book-excerpt/ ''Opening Up: A Guide to Creating and Sustaining Open Relationships''] {{ISBN|978-1573442954}}. |
|||
*{{cite journal <!-- Citation bot bypass--> |last=Cardoso |first=Daniel |last2=Pascoal |first2=Patricia M. |last3=Maiochi |first3=Francisco Hertel |title=Defining Polyamory: A Thematic Analysis of Lay People’s Definitions |journal=Archives of Sexual Behavior |volume=50 |issue=4 |date=2021 |issn=0004-0002 |pmid=34046765 |pmc=8321986 |doi=10.1007/s10508-021-02002-y |doi-access=free |pages=1239–1252 |url=https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10508-021-02002-y.pdf |oclc=9053599511}} |
|||
*Veaux, Franklin; Rickert, Eve. 2014. [[More Than Two|''More Than Two: A practical guide to ethical polyamory'']], ISBN (paperback): 978-0-9913997-0-3, ISBN (Kindle/ePub): 978-0-9913997-2-7. |
|||
*{{cite encyclopedia |last1=Cutas |first1=Daniela |title=Polyamory |encyclopedia=The International Encyclopedia of Ethics |publisher=Wiley |date=2013-02-15 |isbn=978-1-4051-8641-4 |doi=10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee827 |pages=1–4}} |
|||
*Barker, Meg; Langdridge, Darren. 2010. ''Understanding Non-Monogamies''. {{ISBN|978-0-415-80055-6}}. |
|||
*{{cite book |last1=Easton |first1=Dossie |author1-link=Dossie Easton |last2=Liszt |first2=Catherine |author2-link=Janet Hardy |title=The Ethical Slut: A Guide to Infinite Sexual Possibilities |title-link=The Ethical Slut |publisher=Greenery Press |year=1997 |isbn=978-0-307-79048-4 |oclc=933473102 |ref=none}} {{Internet Archive|id=ethicalslut00doss|name=''The Ethical Slut: A Guide to Infinite Sexual Possibilities''}} |
|||
<!-- articles should be referenced IN THE ARTICLE, not tacked on at the end... |
|||
*{{cite journal <!-- Citation bot bypass--> |last=Gupta |first=Shivangi |last2=Tarantino |first2=Mari |last3=Sanner |first3=Caroline |title=A scoping review of research on polyamory and consensual non‐monogamy: Implications for a more inclusive family science |journal=Journal of Family Theory & Review |volume=16 |issue=2 |date=2024 |issn=1756-2570 |doi=10.1111/jftr.12546 |doi-access=free |pages=151–190 |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jftr.12546 |oclc=10077848078}} |
|||
*Bennett, Jessica. [http://www.newsweek.com/id/209164 "Only You. And You. And You"], ''[[Newsweek]]'', July 29, 2009. |
|||
*{{cite journal |last1=Hnatkovičová |first1=D. |last2=Bianchi |first2=G. |title=Model of motivations for engaging in polyamorous relationships |journal=[[Sexologies]] |date=2022 |volume=31 |issue=3 |pages=184–194 |doi=10.1016/j.sexol.2022.03.003 |doi-access=free |issn=1158-1360 |oclc=9510963844}} |
|||
*Cook, Elaine. [http://www.ejhs.org/volume8/cook1.htm "Commitment in Polyamory"], ''[[Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality]]'', Volume 8, December 12, 2005. |
|||
*{{cite book |last=Kaldera |first=Raven |title=agan Polyamory: Becoming a Tribe of Hearts |publisher=Llewellyn |publication-place=Woodbury, MN |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-7387-0762-4 |oclc=60742176}} |
|||
*Davidson, Joy. [http://www.ejhs.org/volume5/polyoutline.html "Working with Polyamorous Clients in the Clinical Setting"], ''[[Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality]]'', Volume 5, April 16, 2002. Also delivered to the [[Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality]], Western Regional Conference, April 2002. |
|||
*{{cite encyclopedia |last1=Klesse |first1=Christian |title=Polyamory |editor1-last=Whelehan |editor1-first=Patricia |editor2-last=Bolin |editor2-first=Anne |encyclopedia=The International Encyclopedia of Human Sexuality |volume=2 |date=2015 |pages=861–1042 |doi=10.1002/9781118896877.wbiehs352 |isbn=978-1-4051-9006-0 |oclc=907684392}} |
|||
*[[Elizabeth F. Emens|Emens, Elizabeth F.]] [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=506242 "Monogamy's Law: Compulsory Monogamy and Polyamorous Existence"], ''New York University Review of Law & Social Change'', Vol. 29, p. 277, 2004. Analyzes social and legal perspectives on polyamory. |
|||
*{{cite book |last=Labriola |first=Kathy |title=Love in Abundance: A Counselor's Advice on Open Relationships |publisher=Greenery Press |publication-place=Eugene, OR |year=2010 |isbn=978-0-937609-47-7 |oclc=793002426 |url=https://archive.org/details/loveinabundancec0000labr |url-access=registration |via=Internet Archive}} |
|||
* Gould, Rebecca Ruth, "[https://www.opendemocracy.net/transformation/rebecca-gould/love-without-monogamy Love Without Monogamy]," ''OpenDemocracy'' 15 August 2016. |
|||
*{{cite journal |last1=Milona |first1=Michael |last2=Weindling |first2=Lauren |title=The Story of Romantic Love and Polyamory |journal=[[Journal of Applied Philosophy]] |date=2024 |doi=10.1111/japp.12764 |doi-access=free |issn=0264-3758 |id={{OCLC|10395234777}}}} |
|||
*Hirako, Elise. "Historietas de Alice" <http://www.ashistorietasdealice.wordpress.com> A booklet with illustrations and stories that are themed in Alice and Anita being forms of love. July 2012 |
|||
*{{cite book |last=Ravenscroft |first=Anthony |title=Polyamory: Roadmaps for the Clueless and Hopeful: an Introduction on Polyamory |publisher=Fenris Brothers |publication-place=Santa Fe, NM |year=2004 |isbn=978-1-890109-53-0 |oclc=1392329517 |url=https://archive.org/details/polyamoryroadmap0000rave |url-access=registration |via=Internet Archive}} |
|||
*McCullough, Derek; Hall, David S. [http://www.ejhs.org/volume6/polyamory.htm "Polyamory – What it is and what it isn't"], ''[[Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality]]'', Volume 6, February 27, 2003. Reviews some of the core beliefs, perspectives, practicalities, and references in polyamory. |
|||
*{{cite journal |last=Sandbakken |first=Ella Marie |last2=Skrautvol |first2=Anita |last3=Madsen |first3=Ole Jacob |title=‘It’s my definition of a relationship, even though it doesn’t fit yours’: living in polyamorous relationships in a mononormative culture |journal=Psychology & Sexuality |volume=13 |issue=4 |date=2022-10-02 |issn=1941-9899 |doi=10.1080/19419899.2021.1982755 |pages=1054–1067 |oclc=10309887554}} |
|||
*[[Annalee Newitz|Newitz, Annalee]]. [https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19125591.800 "Love Unlimited: The Polyamorists"], ''[[New Scientist]]'', July 7, 2006. |
|||
*{{cite encyclopedia |last1=Schippers |first1=Mimi |title=Polyamory |encyclopedia=The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology |date=19 November 2019 |pages=1–2 |doi=10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosp047.pub2}} |
|||
*Penny, Laurie. [https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/20/polyamorous-shows-no-traditional-way-live "Being polyamorous shows there's no 'traditional' way to live"]. ''[[The Guardian]]''. Tuesday August 20, 2013. |
|||
*{{cite book |last=Schippers |first=Mimi |title=Polyamory, Monogamy, and American Dreams: The Stories We Tell about Poly Lives and the Cultural Production of Inequality |publisher=Routledge |publication-place=Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon |year=2019 |isbn=978-1-351-71711-3 |oclc=1110122489}} |
|||
*Strassberg, Maura I. {{cite web |url= https://culsnet.law.capital.edu/LawReview/BackIssues/31-3/Strassberg14.pdf |title= "The Challenge Of Post-Modern Polygamy: Considering Polyamory" |url-status= dead |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20060524030716/https://culsnet.law.capital.edu/LawReview/BackIssues/31-3/Strassberg14.pdf |archivedate= May 24, 2006 |df= mdy-all }} {{small|(541 KB)}}. Research analyzing monogamy, polygamy, polyfidelity and polyparenting and considers how polyfidelitous marriage might fit into Western culture within a Hegelian framework. |
|||
*{{cite encyclopedia |last1=Schubert |first1=Katie A. |title=Polyamory |encyclopedia =Encyclopedia of Family Studies |date=2016-02-23 |isbn=978-1-119-08562-1 |pages=1–3 |doi=10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs090 |oclc=1006311930}} |
|||
* {{cite journal|last1=Weitzman|first1=Geri|title=Therapy with Clients Who Are Bisexual and Polyamorous|journal=Journal of Bisexuality|date=2006|volume=6|issue=1–2|pages=137–164|doi=10.1300/J159v06n01_08|url=http://www.numenor.org/~gdw/psychologist/bipolycounseling.html|access-date=December 4, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150318053259/http://www.numenor.org/~gdw/psychologist/bipolycounseling.html|archive-date=March 18, 2015|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all}} |
|||
*{{cite book |last=Stewart |first=Kate L. |title=The Open Relationship Handbook : Basic Tips and Tools for Navigating Non-Monogamy |publisher=BookBaby |publication-place=Cork |year=2013 |isbn=978-1-4835-0151-2 |oclc=898420526}} |
|||
--> |
|||
*{{cite book |last=Weitzman |first=Geri D. |chapter=Polyamory |editor-last=Lebow |editor-first=Jay |editor-link=Jay Lebow |editor-last2=Chambers |editor-first2=Anthony |editor-last3=Breunlin |editor-first3=Douglas C. |title=Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy |publisher=Springer International Publishing |publication-place=Cham |year=2019 |isbn=978-3-319-49423-4 |doi=10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_495 |oclc=1129297823|pages=2233–2236}} |
|||
*{{cite journal |last=Wilson |first=Jennifer |title=Open Season • The rising popularity of polyamory |journal=The New Yorker |date=January 1–8, 2024 |url=https://www.discountmags.com/au/magazine/the-new-yorker-january-01-08-2023-double-issue-digital-m/in-this-issue/CMXYuGgNv1703496823455 |access-date=2024-12-29 |url-access=subscription |pp=49–52 |issn=0028-792X |quote=A good love affair, when you're inside it, feels like it could change the world. But changing the world takes more than spreading the love; you have to spread the wealth, too. Maybe that's just utopian, hippie nonsense. But what can I say? I'm a romantic.}} ''Earlier online version:'' {{cite web |last=Wilson |first=Jennifer |title=How Did Polyamory Become So Popular? |website=The New Yorker |date=2023-12-25 |url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/01/01/american-poly-christopher-gleason-book-review-more-a-memoir-of-open-marriage-molly-roden-winter |url-access=subscription |issn=2163-3827 |access-date=2024-12-29}} |
|||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
Line 274: | Line 290: | ||
{{Sister project links|commons=Category:Polyamory|v=no|n=no|s=no|b=no|voy=no}} |
{{Sister project links|commons=Category:Polyamory|v=no|n=no|s=no|b=no|voy=no}} |
||
'''Polyamory-related media''' |
'''Polyamory-related media''' |
||
*[ |
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtdsZ8B7JQY TEDx Talk: Polyamory] |
||
*{{curlie|Society/Relationships/Alternative_Lifestyles/Polyamory/}} |
|||
'''Polyamory-related media coverage''' |
'''Polyamory-related media coverage''' |
||
* [ |
* [https://polyinthemedia.blogspot.com/ Polyamory in the News] (2005–present) |
||
'''Research and articles''' |
'''Research and articles''' |
||
Line 284: | Line 299: | ||
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20110722071434/http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/library/Pdf/Polyamory%20Bibliography.pdf Polyamory Bibliography] from the Kinsey Institute. |
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20110722071434/http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/library/Pdf/Polyamory%20Bibliography.pdf Polyamory Bibliography] from the Kinsey Institute. |
||
'''Guides''' |
|||
{{Navboxes |
|||
* [http://www.paganicon.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/A-Boquet-of-Lovers.pdf A Bouquet of Lovers] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210925190807/https://paganicon.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/A-Boquet-of-Lovers.pdf |date=September 25, 2021 }} – Example of prescriptive use of primary/secondary terminology |
|||
|list = |
|||
{{Close relationships navbox}} |
{{Close relationships navbox}} |
||
{{Close plural relationships}} |
{{Close plural relationships}} |
||
Line 291: | Line 307: | ||
{{Human sexuality and sexology}} |
{{Human sexuality and sexology}} |
||
{{Sexual identities}} |
{{Sexual identities}} |
||
{{Bisexuality topics}} |
|||
{{LGBT|selected=identities|orientation=yes|state=collapsed|main=expanded}} |
|||
}} |
|||
[[Category:Interpersonal relationships]] |
[[Category:Interpersonal relationships]] |
Latest revision as of 00:29, 30 December 2024
Parent category | Non-monogamy |
---|---|
Subcategories | Polyfidelity |
Other terms | |
Associated terms | |
Part of a series on |
Non-monogamy and polyamory |
---|
Polyamory (from Ancient Greek πολύς (polús) 'many' and Latin amor 'love') is the practice of, or the desire for, romantic relationships with more than one partner at the same time, with the informed consent of all partners involved. Some people who identify as polyamorous believe in consensual non-monogamy with a conscious management of jealousy and reject the view that sexual and relational exclusivity (monogamy) are prerequisite for deep, committed, long-term, loving relationships.[1] Others prefer to restrict their sexual activity to only members of the group, a closed polyamorous relationship that is usually referred to as polyfidelity.[2][3]
Polyamory has come to be an umbrella term for various forms of non-monogamous, multi-partner relationships, or non-exclusive sexual or romantic relationships.[4][5][6] Its usage reflects the choices and philosophies of the individuals involved, but with recurring themes or values, such as love, intimacy, honesty, integrity, equality, communication, and commitment.[7][8] It can often be distinguished from some other forms of ethical non-monogamy in that the relationships involved are loving intimate relationships, as opposed to purely sexual relationships.[9]
Terminology
[edit]The word polyamorous first appeared in an article by Morning Glory Zell-Ravenheart, "A Bouquet of Lovers", published in May 1990 in Green Egg Magazine, as "poly-amorous".[10] In May 1992, Jennifer L. Wesp created the Usenet newsgroup alt.polyamory, and the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) cites the proposal to create that group as the first verified appearance of the word.[10] In 1999, Zell-Ravenheart was asked by the editor of the OED to provide a definition of the term, and she provided it for the UK version as "the practice, state or ability of having more than one sexual loving relationship at the same time, with the full knowledge and consent of all partners involved."[11] The words polyamory, polyamorous, and polyamorist were added to the OED in 2006.[12]
