Talk:Future War: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The particular quibble is with the use/addition of '(stolen)'. Is this allegation proven? I did not note a citation providing any details. [[Special:Contributions/12.10.217.50|12.10.217.50]] ([[User talk:12.10.217.50|talk]]) 21:55, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
The particular quibble is with the use/addition of '(stolen)'. Is this allegation proven? I did not note a citation providing any details. [[Special:Contributions/12.10.217.50|12.10.217.50]] ([[User talk:12.10.217.50|talk]]) 21:55, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
[IMDB as a source] |
|||
Really? Citing the trivia section at IMDB, people? That site is user controlled, especially the trivia section where many untruths have been added about movies. Gee, that's like citing Wikipedia as a reliable source. |
Really? Citing the trivia section at IMDB, people? That site is user controlled, especially the trivia section where many untruths have been added about movies. Gee, that's like citing Wikipedia as a reliable source. |
Revision as of 05:28, 4 May 2008
Film Stub‑class | |||||||
|
Science Fiction Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
Template:Filmimage I was just wondering if it was appropriate to have the following appear on this page:
"As a side not the actual "tracker" feet and mechanical tracker from "Future War" were taken (stolen) by Dublin for use in "Carnosaur 3"."
The particular quibble is with the use/addition of '(stolen)'. Is this allegation proven? I did not note a citation providing any details. 12.10.217.50 (talk) 21:55, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
[IMDB as a source] Really? Citing the trivia section at IMDB, people? That site is user controlled, especially the trivia section where many untruths have been added about movies. Gee, that's like citing Wikipedia as a reliable source.