Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Feminism: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Feminism/Archive 6) (bot
Line 13: Line 13:
|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes
|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes
}}
}}

== Merge discussion at [[Talk:Incel]] ==

Hello, per point 3 of [[WP:PM]], I am notifying this project of the merge discussion at [[Talk:Incel]]. This is based on a just recently closed AfD (see page of [[incels.is]]). The AfD closed with a consensus to merge, but since that consensus, I have increased the incels.is article a lot in sourcing and content though, so a merge may now not be necessary. [[Special:Contributions/2001:48F8:3004:FC4:48EA:35CE:A536:B342|2001:48F8:3004:FC4:48EA:35CE:A536:B342]] ([[User talk:2001:48F8:3004:FC4:48EA:35CE:A536:B342|talk]]) 20:38, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

== FAR for Maria: or, The Wrongs of Woman ==

[[User:Buidhe]] has nominated [[Maria: or, The Wrongs of Woman]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Maria: or, The Wrongs of Woman/archive1|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|here]].<!--Template:FARMessage--> [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 17:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Buidhe@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Buidhe/messages&oldid=1161728552 -->


==A new "is ''[[AfterEllen]]'' a reliable source" discussion (July 2023)==
==A new "is ''[[AfterEllen]]'' a reliable source" discussion (July 2023)==

Revision as of 04:54, 24 August 2023

Main page Talk page Members Resources Popular pages
WikiProject iconFeminism Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

A new "is AfterEllen a reliable source" discussion (July 2023)

The last one was in July 2020.
New discussion at WP:RS/N > "Is AfterEllen a reliable source for BLP reporting?".
Presented as a question about use in a BLP ... come see where it goes. Pyxis Solitary (yak yak). Ol' homo. 02:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Center for Reproductive Rights

Center for Reproductive Rights article is anemic and out-of-date. It is not reflective of the organization's significance in the fight for abortion rights. The list of cases "in recent years" was from 2013, ten years ago. Meanwhile CRR has dozens of cases currently open, including the highly publicized Zurawski v. State of Texas with 15 plaintiffs who were harmed by the state's anti-abortion law. CRR operates in a number of countries.

Google searching "Center for Reproductive Rights" (entire phrase in quotes) gets 600 hits in NYTimes, 500 in AP News, over 400 in Washington Post. 600k hits on the web in general.

Wikiproject Feminism was listed on the talk page for this article. I also posted at WikiProject Abortion Article improvement & creation requests but that project seems moribund with almost no activity. -- M.boli (talk) 14:35, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting Copyedit Help at Alliance Against Sexual Coercion

Hi, I found this article via the Random Article link. I've been trying to improve it and I looked into the history and it looks like it was started as a part of a class wikipedia article creation project. It needs more copyediting and work but I am not sure I am able to do everything it needs. Thank you for any help you can give? I hope what I have done so far is useful. Saikyoryu (talk) 01:09, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to split MOS:GENDERID from Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography

Comments invited.

Bluerasberry (talk) 19:11, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting inputs at AFD - Islamic Bill of Rights for Women in the Mosque

Requesting inputs at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic Bill of Rights for Women in the Mosque (2nd nomination) discussion. - Bookku (talk) 05:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]