Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dallas Stars Ice Girls: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 20:46, 8 April 2021

Dallas Stars Ice Girls

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Reason was "Failing of notability per WP:GNG" nominated by CommanderWaterford (ping as a courtesy) I concur with their PROD, and am nominating it here for the same reason Fiddle Faddle 09:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 09:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 09:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 09:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 09:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 09:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom, WP:FANPOV clearly failing WP:GNG CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:50, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to the Dallas Stars page where it can have a line or two. I tried to do the gentle thing first by removing the promotional content from the page and tagging it for notability, but this wasn't successful. Fram (talk) 09:52, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I guess if its put onto the respective parent pages and this is used as a redirect to that page, then I'll be fine. I just think that i sourced it enough that it could remain its own page because of the reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bentheswimmer11 (talk • contribs) 09:59, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - per Fram. A neutral sentence or two on the Dallas Stars article is fine. This article, which is written in a style clearly not suited for an encyclopedia, is not. PraiseVivec (talk) 11:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG, as there's zero significant coverage. All the sources used in the article are either non-independent sources or trivial coverage (a listicle, audition information and a Q&A). Ytoyoda (talk) 13:41, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, a similar article by the same user with the same problems (sketchy sourcing, WP:GNG, promotional tone) was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolina Hurricanes Storm Squad. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 *'''Redirect''' - per [[User:Fram|Fram]]. A neutral sentence or two on the Dallas Stars article is fine. This article, which is written in a style clearly not suited for an encyclopedia, is not. [[User:PraiseVivec|PraiseVivec]] ([[User talk:PraiseVivec|talk]]) 11:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' Fails [[WP:GNG]], as there's zero significant coverage. All the sources used in the article are either non-independent sources or trivial coverage (a listicle, audition information and a Q&A). [[User:Ytoyoda|Ytoyoda]] ([[User talk:Ytoyoda|talk]]) 13:41, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
+::For what it's worth, a similar article by the same user with the same problems (sketchy sourcing, WP:GNG, promotional tone) was deleted per [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolina Hurricanes Storm Squad]]. [[User:Ytoyoda|Ytoyoda]] ([[User talk:Ytoyoda|talk]]) 20:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)