Some reference works define polyamory as a relational form (whether interpersonal or romantic or sexual) that involves multiple people with the consent of all the people involved, like Oxford Living Dictionaries, Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary and Thesaurus, and Dictionary.com.[13][14][15][16] Some criticized the Merriam-Webster definition of polyamory, which defines the term as "the state or practice of having more than one open romantic relationship at a time,"[17] as missing a "vital component": consent.[18]
The word polyamory combines the Greek word for "many" (poly) and the Latin word for "love" (amor).[19] Polyamory is not generally included in the LGBT umbrella because it's not a sexuality or a gender identity.[20]
As a practice
[edit]Consensual non-monogamy, which polyamory falls under,[21] can take many different forms, depending on the needs and preferences of the individual(s) involved in any specific relationship(s). As of 2019, over one fifth of the United States population has, at some point in their lives, engaged in some sort of consensual non-monogamy.[22]
Separate from polyamory as a philosophical basis for relationships are the practical ways in which people who live polyamorously arrange their lives and handle certain issues, as compared to those of a more conventional monogamous arrangement.[1] People of different sexual orientations are a part of the community and form networks of relationships, with consent and agreement of their partners.[23][24][25] Many things differentiate polyamory from other types of non-monogamous relationships. It is common for swinging and open couples to maintain emotional monogamy while engaging in extra-dyadic sexual relations.[26]
The friend or partner boundary in monogamous relationships and other forms of non-monogamy is typically fairly clear. Unlike other forms of non-monogamy, though, "polyamory is notable for privileging emotional intimacy with others."[9] Benefits of a polyamorous relationship might include:[27] the ability of individuals to discuss issues with multiple partners, potentially mediating and thus stabilizing a relationship, and reducing polarization of viewpoints, and emotional support and structure from other committed adults within the familial unit. Other benefits include a wider range of adult experience, skills, resources, and perspective and support for companionate marriages, which can be satisfying even if no longer sexually vital, since romantic needs are met elsewhere. This acts to preserve existing relationships.[28]
The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction estimated that there were half-a-million "openly polyamorous families" in the United States in July 2009.[29][30] Additionally, 15–28% of heterosexual couples and about half of gay and bisexual people have a "non-traditional" arrangement of some kind as reported in The Guardian in August 2013.[31] Polyamorous communities have been said to be outwardly feminist as women were central to the creation of such communities and gender equality is a central tenet.[29] For those who are polyamorous, social distancing, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, created ripples in existing relationships, leading some to split apart and others to struggle to maintain their connections with one another.[32][33][34]
Fidelity and loyalty
[edit]A large percentage of polyamorists define fidelity not as sexual exclusivity, but as faithfulness to the promises and agreements made about a relationship.[35][36][37] As a relational practice, polyamory sustains a vast variety of open relationship or multi-partner constellations, which can differ in definition and grades of intensity, closeness and commitment.[38] Specifically, polyamory can take the forms of a triad[a] of three people in an intimate relationship, a poly family of more than three people, one person as the pivot point of a relationship (a "vee"), a couple in a two-person relationship which portrays other relationships on their own, and various other intimate networks of individuals.[24][29][39] There are also those who are swingers and engage in polyamory, or engage in poly-dating.[39] A poly family is sometimes called kitchen table polyamory,[40] a style of polyamory in which all members of a particular polycule are comfortable and connected enough with each other that it is not uncommon for them to literally gather around the kitchen table, as they may spend holidays, birthdays, or other important times together as a large group. This style places an emphasis on family-style connections, and not all members are necessarily sexually or romantically involved with every other person in the group.[41][42] Other styles of polyamory include parallel polyamory, where members of individual relationships prefer not to meet or know details of their partners' other relationships,[41][42] solo polyamory defines non-monogamous individuals who do not want a primary partner[43] and may resist the "relationship escalator" (an idea that relationships must follow a progression, or "escalator" from dating, to being exclusive, to becoming engaged, getting married, and having children).[44][45] For some, polyamory functions as an umbrella term for the multiple approaches of 'responsible non-monogamy'.[38] A secret sexual relationship that violates those accords would be seen as a breach of fidelity. Polyamorists generally base definitions of commitment on considerations other than sexual exclusivity, e.g., "trust and honesty" or "growing old together".[46] In an article in Men's Health, Zachary Zane states that commitment in a polyamorous relationship means that "you will be there for that person", supporting them, taking care of them, and loving them.[47]
Communication and negotiation
[edit]Because there is no "standard model" for polyamorous relationships, and reliance upon common expectations may not be realistic, polyamorists advocate explicitly negotiating with all involved to establish the terms of their relationships, and often emphasize that this should be an ongoing process of honest communication and respect. Polyamorists typically take a pragmatic approach to their relationships; many accept that sometimes they and their partners will make mistakes and fail to live up to these ideals, and that communication is important for repairing any breaches.[48][49] They also argue that polyamory is a response to challenges of relationships of a monogamous nature.[29]
Trust, honesty, dignity, and respect
[edit]Polyamory has been defined as loving more than one person at once, with respect, trust, and honesty for all partners involved.[48][49][50] Ideally, a partner's partners are accepted as part of that person's life rather than merely tolerated, and usually a relationship that requires deception or a "don't-ask-don't-tell" policy is seen as a less than ideal model. Out additionally described polyamory as "not a sexuality" but as actually "having multiple intimate relationships".[51]
Non-possessiveness
[edit]Some polyamorists view excessive restrictions on other deep relationships as less than desirable, as such restrictions can be used to replace trust with a framework of ownership and control. It is usually preferred or encouraged that a polyamorist strive to view their partners' other significant others, often referred to as metamours or OSOs,[52] in terms of the gain to their partners' lives rather than a threat to their own (compersion). Therefore, jealousy and possessiveness are generally viewed not so much as something to avoid or structure the relationships around, but as responses that should be explored, understood, and resolved within each individual, with compersion as a goal.[53] This is related to one of the types of polyamory, which is non-hierarchical, where "no one relationship is prioritized above the rest"[24] and the fact that polyamorists insist on working through problems in their relationships "through open communication, patience, and honesty."[29]
Compersion
[edit]Compersion is a term coined by members of the polyamorous community to describe an empathetic state of happiness and joy experienced when another individual experiences happiness and joy.[54][55][56] In the context of polyamorous relationships, it describes positive feelings experienced by an individual when their intimate partner is enjoying another relationship.[50][57][58] It has been variously described as "the opposite or flip side of jealousy",[59] analogous to the "joy parents feel when their children get married",[60] and a "positive emotional reaction to a lover's other relationship".[42] The term is traced to the Kerista Commune in San Francisco.[58][61][62]
Difficulties
[edit]Morin (1999) and Fleckenstein (2014) noted that certain conditions are favorable to good experiences with polyamory, but that these differ from the general population.[63][64] Heavy public promotion of polyamory can have the unintended effect of attracting people to it for whom it is not well-suited. Unequal power-dynamics, such as financial dependence, can also inappropriately influence a person to agree to a polyamorous relationship against their true desires. Even in more equal power-dynamic relationships, the reluctant partner may feel coerced into a proposed non-monogamous arrangement due to the implication that if they refuse, the proposer will pursue other partners anyway, will break off the relationship, or that the one refusing will be accused of intolerance and not being open-minded.[65]
Polyamorous relationships present practical pitfalls. One common complaint from participants is time management, as more partners means one must divide one's time and attention between them, leaving less for each.[66] Related is that the complexity of the arrangement can lead to so much effort being spent on the relationship that personal, individual needs can be overlooked.[9] The strong emphasis on communication can unintentionally marginalize partners who are less articulate.[9] Finally, negotiating the sometimes complex rules and boundaries of these relationships can be emotionally taxing, as can reconciling situations where one partner goes outside those boundaries.[9][66]
Scientific study of psychological well-being and relationship satisfaction for participants in polyamory has been limited due to mostly being a "hidden population". While some results could be interpreted as positive, these findings often suffer from bias and methodological issues.[67] A significant number of studies rely on small samples, often recruited from referrals, snowball-sampling, and websites devoted to polyamory.[67] Individuals recruited in this manner tend to be relatively homogeneous in terms of values, beliefs, and demographics, which limits the generalizability of the findings. These samples also tend to be self-selecting toward individuals with positive experiences, whereas those who found polyamory to be distressing or hurtful might be more reluctant to participate in the research.[67] Most of the studies rely entirely on self-report measures. Generally, self-reports of the degree of well-being and relationship satisfaction over time are flawed, and are often based on belief rather than actual experience.[67] Self-report measures are also at risk of self-enhancement bias, as subjects may feel pressure to give positive responses about their well-being and relationship satisfaction in the face of stereotype threat.[67]
Legal issues
[edit]Parenting
[edit]In 1998, a Tennessee court granted guardianship of a child to her grandmother and step-grandfather, after the child's mother April Divilbiss and partners outed themselves as polyamorous on MTV. After contesting the decision for two years, Divilbiss eventually agreed to relinquish her daughter, acknowledging that she was unable to adequately care for her child and that this, rather than her polyamory, had been the grandparents' real motivation in seeking custody.[68]
In 2017, three men became the first family in the state of California to have names of three fathers on their child's birth certificate.[69]
In June 2018, a court in Newfoundland and Labrador recognized three unmarried adults as legal parents of a child who was born within the polyamorous family they had formed; this was believed to be a first for Canadian law. The three adults included the child's mother and two men; the child's biological father was unknown.[70]
In November 2020, the issue of polyamory came to the Supreme Court of Vermont in the form of a dispute between two men and a woman in a polyamorous relationship.[71]
In April 2021, a British Columbia Supreme Court justice declared a woman was the third legal parent in a polyamorous "triad".[72]
Domestic partnerships
[edit]In 2016, writer Rebecca Ruth Gould called for non-monogamy, including polyamory, to receive "the legal recognition it deserves", saying that polyamory remains a "negative identity".[73]
In June 2020, the city council of Somerville, Massachusetts, voted to recognize polyamorous domestic partnerships in the city, becoming the first American city to do so. This measure was passed so that those in a polyamorous relationship would have access to their partners' health insurance amid the COVID-19 pandemic.[74][75][76][77]
In March 2021, the Cambridge, Massachusetts City Council approved an ordinance amending the city's laws, stipulating that "a domestic partnership needn't only include two partners."[78][79][80] The measure was supported by the Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition, also known as PLAC, composed of the Chosen Family Law Center, Harvard Law School LGBTQ+ Advocacy Clinic, and some members on the American Psychological Association's Committee on Consensual Non-Monogamy. This ordinance was originally proposed in July 2020.[81][82] In April 2021, the adjacent town of Arlington, Massachusetts, approved domestic partnerships of more than two people through a motion at Town Meeting. Any motion approved at Arlington's Town Meeting is subject to review and approval from the state Attorney General's office;[83] by early January 2022 that office (the office of Maura Healey) approved it.[84]
Anti-discrimination law
[edit]People in polyamorous relationships sometimes receive punishment at work when they are open about their relationships.[85]
