User talk:FoCuSandLeArN: Difference between revisions
Niyatidesai (talk | contribs) →Please respond: Synaptics Wikipedia Page: new section |
m Signing comment by Niyatidesai - "→Please respond: Synaptics Wikipedia Page: new section" |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Thank you! |
Thank you! |
||
Niyati <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Niyatidesai|Niyatidesai]] ([[User talk:Niyatidesai|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Niyatidesai|contribs]]) 17:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC)</span></small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Niyati |
Revision as of 17:00, 8 July 2016
This is FoCuSandLeArN's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34Auto-archiving period: 2 days |
If you wish to ask why an article you submitted was declined, see some general advice here. If this advice does not answer your questions, then for the fastest response try the AFC Help Desk or our unofficial live chat. If you're here because I reverted one of your edits, please check your talk page for any rationales first. Otherwise, please to leave me a message.
Speedy tagging
This speedy deletion tagging was too speedy. I've messaged you about this in the past, but apparently to no avail. Please remember not to bite the newbies. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- @WikiDan61: Do you believe Kirstin Mitchell passes GNG? Only source I could find is that she made an album cover. I do some research before tagging, you know. If the person's non-notable now what's the point of waiting 15 mins? I always strive not to bite newbies. Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 18:32, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- How much research could you have done if you tagged the article less than one minute after it was created? Do I believe her to be notable? Probably not. But it's possible that the author could have surprised you and me with sources that you are not aware of to demonstrate notability. But it's also possible that the author will not now bother, having been bitten. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 23:10, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Please respond: Synaptics Wikipedia Page
Hello,
I saw you reverted my changes to the Synaptics page for violating the external links policy. I took a read through the policy and couldn't pin-point exactly what I should be changing. Can you please let me know so I can reinstate my editorial updates with the appropriate link structure? Your prompt response here would be much appreciated.
Thank you! Niyati — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niyatidesai (talk • contribs) 17:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC)