Jump to content

Talk:Scanners: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Automatically signing comment made by 71.252.130.253
Line 17: Line 17:
Thank god.[[User:203.53.167.180|203.53.167.180]] 08:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank god.[[User:203.53.167.180|203.53.167.180]] 08:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)


:::::: That is on Uncyclopedia. And it makes me laugh. Boom! <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.252.130.253|71.252.130.253]] ([[User talk:71.252.130.253|talk]]) 20:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::::: That is on Uncyclopedia. And it makes me laugh. Boom!


==Minor revert==
==Minor revert==

Revision as of 20:38, 3 September 2007

I think the Scanners remake has been cancelled. The page about it has disappeared from the IMDB, although I have yet to find any news proof that the remake isn't going to happen.--MythicFox 08:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's news that it's on again, hurrah. [1] --Ebyabe 15:03, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

Cant we get the pic of that scanner's head exploding near the start of the film?

Are we allowed to show that much violence? Bubble bunny
ROFL. No way. That is way too disgusting and gory for wikipedia. Waffle247 13:22, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank god.203.53.167.180 08:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is on Uncyclopedia. And it makes me laugh. Boom! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.252.130.253 (talk) 20:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Minor revert

Reverted vandalism that added bogus sequels.Rob Banzai 22:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ending?

It's possibly to interpret the ending in another way. You could see it as only one of them survived, and you are not sure which person is in the body, couldn't you?