User talk:Nihonjoe: Difference between revisions
barnstar |
No edit summary |
||
Line 207: | Line 207: | ||
:::They were (most of them) deleted as copyright violations. If there are specific articles about which you have questions, feel free to ask, but I'm not going to spend the time giving you individual rationales for the deletion of over 600 articles since almost all of them were deleted for the same reason. As for your accusation that I'm "just trying to earn merit by using the non-rigorous policies of Wikipedia as a whole as a scapegoat for negative edits", I have no idea what that even means. I don't make "egative edits", whatever you mean by that. The samurai-related articles which I've deleted are only a tiny drop in the bucket compared to the total number of articles I've worked on here (somewhere in the neighborhood of 30,000 different articles for a total of nearly 65,000 edits). ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]]<sup>[[Help:Installing Japanese character sets|?]]</sup> · <small><font color="blue">[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|投稿]]</font> · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 23:40, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
:::They were (most of them) deleted as copyright violations. If there are specific articles about which you have questions, feel free to ask, but I'm not going to spend the time giving you individual rationales for the deletion of over 600 articles since almost all of them were deleted for the same reason. As for your accusation that I'm "just trying to earn merit by using the non-rigorous policies of Wikipedia as a whole as a scapegoat for negative edits", I have no idea what that even means. I don't make "egative edits", whatever you mean by that. The samurai-related articles which I've deleted are only a tiny drop in the bucket compared to the total number of articles I've worked on here (somewhere in the neighborhood of 30,000 different articles for a total of nearly 65,000 edits). ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]]<sup>[[Help:Installing Japanese character sets|?]]</sup> · <small><font color="blue">[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|投稿]]</font> · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 23:40, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
Well I checked a number of the articles that I found on this obscure page--[[User:Exiled Ambition/Articles]]--and while the good majority of the articles there weren't deleted they were turned into essentially informationless articles under the pretext that the references they used were violated. But after a bit of research on those references the article creator didn't seem to have made many copyright violations despite your edits, and even months later there hasn't been a hint of care in expanding those articles in any way. |
|||
Knowing this I can only be brought to the conclusion that you carelessly and unknowingly performed similar, and even more negative, actions on the samurai articles that used to occupy Wikipedia but that are now deleted. But instead of reasoning on this when it's obvious you had no reason in the book to do what you did you begin bragging about your total number of edits as if it will do the work of convincing me you are a competent administrator. |
|||
I will bring this matter up in our project room and see what we can do about this issue. [[User talk:IMMORTAL SAMURAI|Talk to IMMORTAL SAMURAI]] 07:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== UAA: [[User:Monicaleighs]] == |
== UAA: [[User:Monicaleighs]] == |
Revision as of 18:26, 10 November 2009
♦ ♦ ♦ Please place new topics at the bottom of the page. ♦ ♦ ♦ |
Archives Generally, I'll reply here if you post here, so please watch this page if you want to see my reply. If I don't reply within a couple days on another page where you replied to one of my comments, feel free to drop a message here. I have over 11,000 pages on my watchlist, so I don't always catch everything new. Thanks! ···日本穣 |
Newtype USA April 2007 Issue (Part 2)
Hi Nihonjoe! Sorry about resurrecting a really old discussion of ours, but I started working on the Le Chevalier D'Eon article again, and I need some more information about the series' novelization. I found zilch about the novel in my online research, so I thought I'd have better luck with that issue. :-/ Does the it say anything more about the novel (like release date, publisher/s, no. of pages, etc.)? And does it say if anime was based on the novel? Thanks, and sorry for the trouble! None of the public libraries that I have access to carry the magazine. :| --SilentAria talk 10:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'll have to look up the article again. It may be a little over a week, though, as I'm busy with some other things right now that may take my time. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:27, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oh okay; take your time, and thanks in advance! :D --SilentAria talk 18:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Still working on it; thanks for being patient. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:02, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Newtype Japan 1990 - 1994
In any of the magazines you have, does it mention anywhere the date that members of CLAMP left the group? If any of the magazines you have does, then could you put the references to them on the article about clamp? It would help alot. Thanks for the trouble. AngelFire3423 (talk) 15:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'll see what I can do. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:34, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Reference library request
