User talk:Jim1138

Ahiran

Sorry about that. I had clicked on the word state, and then accidentally clicked on the link button. I clicked 'done' to get rid of the box that had popped up, but didn't realise that that would make a link. It won't happen again! TheIrishJJ

NFL Network and CBS partnership broke off for 2016

CBS contract with Thursday Night Football expired.

Sorry that wasn't me, my computer was taken by a friend who edited the page, will not happen again.

northern province edting to keep as SIMPLE, short and sweet. Nambungal..

Yes i made this edit. IM abroad. We need to market the province for investment..please dont put history that i and we personally share amongst us. BUt to the outside world this is not relevant. Please consider reverting it back to the simple and sweet structure i put in place. TO be be frank naama thamilargal. I know historical stuff is important. BUt people who are interested in history should be able to find it out online not on wiki where its got to be simple and sweet. I dont want this place to talk aboit crimes and stuff like that. there is another page for that..please share my concerns

Entheogen edit on ants

Hi, you reverted this addition as not relevant, yet it is one of the only examples of an insect-based entheogen. As such, it would seem relevant to an entry on "entheogens:

answer for your inquiries

Dear Jim

I well received your message. I think the function of Wiki is to spread and share right knowledge worldwide. I think the part of controversy is not objective. I knew a case of lawsuit is true. however the contents( i mean written sentences) is NOT objective because the references are from article. As you know, articles always include personal opinion. i truly agree there are FACT too. but i would like to say, the reference is part of article and some parts are not objective because it is personal thought.

secondly, main part of Pepero page is covered by Controversy. what is the important factor of Wiki page? main contents(explanation, sales volume, # of countries etc) is more important than extra one(lawsuit etc)

and i am preparing for main contents parts now and i will update in a day.

that's the reason why i edit the Controversy part firstly.

i hope this message help you understand what i intend.

best regard,

Legacy

Very simple.The legacys i removed were fan made.

Will Young

You sir are my hero!!!

Thanks for stopping the silly edits to my brothers page.

BMY

Wrong facts Causes of the Indian Rebellion of 1857

Hey Jim why did you revert back the content even after providing edit summary?These days wiki is presenting wrong information to people.Stop spreading false news.Your reputation hass already started to erode,i feel someday you will pay price. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.99.48.121 (talk • contribs) 19:36, 10 January 2016

Where did i mess up on the sexism page?

Where?

Mccullough edits

I have added citations that I hope will satisfy the Wikipedia criteria for this entry. I would like to remove the entire sentence about "widely cited as an expert..." because I agree with you that it is not suJBass-Playa (talk) 19:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)bstantiated by the four citations, but anticipate that you will revert it back if I try to do so. Please advise on how you would like that sentence to be handled. I agree with you that it is problematic.

JBass-Playa (talk) 19:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Democratic Ideals

The See Also section appears twice, and I thought I would clean up the page by getting rid of one.

It's true: there were two identical "See also" sections. I've reverted it back, if you don't mind. Me, Myself & I (talk) 05:33, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry for not respecting the intellectual weight behind history-defining debates such as those on David Bowie's nationality. 67.71.181.24 (talk) 05:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

reason for the change

CaptainRex75 (talk) 08:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC) Hi there, Sorry about that. The reason for that edit was simply me lasting out due to personal issues. I hated when Iceman was turned Gay and it pained me to see this horrendous change displayed on one of my favourite heroes Wiki page. I just wanted to get rid of it and I'm sorry.

Im not homophobic in any way, Im just against changing a well established character for the sake of pandering.

@CaptainRex75: Kind of like life, isn't it? People never turn out to be quite who you think they are. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Hindu Deities

SO why did you delete my changes Jim? most of the translations and concepts surrounding the subject matter were thoroughly wrong. Even the sources of the definitions and subjects were from other outdated articles which were already biased against the Hindu culture. Why not just cite the Hindu literature for this article instead 19th century western interpretations?

