User talk:Rockchalk717

Archives (Index)

2014/July 2014/August 2014/September 2014/December 2015/January 2015/April 2015/May 2015/June 2015/November 2016/February 2016/April 2016/June 2016/July 2016/September 2016/October 2016/November 2016/December 2017/April 2017/May 2017/July 2017/December 2018/February 2018/April 2018/May 2018/June 2018/July 2018/September 2018/October 2019/January 2019/February 2019/March 2019/May 2019/June 2019/July 2019/September 2019/October 2019/November 2019/December 2020/January 2020/March 2020/June 2020/July 2020/September 2020/October 2021/February 2021/March 2021/April 2021/May 2021/June 2021/July 2021/August 2021/September 2021/October 2022/April 2022/June 2022/July 2022/August 2022/October 2022/November 2022/December 2023/January 2023/February 2023/March 2023/April 2023/June 2023/July 2023/August 2023/September 2023/October 2023/November 2023/December 2024/January 2024/February 2024/March 2024/April 2024/July

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Welcome to my talk page don't forget to sign your post using ~~~~ or the button. If you are looking for an old post of mine, it was probably archived by Cluebot so if it's over a week old, I suggest trying my archives which is linked to your right. If I don’t intend to respond to a post here, I’ll most likely just clear it off before it gets archived. I like to keep my talkpage pretty clean, I get annoyed scrolling through long talk pages. Also, regardless of if you're an admin or not, please do not revert my talkpage unless you are reverting a personal attack, copyright violation, or vandalism. Finally, if you're responding to a post on your talkpage, I would prefer if you respond there and ping me. Thank you and as always, Rock Chalk Jayhawk.
----------Rockchalk717

Oh well

The NFL Network just posted it five minutes ago. I really wanted to ditch TMZ! Hope your classes went well. Bringingthewood (talk) 22:51, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello again. Not to mess up your talk page, I'll just continue here. I saw that you removed the sacks for Deacon Jones, and I removed Fred Dryer's. What do you suggest for the players who have totals listed, but started in 1981 or ended in 1982? L.T. for example, or Jack Youngblood. Should we just stay away from them (too much math and explanations) and stick to the careers ending prior to 1982? - Bringingthewood (talk) 23:22, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

@Bringingthewood: You're good. My best recommendation is to go with NFL.com's sack total because they'll go with what is official.--Rockchalk717 00:14, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Sounds like a plan. Right now it's nice and easy getting those who retired before 1982. If Watt only got one more sack in 2021, I could stop seeing the "unofficial" sack leader on Al Baker's page. I'll let you go ... thanks for the response. - Bringingthewood (talk) 00:22, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

We had a good page here all along List_of_National_Football_League_career_sacks_leaders. Several infoboxes were already correct. Glad you edited Deacon Jones, not sure if it's a WP rule, but the infobox should really show stats that are 'official only'. Bringingthewood (talk) 01:40, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

@Bringingthewood: I think it's one of those unwritten rules more than anything. We do most things here based on being official, but that's the best thing I can point to about that.--Rockchalk717 03:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

The best and only thing. Sounds good to me. Hopefully most will leave these alone. Thanks again and have a good week. Bringingthewood (talk) 03:27, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

@Bringingthewood: No problem, you too.--Rockchalk717 04:02, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Chase Claypool

Just so I understand, this is not a source?

https://www.si.com/nfl/draft/news/chase-claypool-trade-bears-dolphins-nfl-draft

We're still waiting for the Bears or Dolphins to post something official on their websites? ParXivalRPT (talk) 15:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

@ParXivalRPT: They have now but for future reference yes.--Rockchalk717 15:15, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Also for future reference, when can his stats be included? When he actually plays in a game as a Dolphin? ParXivalRPT (talk) 17:34, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

@ParXivalRPT: Yes.--Rockchalk717 20:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Do you know if there is any consensus on if the "w" in "Week (X)" should be capitalized or not? Just so I have a source going forward to adhere to. Thanks again! ParXivalRPT (talk) 03:31, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

@ParXivalRPT: I don't think there's a consensus per se, but I think most people do lower case.--Rockchalk717 04:35, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Possible College of Faith Football Article

Since you're a college football fan, I'm sure you remember the College of Faith football teams of the mid-2010s (yes, there were two — three if you count the University of Faith out of Florida). I do think this would be an extremely interesting project, but I first need to complete the game log for all three teams. What do you think? This Reddit post offers great insight on the history of College of Faith up to 2014: (OC) The History of College of Faith: Background on the Noble Idea that Failed in Practice. Wjenkins96 (talk) 05:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

@Wjenkins96: I'm actually not familiar with that. I did do a google search about it and it turned up limited sources and several different schools popped up in the results. The problem with this I'm finding is, while with the little bit I saw it would be interesting, an article about it may struggle to pass WP:GNG, which are the basic general notability guidelines articles must follow to remain in Wikipedia. There must be multiple independent reliable sources in order for it to pass.--Rockchalk717 05:47, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

CONTACT ME

First, be polite. Your curtness is irritating. (See what I mean?)