Any chance of nabbing the Newtype USA, September 2003 (Volume 2 Number 9) article on Sailor Moon, please? I believe it may have the ratings for Pretty Guardian Sailor Moon, but I'm still interested in it even if that's not the case. Thank you. --Malkinann (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm in the middle of moving, so I may not be able to access it for a bit. I'll keep your request on my talk page, though, and take care of it as soon as possible (which, again, may be a while). ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:53, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Cheers, good luck with the move! --Malkinann (talk) 21:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Reply to WT:VG#Magazines
Hello Nihonjoe. It depends on how much the shipping of those magazines will cost. Do you have a ball park figure in US$? And how many of each magazine do you have? Around what time period did you subscribe to them? -sesuPRIME 19:13, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- I don't have a ballpark cost for shipping as it will likely depend on where I'm shipping them. There are around 20 PSMs, 10 or so OPM, maybe 5 EGM, and one Nintendo Power. I don't have exact numbers as they are located someplace else. I may have additional ones around here, too. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:39, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- If Sesuprime ends up not wanting them, I'm interested. I already have a number of those magazines, but am always looking to fill in the holes though. Would it be possible to get a full listing of the issues? Shoot me an email if you can. (Guyinblack25 talk 21:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC))
- Sure, but it will be a bit (a week or two) as I'm in the middle of moving. I'm looking to get rid of them in a lot, though, not piecemeal. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 22:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I guess it depends on how many of the issues I already have. Just shoot me an email whenever you have the info. If I don't receive one, I'll assume Sesu got them. (Guyinblack25 talk 00:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC))
- Eh, let Guy have them; my main interest was in the NPs. -sesuPRIME 01:50, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- I know I have some other NPs somewhere around if you want them. I just haven't gotten to them yet in clearing everything out of this place. :) ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- Around when are those NPs from? -sesuPRIME 19:46, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- A few years ago. I'll let you know when I locate them. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:18, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- Around when are those NPs from? -sesuPRIME 19:46, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- I know I have some other NPs somewhere around if you want them. I just haven't gotten to them yet in clearing everything out of this place. :) ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- Eh, let Guy have them; my main interest was in the NPs. -sesuPRIME 01:50, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I guess it depends on how many of the issues I already have. Just shoot me an email whenever you have the info. If I don't receive one, I'll assume Sesu got them. (Guyinblack25 talk 00:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC))
- Sure, but it will be a bit (a week or two) as I'm in the middle of moving. I'm looking to get rid of them in a lot, though, not piecemeal. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 22:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- If Sesuprime ends up not wanting them, I'm interested. I already have a number of those magazines, but am always looking to fill in the holes though. Would it be possible to get a full listing of the issues? Shoot me an email if you can. (Guyinblack25 talk 21:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC))
- Okay, here's a list of some of them (there will be more listed as I find them):
- NP: volumes 183-189, 191-192
- PSM: volumes 3, 6, 8, 10-11, 13, 35-40, 42-66, 68-83, 85-92, 94-99, 101-105, 107-108, 110-116, 118-120, 124-129 (110 includes a lenticular image on a large card with a scene from Pursuit Force, 2 copies of #8)
- EGM: volumes 173, 175-177, 180, 183-186, 188-193, 197-198, 213, 216-217
- OPM: volumes 1, 67-73-75, 77-79, 81-89, 90, 92-94, 97-106, 108-109, 111-112 (last issue) (most of them have the discs, 2 copies each of 76-77 and 79, some may have my address cut out of the cover)
- Official Dreamcast Magazine: volumes 3-11
- Again, I'll list more as I find them (including the stack I mentioned originally, which is different than the issues listed above). ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 21:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the listing. I'll compare it against my collection when I get home. May take me a while though because I have most of them boxed up. (Guyinblack25 talk 17:34, 7 July 2009 (UTC))
- Just keep in mind this isn't all of them. I have quite a few more of them. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 21:37, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry for the late reply. I don't have most of the ones you listed, so if Sesu doesn't want them I'll take them. I'll figure out something to do with any repeats. Email me whenever you get a chance so we can work out the shipping details. (Guyinblack25 talk 15:33, 13 July 2009 (UTC))
