Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beta Delta Alpha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 19:50, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Delta Alpha

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article appears to be created by a single purpose account for promotional purposes around the same time the fraternity was created. I am nominating per WP:ORGDEPTH as there is 0 coverage of the organization outside of school affiliated websites or social media. And even if it's the "first Arab interest fraternity", that is not enough to keep the article per WP:ORGSIG—"No company or organization is considered inherently notable."BriefEdits (talk) 07:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 07:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fraternities and sororities-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 07:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 07:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:13, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly fails WP:ORG. Brycehughes (talk) 10:36, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify Single chapter, does not yet meet our (the F&S Project)'s 10-year requirement for notability of locals. Frustratingly, the group's website is down. It may be dormant. I'd prefer to keep the page as a draft, to resume as an article after 2024 if they remain an active group. Many of these 'start-up' locals fail; Dormancy wouldn't be surprising. Jax MN (talk) 14:40, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The issue with moving to draft space is that unless there's additional activity with this fraternity in the next 6 months, the draft is subject to deletion by WP:G13. I don't see the draft surviving for another 3 years to meet the requirements of F&S Project. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 15:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your point. I could keep it in my own draft space but I think that is likewise subject to timeout, or could take a copy of the page to bring forward later. They remain listed as active on UCLA student life pages, but their own website is down. Attributable to growing pains or dormancy, I don't know. Jax MN (talk) 15:34, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.