Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beta Delta Alpha: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Relisting discussion (XFDcloser)
Line 11: Line 11:
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 10:13, 9 June 2021 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Beta Delta Alpha]]</noinclude></div>
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 10:13, 9 June 2021 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Beta Delta Alpha]]</noinclude></div>
*'''Delete''' Clearly fails [[WP:ORG]]. [[User:Brycehughes|Brycehughes]] ([[User talk:Brycehughes|talk]]) 10:36, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:36, 9 June 2021

Beta Delta Alpha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article appears to be created by a single purpose account for promotional purposes around the same time the fraternity was created. I am nominating per WP:ORGDEPTH as there is 0 coverage of the organization outside of school affiliated websites or social media. And even if it's the "first Arab interest fraternity", that is not enough to keep the article per WP:ORGSIG—"No company or organization is considered inherently notable."BriefEdits (talk) 07:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 07:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fraternities and sororities-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 07:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 07:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 10:13, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]