- As soon as I finish listing them, I will let you know. I still have more that I haven't listed (or located) yet. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:42, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry for the late reply. I don't have most of the ones you listed, so if Sesu doesn't want them I'll take them. I'll figure out something to do with any repeats. Email me whenever you get a chance so we can work out the shipping details. (Guyinblack25 talk 15:33, 13 July 2009 (UTC))
- Just keep in mind this isn't all of them. I have quite a few more of them. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 21:37, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the listing. I'll compare it against my collection when I get home. May take me a while though because I have most of them boxed up. (Guyinblack25 talk 17:34, 7 July 2009 (UTC))
Animage July 1995
I've been working on the New Cutie Honey series article. Back in 2007 I noticed a Yahoo auction (now gone) for "OVA GALS '95", which had pictures and drawings from (and notes on) various OVAs, including "新・キューティーハニー Vol. 3" (the fifth and sixth episodes of that series I believe). It had the lead character Honey (or at least her chest :P), and its title in huge English letters on the cover. Not long ago, I saw this page that says it was a supplement/appendix to the July 1995 Animage.
I then saw the magazine list, where you are listed as an owner of that and other '95 Animages. If you do have it (or just the supplement), I would appreciate any Honey-related notes (dates, info, etc.) it has. I still have the three blurry pictures from the auction's page (I didn't save the page itself), so I can send those if they can help to find the supplement. The Honey article is big but still missing some things (Laserdisc release dates and such)--any help is good help! --an odd name 06:43, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- It will be a bit as I'm currently in the middle of sorting things after a move. Thanks for your patience. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 08:30, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Newtype USA, August 2003 (Volume 2 Number 8)
Wondering if you could find info on Iron Wok Jan from Newtype USA, August 2003 (Volume 2 Number 8) for me. Thanks and take your time as I'm assuming your still busy from your move. Extremepro (talk) 10:01, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Newtype USA, August 2007 (Volume 6 Number 8)
Info on Peace Maker in Newtype USA, August 2007 (Volume 6 Number 8). Thanks. Extremepro (talk) 10:04, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- Info on Brave Story: New Traveler game review as well. Thanks. Extremepro (talk) 10:09, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Newtype USA, February 2007 (Volume 6 Number 2)
Info on Mechademia please. Thanks Extremepro (talk) 10:11, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Newtype USA, November 2006 (Volume 5 Number 11)
Info on Ghost Hunt please. Thanks. Extremepro (talk) 10:15, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Newtype USA, December 2006 (Volume 5 Number 12)
Info on Kamiyadori please. Thanks. Extremepro (talk) 10:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Newtype USA, July 2003 (Volume 2 Number 7)
Info on Brave Story's aizoban. Thanks. As with all the above requests please take your time to do them. Thank you very much in advance. Extremepro (talk) 10:20, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Death of User Fg2
Sorry if I'm not posting correctly - I just wanted to let you know that fellow Tokyo group member Fg2 passed away last month. He was a frequent contributor to Wikipedia and Commons. I'm not sure of the etiquette on posting things such as this, but his obituary is here:
http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/bostonglobe/obituary.aspx?n=frank-j-gualtieri&pid=131905563 203.181.14.206 (talk) 13:16, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know. He will be sorely missed here. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 14:19, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Caps
Hi, Nihonjoe. Sad news above, indeed... About the capitalization issue you brought up at the Takeo Kimura filmography review, you pointed to: wp:MOS-JA#Titles_of_books_and_other_media, which, as I read it now, doesn't seem to address this particular issue. It seems to address the issue of the Japanese use of English words in titles titles with odd capitalization. It doesn't seem to apply to the romanization of the Japanese title. The issue in question is the practise of putting the romanization in the form of first word in caps, remaining words (except for proper nouns) in lower case. (for example: This Day's Life (今日のいのち, Kyō no inochi), as opposed to This Day's Life (今日のいのち, Kyō no Inochi)) The section refers to Wikipedia:ALBUMCAPS#Capitalization, which says, "In titles of songs or albums in a language other than English, the project standard is to use the capitalization utilized by that language, not the English capitalization."