Second, you have reverted several of my edits to Kansas Jayhawks related pages, especially to the 2023-24 MBB page.

You call them UNNECESARY EDITS but do not explain what makes them "unnecessary".

I was not in the mood to argue your previous reversions, but I am not letting the removal of the notice of the game honoring KU Alum and Hall John B. McLendon, Jr. go.

I understand I am a novice at this and you a seasoned hand, but that entry is a perfectly valid one and has even been addressed by KU AThletics on its website as part of its PR for the nonconference schedule.

Please contact me to discuss your reasoning. I would like to settle this misunderstanding between us, not in what looks to be a public forum.

I do not know how to contact you privately from here or I would. Perhaps you could help with this?

Thank you. LTCUSARet (talk) 19:37, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

RockChalk717, please go to the Talk page for KU MBB 2023-24 to repsond.

Thanks!

LTCUSARet (talk) 20:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

linebacker/defensive end

so are we just changing free agent pass rushers to the position that they played most of their career, rather than what they most recently played (Frank Clark)? If so please let me know so I can change/fix this for other pass rushers Bears247 (talk) 18:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

@Bears247: I don't think there's a consensus either way but it doesn't make any sense to list a position a player played 2 games at (excluding games he was inactive) since college.--Rockchalk717 23:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Sacks prior to 1982

Hi RC. I've been having a conversation with @Sergio Skol regarding official sacks being listed, no sacks prior to 1982 etc. Sergio asked if I could start a discussion about it. I'm asking you because I originally saw when you removed the stats for Deacon Jones. There's no rule that I see, but I'm against it because the amount of players to change and designate official/unofficial would be insane. This can't be swept under the rug, what do you suggest as far as a discussion? I can't let this go, because I'm not, you're not and Sergio will not be in the mood to revert these every week. Bringingthewood (talk) 23:39, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Just to clarify, I'm against adding stats to the infobox that are not official. Not against you removing them from Deacon Jones, lol. Bringingthewood (talk) 23:45, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

How about it?

Would you lend us Jake Browning for this Thursday night? I'll give you Trubisky and let's sayyyyyy... a Bronx cannoli? Bringingthewood (talk) 05:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

@Bringingthewood: In the words of Randy Jackson , Yeah that's gonna be a no for me dawg. Lol.--Rockchalk717 05:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

HA! It didn't hurt to ask. Besides, I really wanted that cannoli. Have a good week! Bringingthewood (talk) 05:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

KC CHeifs edit

Regarding the 10 of 11 playoff losses thing on Kansas City Chiefs, it seems really ridiculous to cherry pick stats like that and completely ignore part of the playoff run that happened that same season. That would be like if i said the Steelers had a 3-8 playoff record including and since the loss in Super Bowl XLV. Either include the whole postseason run or none of it. I believe it says between 1993 and 2017 correct? That includes the other playoff games then. If youre wondering, I’m not a chiefs fan saying this. I just think it doesn’t make sense to ignore part of a playoff run that happened the same season to further a choker narrative. Eg224 (talk) 19:34, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Edit: someone added the afc championship to the heading mentioning it as the beginning of the streak, so, I think it’s fine now. Eg224 (talk) 19:36, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

@Eg224: I'm a Chiefs fan, why would I cherry pick a stat that is negative to my team? I added the AFC Championship thing to make it more clear of the point that was being made. I also added that "10/11" comment myself several years ago. The comment was added to better paint an image of the franchise turnaround, not necessarily to call them choke artists, even if I did use that term myself off of Wikipedia multiple times during that stretch in frustration.--Rockchalk717 19:50, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello Rockchalk717, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Happy editing, WuTang94 (talk) 04:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

WuTang94 (talk) 04:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Ed Budde

On 26 December 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ed Budde, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 20:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Revert you made

Hey I am not understanding on what you mean on that revert you made just now? (And is there a way we can fix that up to make it work?) Hoopstercat (talk) 03:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

@Hoopstercat: Just because something is sourced, doesn't mean it should be included on Wikipedia. This place isn't just for including random bits of information. The playoffs page is for the playoffs and what happens, not listing every possible scenario. There is nothing to fix, just plain simple it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. If people want to know clinching scenarios they can google it.--Rockchalk717 03:42, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Ok that makes sense, but removing teams that have playoff berths but not sure on seed does not make sense Hoopstercat (talk) 03:43, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