In 2010, Ann Tweedy, a legal scholar, argued that polyamory could be considered a sexual orientation under existing United States law.[86] This argument was opposed by Christian Keese, who wrote in 2016 that advocating a "sexual orientation model of polyamory is likely to reduce the complexity and transformative potential of poly intimacies," while also limiting the reach and scope of possible litigation, obstructing the ability of poly activists to form alliances with other groups, and increasing the possibility that poly activists will have to settle for legal solutions which are "exclusive and reproductive of a culture of privilege".[87]
In March 2023, the city of Somerville, Massachusetts passed an ordinance prohibiting discrimination against polyamorous people in employment and policing.[85]
In April 2024, Oakland City Council passed legislation banning discrimination based on family and relationship structure in businesses, civil services, and housing.[88]
In May 2024, Berkeley, California passed a law banning discrimination on the basis of relationship and family structure in businesses, city services, and housing.[89]
Marriage implications
[edit]Most western countries do not recognize polygamous marriages, and consider bigamy a crime. Several countries also prohibit people from living a polygamous lifestyle. This is the case in some states of the United States where the criminalization of a polygamous lifestyle originated as anti-Mormon laws, although they are rarely enforced.[90] Having multiple non-marital partners, even if married to one, is legal in most U.S. jurisdictions; at most it constitutes grounds for divorce if the spouse is non-consenting, or feels that the interest in a further partner has destabilized the marriage. In some jurisdictions, like North Carolina, a spouse can sue a third party for causing "loss of affection" in or "criminal conversation" (adultery) with their spouse,[91] while more than twenty states in the US have laws against adultery, although they are infrequently enforced; the Supreme Court's ruling in Lawrence v. Texas did not explicitly hold such laws to be unconstitutional but its reasoning may imply that conclusion.[92]
Polyamory, however, is on a continuum of family-bonds that includes group marriage[93] and it does not refer to bigamy as long as no claim to being married in formal legal terms is made.[94][95] The Social History of the American Family: An Encyclopedia (2014, edited by Marilyn J. Coleman and Lawrence H. Ganong) stated that under existing U.S. federal law, a polyamorous relationship is legal in all 50 states while polygamy is not.[96] On November 23, 2011, the Supreme Court of British Columbia ruled that the anti-polygamy law of Canada does not affect unformalized polyamorous households; this is why Polyamory Day is celebrated every year on November 23.[97] Even so, those in polyamorous relationships often face legal challenges when it comes to custody, morality clauses, adultery and bigamy laws, housing, and where they live.[98]
In 2012, legal scholar Deborah Anapol called for the revision of existing U.S. laws against bigamy to permit married persons to enter into additional marriages, provided that they have first given legal notice to their existing marital partner or partners, with a "dyadic networks" model.[99] In 2015, another legal scholar, Ronald C. Den Otter, wrote in the Emory Law Journal (in the article "Three May Not Be a Crowd: The Case for a Constitutional Right to Plural Marriage") that in the United States the constitutional rights of due process and equal protection fully support marriage rights for polyamorous families.[100]
During a PinkNews question-and-answer session in May 2015, Redfern Jon Barrett questioned Natalie Bennett, leader of the Green Party of England and Wales, about her party's stance toward polyamorous marriage rights. Bennett responded by saying that her party is "open" to discussion on the idea of civil partnership or marriages between three people.[101] Bennett's announcement aroused media controversy on the topic and led to major international news outlets covering her answer.[102][103] A follow-up article written by Barrett was published by PinkNews on May 4, 2015, further exploring the topic.[104] In most countries, it is legal for three or more people to form and share a sexual relationship (subject sometimes to laws against homosexuality or adultery if two of the three are married). With only minor exceptions no developed countries permit marriage among more than two people, nor do the majority of countries give legal protection (e.g., of rights relating to children) to non-married partners. Individuals involved in polyamorous relationships are generally considered by the law to be no different from people who live together, or "date", under other circumstances. In 2017, John Alejandro Rodriguez, Victor Hugo Prada, and Manuel Jose Bermudez became Colombia's first polyamorous family to have a legally recognized relationship,[105] though not a marriage, as by Colombian law, marriage is between two people, so they instead called it a "special patrimonial union".[106][107] Some have called for domestic partnership laws to be expanded to include polyamorous couples[108] and have said that marriage-like entitlements should apply to such couples.[109]
Prevalence
[edit]Research into the prevalence of polyamory has been limited. A comprehensive government study of sexual attitudes, behaviors and relationships in Finland in 1992 (age 18–75, around 50% female and male) found that around 200 out of 2250 (8.9%) respondents "agreed or strongly agreed" with the statement "I could maintain several sexual relationships at the same time" and 8.2% indicated a relationship type "that best suits" at the present stage of life would involve multiple partners. By contrast, when asked about other relationships at the same time as a steady relationship, around 17% stated they had had other partners while in a steady relationship (50% no, 17% yes, 33% refused to answer).[110]
The article What Psychology Professionals Should Know About Polyamory (by Geri Weitzman) based on a paper presented at the 8th Annual Diversity Conference in March 1999 in Albany, New York, states that while openly polyamorous relationships are relatively rare there are "indications that private polyamorous arrangements within relationships are actually quite common."[111] They also note, citing 1983 study of 3,574 married couples in their sample that "15–28% had an understanding that allows nonmonogamy under some circumstances," with percentages are higher among "cohabitating couples (28%), lesbian couples (29%) and gay male couples (65%)." According to Jessica Fern, a psychologist and the author of Polysecure: Attachment, Trauma and Consensual Nonmonogamy, as of September 2020, about 4% of Americans, nearly 16 million people, are "practising a non-monogamous style of relationship".[112] A study by Amy C. Moors, Amanda N. Gesselman and Justin R. Garcia published on 23 March 2021 and using a sample of 3,438 individuals has shown that 10.7% of the sample were engaged in a polyamorous relationship at some point in their life, and 16.8% reported a desire to try or be in one. The study also revelated a correlation between educational background and polyamory, showing lesser-educated male individuals were more likely to engage or having been engaged in polyamorous relationships. These findings indicate that the number of Americans who have engaged in polyamorous relationships is significantly higher than previously thought.[113]
Acceptance by religions
[edit]The Oneida Community in the 1800s in New York (a Christian religious commune) believed strongly in a system of free love known as a complex marriage,[114] where any member was free to have sex with any other who consented.[115] In 1993, the archives of the community were made available to scholars for the first time. Contained within the archives was the journal of Tirzah Miller,[116] Noyes' niece, who wrote extensively about her romantic and sexual relations with other members of Oneida.[117]
Some Christians are polyamorous, but mainstream Christianity does not accept polyamory.[118] In 2017, the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, an evangelical Christian organization, released a manifesto on human sexuality known as the "Nashville Statement". The statement was signed by 150 evangelical leaders, and includes 14 points of belief.[119] Among other things, it states, "We deny that God has designed marriage to be a homosexual, polygamous, or polyamorous relationship."[120]
Some Jews are polyamorous, but mainstream Judaism does not accept polyamory. However, in 2000, Rabbi Jacob Levin came out as polyamorous to his synagogue's board in California without losing his job as rabbi.[121] As well, in his book A Guide to Jewish Practice: Volume 1 – Everyday Living (2011), Rabbi David Teutsch wrote, "It is not obvious that monogamy is automatically a morally higher form of relationship than polygamy," and that if practiced with honesty, flexibility, egalitarian rules, and trust, practitioners may "live enriched lives as a result".[122] In 2013, Sharon Kleinbaum, the senior rabbi at Congregation Beit Simchat Torah in New York, said that polyamory is a choice that does not preclude a Jewishly observant and socially conscious life.[123] Some polyamorous Jews point to biblical patriarchs having multiple wives and concubines as evidence that polyamorous relationships can be sacred in Judaism.[124] An email list is dedicated to polyamorous Jews; it is called AhavaRaba, which roughly translates to "big love" in Hebrew,[125] and which echoes God's "great" or "abounding" love mentioned in the Ahava rabbah prayer.[126]
LaVeyan Satanism is critical of Abrahamic sexual mores, considering them narrow, restrictive and hypocritical. Satanists are pluralists, accepting polyamorists, bisexuals, lesbians, gays, BDSM, transgender people, and asexuals. Sex is viewed as an indulgence, but one that should only be freely entered into with consent. The Eleven Satanic Rules of the Earth only give two instructions regarding sex: "Do not make sexual advances unless you are given the mating signal" and "Do not harm little children", though the latter is much broader and encompasses physical and other abuse. This has always been a consistent part of CoS policy since its inception in 1966. Magister Peter H. Gillmore wrote in an essay supporting same-sex marriage that some people try to suggest that their attitude on sexuality is "anything goes" even though they have a principle of "responsibility to the responsible".[127]
Unitarian Universalists for Polyamory Awareness, founded in 2001, has engaged in ongoing education and advocacy for greater understanding and acceptance of polyamory within the Unitarian Universalist Association.[128] At the 2014 General Assembly, two UUPA members moved to include the category of "family and relationship structures" in the UUA's nondiscrimination rule, along with other amendments; the package of proposed amendments was ratified by the GA delegates.[129]
Acceptance by non-religious organizations
[edit]In 2018, the Association of Humanistic Rabbis issued "A Statement on Sexual Ethics for the 21st Century", which states in part, "We commit to the freedom and empowerment of all adults to full consensual sexual expression, be it monogamous or polyamorous."[130]
In a clinical setting
[edit]In 2002, a paper titled Working with polyamorous clients in the clinical setting (by Joy Davidson) addressed various areas of inquiry. This included the importance of talking about alternatives to monogamy, how therapists can work with those who are exploring polyamory, basic understandings of polyamory, and key issues that therapists need to watch for in the course of working with polyamorous clients. Its conclusions were that "Sweeping changes are occurring in the sexual and relational landscape" (including "dissatisfaction with limitations of serial monogamy, i.e. exchanging one partner for another in the hope of a better outcome"); that clinicians need to start by "recognizing the array of possibilities that 'polyamory' encompasses" and "examine our culturally-based assumption that 'only monogamy is acceptable'" and how this bias impacts on the practice of therapy; the need for self-education about polyamory, basic understandings about the "rewards of the poly lifestyle" and the common social and relationship challenges faced by those involved, and the "shadow side" of polyamory, the potential existing for coercion, strong emotions in opposition, and jealousy. The paper also states that the configurations a therapist would be "most likely to see in practice" are individuals involved in primary-plus arrangements, monogamous couples wishing to explore non-monogamy for the first time, and "poly singles".[39]
In 2002, the rights of polyamorous people were added to the mission of the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom, an American sex-positive advocacy and educational organization;[131] a manual for psychotherapists who deal with polyamorous clients was published by them in September 2009, called What Psychotherapists Should Know About Polyamory (written by Geri Weitzman and others).[132][133]
The National Coalition for Sexual Freedom manages the Kink And Poly Aware Professionals Directory, which consists of an Internet directory of psychotherapeutic, medical, and other professionals who have volunteered to be contacted by people who are involved in polyamory (and/or BDSM, etc.).[134][135][136]
The Polyamory-Friendly Professionals Directory is a directory on the Internet "of professionals who are sensitive to the unique needs of polyamorous clientele"; it includes psychologists, therapists, medical professionals, and other professionals.[137]
Media representation
[edit]1970s to 2000s
[edit]The Gods Themselves is a 1972 novel by Isaac Asimov, a third of which is devoted to describing an alien race in an alien dimension where romantic relationships are usually composed of three individuals and where conception, and orgasm, is only possible during sexual intercourse between all three partners at the same time (i.e., a threesome).[138]
Starfire, also known as Princess Koriand'r, is a fictional superhero appearing in books published by DC Comics, who debuted in a preview story inserted within DC Comics Presents #26 (October 1980) and was created by Marv Wolfman and George Pérez;[139] she was shown to be a polyamorous character. Starfire was raised on the world of Tamaran where it was acceptable to have an open marriage. Some critics argue that after arriving on Earth, she remained sex-positive and free-thinking, remaining open to polygamous relationships, open sex, and pansexual "free-love" with anyone, often leading to conflict with Earth's more reserved culture and customs.[140][141] For Starfire, polyamory was a personal and cultural preference.[140]