... which doesn't really address non-Roman scripts... Am I reading it wrong? Or is there another part of MOS-JA that does specifically address this?... I'm preparing to go through my own filmographies, and, not having any strong preference either way, would just as soon they be in line with MOS-JA recommendations. Regards. Dekkappai (talk) 19:46, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- I guess it's more implied than specifically spelled out (not sure why every last thing needs to be specifically spelled out for some people, either). There are a few places where it states that standard capitalization rules apply, including in the section you reference ("Within the English-language Wikipedia, however, capitalization should be conventional..."). The ALBUMCAPS section you mention is likely referring to languages such as Spanish and French where it is standard to only capitalize the first word of a title rather than the standard used in English which is to capitalize all nouns, pronouns, verbs, and some other words. This has been discussed a few times, and each time the consensus was to apply the English capitalization rules to rōmaji titles as this is the English Wikipedia. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 21:40, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. Not sure I'll convert existing entries, but won't object if someone else does. I'll go with that style from now on then. Cheers! Dekkappai (talk) 22:01, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
RFA spam
Thank you for participating in WP:Requests for adminship/Kww 3 | |
---|---|
Sometimes, being turned back at the door isn't such a bad thing |
DYK for Seizō Watase
Wikiproject: Did you know? 20:43, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks! ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:07, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Did I forget to thank you? ..
- You're welcome, and good luck. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 13:48, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
I should have kept my mouth shut
Because I found that someone had moved several pages from non-Hepburn romanized titles for living persons to Hepburn versions, reverted the moves (subjects such as Yoko Kanno and Ryuichi Sakamoto), and brought it up on WT:MOS-JA, there's now a discussion to drastically change the method by which names of modern people are romanized (use Hepburn only, disregard established or common spellings except as redirects), because the subject of an article is not a reliable source for how to spell his or her own name in the English alphabet.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:41, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Sorry
I've just started to use the Lupin anti-vandal tool and thought I was reverting vandalism. Sorry! I wasn't trying to move the block notice on User:Leecorso11's page. WWE Socks 04:57, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- No problem. Please be more careful, though, as it appears that this is not the only misfire in your use of that tool. I suggest reviewing edits more carefully before using a semi-automated tool to revert them. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:07, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Newtype article
See Talk:The End of Evangelion#Newtype review. As far as I can tell, the review must've been 2002 or earlier, which would make it one of the first Newtype USA issues; if you could double-check the link's transcription's general fidelity (modulo the obvious typos), that'd be great. (Also nice would be any opinion on whether to include the little spat.) --Gwern (contribs) 15:38 30 October 2009 (GMT)
Deletion review for six World Club Challenge winners templates
An editor has asked for a deletion review of six World Club Challenge winners templates. Because you deleted them, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Tim Song (talk) 07:39, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
When I requested protection on this page back in April, I was told that the transcluded doc pages weren't protected. You may want to socialize your decision to protect it. Celestra (talk) 15:15, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- Socialize my decision? I don't know what you mean. I protected it because anon IPs kept messing it up. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:25, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- To socialize a decision means to discuss it with others. Anon IPs have been messing that page up at a fairly constant rate since I started servicing SPERs. I also thought that protection would help, but I was informed that the intent of the transcluded doc was to allow non-autoconfirmed users to edit something while the templates themselves were protected. That may have been wrong at the time or it may have changed, but you should be aware of it and you might want to discuss it with other admins. Celestra (talk) 06:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Must be a British English meaning as it's never used that way in the States. Thanks for the update. :) There are always exceptions, and this was one of them. I set the protection for a specific time (I forget the exact time length), so it will eventually expire. Hopefully that will dissuade them from this long enough for them to forget about the page. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:58, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- I wouldn't know about British English, but the phrase seems popular in the Silicon Valley. I hadn't realized it was uncommon elsewhere. Thanks for sharing that. Cheers, Celestra (talk) 01:31, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Must be a British English meaning as it's never used that way in the States. Thanks for the update. :) There are always exceptions, and this was one of them. I set the protection for a specific time (I forget the exact time length), so it will eventually expire. Hopefully that will dissuade them from this long enough for them to forget about the page. