Jump to content

User talk:Prasad Rai: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
Notification: proposed deletion of Malabare Mansion.
Line 156: Line 156:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 17:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 17:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Malabare Mansion]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Malabare Mansion]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails [[WP:GNG]]. Searches in English and Bengali found no significant coverage in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. The sole source is print on demand publisher [[Dictus Publishing]]. Imprints of its parent company have been described as "predatory vanity press" or "spam", lacking basic editorial processes. When this book was published, the parent was republishing Wikipedia content, so this may be [[WP:CIRCULAR]] as well.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Malabare Mansion|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 17:10, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:10, 8 March 2023

Please feel free to comment on my work here in Wikipedia. Thanks. (Prasad Rai (talk) 03:02, 6 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bengal Tenancy Act of 1885, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.banglapedia.org/httpdocs/HT/B_0421.HTM.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 12:04, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid making small changes to the source doesn't resolve the copyright problem - close paraphrases are still copyrighted. You need to write the article from scratch. Hut 8.5 16:42, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Prince Daniyal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Punjab, Shahzada and Mansab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yesünto'a requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:57, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bengal Tenancy Act of 1885 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Land and Rent
Chalanbeel Horse Race (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sprint race

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Genealogical Gleanings of the Indian Princely States requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. reddogsix (talk) 12:39, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Mirza Jahan Shah, Prasad Rai!

Wikipedia editor Sesamevoila just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this page about one of the lesser princes. I notice you had copyvio issues with your earlier pages. It's great that you are now contributing without violating any of its principles. Looking forward to more such pages

To reply, leave a comment on Sesamevoila's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mirza Jahangir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Darbar and Shahzada
Mirza Jahan Shah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Shahzada
Mirza Salim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Shahzada

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shamez Uddin Ahmed, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Khan and Akhtar Hussain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zahir Shah Mirza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Azimganj Raj (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Babu
Nadia Raj (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bahadur
Nashipur Raj (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bijapur
Sovabazar Raj (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hindu College

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Muhammad Azam Shah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shahzada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:24, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tribhuvan Roy

The article Tribhuvan Roy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is an inadequately referenced BLP lacking any independent sources. A quick Google search does not turn up anything that meets our criteria. Unless somebody can dig deeper and find something better I think it has to go.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanielRigal (talk) 20:20, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdus Sobhan Chowdhury for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdus Sobhan Chowdhury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdus Sobhan Chowdhury until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 04:50, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Almanach de Bruxelles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and Wikipedia:Notability (websites)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:55, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Ibrahim Ali Mridha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Up Chairman are not notable person. So delete it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Delwar09:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gole Afroz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gole Afroz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gole Afroz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Worldbruce (talk) 17:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Malabare Mansion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Searches in English and Bengali found no significant coverage in reliable sources. The sole source is print on demand publisher Dictus Publishing. Imprints of its parent company have been described as "predatory vanity press" or "spam", lacking basic editorial processes. When this book was published, the parent was republishing Wikipedia content, so this may be WP:CIRCULAR as well.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Worldbruce (talk) 17:10, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]