In 1989, the anime series Ranma ½ included a polyamorous character, Tatewaki, who is in love with both Akane and the "Pigtail Girl" (Ranma's female form) and proposes to date both, but they do not return his feelings.[142]
Robert Jordan's fantasy book series The Wheel of Time, which began its run in 1990, is notable for its inclusion of various polyamorous relationships throughout the narrative. This includes the protagonist Rand al’Thor, who enters a romantic relationship with three women, Min, Aviendha and Elayne. The Aiel culture in the series also practice polyamory commonly.[143] The books also hinted at a relationship between Alanna and her (male) warders Ihvon and Maksim, but it was not explored in detail until the 2021 television adaptation.[144]
In 2002, the Futurama episode "A Taste of Freedom" showed Old Man Waterfall, who is Zoidberg's defense attorney until killed by a giant crab warship, having seven wives and one husband.[145] While Waterfall's case for Zoidberg is unsuccessful, the Supreme Court holds polygamy as legal, though this leads to jeers from spectators. The made-for-TV Futurama film, The Beast with a Billion Backs (published 2008), featured two polyamorous characters: Colleen O'Hallahan and Yivo. Colleen had five boyfriends, Fry, Chu, Ndulu, Schlomo and Bolt Rolands,[146][b] while Yivo is a planet-sized alien with no determinable gender, dating, then marrying all people of the universe at once.[147] Fry and Colleen eventually break up. Afterwards, Yivo remains in a relationship with Colleen.[148]
The 21st century brought various new forms of representation of polyamory. In 2007, Daniel Help Justice's book Dreyd featured Tarsa, a priestess, warrior, and bisexual woman, as part of a polyamorous love triad.[149] In 2009, Graham Nicholls founded www.polyamory.org.uk, the United Kingdom's first website about polyamory[150] and the Mom of Pina in Maria Pallotta-Chiarolli's novel, Love You Two was shown to be polyamorous and bisexual, leading Pina on a journey to explore the "complex spectrum of sex and love" in humanity itself.[149] In 2010, the series Lost Girl began. It included Bo Dennis, a bisexual succubus which must sustain herself by feeding from the life force of male and female Fae and humans, via oral intake or the energy created through sex. In the first two seasons she was involved romantically with Dyson (a heterosexual shapeshifter) and Lauren (a lesbian human). Later on, Bo tried to have a monogamous relationship with Lauren, with Bo and Lauren remaining in love with each other through ups and downs, and later accepting each other as a couple by the end of the series.[151][152]
Increased representation in the 2010s
[edit]Polyamorous characters appeared in various media in the 2010s. In the 2010 television show Caprica, several main characters are portrayed as being in a polyfidelitous-style marriage consisting of multiple men and women, with each member being equal socially and legally.[153] From 2012 to 2013, the American reality television series on the American pay television network Showtime, Polyamory: Married & Dating, was broadcast. It followed polyamorous families as they navigated the challenges presented by polyamory.[154][155][156] Around the same time, the webcomic Kimchi Cuddles began, which portrayed polyamorous people like other characters, "only with more partners to steal their blankets."[157] The following years featured a polyamorous captain in Jacqueline Koyanagi's novel, Ascension,[149] and three characters (Reese, David, and Amber) in a relationship in Malinda Lo's novel, Inheritance.[149] In 2011, American Horror Story: Hotel began, with Countess Elizabeth Johnson, played by Lady Gaga, beginning a relationship with famed film actor Rudolph Valentino and his wife, Natacha Rambova, as seen in episode seven.[158] The following year, the YouTube show The Gay and Wondrous Life of Caleb Gallo would show a couple working through their decision to convert from monogamy to polyamory,[159] like Brian Jordan Alvarez, who considers himself polyamorous.[160]
From 2015 to 2017, in the webcomic Always Human by Ari North, the parents of Sunati (Nisa and Prav) were shown to be in a polyamorous relationship with a man named Vish, who Nisa calls "our boyfriend".[161] In another webcomic, Unknown Lands, which began in 2015, Vard is shown to be polyamorous,[162] along with most of the cast having a queer sexual identity. The webcomic itself has environmental, feminist, and LGBTQ+ themes.[163] A few years later, the 2017 film Professor Marston and the Wonder Women focuses on the real-life polyamorous relationship between the professor, psychologist William Moulton Marston (the creator of Wonder Woman), his wife and research partner Elizabeth Holloway Marston, and their student, Olive Byrne, as they share a "workplace, a bed, a home and eventually a family."[164] Furthermore, fiction writer Cassandra Clare stated that Mark Blackthorn in The Dark Artifices book series would "definitely be open to a polyamorous relationship",[165] but would not cheat or lie, while noting that another such relationship between other characters would not be possible.[166] Eventually, he ends up in a polyamorous triangle, with a girlfriend and a boyfriend who are dating each other. Additionally, writer K. Ancrum confirmed that polyamorous characters were in two of her books (The Wicker King and The Weight of the Stars), but did not name any specific characters.[167] At the same time, Em, best friend of the protagonist in two books by Leigh Matthews (Don't Bang the Barista and Go Deep) is a bisexual woman dating a man in the first book, but by the second book she has "happily settled into a poly triad", wondering how she will get married.[149]
On May 29, 2017, in the last season of Steven Universe, Fluorite, a member of the Off Colors, a fusion of six different gems into one being, with fusion as the physical manifestation of a relationship, was introduced. This character reappeared in various episodes in the show's fifth season ("Lars Head", "Lars of the Stars", "Your Mother and Mine"), the season 5 finale, "Change Your Mind", along with one in Steven Universe Future ("Little Graduation") and in Steven Universe: The Movie,[168] with the latter two as non-speaking appearances. The series creator, Rebecca Sugar, confirmed that Fluorite is a representation of a polyamorous relationship at the show's Comic Con panel in San Diego.[169][170] Sugar said at the panel, and at another conference, that she was inspired after talking with children at an LGBTQ+ center in Long Beach, California, who wanted a polyamorous character in the show.[169][171][170] Steven Universe was not alone in this regard. The fourth season of BoJack Horseman, a mature animated series, featured a character named Hollyhock, the sister of the protagonist, who has eight adoptive fathers[c] in a polyamorous gay relationship.[172] The same year, Unicornland premiered, with eight-episode web series focusing on Annie's exploration into polyamory after her divorce.[173]
2018–present
[edit]Polyamory was the subject of the 2018 Louis Theroux documentary Love Without Limits, where Theroux travels to Portland, Oregon, to meet a number of people engaged in polyamorous relationships.[174] Also in 2018, 195 Lewis, a web series about a black lesbian couple dealing with their relationship being newly polyamorous,[175] received the Breakthrough Series – Short Form award from the Gotham Awards.[176] The series premiered in 2017 and ran for five episodes.[177] The same year, the comic Open Earth premiered. The comic is set in the future and monogamous relationships are seen as outdated to all the young people on board the space station, all of whom are polyamorous. Author Sarah Mirk said that she wanted to write a story where "open relationships can be really positive and wonderful" and said that it is realistic to believe that people would "explore multiple relationships".[178]
Trigonometry is an eight-part BBC TV drama series which started on March 15, 2020, and is about an existing couple being joined by a third person and forming a polyamorous relationship. The BBC said that Trigonometry is "A love story about three people who are made for each other."[179][180] In July 2021, Australian soap opera Neighbours explored polyamory with three of its main characters. Actress Jacinta Stapleton was proud to be involved in the story arc, stating: "I think we should always try to reflect real intimate relationships in our society. Polyamory certainly is a part of that. The more we represent the beautifully diverse nature and uniqueness of humans, the more people will feel accepted and seen."[181]
Polyamory-related observances
[edit]Metamour Day is celebrated every year on February 28. It celebrates the relationships people have with their metamours (partners' other significant others, often referred to as metamours or OSOs.[52])[182]
Polyamory Pride Day is celebrated every year on a day in Pride Month.[97]
Polyamory groups sometimes participate in pride parades.[183][184]
International Solo Polyamory Day is celebrated every year on September 24.[97]
Polyamory Day is celebrated every year on November 23; that day was chosen because on November 23, 2011, the Supreme Court of British Columbia ruled that the anti-polygamy law of Canada does not affect unformalized polyamorous households.[97]
Polyamory rights organizations
[edit]The Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association (CPAA) was founded in 2009. It "advocates on behalf of Canadians who practice polyamory. It [also] promotes legal, social, government, and institutional acceptance and support of polyamory, and advances the interests of the Canadian polyamorous community generally."[185][186]
The Organization for Polyamory and Ethical Non-monogamy (OPEN) was founded in the United States in 2022 as "a nonprofit organization dedicated to normalizing and empowering non-monogamous individuals and communities."[187][188]
The Polyamory Action Lobby (PAL) was founded in 2013 in Australia to fight cultural misconceptions about polyamorous people and to fight for their legal rights.[189]
The Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition (PLAC), based in the United States, "seeks to advance the civil and human rights of polyamorous individuals, communities, and families through legislative advocacy, public policy, and public education."[190][191]
The UK Polyamory Association (UKPA) was founded by Giulia Smith.[192] Its mission statement is, “The UK Polyamory Association exists to support the needs of polyamorous people and communities across the UK. We aim to increase public awareness and acceptance of polyamory, and challenge stigma through advocacy, positive representation, and education.”[193][194]
Unitarian Universalists for Polyamory Awareness (UUPA) was founded in 2001. It "has as its mission to serve the Unitarian Universalist Association and the community of polyamorous people within and outside the UUA by providing support, promoting education, and encouraging spiritual wholeness regarding polyamory."[128]
Opposition
[edit]Yasmin Nair, a co-founder of Against Equality, has criticized polyamory. She has stated that polyamorists are not inherently radical,[195] and said that the discourse around polyamory is unengaging and not liberating, only fetishizing a "peculiar form of monogamy...and long-term relationships".[196] In a 2013 article in The Guardian, Julie Bindel described polyamory a "co-opting and rebranding of polygamy". She argued that contemporary proponents of polyamory often overlooked gender dynamics and characterized it as a choice predominantly made by "overwhelmingly white, affluent, university-educated, and privileged folk".[197] The conservative National Review claimed that "widespread acceptance of polyamory could make society worse off" with supposed false notions of honesty.[198] Conor Friedersdorf, writing in The Atlantic in 2015, expressed his opposition to polyamorous civil marriages.[199]
Notable practitioners of polyamory
[edit]- Dossie Easton, co-author of The Ethical Slut and other works[200]
- Terisa Greenan, writer, actress, filmmaker, and creator of Family: the web series[201]
- Laurell K. Hamilton, writer, known for Anita Blake: Vampire Hunter[202]
- Janet Hardy, writer and sex educator, and founder of Greenery Press[203][204]
- Brenda Howard, bisexual rights activist[205]
- Willow Smith, American musician[206]
Gallery
[edit]-
The earliest polyamory pride flag design, created by Jim Evans in 1995.[207] The Greek letter Pi stands for the first letter in the word polyamory. Evans wanted a symbol that could be used without drawing wider attention.[208]
-
A polyamory pride flag designed by Red Howell. The design was chosen in 2022, selected from four candidates via an online survey conducted by the blog PolyamProud.[209][210]
-
The "infinity heart" is a widely used symbol of polyamory.[211]
See also
[edit]- Amatonormativity – Assumption that everyone prospers with an exclusive, romantic relationship
- Mononormativity – Social assumption of monogamous normativity
- Free love – Social movement that accepts all forms of love
- Group marriage – Three or more adults in a partnership
- Group sex – Sexual behavior involving more than two participants
- Ménage à trois – Romantic relationship with three partners
- Non-monogamy – Intimate relationship that is not strictly monogamous
- Open relationship – Interpersonal relationship to form of a non-monogamous relationship
- Polyamory in the United States
- Polyday – One-day convention/conference held in the UK, celebrating polyamory
- Polyfidelity – Form of non-monogamy
- Relationship anarchy – Belief that relationships should be unbound by rules except those with a mutual agreement
- Romantic orientation – Classification of a person's romantic attraction towards others
- Sociosexual orientation – Difference in the willingness to engage in sexual activity outside of a committed relationship
- Terminology within polyamory – Evolution and meaning of the word "polyamory" and related alternative definitions and concepts
Notes
[edit]- ^ The term "triad" for this type of arrangement was coined by Isaac Asimov in his 1972 novel The Gods Themselves.
