Talk:Zhu Xueqin: Difference between revisions
m →Suggestions for someone with both Chinese & English fluency: Grammar & formatting changes. |
suggestion |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*There may well be parts of the English article that can get translated to the Chinese article, too. Unfortunately, I have no understanding of Chinese except what I can glean from [http://translate.google.com translate.google.com] |
*There may well be parts of the English article that can get translated to the Chinese article, too. Unfortunately, I have no understanding of Chinese except what I can glean from [http://translate.google.com translate.google.com] |
||
[[Mahalo]]! [[User:Peaceray|Peaceray]] ([[User talk:Peaceray|talk]]) 05:20, 15 April 2011 (UTC) |
[[Mahalo]]! [[User:Peaceray|Peaceray]] ([[User talk:Peaceray|talk]]) 05:20, 15 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
==Revision of Zhu Xueqin== |
|||
Perhaps someone can find sources that are not from an anonymous blog. Below is some code that I had included that made use of a source from the Peoples Daily & Fang Zhouzi's blog, before the deletions to adhere to [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|BLP policy]]. |
|||
===Begin code=== |
|||
<nowiki>Zhu won praise for immediately placing the case in hands of the authorities at [[Fudan University]] where he obtained his Ph.D. But after half a year, on 12th, Jan, 2011, the Committee of Academic Standards at Fudan University declared that though Zhu's dissertation is "flawed", the accusation of plagiarism cannot be justified<ref name="Peoples Daily">{{cite web |url=http://society.people.com.cn/GB/86800/13720819.html |title=复旦大学认定对学者朱学勤剽窃抄袭的指控不能成立 |author=姜泓冰 |trans_title=Allegations of plagiarism can not be established against Fudan University scholar Zhu Xueqin |date=2011-01-13 |language=Chinese |publisher=[[People's Daily Online]] |location=Beijing |accessdate=April 12, 2011 |quote=有缺点,不是剽窃 <nowiki>[There are shortcomings, not plagiarism]</nowiki> }}</ref>. This conclusion arose many dissatisfaction and critics in academic circle and on internet. The Committee is suspected to have covered up for Zhu for their personal friendship with Zhu.</nowiki><nowiki>A famous scientist and essayist, Dr. Fang Shimin (better known as [[Fang Zhouzi]]([[:zh:方舟子]])) declared that "even a pupil would tell that Zhu has plagiarised"<ref name="Fang Sina">{{cite web |url=http://blog.sina.com.cn/fangzhouzi |title=Fang Sina blog |author=Fang Sina |authorlink=Fang Sina |date=2011-01-13 22:30 |location=China |page= |pages= |at= |language=Chinese |accessdate=April 12, 2011 }}</ref>.</nowiki> |
|||
===End code=== |
|||
[[User:Peaceray|Peaceray]] ([[User talk:Peaceray|talk]]) 04:26, 22 April 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:26, 22 April 2011
Biography Start‑class | |||||||
|
China Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Philosophy: Philosophers / Eastern Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Suggestions for someone with both Chinese & English fluency
- Although the English language version (2006) preceded the Chinese article (2008), it looks like there are additional sections on the Chinese article that one could use to expand the English version.
- There are more Chinese books written by Xueqin Zhuto that one could include in the ==Bibliography==. These can be found at http://www.worldcat.org/search?q=au%3A1952-+Xueqin+Zhu&qt=results_page, the critical search terms being au:1952- Xueqin Zhu.
- There may well be parts of the English article that can get translated to the Chinese article, too. Unfortunately, I have no understanding of Chinese except what I can glean from translate.google.com
Mahalo! Peaceray (talk) 05:20, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Revision of Zhu Xueqin
Perhaps someone can find sources that are not from an anonymous blog. Below is some code that I had included that made use of a source from the Peoples Daily & Fang Zhouzi's blog, before the deletions to adhere to BLP policy.
Begin code
Zhu won praise for immediately placing the case in hands of the authorities at [[Fudan University]] where he obtained his Ph.D. But after half a year, on 12th, Jan, 2011, the Committee of Academic Standards at Fudan University declared that though Zhu's dissertation is "flawed", the accusation of plagiarism cannot be justified<ref name="Peoples Daily">{{cite web |url=http://society.people.com.cn/GB/86800/13720819.html |title=复旦大学认定对学者朱学勤剽窃抄袭的指控不能成立 |author=姜泓冰 |trans_title=Allegations of plagiarism can not be established against Fudan University scholar Zhu Xueqin |date=2011-01-13 |language=Chinese |publisher=[[People's Daily Online]] |location=Beijing |accessdate=April 12, 2011 |quote=有缺点,不是剽窃 <nowiki>[There are shortcomings, not plagiarism] }}</ref>. This conclusion arose many dissatisfaction and critics in academic circle and on internet. The Committee is suspected to have covered up for Zhu for their personal friendship with Zhu.</nowiki>A famous scientist and essayist, Dr. Fang Shimin (better known as [[Fang Zhouzi]]([[:zh:方舟子]])) declared that "even a pupil would tell that Zhu has plagiarised"<ref name="Fang Sina">{{cite web |url=http://blog.sina.com.cn/fangzhouzi |title=Fang Sina blog |author=Fang Sina |authorlink=Fang Sina |date=2011-01-13 22:30 |location=China |page= |pages= |at= |language=Chinese |accessdate=April 12, 2011 }}</ref>.
End code
- Start-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class China-related articles
- Low-importance China-related articles
- Start-Class China-related articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class philosopher articles
- Low-importance philosopher articles
- Philosophers task force articles
- Start-Class Eastern philosophy articles
- Low-importance Eastern philosophy articles
- Eastern philosophy task force articles