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:58, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- To socialize a decision means to discuss it with others. Anon IPs have been messing that page up at a fairly constant rate since I started servicing SPERs. I also thought that protection would help, but I was informed that the intent of the transcluded doc was to allow non-autoconfirmed users to edit something while the templates themselves were protected. That may have been wrong at the time or it may have changed, but you should be aware of it and you might want to discuss it with other admins. Celestra (talk) 06:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
I would like to request that the template above be reinstated. It was deleted under G6. It has been asked of me to speak to you directly in order to expedite the situation. Many thanks. Lando09 (talk) 16:09, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- The discussion is taking place over at WP:DRV#World Club Challenge winners templates. It looks like they are going to be procedurally undeleted and then procedurally listed at TfD. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your efforts. The page was created by a persistent sockpuppet and it's hard - too hard sometimes - to tell whether his efforts are facetious / malicious or if they contain a kernel of merit! JohnInDC (talk) 19:50, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
"Der Fuhrer" in usernames
Your comment notwithstanding, I blocked the account ... the associations of that term are just too strong to allow it. Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- I don't care either way, so that's fine by me. I was just pointing out that it may not necessarily be meant as offensive. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:53, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Samurai Articles: Deletion Violation
Hello, this is user:IMMORTAL SAMURAI, a frequent Wikipedia contributor to the Japanese "project" here. I've read into the history of most of the samurai articles that once existed here on Wikipedia and it said that you, personally, for not the first time, deleted over 100--even 200--samurai related articles within the past few months without any reason stated. I understand Wikipedia's administration recruiting policies are very non-rigorous, but don't you think this is stepping the line too far in what power you have here?
Therefore I ask that you please begin revising these articles, for what you've done to Wikipedia has been critically thoughtless and harmful to our project. If you choose to ignore this warning, however, I will be forced to speak to other administrators concerning your violation of power and have you suspended or banned from it. Talk to IMMORTAL SAMURAI 12:23, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- I stand by all the actions taken regarding any articles you refer to here. As a "frequent Wikipedia contributor to the Japanese 'project' here", however, you don't seem to have any edits other than here and on your userpage. What other username(s) have you used to make these contributions? ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 17:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- The other username I went by was Ytny, which is why you haven't seen any contributions from this account yet.
- May I ask why you stand by the actions you took regarding the articles I am referring to? From what I can see of them they weren't copyright-violated articles and the references were legitimate, making them perfectly regular articles that had no reason to be deleted. To me it seems you're just trying to earn merit by using the non-rigorous policies of Wikipedia as a whole as a scapegoat for negative edits. Please do explain. Talk to IMMORTAL SAMURAI 19:42, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- They were (most of them) deleted as copyright violations. If there are specific articles about which you have questions, feel free to ask, but I'm not going to spend the time giving you individual rationales for the deletion of over 600 articles since almost all of them were deleted for the same reason. As for your accusation that I'm "just trying to earn merit by using the non-rigorous policies of Wikipedia as a whole as a scapegoat for negative edits", I have no idea what that even means. I don't make "egative edits", whatever you mean by that. The samurai-related articles which I've deleted are only a tiny drop in the bucket compared to the total number of articles I've worked on here (somewhere in the neighborhood of 30,000 different articles for a total of nearly 65,000 edits). ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:40, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Well I checked a number of the articles that I found on this obscure page--User:Exiled Ambition/Articles--and while the good majority of the articles there weren't deleted they were turned into essentially informationless articles under the pretext that the references they used were violated. But after a bit of research on those references the article creator didn't seem to have made many copyright violations despite your edits, and even months later there hasn't been a hint of care in expanding those articles in any way.
