Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Streamup (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:12, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Streamup

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Permastub showing no evidence of notability. Sole reference is a blog. The previous AFD was withdrawn on the basis of this Variety article, which is a single passing mention and definitely not sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH; a WP:BEFORE shows only press releases. Would need solid RS coverage to demonstrate WP:CORPDEPTH to keep. David Gerard (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No evidence of notability, and that passing mention is certainly not enough. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Obscure website seeking publicity via Wikipedia. Ode+Joy (talk) 22:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The only in-depth source I could find was this Mashable article. It's a pretty low-quality source and WP:MULTSOURCES are required to satisfy WP:ORG. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 09:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete any couple of kids can put up a web site with videos. the SEC database shows no company of that name, so no idea if it is still six employees. Seems way too soon. W Nowicki (talk) 22:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nomMahdiar86 (talk) 21:48, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 02:06, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.