User:TexasAndroid: Difference between revisions
Avrilrox63 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Hi! Why did you delete my page? I wasn't even done with it yet! Yeah, thanks alot (not)! Love, Avrilrox63 aka Shannon Marie.== |
==Hi! Why did you delete my page? I wasn't even done with it yet! Yeah, thanks alot (not)! Love, Avrilrox63 aka Shannon Marie. Also You Deleted Yung D. Y did U Mr.he is a real artist dude == |
||
__NOTOC__ |
__NOTOC__ |
Revision as of 15:16, 23 October 2008
Hi! Why did you delete my page? I wasn't even done with it yet! Yeah, thanks alot (not)! Love, Avrilrox63 aka Shannon Marie. Also You Deleted Yung D. Y did U Mr.he is a real artist dude
Computer programmer from San Antonio, Texas.
Moderator at Virtual Globetrotting, an archival site of interesting Google Maps views.
Reverter of vandalism, and wiki-link cleaner. (I'm no great author of Wiki pages, but I'm good at cleaning up other people's messes. :)
My barnstar collection is here.
Current Projects
Mostly been working through the categories list working to remove or fix as many red category links as possible. And general vandalism fighting.
This user has been an admin for 18 years, 9 months and 26 days. |
en | This user is a native speaker of the English language. |
This user is a member of the Counter-Vandalism Unit. |
This user lives in the U.S. State of Texas. |
This user is male. |
This user has created a global account. |
This user tracks his money on Where's George? |
This user uses Google Maps. |
CoH | This user fights on both fronts in Paragon City and the Rogue Isles. | CoV |
This editor is a Veteran Editor III and is entitled to display this Silver Editor Star. |
Current Outstanding admin load
Administrative backlog
Reports
User-reported
- Ayapemmanuel846 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) He added misinformation on the ABS-CBN News and Current Affairs page. Andor127 (talk) 20:48, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Peaceray (talk) 21:46, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Isrjr (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. LR.127 (talk) 22:10, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. @LR.127 HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:18, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- 2601:645:4580:9EA0:B5D7:4C2C:5E4F:1D52 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – IP with unsourced, POV edits. LR.127 (talk) 22:18, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:16, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- 103.111.90.252 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Violence in the Quran (diff): WP:NOTHERE to build an encyclopedia, see edit summary. Heythereimaguy (talk) 23:02, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:14, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- 118.100.228.61 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism within 1 day of being unblocked. Bowler the Carmine | talk 23:24, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Esperminioxd (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "sperm" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:20, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- O7Official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Bagudu blog (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Les Spam (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "spam" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:10, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- I have pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Chump4Trump93 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:10, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:10, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 23:10, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- Icelandic crime groups (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:59, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Name seems to represent a concept, as opposed to a specific group. i did delete their user page. Just Step Sideways (talk) 23:08, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
- Opinion polling for the next Israeli legislative election (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 10:11, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 22:01, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The Plot section of the film is bombarded with people constantly adding extraneous details and attempts to define purposefully ambiguous moments in the film. There has been a back-and-forth over the plot for over a month now that isn't calming. Can you lock it for a short span until people have cooled off, maybe? 194.74.175.114 (talk) 13:06, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- It would require a full lock, since there are EC editors adding to the plot. I'd prefer if someone attempted to create a topic at the talk page to discuss the issue before issuing full protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 13:10, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism - seasonal problem. Entranced98 (talk) 16:46, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It seems intentionally irrelevant information added again and again. Rocky Masum (talk) 17:31, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 19:59, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Recent Arab-Israeli conflict article Wiiformii (talk) 18:11, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 18:19, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Top5a (talk) 19:33, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandalism by apparently the same person via different IP's over several months. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 20:07, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 20:30, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandalism by apparently the same person via different IP's over several months. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 20:08, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 20:30, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandalism by apparently the same person via different IP's over several months. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 20:09, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 20:30, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Lots of edits of his date of birth due to still unconfirmed claims by Joseph Moukoko who has been know as his father but now states that he isn't and that his date of birth actually was four years earlier RyokunDE (talk) 21:17, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Persistent BLP-violating (and potentially COI, considering they're from the university's IP range) IP edits CR (talk) 21:18, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism(see hist or diffs) Requested protection type: Pending changes or semi-protection. RaschenTechner (talk) 22:09, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:28, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason:Article is in a poorly written state and barely gets meaningful contributions since it was last protected. No signs of disruptive editing for a long time either.Axedd (talk) 14:45, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Axedd: Is the long-term abuser that caused the article to be ECP'd still active on other articles? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:46, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Last time this specific user was active was 4 years ago according to his case page. I believe another sock caused this page to locked over an year ago for edit warring, but they weren't solely interested in this particular page. Axedd (talk) 16:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- The case page is not a reliable indicator of if an LTA is active or not, especially if they're reveling in the attention. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 08:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Last time this specific user was active was 4 years ago according to his case page. I believe another sock caused this page to locked over an year ago for edit warring, but they weren't solely interested in this particular page. Axedd (talk) 16:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging @Yamaguchi先生 --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:18, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Axedd for being in touch and Jéské for the ping. Axedd, you are already able to edit this article in the currently protected state. For context, there have been over 18 different page protections applied over the years due to long term abuse, block evasion, and persistent disruption in general. In light of this, was there any specific reason that you're looking to see this page unprotected? Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because i believe that the metaverse is now less associated with crypto and the blockchain - especially after the rise of spatial computing. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Suggested action: Lower to WP:WHITELOCK/WP:PCPP to prevent disruptive editing from cryptospammers while still allowing for broader contribution from legitimate editors (especially IPs like me). Otherwise, if no cryptospam is expected, remove protection completely. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Unprotection: Requesting a reduction to indef WP:ECP, per conversation on talk page of imposing administrator. Move protection can remain at indef sysop. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:17, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'll have to disagree. Just look at the page history. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 05:28, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- I looked at the page history and the deleted contributions prior to making this request. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:05, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Still. If there was a need to even delete contributions from the page history to begin with, it should remain fully locked. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 18:54, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- I looked at the page history and the deleted contributions prior to making this request. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:05, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Done, now at ECP since the protecting admin agrees. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:59, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The season is completed. 2A02:C7C:A01:3E00:6416:9E81:7DAB:2ECD (talk) 13:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- The protection expires in less than two weeks. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:45, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page.. No valid reason given to remove protection, and it isn't permanent anyway. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:52, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Flagg dying in 2014. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 12:42, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. It wasn't protected due to BLP, it was protected for persistent spamming, peacocking, unsourced assertions, and unjustified removal of tags. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:55, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Then why does the pagelock say it was protected to promote compliance with BLP? If the page is to stay protected, the protection reason should at least be changed. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 22:42, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
This, I think, is the first time I've made a suggestion. Hopefully, I'm doing this correctly.
The lateral fricative voiced retroflex, as an example, has an IPA representation of ɖɭ˔ according to its Wikipedia page, but the IPA Pulmonic table and other tables use the Unicode representation in the table and any font I have found just doesn't handle that character,
Would it be better to use the IPA representation which I think many fonts handle since the table has 'IPA' in its title and its link points to the Wikipedia page with both representations? The linked article each cell in the table states that the representation the IPA version and that the Unicode character is implied from that.
I'd be happy to make a list of each table and cell where this occurs if that is necessary and you think these will be worthwhile changes. BLWBebopKid (talk) 19:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging @Kwamikagami as they are likely to have some insight to these issues. For me personally, I'm not sure. I happen to have fonts installed that handle the extIPA symbols, but I'm in the stark minority there. Remsense ‥ 论 01:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- ExtIPA is IPA. It's just a specialized subset. For example, extIPA can be used in the 'Illustrations of the IPA' published in JIPA.