- ^ Fry breaks up with Colleen and becomes the messenger of Yivo after he states that their relationship is not working out.
- ^ Dashawn Manheim, Steve Mannheim, Jose Guerrero, Cupe Robinson III, Otto Zilberschlag, Arturo "Ice Man" Fonzerelli, Gregory Hsung, and Quackers McQuack
References
[edit]- ^ a b Klesse, C. (2011). "Notions of love in polyamory: Elements in a discourse on multiple loving". Laboratorium. 3 (2): 4–25. Archived from the original on March 17, 2017. Retrieved December 27, 2016.
- ^ Miller, Timothy (1999). The 60s communes: hippies and beyond. Syracuse University Press. p. 135. ISBN 978-0-8156-0601-7. Archived from the original on November 7, 2013. Retrieved March 12, 2011.
- ^ Pines, Ayala; Aronson, Elliot (1981). "Polyfidelity: An alternative lifestyle without jealousy?". Journal of Family and Economic Issues. 4 (3): 373–392. doi:10.1007/BF01257945.
- ^ "Poly glossary". PolyMatchMaker.com. Archived from the original on July 6, 2017. Retrieved June 24, 2017.
- ^ Helen Echlin (November 14, 2003). "When two just won't do". The Guardian. Archived from the original on August 27, 2013. Retrieved March 27, 2007.
- ^ Schippers, Mimi (2017). Beyond Monogamy: Polyamory and the Future of Polyqueer Sexualities. NYU Press. Archived from the original on August 7, 2017. Retrieved August 6, 2017.
- ^ Haritaworn, J.; Lin, C.-J.; Klesse, C. (August 15, 2016). "Poly/logue: A Critical Introduction to Polyamory". Sexualities. 9 (5): 515–29. doi:10.1177/1363460706069963. S2CID 145274479.
Polyamory describes a form of relationship where it is possible, valid and worthwhile to maintain (usually long-term) intimate and sexual relationships with multiple partners simultaneously.
- ^ Klesse, C. (August 15, 2016). "Polyamory and its 'Others': Contesting the Terms of Non-Monogamy". Sexualities. 9 (5): 565–583. doi:10.1177/1363460706069986. S2CID 143812369.
- ^ a b c d e Brunning, Luke (2018). "The Distinctiveness of Polyamory". Journal of Applied Philosophy. 35 (3): 15–16. doi:10.1111/japp.12240. ISSN 0264-3758. S2CID 147982689. Archived from the original on October 25, 2020. Retrieved August 18, 2020.
- ^ a b Alan (January 6, 2007). ""Polyamory" enters the Oxford English Dictionary, and tracking the word's origins". Polyamory in the News!. Archived from the original on January 31, 2016. Retrieved January 27, 2016.
- ^ The Ravenhearts. "Frequently Asked Questions re: Polyamory". Archived from the original on March 24, 2010. Retrieved July 6, 2011.
- ^ "September 2006 update". The OED today. Oxford University Press. September 14, 2006. Archived from the original on December 28, 2015. Retrieved January 27, 2016.
- ^ "Definition of polyamory in US English". Oxford Living Dictionaries. Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on January 30, 2018. Retrieved January 29, 2018.
- ^ "Definition of polyamory in English". Oxford Living Dictionaries. Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on January 30, 2018. Retrieved January 29, 2018.
- ^ "Definition of "polyamory" – English Dictionary". Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary & Thesaurus. Cambridge University Press. Archived from the original on January 30, 2018. Retrieved January 29, 2018.
- ^ "Polyamory -- Definition of Polyamory at Dictionary.com". Dictionary.com. 2020. Archived from the original on November 11, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ "Polyamory--Definition of Polyamory by Merriam-Webster". Merriam-Webster. 2020. Archived from the original on August 3, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Kassel, Gabrielle (July 24, 2019). "Here's What a Polyamorous Relationship Actually Is—and What It Isn't". Shape magazine. Archived from the original on June 6, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Orfanidis, Georgios A. (December 27, 2019). "Polyamory (Polygamy and Polyandry)". In Leeming, David A. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion. Springer. pp. 1–4. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27771-9_200097-1. ISBN 978-3-642-27771-9. S2CID 239527267. Archived from the original on March 10, 2022. Retrieved December 27, 2020 – via Springer Link.
- ^ "Why isn't polyamory included in LGBTQ?". Polyamory Advice. July 6, 2018. Retrieved March 5, 2024.
- ^ Sheff, Elisabeth A. (July 26, 2018). "What Is the Difference Between Polyamory and Polygamy?". Psychology Today. Archived from the original on December 25, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Haupert, M. L.; Gesselman, Amanda N.; Moors, Amy C.; Fisher, Helen E.; Garcia, Justin R. (July 4, 2017). "Prevalence of Experiences With Consensual Nonmonogamous Relationships: Findings From Two National Samples of Single Americans". Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 43 (5): 424–440. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2016.1178675. ISSN 0092-623X. PMID 27096488. S2CID 6855648.
- ^ Ficher, Nancy; Seidman, Steven, eds. (2016). "Contesting the Culture of Monogamy". Introducing the New Sexuality Studies (third ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. p. 326.
- ^ a b c Weitzman, Geri (2006). "Therapy with Clients Who Are Bisexual and Polyamorous". Journal of Bisexuality. 6 (1–2): 137–164. doi:10.1300/J159v06n01_08. S2CID 143967318. Archived from the original on March 18, 2015. Retrieved December 4, 2006.
- ^ Strassberg, Maura I. "The Challenge Of Post-Modern Polygamy: Considering Polyamory" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on May 24, 2006.
- ^ Barker & Langdridge 2012, p. 71, Swinging: Pushing the Boundaries of Monogamy?.
- ^ "Polyamory 101". PolyamoryOnline. 2007. Archived from the original on September 28, 2007. Retrieved April 27, 2007.
- ^ "The Chicago School of Professional Psychology" (PDF). ego.thechicagoschool.edu. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 19, 2013. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
- ^ a b c d e Bennett, Jessica (July 29, 2009). "Polyamory: The Next Sexual Revolution?". Newsweek. Archived from the original on November 4, 2020. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
- ^ Newitz, Annalee (July 7, 2006). "Love Unlimited: The Polyamorists". New Scientist. Archived from the original on November 9, 2020. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
- ^ Penny, Laurie (August 20, 2013). "Being polyamorous shows there's no 'traditional' way to live". The Guardian. Archived from the original on November 12, 2020. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
- ^ Iovine, Anna (April 19, 2020). "What it's like to be polyamorous during the coronavirus quarantine". Mashable. Archived from the original on April 19, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Smith, Gabrielle (August 7, 2020). "9 Ways Non-Monogamous People Are Dealing With the Pandemic". Self. Archived from the original on November 29, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Migdal, Alex (June 14, 2020). "Polyamory during a pandemic? It's complicated". CBC News. Archived from the original on August 9, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Zhu, Jingshu (January 2018). "We're Not Cheaters: Polyamory, Mixed-Orientation Marriage and the Construction of Radical Honesty" (PDF). Social Science. 14 (1). Archived (PDF) from the original on February 28, 2021. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Sudeep, Theres (November 28, 2020). "In Bengaluru, many couples are exploring polyamory". Deccan Herald. Bangalore, Karnataka, India. Archived from the original on December 4, 2020. Retrieved December 11, 2020.
- ^ Cook, Elaine (December 12, 2005). "Commitment in Polyamory". Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality. 8. Archived from the original on November 27, 2020. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
- ^ a b Klesse, Christian (February 5, 2014). "Polyamory: Intimate practice, identity or sexual orientation?" (PDF). Sexualities. 17 (1–2): 81. doi:10.1177/1363460713511096. S2CID 144546531. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 29, 2021. Retrieved March 12, 2020.
- ^ a b c Davidson, Joy (April 16, 2002). "Working with Polyamorous Clients in the Clinical Setting". Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality. 5. Archived from the original on September 19, 2020. Retrieved December 23, 2020. Also delivered to the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, Western Regional Conference, April 2002.
- ^ Slone, Isabel B. (June 9, 2020). "How a polyamorous Toronto man is managing his four romantic relationships remotely". Toronto Life. Archived from the original on July 2, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ a b Bergdall, Melissa K.; Blumer, Markie L. C. (January 2, 2015). "More Than Two: A Practical Guide to Ethical Polyamory, by Franklin Veaux and Eve Rickert". Journal of Feminist Family Therapy. 27 (1): 40–45. doi:10.1080/08952833.2015.1005963. ISSN 0895-2833. S2CID 143233814.
- ^ a b c Veaux, Franklin; Rickert, Eve (2014). More than two : a practical guide to ethical polyamory. Thorntree Press. ISBN 9780991399703. OCLC 878396611.
- ^ Zimmerman, Kevin J. (July 2012). "Clients in Sexually Open Relationships: Considerations for Therapists". Journal of Feminist Family Therapy. 24 (3): 272–289. doi:10.1080/08952833.2012.648143. ISSN 0895-2833.
- ^ Sheff, Elisabeth A. (October 14, 2013). "Solo Polyamory, Singleish, Single & Poly". Psychology Today. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Dodgson, Lindsay (February 19, 2019). "There's a dark side of polyamory that nobody talks about". Insider. Archived from the original on June 25, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Cook, Elaine (2005). "Commitment in Polyamorous Relationships". Archived from the original on October 4, 2006. Retrieved July 10, 2006.
- ^ Zane, Zachary (December 9, 2020). "I'm in a Loving, Committed Relationship. I'm Also Polyamorous". Men's Health. Archived from the original on December 16, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ a b From PolyOz glossary: "Not in the [linguistic roots of the term] but very important is the commitment to honesty with all partners, and openly negotiated ground rules." Scm-rpg.com Archived February 27, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ a b From sexuality.org: "Two of the cultural cornerstones of the polyamory community are honesty and communication: it's expected that you and your existing long-term partner(s) will have talked over what you're comfortable with and what you aren't comfortable with, and that nobody is going around behind anyone else's back."
- ^ a b McCullough, Derek; Hall, David S. (February 27, 2003). "Polyamory – What it is and what it isn't". Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality. 6. Archived from the original on December 10, 2020. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
- ^ Street, Mikelle (December 3, 2020). "YungBlud Opens Up About Sexuality, Talks Male Hookups". Out. Archived from the original on December 3, 2020. Retrieved December 14, 2020.
- ^ a b "Black and Poly Dictionary". Black and Poly. November 13, 2017. Archived from the original on July 1, 2019. Retrieved May 10, 2010.
- ^ Attridge, Mark (February 4, 2013). "Jealousy and Relationship Closeness". SAGE Open. 3 (1): 215824401347605. doi:10.1177/2158244013476054.
- ^ Balzarini, Rhonda N.; McDonald, James N.; Kohut, Taylor; Lehmiller, Justin J.; Holmes, Bjarne M.; Harman, Jennifer J. (May 1, 2021). "Compersion: When Jealousy-Inducing Situations Don't (Just) Induce Jealousy". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 50 (4): 1311–1324. doi:10.1007/s10508-020-01853-1. ISSN 1573-2800. PMID 34041641.
- ^ Thouin-Savard, Marie I.; Flicker, Sharon M. (2023). "Compersion". In Shackelford, Todd K. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Sexual Psychology and Behavior. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–7. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-08956-5_2472-1. ISBN 978-3-031-08956-5. Retrieved August 17, 2024.