Changes

But Im not vandalising, I'm simply restoring the page to its proper characterisation. If people have a problem with it, them why not make another page depicting the false Iceman. CaptainRex75 (talk) 09:44, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

SaF

I believe if you do some research you will find that what was edited was in fact true. Thank you very much. Ijs622 (talk) 01:43, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Bruh content isn't up to date thooooooo. Just bringing it up to date thoooooo. I'm black. Is that why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ijs622 (talk • contribs) 01:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

@Ijs622: How would I know your race? If you add something potentially libelous, you need to back it up with reliable sources, otherwise it gets removed and you get warned. Saying "Google it" doesn't cut the mustard, see WP:BURDEN I.e. you prove it, don't expect me to.

Please remember to sign your talk with four tildes "~~~~" so others know who left the message. Jim1138 (talk) 02:06, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Removing the erroneous warning from my talk page

Are you running around and getting these other people involved in this?

Let's just resolve this quickly and simply between us instead.

OK, if you cannot apologise for putting duplicating the content and leaving the erroneous and damaging bad mark, please just get it removed and erased instead.

Thank you. --Wordfunk (talk) 04:49, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Honestly, Jim. You're an arrogant, obstinate little asshole.

Do you feel good now about fcuking someone up who gave their time freely?

Do you really believe your actions made the Wikipedia a better place or encouraged cooperation?

Luck you to have a circle jerk of admins to defend you but perhaps, just so I can learn the way things work here, you could just explain to me what the benefit of replacing completely duplicated content was in the first place?

You never were able to admit that was just plain wrong.

Thank you. --Wordfcuk (talk) 06:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Columbus short edits

Hello I'm not sure how to add a citation but here. Hopefully you can correct it. Thanks

"Short is most known for his numerous run ins with the law. He pled guilty to domestic violence in 2014. Short also pleaded guilty to felony battery charges after a fight in a bar where he attacked his in-law. In an interview with Access Hollywood, Short openly admitted that substance abuse, both alcoholism and cocaine use, lead to his exit from Scandal."

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/columbus-short-los-angeles-court-jailed-article-1.1912077

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/columbus-short-pleads-no-contest-to-knocking-man-out_5605750ae4b0af3706dbfc77

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/columbus-short-cocaine-abuse-led-scandal-exit-article-1.2041885 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.175.21.175 (talk) 18:53, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Story Of Finding Dory.

Finding Dory is about Dory's family, Dory is lost in the sea somewhere far. Nemo and his dad go to find then Dory found her family and it is a happily ever after. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsi--DanielZain (talk) 10:25, 15 January 2016 (UTC)gned]] comment added by 51.39.111.157 (talk) 09:07, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

About LGBT Rights in Lebanon

It`s a repetition of the contain please read the article first --DanielZain (talk) 10:25, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Labor-Progressive Party spelling

You wrote: It's Labour-Progressive Party Canadian English, not American English. Please verify what you are correcting. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 03:52, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

My response:

What's your source for the spelling? Here are mine:

1) Parliament of Canada website biography of Fred Rose, MP.

2) Constitution of the Labor-Progressive Party (cover)

3) Victory Through Unity: Report to the Constituent Convention of the Labor-Progressive Party by Tim Buck

3) Program of the Labor Progressive Party

4) Electoral Program of the Labor-Progressive Party (ca. 1944)

I've verified the spelling. Have you?

192.235.252.195 (talk) 04:01, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

I would agree. The article is named Labour Progressive Party. There is a discussion on talk:Labour Progressive Party to change it to Labor Progressive Party (again). Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:10, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Coney Dogs...

If you look back at the article...all I did was add one (1) link to an already external link section...but hey no problem do what you want with it..you might as well remove the external link section too...Have a nice day.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exhummerdude (talk • contribs) 19:13, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

@Exhummerdude: All of the external links on that page were wp:spam. Promotional and do not directly contribute to the article - there mainly to promote the business with a slight relevance to the article. - see wp:elno. If you run into spam such as this, please remove the links. Unfortunately, this kind of spam is all too common. I removed all the links to restaurants from that article. here Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 22:10, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Jim. I am actually a close friend of Uli Kusch, so I know personally that all of his friends refer to him as Scootch Cleeton. I'm vaguely shocked that you were not aware of Uli's nickname. I thought it was a globally known fact. I request that you do not change it back, as I am sure that this is the way Scootch would want it. Somecats (talk) 03:53, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Jonathan Ellery

Hello Jim1138, apologies for not leaving a detailed edit summary. Removing the paragraphs wasn't a mistake, Jonathan had said he didn't want them there and I offered to take them off on his behalf.