- The issue is one of font support. The letters in question date to 2015, though they weren't added to Unicode until 2021. There are websites that list fonts that support various characters. These are supported by the SIL fonts, which are the best free IPA fonts available. If you don't have a good font installed, you're not going to be able to view IPA correctly anyway. That's why we have the IPA notice in articles, that you may need to install an IPA font to view the article properly. — kwami (talk) 05:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
1 protected edit request | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:14, 13 December 2024 (UTC) |
13 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 23:19, 13 December 2024 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled
User:Pbritti told me to. Apparently I qualify, and I've been cranking out a decent number of articled recently. Been editing Wikipedia on and off since 2009, been editing more regularly for the last year or two. Been a rollbacker and pending changes reviewer for almost 12 years. I created one GA and have taken two articles from being just a few sentences to GA status, a few more nominations in the pipeline. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 02:51, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
During the temporary stint granted as autopatrolled, I have created over 100 pages following the suggestions of the admin. Have been consistently adding relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them. Have also started using Rater and StubSorter. Trying to strengthen myself with Wikipedia's core content policies by regular reading. Requesting extension... Davidindia (talk) 09:25, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Created 69 articles, new creations do not appear to require patrolling. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:47, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
I have created 400+ well-sourced articles on military, history, literature, politics, and academia, including recent BLPs. I believe i meet the criteria for autopatrolled rights. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser
Requesting AWB rights for an account created specifically for semi-automatic edits. (Here are my AWB edits on this account to date.) Remsense ‥ 论 04:44, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I am re-requesting AWB perms. It was last denied because I had shown zero need for it but this time, I think I do have a reason. I had recently created Niagara (electoral district) and Middlesex North from a (redirect) to a Disambiguation page, and it has links. I would like to use AWB to update the links, and make it point to the right pages. I'm thinking there could be more "redirect-to-disambigaution" pages that would need updating links. Crafterstar (talk) 19:16, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to have AWB permission to do simple maintenance edits, like fixing typos or fixing links to disambiguation pages, more easily. Milo8505 (talk) 19:33, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights To improve the references for the page Flint water crisis. Emannnt (talk) 23:15, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for confirmation |
---|
Confirmed
Reason for requesting confirmed rights: Been contributing for wikipedia. Confirming my account will motivate me to contribute more to this space. UMAGPR (talk) 08:50, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag. |
---|
Extended confirmed |
Requests for file mover |
---|
File mover
Vulcan would like to be able to rename files and to help others in doing so. Already have similar role in Commons. Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:21, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer
Hi! I'd love to help out with the backlog. I have around ~40 AfD !votes, and I'm usually one of the first votes and always use strong guideline-backed reasoning. I've only had 1 AfD in the "red" cell of AfD Stats, that was a bio of a person from a non-English speaking country, and I tried to find sources in my WP:BEFORE, but nothing come up, and then another user more familiar with that country was able to dig something up so I withdrew (I don't think it should count as a black mark against me). I've also reviewed a lot of AfC submissions (a good amount of them sadly don't show in the AfC tool as they were later deleted, but there's still a decent chunk in there), and I almost always provide personalized advice backed with good reasoning when declining. You can find my CSD log here (n. 10, 100% success): User:MolecularPilot/CSD_Log, and I've also created 5 articles (see my user page), 4 of which are B class. Thanks for your time! :) MolecularPilot 🧪️✈️ 05:30, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to help contribute reduce the large backlog of unreviewed new pages. I've been an active AFC reviewer for a while. I've contributed to and created dozens of articles that are still live to date. ANUwrites 06:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
After I was granted the right some weeks ago, I have been reviewing new articles and since it expires in 6 days, I would like to request for an extension Tesleemah (talk) 20:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover |
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback
My next logical request for permission, one that I don't suppose I can utilize alongside Ultraviolet to stop the bad faith one-timers and vandals where I watch. Although, I must admit, I should simultaneously take care to not get into any content dispute I see; I'll do my best not to get into one this way. Thanks for considering (again). 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 01:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to be able to access rollback tools to fight vandalism more effectively, I am familiar with Wikipedia's rules. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 17:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
This permission will help me in combating vandalism. I’ve been actively patrolling recent changes, always warning users when necessary, assuming good faith, and taking full responsibility for all my edits. I also do crosswiki patrolling and recently joined the SWMT. — Jet Pilot (talk) 21:03, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I had been actively patrolling RC in 2023 but paused for a long time since I was too busy. I plan to resume soon and would like rollback rights to make it easier. Note from 07:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC): I had just been informed that RedWarn can be used on a school computer, so it's very likely that I will be using it. xRozuRozu • teacups 23:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
I have been reverting vandalism by undoing edits, warning users, and monitoring several pages to keep them protected. Rollback rights would make my efforts faster and more efficient. I am familiar with WP:VANDAL. ZyphorianNexus (talk) 07:15, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
|
Immediate requests
Category | Entries |
---|---|
Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
Requests for unblock | 91 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 0 |
Candidates for speedy deletion | 20 |
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 1 |
Deletion
Category | Entries |
---|---|
Articles for deletion | 484 |
Templates for deletion | 121 |
Categories for deletion | 83 |
Wikipedia files for discussion | 69 |
All redirects for discussion | 284 |
Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 23 |
Possible copyright violations | 12 |
All articles proposed for deletion | 259 |
All files proposed for deletion | 92 |
Unsorted AfD debates | 0 |
All files with the same name on Commons | 0 |
Image copyright problems
Category | Entries |
---|---|
Orphaned non-free use | 357 |
Unknown copyright status | 56 |
Unknown source | 64 |
No non-free use rationale | 3 |
Replaceable non-free use images | 15 |
Disputed non-free use images | 30 |
Page protection
Category | Entries |
---|---|
Protected | 10 |
Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,239 |
Fully protected user and user talk pages | 440 |
Protected against vandalism | 4 |
Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
Semi-protected | 2,337 |
Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
General cleanup | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
---|---|---|
All pages needing cleanup | 34,094 | 0.49 |
All articles needing rewrite | 6,002 | 0.09 |
All articles needing expert attention | 1,332 | 0.02 |
All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 39,996 | 0.58 |
Reference problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All pages needing factual verification | 11,141 | 0.16 |
All articles with unsourced statements | 535,263 | 7.73 |
All articles lacking sources | 71,584 | 1.03 |
All unreferenced BLPs | 7 | 0 |
All articles needing additional references | 474,720 | 6.86 |
All articles needing references cleanup | 4,614 | 0.07 |
All articles lacking in-text citations | 105,490 | 1.52 |
All articles with dead external links | 314,885 | 4.55 |
Image cleanup problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
Wikipedia files lacking a description | 138 | - |
Wikipedia files with unknown source | 20 | - |
Other problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All articles to be merged | 1,087 | 0.02 |
All articles to be split | 811 | 0.01 |
Unsorted Stubs | 1 | - |
Stub categories | 19,270 | - |
All uncategorized pages | 668 | 0.01 |
All orphaned articles | 52,933 | 0.76 |
All articles needing copy edit | 2,419 | 0.03 |
All articles with style issues | 19,591 | 0.28 |
All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,761 | 0.04 |
All articles that may contain original research | 16,500 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
Category | Entries |
---|---|
Requested moves | 444 |
All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 7,338 |
All accuracy disputes | 15,750 |
Articles with invalid ISBNs | 0 |
Articles with invalid ISSNs | 5 |
All articles to be expanded | 65,988 |
Special pages
Maintenance reports | Information |
---|---|
Broken redirects | |
Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
Long pages | |
New pages | New page patrol |
New pages feed | Page curation |
Protected pages | Protection policy |
Short pages | |
Uncategorized | Categorization |
Uncategorized cats | |
Uncategorized templates | |
Unused categories | |
Unused files (images) | |
Unused templates | |
Without interwiki links | |
Most interwiki links |