- ^ Buczel, Klara Austeja; Szyszka, Paulina D.; Mara, Izu (July 1, 2024). "Exploring Compersion: A Study on Polish Consensually Non-Monogamous Individuals and Adaptation of the COMPERSe Questionnaire". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 53 (8): 3285–3307. doi:10.1007/s10508-024-02930-5. ISSN 1573-2800. PMC 11335843. PMID 38951409.
- ^ Sheff, Elisabeth (December 17, 2013). "Jealousy and Compersion with Multiple Partners – How polys deal with jealousy and feel happy when their lover loves someone else". Psychology Today. Archived from the original on October 31, 2019. Retrieved June 28, 2014.
- ^ a b "Polyamory Society Glossary". Archived from the original on August 7, 2013. Retrieved December 26, 2006.
- ^ "PolyOz | Compersion | Poly Terms and Concepts". Archived from the original on November 1, 2012.
- ^ InnKeeper, Joreth. "The Inn Between". Archived from the original on April 10, 2014. Retrieved March 31, 2014.
- ^ Anapol, Deborah M (1997). Polyamory: The New Love Without Limits. San Rafael, CA: IntinNet Resource Center. pp. 49–64.
- ^ Taormino 2008, p. 217.
- ^ Shernoff, M (2006). "Negotiated nonmonogamy and male couples" (PDF). Family Process. 45 (4): 407–18. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2006.00179.x. ISSN 0014-7370. PMID 17220111. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 29, 2013.
- ^ Fleckenstein, James R.; Cox, Derrell W. (November 18, 2014). "The association of an open relationship orientation with health and happiness in a sample of older US adults". Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 30 (1): 94–116. doi:10.1080/14681994.2014.976997. ISSN 1468-1994. S2CID 144311126.
Regression analyses suggest that the factors which predict better health and happiness differ between the general population and those who participate in consensually non-exclusive sexual relationships
- ^ Sizemore, Kayla M.; Olmstead, Spencer B. (October 6, 2017). "Willingness of Emerging Adults to Engage in Consensual Non-Monogamy: A Mixed-Methods Analysis". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 47 (5): 1423–1438. doi:10.1007/s10508-017-1075-5. ISSN 0004-0002. PMID 28986760. S2CID 4030065.
The final reason given by those in the 'Willing' group was that their engagement in CNM would be a sacrifice for their partner or for their relationship. This group of participants indicated that despite their own lack of desire to engage in CNM, they would be willing to try CNM for their partner or their relationship.
- ^ a b Masters, Robert (2011). Transformation through intimacy : the journey toward awakened monogamy. Berkeley, Calif: North Atlantic Books. pp. 23–25. ISBN 978-1-58394-388-5. OCLC 793850748.
- ^ a b c d e Rubel, Alicia N.; Bogaert, Anthony F. (September 4, 2014). "Consensual Nonmonogamy: Psychological Well-Being and Relationship Quality Correlates". The Journal of Sex Research. 52 (9): 961–982. doi:10.1080/00224499.2014.942722. ISSN 0022-4499. PMID 25189189. S2CID 36510972.
- ^ Divilbiss, April (October 2000). "PolyFamily Child Custody Case Ends After 2 Year Battle..." Polyamory Society. Archived from the original on August 26, 2005. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Feldman, Jamie (December 23, 2020). "This Throuple Made History With Their First Child. Here's What Their Lives Are Like". HuffPost. Archived from the original on March 2, 2021. Retrieved March 13, 2021.
- ^ MacDonald, Michael (June 14, 2018). "3 adults in polyamorous relationship declared legal parents by N. L. court". CBC News. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ "SCOV Law Blog: Court decides parentage issue in divorce involving polyamory". VTDigger. November 6, 2020. Archived from the original on November 24, 2020. Retrieved December 14, 2020.
- ^ Labbé, Stefan (April 28, 2021). "B.C. judge declares woman third legal parent in polyamorous 'triad'". Times Colonist. Archived from the original on August 28, 2021. Retrieved August 28, 2021.
- ^ Gould, Rebecca Ruth (August 15, 2016). "Love Without Monogamy". OpenDemocracy. Archived from the original on August 29, 2019. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
- ^ Stening, Tanner (July 1, 2020). "Somerville City Council passes ordinance recognizing polyamorous domestic partnerships". masslive. Archived from the original on July 2, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Taliesin, Julia. "Somerville votes to recognize polyamorous domestic partnerships. It is one of the first in nation". MetroWest Daily News, Framingham, MA. Archived from the original on July 1, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ McNamara, Audrey (July 3, 2020). "Massachusetts city officially recognizes polyamorous relationships". CBS News. Archived from the original on November 7, 2020. Retrieved December 14, 2020.
- ^ Greenberg, Zoe (July 2, 2020). "Somerville's new polyamory-friendly policy a 'turning point'". Boston Globe. Archived from the original on October 25, 2020. Retrieved December 14, 2020.
- ^ Brown, Elizabeth Nolan (March 10, 2021). "Cambridge Will Recognize Polyamorous Partnerships and Other Domestic Arrangements With More Than 2 Adults". Reason.com. Archived from the original on March 10, 2021. Retrieved March 13, 2021.
- ^ "Cambridge City Council meeting - March 8, 2021 - AGENDA". Cambridge Civic Journal. March 8, 2021. Archived from the original on March 10, 2021. Retrieved March 13, 2021. This is a publication run by a man named Robert Winters, who is a civic watcher of the Cambridge, MA government.
- ^ Adams, Diana; Chen, Alexander (March 9, 2021). "Cambridge Becomes 2nd US City to Legalize Polyamorous Domestic Partnerships" (PDF) (Press release). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 9, 2021. Retrieved March 13, 2021.
- ^ Levy, Marc (July 28, 2020). "Law acknowledging polyamorous relationships takes step forward, two councillors holding back". Cambridge Day. Archived from the original on November 1, 2020. Retrieved December 14, 2020.
- ^ "POR 2020 #180 The City Manager be and hereby is requested to confer with the City of Cambridge Law Department to review the above changes to the language of the Domestic Partnerships Ordinance and report back to the Council. Passed to a Second Reading in Council July 27, 2020. To Be Ordained on or After September 14, 2020". Cambridge, Massachusetts. 2020. Archived from the original on December 14, 2020. Retrieved December 14, 2020.
- ^ Collings, Jesse. "Town Meeting approves domestic partnership for relationships with more than two people". Wicked Local. Archived from the original on May 13, 2021. Retrieved May 13, 2021.
- ^ Murphy, Pat (January 6, 2022). "AG upholds town's recognition of 'polyamorous' relationships | Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly". Archived from the original on December 25, 2022. Retrieved December 25, 2022.
- ^ a b Meredith Goldstein (March 23, 2023). "Somerville celebrates another first for polyamorous people". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on March 24, 2023. Retrieved March 24, 2023.
- ^ Tweedy, Ann (October 2011). "Polyamory as a sexual orientation". University of Cincinnati Law Review. 79 (4): 1461–1515. Archived from the original on August 24, 2020. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
- ^ Keese, Christian (2016). "Marriage, Law and Polyamory. Rebutting Mononormativity with Sexual Orientation Discourse?". Oñati Socio-legal Series. 6 (6): 1348. Archived from the original on April 22, 2018. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ McClurg, Lesley (May 31, 2024). "Polyamorous families are recognized and protected in Oakland, CA". NPR. Retrieved June 1, 2024.
- ^ Markovich, Ally (May 22, 2024). "Berkeley law extends legal protections to polyamorous people and non-nuclear families". Berkeleyside.
- ^ Turley, Jonathan (October 3, 2004). "Polygamy laws expose our own hypocrisy". USA Today. Archived from the original on July 22, 2012. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Ruby Deaton Pharr, v. Joyce W. Beck, 554 S.E.2d COA01-3 (North Carolina Court of Appeals November 20, 2001).
- ^ Grossman, Joanna (December 16, 2003). "Punishing Adultery in Virginia". Findlaw. Archived from the original on November 27, 2018. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Francoeur, Robert T. (2004). "United States: Interpersonal Heterosexual Behaviors". In Francoeur, Robert T.; Noonan, Raymond J. (eds.). The Continuum Complete International Encyclopedia of Sexuality. London: A&C Black. pp. 1205–1206. ISBN 9780826414885. Archived from the original on March 10, 2022. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Constantine, Larry L. (1974). Group Marriage: A Study of Contemporary Multilateral Marriage. Collier Books. ISBN 978-0020759102. Archived from the original on March 10, 2022. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Crawford, Alison (September 14, 2016). "Canadian polyamorists face unique legal challenges, research reveals". CBC. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Martinez, Michelle (2014). "Polygamy". In Ganong, Lawrence H.; Coleman, Marilyn J. (eds.). The Social History of the American Family: An Encyclopedia. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications. p. 1048. ISBN 978-1452286150. Archived from the original on March 10, 2022. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ a b c d "Polyamory Day - Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association". Archived from the original on January 22, 2021. Retrieved December 26, 2020.
- ^ Sheff, Elisabeth A. (January 18, 2014). "The Five Most Common Legal Issues Facing Polyamorists". Psychology Today. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Anapol, Deborah (2012). Polyamory in the 21st Century: Love and Intimacy with Multiple Partners. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 9781442200227. Archived from the original on September 26, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Den Otter, Ron. "Three May Not Be a Crowd: The Case for a Constitutional Right to Plural Marriage". Emory Law Journal. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 30, 2015. Retrieved June 27, 2015.
- ^ McCormick, Joseph (May 1, 2015). "Natalie Bennett is 'open' to polyamorous marriages and civil partnerships". PinkNews. Archived from the original on June 20, 2015. Retrieved June 20, 2015.
- ^ Holehouse, Matthew (May 1, 2015). "Greens 'open' to three-person marriage, says Natalie Bennett". Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on March 16, 2018. Retrieved June 20, 2015.
- ^ Ashton, Emily (May 1, 2015). "The Green Party Is "Open" To Legalizing Three-Way Marriages". BuzzFeed. Archived from the original on December 24, 2016. Retrieved June 20, 2015.
- ^ Barrett, Redfern (May 4, 2015). "Comment: Why polyamorous marriages are the next step to equality". PinkNews. Archived from the original on July 2, 2015. Retrieved June 20, 2015.
- ^ Reynolds, Daniel (June 15, 2017). "Three Gay Men Make History by Marrying in Colombia". The Advocate. Archived from the original on June 16, 2017. Retrieved June 16, 2017.
- ^ Brodzinski, Sibylla (July 3, 2017). "Colombia legally recognizes union between three men". The Guardian. Archived from the original on September 13, 2018. Retrieved September 13, 2018.
- ^ Taylor-Coleman, Jasmine (July 20, 2017). "Polyamorous marriage: Is there a future for three-way weddings?". BBC News. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Dryden, J. Boone (2015). "This Is the Family I Chose: Broadening DomesticPartnership Law to Include Polyamory". Hamline University's School of Law's Journal of Public Law and Policy. 36 (1): 162–188. Archived from the original on March 6, 2022. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Brake, Elizabeth (2013). "Recognizing Care: The Case for Friendship and Polyamory". Syracuse Journal of Law & Civic Engagement. 14 (1). Archived from the original on April 8, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Finnish Sex Survey 1992 Archived September 10, 2008, at the Wayback Machine (PDF)
- ^ "What Psychology Professionals Should Know About Polyamory". polyamory.org. Archived from the original on April 9, 2005. Retrieved March 26, 2005.
- ^ Kavanagh, Jess (September 19, 2020). "Building bridges: How polyamory made me a better friend, lover and person". Irish Times. Archived from the original on October 3, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Moors, Amy (March 23, 2021). "Desire, Familiarity, and Engagement in Polyamory: Results From a National Sample of Single Adults in the United States". Frontiers in Psychology. 12: 619640. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.619640. PMC 8023325. PMID 33833712.
- ^ Foster, Lawrence (January 2010). "Free Love and Community: John Humphrey Noyes and the Oneida Perfectionists". In Pitzer, Donald E. (ed.). America's Communal Utopias. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. pp. 253–278. ISBN 978-0807846094. Archived from the original on January 30, 2022. Retrieved December 25, 2020.
- ^ Stoehr, Taylor (1979). Free Love in America: A Documentary History. New York: AMS Press, Inc. ISBN 9780404160340.
- ^ Herrick, Tirzah Miller; Fogarty, Robert S. (2000). Fogarty, Robert S. (ed.). Desire and Duty at Oneida: Tirzah Miller's Intimate Memoir. Bloomington Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. ISBN 9780253213624. OCLC 247762494.