Speakersfive (talk) 09:35, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

hi sorry...i deleted unexpectedly..thank you so much for CMMI info — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.164.132.14 (talk) 10:59, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Sock's vandalism

Dear Jim1138, the IP 187.67.5.89 is a sock of user Transeunte da Wikipédia. He is vandalizing several pages as related in this request. He was blocked after that my request. Please, I ask you to pay attention to that vandalized articles, which surely will attacked again by IP's socks of that editor. Also, if possible, I'd like you to protect my pages for anonymous edits (User page and Talk page).Thanks.
PauloMSimoes (talk) 13:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Jim1138. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

David Hartwell

Thank you for your reverts - at last word from his wife, David was in critical condition, but alive. Problem is there are incorrect published "reliable" sources saying that he died. If the page could be semi'd it would help - but I'm not an admin. Sadly, the situation is likely to change, for the worse. Tvoz/talk 08:14, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Jason DeCaires Taylor edit

Hi Jim,

I added the Rising Tide details to the Jason deCaires Taylor page. I cited an article in the Guardian, number 34 I believe. Not sure why this has not worked. Please could you confirm and readd the details? Could you send me the text I added as I did not save a copy?

Thanks Nick

Underwatersculpture (talk) 14:08, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

British Isles edits

Dear Jim1138

Please stop reverting the changes to the British Isles page, the Republic of Ireland is NOT part of the British Isles.

http://www.thejournal.ie/is-ireland-british-isles-northern-ireland-europe-islands-1140112-Oct2013/

FredRed2 (talk) 04:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Userlinks

Hello Jim1138, I'd like to thank you for all your useful information. I hope that you are aware that I wasn't complaining about you. It's pretty obvious. As far as the proof/evidence word usage is concerned, I definitely agree that "evidence" is far more appropriate. "Proof" seems so conclusive and compelling. Cheers. Gtrbolivar (talk) 14:41, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Re: MBC FM

Hello, Jim. I apologize about the edting fail on the MBC FM page. I had press the wrong button during editing, which caused me to save the page before the edit was complete. It has now be fixed. Thank you for the note on my talk page! 75.129.156.0 (talk) 01:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Giuseppe Gentile declaretion

Is a declaretion of Giuseppe Gentile during an interview in a Italian Channel television. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.62.135.212 (talk) 08:30, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

David Sylvian

Thanks, but that was a real edit for the David Sylvian site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Huwgriffiths (talk • contribs) 08:46, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

stop undoing my edit

Stop insulting me by claiming i am not giving a reason for the removal in the edit summary. This is a clear lie being peddled by you and previous editors, who have done the exact same as you. I have given very clear reasoning.49.195.159.44 (talk) 09:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

San Beda College

That wasn't a test edit. It is proven that San Beda as a Higher Educational Institution it has linkages thru the ASEACCU and RENPER. Thanks! UIOGD

Reference: http://www.sanbeda.edu.ph/est1901/international-linkages.html PS: For Violent Reactions, email me at my San Beda College account: C-130519@sanbeda.edu.ph

203.215.120.170 (talk) 12:50, 27 January 2016 (UTC) 203.215.120.170 (talk) 12:52, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Guanín (bronze)

An article that you have been involved in editing—Guanín (bronze) —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Anomalocaris (talk) 19:57, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

@Anomalocaris: I reverted some unexplained text deletion via wp:huggle, don't know anything about the topic, and so not concerned with the content nor merger. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 03:46, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Capitalization of "internet" vs. "Internet"

Hi Jim,

Thanks for the edit. I checked up "Internet" vs. "internet" in the Oxford English Dictionary (http://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/248411), and you're right, "internet" is also commonly used. I opted to use the capitalized form, since it's the primary form listed in the OED, and it's also the primary form for the Wikipedia entry on the Internet (and see here). In addition, I figured since many prominent news organizations use the capitalized form (see here), it was better to adhere to their publication standards.