Knowing this I can only be brought to the conclusion that you carelessly and unknowingly performed similar, and even more negative, actions on the samurai articles that used to occupy Wikipedia but that are now deleted. But instead of reasoning on this when it's obvious you had no reason in the book to do what you did you begin bragging about your total number of edits as if it will do the work of convincing me you are a competent administrator.
I will bring this matter up in our project room and see what we can do about this issue. Talk to IMMORTAL SAMURAI 07:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
UAA: User:Monicaleighs
Could you please take another look at the report I made? The user in question is apparently not the article subject (which would have raised COI issues), but someone pretending to be the article subject and trying to direct traffic to a phony Myspace page. I believe this violates the "Real Names" provisions of the username policy, in particular "Do not edit under the name of a well-known living person unless it is your real name, and you either are that well-known person or you make it clear that you are not." Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:15, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- I left a note on their user page. If they do not respond appropriately, they will likely be blocked within a week. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:34, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Petit Apple Pie
I have nominated Petit Apple Pie, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petit Apple Pie. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:25, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, I know why you contacted me about it. I'm just incredulous that you are taking things this far instead of doing something productive. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:02, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- And I'm incredulous that you continue making such uncivil and bad faith remarks when you are supposed to be an admin. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:12, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Being an admin has nothing to do with it (not even a little bit). You keep going after this article even though you know how difficult it is to locate printed articles on topics over 25 years old in Japan. See the AfD for a part of WP:BK of which you were apparently not aware. It specifically addresses non-contemporary topics such as this. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:16, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not even the person who first prodded it! I tagged it for notability, as was appropriate. Notability was NOT demonstrated. I realize you created it so its hard to be neutral, but facts are facts. It did not have evidence of notability per Wikipedia's guidelines, and it still doesn't. Two years after you made it, its still in the same shape. There is a difference between difficulty and impossibility. I answered your claim of it being non-contemporary in the AfD. And yes, your being an admin has plenty to do with it. You, even more than other editors, should at least be able to try to maintain civility, rather than making uncalled for and unsolicited snippy remarks at other editors. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:20, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- If I'm being "snippy", it's because you refuse to work with anyone who disagrees with you when you've made up your mind on a topic like this. You just plain refuse. I've seen it over and over, and you make it very difficult for anyone to do work when you try to steamroll right over them. I wouldn't have created the article if I didn't think it was a notable topic. As I've told you again and again, it's damn near impossible to find articles from that time period. Really. I'm not joking about that. WP:BK doesn't even address book series at all. I still find it difficult to believe that a series isn't considered notable when it has nearly 20 volumes and was published over 5 years through a major publisher (think of it as the Random House of Japan), but a one-off book with two different local newspaper reviews can be considered notable. Your interpretation of WP:BK is far too strict. You can't keep trying to hammer round pegs in its square hole; it just doesn't work. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:28, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Righteous Sock Barnstar | ||
Awarded to Nihonjoe for meritorious editing. Thank you for your good work reviewing speedy deletion tags on new articles written by an unknown editor. As part of this project I created an account with a dubious username and wrote ten referenced but badly formatted stubs about Antarctic mosses. Two of those articles were nominated for speedy deletion; you rejected one of the nominations with a note that the article did not qualify for A7 speedy criteria. Thank you for prompt and conscientious reviewing. Durova362 04:28, 10 November 2009 (UTC) |