- ^ Chmielewski, Wendy E. (2001). "Reviewed work: Desire and Duty at Oneida: Tirzah Miller's Intimate Memoir, Robert S. Fogarty". Utopian Studies. 12 (1): 176–178. ISBN 9780815621690. JSTOR 20718260. OCLC 5542766034.
- ^ "Multiple intimate relationships: a summary of liberated Christians' views". Liberated Christians. Archived from the original on October 15, 2015. Retrieved August 25, 2015.
- ^ Meyer, Holly (August 29, 2017). "More than 150 evangelical religious leaders sign 'Christian manifesto' on human sexuality". USA Today. Archived from the original on August 30, 2017. Retrieved August 30, 2017.
- ^ Meyer, Holly (August 30, 2017). "What is the Nashville Statement and why are people talking about it?". USA Today. Archived from the original on August 31, 2017. Retrieved August 31, 2017.
- ^ Goldstein, Sarah (February 2007). "A Modest Proposal for the "Vanishing American Jew"". Heeb Magazine. Archived from the original on August 19, 2020.
Rabbi Jacob Levin, 62, is an exception. When he came out to his synagogue's board seven years ago, his disclosure was met with a mix of confusion and dismay.
- ^ Teutsch, David (2011). A Guide to Jewish Practice: Volume 1 – Everyday Living. RRC Press. pp. 217–227. ISBN 978-0938945185.
- ^ "Polyamorous Jews seek acceptance". Haaretz. Jewish Telegraphic Agency. October 12, 2013. Archived from the original on March 19, 2015. Retrieved November 21, 2014.
- ^ Lavin, Talia (March 10, 2013). "Married and dating: Polyamorous Jews share love, seek acceptance". Jewish Telegraphic Agency. Archived from the original on October 12, 2013. Retrieved June 16, 2017.
- ^ "Married and dating: Polyamorous Jews share love, seek acceptance". Jewish Telegraphic Agency. October 10, 2013. Archived from the original on October 12, 2013. Retrieved October 13, 2013.
- ^ Hoffman, Lawrence, ed. (1997). My People's Prayer Book: The Sh'ma and its blessings. Jewish Lights Publishing. p. 69. ISBN 9781879045798.
- ^ "Founding Family: "Morality" versus Same-Sex Marriage". Church of Satan. Archived from the original on October 27, 2013. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ a b "UUPA website". Archived from the original on December 5, 2019. Retrieved December 17, 2019.
- ^ "Unitarian Universalist Association: Rule II, Section C-2.3.: Non-discrimination". Archived from the original on May 18, 2015.
- ^ "A Statement on Sexual Ethics for the 21st Century". humanisticrabbis. Archived from the original on January 27, 2021. Retrieved February 11, 2021.
- ^ "History of NCSF". National Coalition for Sexual Freedom. 2020. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Weitzman, Geri; et al. (2009). What psychotherapists should know about polyamory (PDF). Baltimore, Maryland: National Coalition for Sexual Freedom. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 26, 2013. Retrieved September 8, 2010.
- ^ Adrianne L. Johnson (2010). "Counseling the Polyamorous Client: Implications for Competent Practice" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on December 25, 2020.
- ^ David M. Ortmann; Richard A. Sprott (November 15, 2012). Sexual Outsiders: Understanding BDSM Sexualities and Communities. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 137–. ISBN 978-1-4422-1737-9. Archived from the original on March 10, 2022. Retrieved March 3, 2021.
- ^ "Kink Aware Professionals (KAP) – Sex-Positive Support for Kink and Nonmonogamy". Archived from the original on March 27, 2021. Retrieved March 3, 2021.
- ^ "Welcome to the New Kink And Poly Aware Professionals Directory (KAP)". Kink Aware Professionals (KAP). Archived from the original on March 27, 2021. Retrieved March 3, 2021.
- ^ "Polyamory-Friendly Professionals Directory: Search". www.polyfriendly.org. Archived from the original on May 6, 2021. Retrieved March 26, 2021.
- ^ Asimov, Isaac (1972). The Gods Themselves. New York: Doubleday. ISBN 0-385-02701-X
- ^ Cowsill, Alan; Irvine, Alex; Korte, Steve; Manning, Matt; Wiacek, Win; Wilson, Sven (2016). The DC Comics Encyclopedia: The Definitive Guide to the Characters of the DC Universe. DK Publishing. p. 284. ISBN 978-1-4654-5357-0.
- ^ a b Century, Sara (October 18, 2018). "Why Starfire's polyamory matters". Syfy Wire. Archived from the original on February 3, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Schenkel, Katie (June 24, 2016). "The Case For Pansexual Starfire [Pride Week]". ComicsAlliance. Archived from the original on February 3, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Yadao, Jason S. (2009). The Rough Guide to Manga. London: Rough Guides. p. 178. ISBN 9781858285610. Archived from the original on March 10, 2022. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Butler, Leigh (December 13, 2016). "The Wheel of Time Reread Redux: The Shadow Rising, Part 10". Reactor.
- ^ "The Wheel of Time boss talks exploring polyamory in season 2 and beyond". Winter is Coming. May 4, 2022.
- ^ Handlen, Zack (June 25, 2015). "Futurama: "A Taste Of Freedom"/"Bender Should Not Be Allowed On Television"". The A.V. Club. Archived from the original on November 4, 2019. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ O'Connor, Stuart (May 16, 2008). "Futurama: The Beast With a Billion Backs (DVD)". ScreenJabber. Archived from the original on June 4, 2017. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
Fry decides to move in with Colleen [despite]...after making the horrifying discovery that he is merely one of the five boyfriends she shares her apartment with.
- ^ Callan, Jonathan (June 25, 2008). "REVIEW - Futurama: The Beast with a Billion Backs". CBR. Archived from the original on August 1, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
The first act parallels the rip in space with the introduction of Fry's new girlfriend, Colleen (voiced by Brittany Murphy), whom Fry soon discovers has four **other** boyfriends. This serves as a thematic lead-in to the plot that tackles notions of polygamous love head-on...It's in the third act, where humanity moves in with Yeevo, that the film really becomes something special...after being exposed as a randy bachelor, Yevo confesses: "Granted, at first I wished only to bang out a cheap one with your universe. But it's your own fault. Your universe dresses provocatively.""
- ^ Handlen, Zack (August 27, 2015). "Futurama: The Beast With A Billion Backs". The A.V. Club. Archived from the original on December 25, 2019. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
...while it's neat for Fry's relationship to Colleen to eventually end with Yivo deciding Colleen, with her group relationships, is the only person to really understand him, that doesn't make Colleen into a better written character, and it doesn't make Fry's romantic struggles more interesting in their own right.
- ^ a b c d e Stepaniuk, Casey (November 16, 2016). "8 Books with Queer Polyamorous Characters". Book Riot. Archived from the original on August 1, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ "Meet the polyamorists – a growing band of people who believe". The Independent. October 22, 2011. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Igarashi, Hayley (March 25, 2014). "The ABCs of Doccubus, TV's Steamy Succubus Romance". Zimbio. Archived from the original on June 29, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Liszewski, Bridget (March 12, 2018). "Lost Girl's Anna Silk is Eager to Reunite with Cast Mates and Meet Fans at ClexaCon 2018". The TV Junkies. Archived from the original on October 7, 2018. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Newitz, Annalee (February 22, 2010). "Is Caprica the Big Love Of Science Fiction?". Archived from the original on April 11, 2021. Retrieved March 15, 2021.
- ^ Juzwiak, Rich (June 26, 2013). "Showtime's Polyamory Is Trashy, Profound and the Best Reality Show on TV". Gawker. Archived from the original on January 23, 2013. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Fraser, Jeff (September 21, 2012). "Polyamory: Exploring the ins and outs of multiple partners". The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on October 28, 2018. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ "Polyamory: Married & Dating official website". Showtime. 2020. Archived from the original on June 4, 2018. Retrieved August 1, 2020.
- ^ Wong, Britany (January 5, 2017). "10 Comics That Show What Polyamorous Love Is Really Like". HuffPost. Archived from the original on February 8, 2019. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Hanks, E. A. (November 19, 2015). "'American Horror Story' Season 5, Episode 7: Gods and Monsters". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 28, 2017. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Byrne, Catie (June 26, 2016). "The Gay and Wondrous Life of Caleb Gallo". The Carolinian (newspaper). Archived from the original on August 1, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
Dubbed by fans as the "throuple scene," this unusual sort of tit for tat homoerotic and polyamorous sexuality encapsulates the dynamic humor and sexual fluidity between characters on the show.
- ^ Horowitz, Steven J. (June 26, 2016). "Chatting With "Gay and Wondrous Life of Caleb Gallo" Creator Brian Jordan Alvarez". Paper Magazine. Archived from the original on October 24, 2019. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
I never want to be monogamous and I'm always falling into this super lovey-dovey kind of love with guys, and then they think that it's implied monogamy when in fact, the texture of my love is monogamous, but my mental and sexual desires are polyamorous.
- ^ Ari North (w, a). "Here Goes Nothing" Always Human, vol. 2, no. 69 (April 7, 2017). Webtoon. Archived from the original on April 11, 2021. Retrieved on December 24, 2020. "Always Human - [Season 2] 69 - Here Goes Nothing". Archived from the original on April 11, 2021. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - ^ Rosi, Kämpe (September 11, 2015). "Cast". Unknown Lands the comic series. Archived from the original on February 22, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ otterchild (September 23, 2016). "Backstage Pass September: Rosi Kampe". The Strip Show, a Webcomic Revue. Archived from the original on February 2, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Smith, Anna (November 16, 2017). "How movies brought polyamory into the mainstream". The Guardian. Archived from the original on June 16, 2019. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Clare, Cassandra (July 11, 2015). "Hi Cassie, I wanted to say thank you for these..." Cassandra Clare's official Tumblr. Archived from the original on May 30, 2017. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Clare, Cassandra (July 18, 2015). "Clockworks and triads". Cassandra Clare's official Tumblr. Archived from the original on July 18, 2015. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ K. Ancrum (2020). "Author F.A.Q". K. Ancrum's official website. Archived from the original on October 2, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Sugar, Rebecca (director), Jones-Quartey, Ian (Writer), Brewster, Miki (Writer), Abrams, Lamar (Writer) (September 2, 2019). Steven Universe: The Movie [Steven Universe: The Movie] (TV Movie). United States: Cartoon Network. Event occurs at 8 PM. B07W8HR413. Archived from the original (Prime video) on December 31, 2019. Retrieved December 31, 2019.
- ^ a b Brown, Tracy (July 21, 2017). "'Steven Universe's' Rebecca Sugar confirms Fluorite is a representation of a polyamorous relationship". L.A. Times. Archived from the original on December 31, 2019. Retrieved December 31, 2019.
- ^ a b Kelley, Shamus (August 1, 2017). "Steven Universe: 9 Things We Learned". Den of Geek. Archived from the original on December 31, 2019. Retrieved December 31, 2019.
- ^ slai (August 9, 2017). "SDCC 2017: The "Steven Universe" Panel". Anime Superhero. Archived from the original on December 31, 2019. Retrieved December 31, 2019.
- ^ Nickalls, Sammy (September 21, 2017). "The Tricky Problem With Hollyhock in 'BoJack Horseman' Season 4". Dot and Line. Archived from the original on March 27, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
The adopted daughter of eight polyamorous fathers, she [Hollyhock] informs him [Bojack] right off the bat that she's not looking for a ninth dad in BoJack—who, thanks to the results of a Todd-facilitated DNA test, she believes to be her biological father.
- ^ Novick, Ilana (April 10, 2017). "TV Is Finally Starting to Get Polyamory Right". Vice News. Archived from the original on May 7, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Mangan, Lucy (November 4, 2018). "Altered States: Love Without Limits review – Louis Theroux treads his tightrope". The Guardian. Archived from the original on November 7, 2018. Retrieved November 7, 2018.
- ^ Lao, Sameer (November 17, 2017). "A Black Queer Couple Candidly Explores Polyamory in '195 Lewis'". ColorLines. Archived from the original on April 17, 2019. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Rachel Montpelier. "2018 Gotham Awards: Wins for Chloé Zhao's "The Rider," "Killing Eve," Elsie Fisher, & More". Women and Hollywood. Archived from the original on November 28, 2018. Retrieved November 27, 2018.