What do you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by B2u9vm1ea8g (talk • contribs) 03:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Recent Change

110.235.224.158 (talk) 09:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC) Jim1138, The changes brought by me were done in-order to support the non-IITian students and who aspire for IES. And I am one of them. Earlier statement ,which I changed, was derogatory and not at all user-friendly.

Bonham

Hello. You recently reverted my edit of this page with the following explanation:

"I noticed that you recently removed some content from Bonham with this edit, without explaining why."

I feel there must be some mistake here, as I did leave a fairly concise edit summary. Given that your reversion was made almost immediately after my edit, I assume this was an automated action and that for some reason it didn't recognise my summary. My summary was as follows: "inked to Bonham surname page and removed redundant list of names"

To explain my case more clearly, the Bonham disambiguation page as it currently stands has a list of people with that name, which is redundant as there is already a page specifically for that purpose. What's more, the disambiguation page doesn't link to the surname page either.

I see two ways of resolving this issue: either to merge the two pages together and delete the Bonham (surname) page, or to do as I did and simply link the surname page in the disambiguation page and remove the redundant list. There are many other pages on Wikipedia that follow this same format, for instance the Jones disambiguation page.

I'll wait for your response before attempting to restore my edit as your bot is likely to revert it again. I look forward to speaking with you soon, Jim. Regards, Al — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.234.115.164 (talk) 10:46, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Please be circumspect with automated tools

With regard to your two recent reverts at daeva:

Huggle is intended for dealing with vandalism and other unconstructive edits. Please refer to WP:VANDAL for a helpful description of unconstructive edits.

Please use automated tools with care. Reverting without reading what you are reverting is not constructive.

The mechanisms that huggle uses "to draw conclusions as to whether an edit is constructive or not" are not foolproof and are not a license to disengage your own mind.

Your "[edit comment] didn't seem very civil, so I removed it [the edit]" does not follow.

Rolling back an *edit* for a seemingly uncivil *edit comment* is not constructive.

Incivility (real or percieved) is not a valid reason for reverting.

Please be more careful with automated reverts in the future. Rollback privileges are *privileges* that need to used with circumspection. Thank you. -- 95.116.189.233 (talk) 13:13, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Replied on editor's talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 13:18, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your reply simply reinforced the point that you ought to counter-check your tools (and yourself). The comment you refer to is not from when you think it is.

In any case, the point is a) do not rv'ing without valid reason, and b) you need to stop using anti-vand tools (i.e. Huggle) for non-vandalism rv's.

Move on. You messed up, but everyone messes up occasionally, and its not a big deal. Just don't be an ass about it. -- 95.116.189.233 (talk) 15:21, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Nin-5H

Hi Jim1138! Thanks for giving me enough help so I can start designing my account, I'm so happy! Please keep me posted every now and then... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nin-5H (talk • contribs) 13:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Syriac Sinaiticus

I reported the IP for vandalism. I doubt anything will happen since the IP's behavior is not always constantly blanking/reverting. Hope this will solve the issue. If not, I would recommend telling admin bgwhite about this since he was the first to revert the IP. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 00:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Edit Message

Hi Jim, I did not make any edits,and the IP address is not shared so not sure how you got my details.

Not vandalism

I 'm not a vandal. Just add the map of a Spanish region. They are not country, only regions of Spain. Please solve this issue with the independentist vandal.--81.38.123.50 (talk) 23:37, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for reporting him. He's clearly going against several consensuses. Additionally, the maps he's arguing about don't suggest/indicate the nationalities of Spain are independent entities. Masclet~enwiki (talk) 01:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

NDS Edit

Hello, it was actually condensing the article and clean up (it badly needs it), so I actually didn't add any new information to it. What in particular was the cause for the reversion?24.192.250.124 (talk) 00:41, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

River Towers(Huntington, WV)

Everything on the page was correct before you decided to ruin it. It really did house a wholesale dildo company.And there are dick-shaped fountains!