Jump to content

Talk:Science fantasy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Science fantasy/Archive 1) (bot
PearBOT II (talk | contribs)
m Merge Talk header and Auto archiving notice per TfD
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{Talk header|search=yes|archive_age=90|archive_bot=lowercase sigmabot III}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject Science Fiction|class=start |importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Science Fiction|class=start |importance=High}}
Line 13: Line 13:
| minthreadsleft=1
| minthreadsleft=1
| minthreadstoarchive=1
| minthreadstoarchive=1
}}
{{auto archiving notice
|bot = lowercase sigmabot III
|age = 90
|small=
}}
}}



Revision as of 01:46, 9 September 2021

HELLO where is 40k and the Metabarons???

We all love golden age writers, but where is the rest??? No single reference to Warhammer 40,000 or the Metabarons? These are the very definition of science fantasy. No reference to Don Lawrence's Storm? It is my understanding that all these immensely popular works happen to be European. Well guess what, there are more countries in the world than USA and MAYBE you should include them in wikipedia articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.103.109.105 (talk) 08:27, 14 October 2010‎

Science fiction of science fantasy? It does contain dragons and other fantastical elements. Similarly, can the entire subgenre of space opera be classified as science fantasy? Comments?