@Hoopstercat: Yes it does because it's already covered in the participants section, just without the extra detail.--Rockchalk717 03:44, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Still at least need a note at this moment to include several teams that have clinched division/playoff berths but not sure on seeds (or otherwise we need to include the seed possibilities that those teams fit since seeding is related to playoffs and those teams being left out doesn’t make sense) Hoopstercat (talk) 03:55, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

College football page lengths

I'm revisiting the Miami Hurricanes football page and wanted to ask: Have you seen an example of a page split into sub-pages as you propose? I looked at a few that are of equal or even greater length, such as Notre Dame Irish football, and am not seeing that. I do see main and further references under headings, but that already exists on the Miami page. I think it's the history you believe should be broken up, and that's where I'm wondering if you have seen any examples of what you're proposing. TheGables (talk) 22:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Sorry about the misplacement. TheGables (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

All good. Notre Dame definitely has a history page that is linked in the main page. See History of Notre Dame Fighting Irish football. That's an example. That page goes more in depth. It's not the greatest example because the history section of the main page is still quite lengthy, but it has a history page.--Rockchalk717 23:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Here again

ANOTHER CONGRATS! I felt like I was just here, lol. I hope you have a good ticker. Bringingthewood (talk) 03:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

@Bringingthewood: After that game, I'm not so sure anymore lol. Thank you. Back-to-back is definitely special.--Rockchalk717 05:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

HA! I was all ready to send a note during regulation ... and then I even got nervous. Back-to-back definitely is! I really didn't want a third team tied with six Super Bowls. But now I think that team from K.C. is going to make my head hurt in the near future. Hmmm. You're welcome and enjoy it once again. :) Bringingthewood (talk) 05:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

ProveIt

Hello! I haven't had hardly negative feedback regarding improving references until your summary, which I believe is fair from your end. Just so happened to be a lot of information added to Chiefs players that was unsourced by other editors. I know KC teams are your interest so it would show up more for you on your Watchlists probably and I apologize. I was under the assumption that anything in the main body and record lists need a reliable source. I figured I would improve almost everything I could on players that had older information and incomplete citations so I could leave them alone for good until new information comes about. I personally could not find anything on the Butker item I placed a template on, and I spent a little bit of time looking for something. I can quit adding that "cn" template on stuff I cannot find but I thought that was protocol. I will improve the KC articles in moderation so you are not flooded. Thanks for all you do. Red Director (talk) 16:46, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

@Red Director: I don't actually use watchlist. It just makes it harder to keep an eye on edits on some of these pages when I saw 10 prove it edits. I don't mind you fixing citations at all, it is important. It's just the amount of those edits get a little crazy sometimes. I do appreciate though. I don't you want you feel like I'm criticizing the work you do either, it is great and necessary.--Rockchalk717 17:21, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

@Rockchalk717:That is what I gathered. It can be a great task sometimes when I see a page have around 10-20 items that need verification or to be rewritten. Each item requires me to open the news link and get the information and that can be rather timely. The process is why I like some media better than others because some sites can autofill easily. When I see that my task is going to be greater on a page than others, I usually check the last version to make sure it is an acceptable version before I add content. Also, if a page has not been edited in a while, it kinds of gives me a personal green light to start major improvements. If I see a task is going to be repetitive, I do try to group those together to have 2-5 references taken care of in the same edit. Some of those take me while to get the information and that is why I do it that way. I knew from the Super Bowl edits that users made that I could use the same reference on that I would be splitting that task up into two editing periods. The last edit I usually do in the process is to get the date formats to match throughout. That edit is probably the cheesiest of them all unless there are many that need it. If it is going to be a small change, I try to group it in another edit. Congrats on your Super Bowl! You have a special situation there in KC and I can't wait to see where it goes. Red Director (talk) 17:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

@Red Director: Thanks for the explanation on what you do. Thank you It definitely is and I'm excited to see what else the future holds. It just blows my mind after going 22 years in between playoff wins they've won 3 Super Bowls in 5 years. Mahomes definitely is on a path that could dethrone Brady.--Rockchalk717 17:48, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Rockchalk717!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

hi :)

Hi this is the first time im on a different talk page Hamterous1 (talk) 17:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Matt Araiza

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Matt Araiza, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

MVS

There's no context to the year he was released from the Chiefs other than the Super Bowl. For the sake of making it chronologically clear, should the year 2024 *not* be mentioned anywhere? February 28 without the year 2024 mentioned isn't clear. ParXivalRPT (talk) 23:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Also, why is there a hyperlink to the playoff game in question for the previous AFC Championship, but we have a generic hyperlink to the most recent AFC Championship game? ParXivalRPT (talk) 23:45, 29 February 2024 (UTC)