User contributions for 178.143.40.241

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

00:2700:27, 9 May 2024 diff hist +2 Barium sulfate →Radiometric measurements
00:1600:16, 9 May 2024 diff hist +32 Talk:Phosphorescence add title current
00:1600:16, 9 May 2024 diff hist +663 Talk:Phosphorescence No edit summary Tag: New topic
00:0600:06, 9 May 2024 diff hist +153 Phosphorescence Undid revision 1222943785 by Zaereth (talk) The citation does not support your original research claim that this is a "completely random process". Namely, the cited source does not contain a single occurrence of the word "random" or "randomness" (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong; I only searched for the terms in my PDF viewer without reading the entire document). Tag: Undo
00:0300:03, 9 May 2024 diff hist +53 Phosphorescence Undid revision 1222944295 by Zaereth (talk) Your lovely little essay fails to address the fact that Joule (or electron-volt) is not a unit of force; it is a unit of energy (or work). If the article says the hole creates a *force* which can be measured in electron-volts, that statement is factually incorrect and must be rectified. This is a matter of fact, not opinion. Tag: Undo

21:0221:02, 2 May 2024 diff hist +146 Cycle detection →Gosper's algorithm: archive link
20:3620:36, 2 May 2024 diff hist −11 Cycle detection →Advantages: fix error in logical reasoning
20:1320:13, 2 May 2024 diff hist +756 Pigeonhole sort Put the example back. Examples are good. It is natural to learn from examples, we should not remove them. Let's stop making WP worse by removing good examples ok?