Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Streamup (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Vote via XFD voting tool |
→Streamup: del |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*'''Delete''': Obscure website seeking publicity via Wikipedia. [[User:Ode+Joy|Ode+Joy]] ([[User talk:Ode+Joy|talk]]) 22:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''': Obscure website seeking publicity via Wikipedia. [[User:Ode+Joy|Ode+Joy]] ([[User talk:Ode+Joy|talk]]) 22:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC) |
||
* '''Delete''': The only in-depth source I could find was [https://mashable.com/article/streamup-will-kennan-departure this] Mashable article. It's a pretty low-quality source and [[WP:MULTSOURCES]] are required to satisfy [[WP:ORG]]. [[User:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d|Dr. Swag Lord]] ([[User talk:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d|talk]]) 09:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC) <!--VCB Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d--> |
* '''Delete''': The only in-depth source I could find was [https://mashable.com/article/streamup-will-kennan-departure this] Mashable article. It's a pretty low-quality source and [[WP:MULTSOURCES]] are required to satisfy [[WP:ORG]]. [[User:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d|Dr. Swag Lord]] ([[User talk:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d|talk]]) 09:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC) <!--VCB Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d--> |
||
* '''Delete''' any couple of kids can put up a web site with videos. the SEC database shows no company of that name, so no idea if it is still six employees. Seems way too soon. [[User:W Nowicki|W Nowicki]] ([[User talk:W Nowicki|talk]]) 22:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:00, 7 October 2021
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Streamup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Permastub showing no evidence of notability. Sole reference is a blog. The previous AFD was withdrawn on the basis of this Variety article, which is a single passing mention and definitely not sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH; a WP:BEFORE shows only press releases. Would need solid RS coverage to demonstrate WP:CORPDEPTH to keep. David Gerard (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: No evidence of notability, and that passing mention is certainly not enough. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Obscure website seeking publicity via Wikipedia. Ode+Joy (talk) 22:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: The only in-depth source I could find was this Mashable article. It's a pretty low-quality source and WP:MULTSOURCES are required to satisfy WP:ORG. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 09:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete any couple of kids can put up a web site with videos. the SEC database shows no company of that name, so no idea if it is still six employees. Seems way too soon. W Nowicki (talk) 22:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)