Jump to content

Talk:Phosphorescence: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
add title
 
Line 6: Line 6:
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Phosphorescence/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Phosphorescence/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}


===Completely random process===
[[User:Zaereth]] regarding your [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Phosphorescence&diff=prev&oldid=1222943785 edit]
[[User:Zaereth]] regarding your [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Phosphorescence&diff=prev&oldid=1222943785 edit]
:"On the atomic scale, temperature is a random process. At any given time some atoms will be extremely hot while others extremely cold. It's why coffee steams even though it's below the boiling point. Randomness increases as an object comes into thermal equilibrium, and any temperature is just an average of the random distribution."
:"On the atomic scale, temperature is a random process. At any given time some atoms will be extremely hot while others extremely cold. It's why coffee steams even though it's below the boiling point. Randomness increases as an object comes into thermal equilibrium, and any temperature is just an average of the random distribution."

Latest revision as of 00:16, 9 May 2024

Completely random process

[edit]

User:Zaereth regarding your edit

"On the atomic scale, temperature is a random process. At any given time some atoms will be extremely hot while others extremely cold. It's why coffee steams even though it's below the boiling point. Randomness increases as an object comes into thermal equilibrium, and any temperature is just an average of the random distribution."

Surely if this is an universally accepted fact, you will be able to provide a source? 178.143.40.241 (talk) 00:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]