User talk:TomasTheBeard: Difference between revisions

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Automuseum Vilnius and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 09:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Auto Muziejus! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 09:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Auto Muziejus. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Automuseum Vilnius, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Automuseum Vilnius has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Automuseum Vilnius. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello Auto Muziejus. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Auto Muziejus. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Auto Muziejus|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 10:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer. Yes, Im not editing this from now on. Just want to make sure how to do it (or not) correctly. Just want to double check if i understood correctly - I cannot create an article of a place that i work in (or i need to post mandadory disclosure on my user page)? If i do that, on that page there will be some info "that this article was paid by "x" and "y" or it will be onli visible to editors? Auto Muziejus (talk) 10:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You post the paid editing disclosure on your user page, at least to start. Typically a differently formatted disclosure is also posted on article or draft talk pages, but you don't need to worry about that yet. Articles themselves only indicate paid editing if there are issues with the content of the article, but the paid editing disclosure on your user page is visible to anyone who visits that page.

You are not forbidden from editing about your museum, but it is highly discouraged. Creating and submitting a draft for review by independent editors is the correct procedure, should you choose to do so. 331dot (talk) 10:37, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't disclose your COI/paid, this will be flagged up on the article page as undisclosed paid editing, which is one of the uglier tags IMO. If you do disclose, then disclosed paid editing can still be flagged, if another editor feels that the contents are promotional and need to be cleaned up. But if you can write in an entirely non-promotional manner, then there is probably no need for that, either.

Once you've disclosed your paid-editing status, you can still edit the draft, you just cannot publish it directly, meaning you must put it through the AfC review process, but you're already doing that anyway. Once the article is published (assuming), you also cannot edit it directly (other than for entirely non-controversial minor edits and factual corrections), and must instead make edit requests via the article talk page. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:37, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So i need to creat a user page as i understand, use the template that 331dot gave a bit earlier, and everything should be ok? sorry for lots of questions, just want to do it right. Auto Muziejus (talk) 10:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 80: / Line 80: @@
 ::If you don't disclose your COI/paid, this will be flagged up on the article page as undisclosed paid editing, which is one of the uglier tags IMO. If you do disclose, then ''disclosed'' paid editing can still be flagged, if another editor feels that the contents are promotional and need to be cleaned up. But if you can write in an entirely non-promotional manner, then there is probably no need for that, either.
 ::Once you've disclosed your paid-editing status, you can still edit the draft, you just cannot publish it directly, meaning you must put it through the AfC review process, but you're already doing that anyway. Once the article is published (assuming), you also cannot edit it directly (other than for entirely non-controversial minor edits and factual corrections), and must instead make edit requests via the article talk page. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 10:37, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
+:::So i need to creat a user page as i understand, use the template that 331dot gave a bit earlier, and everything should be ok? sorry for lots of questions, just want to do it right.  [[User:Auto Muziejus|Auto Muziejus]] ([[User talk:Auto Muziejus#top|talk]]) 10:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)