- ^ "195 Lewis Online Premiere!! — 195 Lewis". 195lewis.com. November 16, 2017. Archived from the original on November 27, 2018. Retrieved November 27, 2018.
- ^ Mirk, Sarah (January 30, 2019). "Erotic Sci-Fi Graphic Novel "Open Earth" Explores Polyamory In Space" (Online). Interviewed by Isabel. Bust. Archived from the original on January 30, 2019. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ "Trigonometry". BBC News. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved August 27, 2020.
- ^ "When is polyamory drama Trigonometry on BBC Two? What is it about?". Radio Times. March 15, 2020. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved August 27, 2020.
- ^ Lee, Jess (July 19, 2021). "Neighbours' Ned Willis suggests polyamorous relationship in new storyline". Digital Spy. Archived from the original on August 16, 2021. Retrieved August 16, 2021.
- ^ "Metamour Day is February 28!". National Coalition for Sexual Freedom. 2020. Archived from the original on July 30, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2020.
- ^ "When you have 2 lovers, the holidays can be tricky". www.theconversation.com. December 18, 2018. Archived from the original on June 2, 2020. Retrieved December 30, 2020.
- ^ staff, Renee Yan, The Shorthorn (April 5, 2017). "Studies find polyamory appeals to some". The Shorthorn. Archived from the original on February 13, 2021. Retrieved December 30, 2020.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Alan M. (November 11, 2010). "Polyamory in the News: As Canadian poly case nears, publicity ramps up". Polyinthemedia. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved April 29, 2020.
- ^ "About". Polyadvocacy.ca. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ "Mission". OPEN. Archived from the original on April 4, 2023. Retrieved June 21, 2022.
- ^ Safronova, Valeriya (June 17, 2022). "Non-Monogamy Advocates Ask Facebook to Be More Open". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 14, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2022.
- ^ Marshall, Jason (February 6, 2013). "Polyamorists set up lobby group". Archived from the original on August 4, 2021. Retrieved December 30, 2020.
- ^ "Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition". Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition. Archived from the original on March 24, 2021. Retrieved March 24, 2021.
- ^ "Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition". www.facebook.com. Archived from the original on April 29, 2021. Retrieved April 29, 2021.
- ^ "From open relationships to polycules: Is monogamy over?".
- ^ "Welcome to the UK Polyamory Association - UKPA". June 27, 2022.
- ^ "UKPA Mission Statement & What We Do - UKPA". June 27, 2022.
- ^ Ben Udashen (March 2, 2019). "Content Warning: Bunker w/ Yasmin Nair (3.2.19)". Unpopular Front (Podcast). Listen Notes. Archived from the original on December 27, 2020. Retrieved December 27, 2020.
- ^ Nair, Yasmin (January 19, 2012). "Newt Gingrich: Polyamorist?". Yasmin Nair's official website. WordPress. Archived from the original on December 27, 2020. Retrieved December 27, 2020.
- ^ Bindel, Julie (August 26, 2013). "Rebranding polyamory does women no favors". The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 27, 2020. Retrieved December 27, 2020.
- ^ Frost, Daniel; Boyd, Hal (January 7, 2010). "The Counterfeit 'Honesty' of Polyamory". National Review. Archived from the original on December 27, 2020. Retrieved December 27, 2020.
- ^ Friedersdorf, Conor (July 9, 2015). "The Case Against Encouraging Polygamy". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 27, 2020. Retrieved December 27, 2020.
- ^ Beckerman, Marty (April 23, 2009). "The Ethical Slut Returns". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on May 13, 2017. Retrieved June 29, 2012.
- ^ Rahner, Mark (March 9, 2009). "Seattle-based 'Family' webisodes no ordinary sexy sitcom". The Seattle Times. Archived from the original on June 12, 2022. Retrieved June 14, 2020.
- ^ "What Polyamory is, and What Polyamory isn't". April 1, 2015. Archived from the original on October 6, 2022. Retrieved June 12, 2022.
- ^ Sachie Godwin, Clamor Magazine, "Perfect Bound". Archived from the original on April 5, 2010. Retrieved March 20, 2010., issue 17, 2002
- ^ "about the author". slutandsons.com. July 14, 2020. Archived from the original on July 6, 2022. Retrieved March 3, 2021.
- ^ "Brenda Howard | LGBTHistoryMonth.com". lgbthistorymonth.com. Archived from the original on July 12, 2015. Retrieved October 4, 2014.
- ^ "Willow Smith comes out as polyamorous — and reveals the 'only' reason she'd get married". TODAY.com. April 28, 2021. Archived from the original on January 17, 2024. Retrieved November 23, 2022.
- ^ Walsh, Matthias (June 17, 2022). "What does the polyamorous flag look like?". LGBTQ Nation. Archived from the original on June 25, 2022. Retrieved June 25, 2022.
- ^ Schumer, Lizz (May 16, 2022). "21 LGBTQ Flags and What They Symbolize". Good Housekeeping. Archived from the original on June 23, 2022. Retrieved June 25, 2022.
- ^ "LGBTQ Agenda: New polyamorous flag is revealed". Bay Area Reporter.
- ^ "New Tricolor Polyamory Pride Flag". November 23, 2022. Archived from the original on November 23, 2022. Retrieved November 27, 2022.
- ^ West, Alex (February 6, 2001). "A List of Poly Symbols". Archived from the original on June 8, 2011. Retrieved May 11, 2002.
variations on Pi-and-the-three-colors the ILIC symbol ... The symbol that started this category, Jim Evans' Poly Pride Flag. He has put this image in the public domain ... "ILIC" stands for Infinite Love in Infinite Combinations (a reference to Star Trek's IDIC credo --- the D in the Star Trek version stands for "Diversity").
Sources
[edit]- Barker, Meg; Langdridge, Darren (2012). Understanding non-monogamies. New York: Routledge. ISBN 9780415652964. OCLC 574760499, 1107788606.
- Taormino, Tristan (2008). Opening Up: A Guide to Creating and Sustaining Open Relationships. San Francisco, Calif: Cleis Press. ISBN 978-1573444972. OCLC 701109107.
Further reading
[edit]- Anapol, Deborah M. (1997). Polyamory: The New Love Without Limits: Secrets of Sustainable Intimate Relationships. San Rafael: IntiNet Resource Center. ISBN 978-1-880789-08-7.
- Antalffy, Nikó; Houston, Lola D. (2016). "Polyamory". The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies. doi:10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss136. ISBN 978-1-4051-9694-9. OCLC 933432480.
- Bloedel, Abbi; Manning, Jimmie (2017). "Exploring polyamory online: Ethics, relationships and understanding". In Nixon, Paul G.; Düsterhöft, Isabel K. (eds.). Sex in the Digital Age. London: Routledge. pp. 195–211. doi:10.4324/9781315446240-15. ISBN 978-1-315-44622-6. OCLC 1001338082. Partial preview at Google Books.
- Brunning, Luke (2018). "The Distinctiveness of Polyamory". Journal of Applied Philosophy. 35 (3): 513–531. doi:10.1111/japp.12240. ISSN 0264-3758. JSTOR 26811073. OCLC 7799693841.
- Brunning, Luke (2022). "Polyamory: The Future of Love?". In Grahle, André; McKeever, Natasha; Saunders, Joe (eds.). Philosophy of Love in the Past, Present, and Future. New York: Routledge. p. 150–163. doi:10.4324/9781003014331. ISBN 978-1-003-01433-1. OCLC 1273727672. Partial preview at Google Books.
- Cardoso, Daniel; Pascoal, Patricia M.; Maiochi, Francisco Hertel (2021). "Defining Polyamory: A Thematic Analysis of Lay People's Definitions" (PDF). Archives of Sexual Behavior. 50 (4): 1239–1252. doi:10.1007/s10508-021-02002-y. ISSN 0004-0002. OCLC 9053599511. PMC 8321986. PMID 34046765.
- Cutas, Daniela (February 15, 2013). "Polyamory". The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley. pp. 1–4. doi:10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee827. ISBN 978-1-4051-8641-4.
- Easton, Dossie; Liszt, Catherine (1997). The Ethical Slut: A Guide to Infinite Sexual Possibilities. Greenery Press. ISBN 978-0-307-79048-4. OCLC 933473102. The Ethical Slut: A Guide to Infinite Sexual Possibilities at the Internet Archive
- Gupta, Shivangi; Tarantino, Mari; Sanner, Caroline (2024). "A scoping review of research on polyamory and consensual non‐monogamy: Implications for a more inclusive family science". Journal of Family Theory & Review. 16 (2): 151–190. doi:10.1111/jftr.12546. ISSN 1756-2570. OCLC 10077848078.
- Hnatkovičová, D.; Bianchi, G. (2022). "Model of motivations for engaging in polyamorous relationships". Sexologies. 31 (3): 184–194. doi:10.1016/j.sexol.2022.03.003. ISSN 1158-1360. OCLC 9510963844.
- Kaldera, Raven (2005). agan Polyamory: Becoming a Tribe of Hearts. Woodbury, MN: Llewellyn. ISBN 978-0-7387-0762-4. OCLC 60742176.
- Klesse, Christian (2015). "Polyamory". In Whelehan, Patricia; Bolin, Anne (eds.). The International Encyclopedia of Human Sexuality. Vol. 2. pp. 861–1042. doi:10.1002/9781118896877.wbiehs352. ISBN 978-1-4051-9006-0. OCLC 907684392.
- Labriola, Kathy (2010). Love in Abundance: A Counselor's Advice on Open Relationships. Eugene, OR: Greenery Press. ISBN 978-0-937609-47-7. OCLC 793002426 – via Internet Archive.
- Milona, Michael; Weindling, Lauren (2024). "The Story of Romantic Love and Polyamory". Journal of Applied Philosophy. doi:10.1111/japp.12764. ISSN 0264-3758. OCLC 10395234777.
- Ravenscroft, Anthony (2004). Polyamory: Roadmaps for the Clueless and Hopeful: an Introduction on Polyamory. Santa Fe, NM: Fenris Brothers. ISBN 978-1-890109-53-0. OCLC 1392329517 – via Internet Archive.
- Sandbakken, Ella Marie; Skrautvol, Anita; Madsen, Ole Jacob (October 2, 2022). "'It's my definition of a relationship, even though it doesn't fit yours': living in polyamorous relationships in a mononormative culture". Psychology & Sexuality. 13 (4): 1054–1067. doi:10.1080/19419899.2021.1982755. ISSN 1941-9899. OCLC 10309887554.
- Schippers, Mimi (November 19, 2019). "Polyamory". The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. pp. 1–2. doi:10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosp047.pub2.
- Schippers, Mimi (2019). Polyamory, Monogamy, and American Dreams: The Stories We Tell about Poly Lives and the Cultural Production of Inequality. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-351-71711-3. OCLC 1110122489.
- Schubert, Katie A. (February 23, 2016). "Polyamory". Encyclopedia of Family Studies. pp. 1–3. doi:10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs090. ISBN 978-1-119-08562-1. OCLC 1006311930.
- Stewart, Kate L. (2013). The Open Relationship Handbook : Basic Tips and Tools for Navigating Non-Monogamy. Cork: BookBaby. ISBN 978-1-4835-0151-2. OCLC 898420526.
- Weitzman, Geri D. (2019). "Polyamory". In Lebow, Jay; Chambers, Anthony; Breunlin, Douglas C. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 2233–2236. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_495. ISBN 978-3-319-49423-4. OCLC 1129297823.
- Wilson, Jennifer (January 1–8, 2024). "Open Season • The rising popularity of polyamory". The New Yorker: 49–52. ISSN 0028-792X. Retrieved December 29, 2024.
A good love affair, when you're inside it, feels like it could change the world. But changing the world takes more than spreading the love; you have to spread the wealth, too. Maybe that's just utopian, hippie nonsense. But what can I say? I'm a romantic.
Earlier online version: Wilson, Jennifer (December 25, 2023). "How Did Polyamory Become So Popular?". The New Yorker. ISSN 2163-3827. Retrieved December 29, 2024.
External links
[edit]Polyamory-related media
Polyamory-related media coverage
- Polyamory in the News (2005–present)
Research and articles
- The Kenneth R. Haslam Collection on Polyamory hosted at the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction includes a wide variety of materials related to polyamory, along with research data.
- Polyamory Bibliography from the Kinsey Institute.
Guides
- A Bouquet of Lovers Archived September 25, 2021, at the Wayback Machine – Example of prescriptive use of primary/secondary terminology