User talk:Andrzejbanas/Archive 7: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 18:47, 30 August 2010

Archives

User talk:Andrzejbanas/Archive 1

Opeth's Blackwater Park rating

if you look on the front page you will notice that all the reviews are featured by a star rating. once you click on the review it goes into a number based division. it still is a star based system, 10 different ratings by 5 soild numbers and a .5 division factor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.156.240 (talk) 20:41, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

also IF you are indeed right and prove me wrong, then the wiki page on sputnikmusic needs to be changed too: "Sputnikmusic operates a simple 5-star rating system, starting at 1, that allows .5 intervals. As a guide to new reviewers, each of these values is assigned a word, ranging from 'Awful' (1.0) to 'Classic' (5.0)." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.156.240 (talk) 20:53, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

well im not trying to be rude. i apologize if i seemed so, but the site does indeed use a star rating, even if it is not shown on the review page itself. it divides it up so it is more user-friendly on their opinions of what a 3.5 rating is, etc. i do agree with your idea, to show the rating as it is on the review. however you should also look into the actual websites ideals on how they break it down, otherwise you could be putting wrong information. i see this isnt the case however, we seem to simply be disagreeing about the nature of whether a star rating should be present or not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.156.240 (talk) 21:11, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hiya, was reading your Eno articles (good job) and saw you'd used the Spin guide book. Any chance you could have a look to see if they've got reviews for Remain in Light and Fear of Music in there and what they gave them out of 10. I'd appreciate the help. Cheers. RB88 (T) 19:35, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, talk about thorough! Thanks a lot. Also, when I'm done with Talking Heads, I wouldn't mind getting some Eno ones to FA (esp Before and After Science) if you're up for it. RB88 (T) 20:04, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The Special Barnstar
		For helping out with the sourcing of Talking Heads reviews and generally being a great contributor to films and albums. Keep it up. RB88 (T) 21:24, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair-use images

Hi, File:2000adposter.jpg, File:Damneddamneddamned30.jpg, File:Xmenlaststandsndtrk.jpg are nominated for deletion. Regards Hekerui (talk) 15:19, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Spin information on Suede, i may use some of it for future edits. I did some expansion to the Coming Up and Head Music articles, i hope you like them.PhilOak (talk) 12:36, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Planet Rock

As I stated in the talk page, keep the reviews in the critical reception section. You should be looking for interviews and such for details about the music. Compare the musical style section of Trans Europe Express to that at Loveless, where tons of concrete information is available on how the the music was created. WesleyDodds (talk) 11:00, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, unless the Spin Alternative Record Guide review cited is a reprint from the magazine, you shouldn't note it in the infobox as being published as part of the monthly publication, for this is misleading. WesleyDodds (talk) 11:05, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trans-Europe Express

Hey, sorry I can't be more of use. Crazy busy these days. From what I gather, the other guy is mistaken about Allmusic. Point him to WP:ALBUMS. As far as I know, page numbers are not that essential at GA, but you will be picked on at FA. And for musical style, interviews and books are needed instead of critics. You can use a sentence or two but not to form the whole thing. It's probably better to stick a small section in the recording bit if you can't find much interview detail from the creators. Good job overall though. RB88 (T) 19:12, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hard Boiled

Hi, I've done a review of your article Hard Boiled, care to have a look? Lampman (talk) 12:26, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS October Newsletter

The October 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. The newsletter includes details on the current membership roll call to readd your name from the inactive list to the active list. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:47, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trans-Europe Express

In response to your message, I am well aware of the rules; the page had already been that way for quite some time, before you started tampering with it. The labels listed are the original labels for each territory, and are the same for the other Kraftwerk album articles as well. Leave it, or I will report vandalism. Electrokinesis (talk) 04:09, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eyes Without a Face

Interesting read - I'm just happy that I don't have to watch this :-) Hekerui (talk) 19:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS' Tag & Assess Drive and Roll Call

The project's Tag & Assess drive has begun. We will be assessing over 50,000 articles during the drive and we need your help! 200-article ranges can be adopted and completed at any pace. A variety of awards are available based on the number of articles assessed. Please help review whatever you are comfortable with, and if you have any questions, leave a message on the talk page of the drive. In addition, please add your name to the active member list if you have not already. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:54, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Black comedy wording vs. dark comedy wording

Hello, Andrzejbanas. I do not completely understand your reason for this change to the Jennifer's Body article. Why is it important to you that it say black comedy instead of dark comedy? They are synonyms of each other, after all. Plenty of critics have called Jennifer's Body a dark comedy, including the critic whose comment you altered. Plus, not all Wikipedia articles go with the more common name for the title of articles. When this happens, people sometimes link to an article in a pipelinked fashion to present the more common name instead. Or they pipelink that way because they prefer the or one of the synonyms for the word instead.

I left your change to the lead as is, but I changed your alteration of the critic's comment back. We should not alter quotes unless the altering is just a style thing, or is done for another really valid reason...along with making it clear that the original wording has been altered. For example, if it means that much to you that the critic say "black" instead of "dark," then we would present it this way: [black] comedy. Flyer22 (talk) 21:45, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I stated on my talk page: You are right that it is not part of the quote (because I took it out of the quote). LOL, it is I who should check better next time. Thank you for explaining your reasons about the other stuff and that. Flyer22 (talk) 22:21, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Criterion

So I see you've found my secret weapon! By all means, help yourself. I've been super busy for the past month or so, so my Wiki contributions have pretty much dropped to zero. I was planning on getting back around to it eventually, but an extra hand would be great. So go for it! Drewcifer (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: HG Clouzot

No problem, I'm looking forward to it. At a glance, the article looks great, I'm confident it will pass the GAN. I've started my GAN review, and will try to finish it as quickly as I can. I'll keep in mind what you said about the sources, too. — Hunter Kahn _(c) 06:48, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem about the responses. I have placed a few more suggestions at the GAN site. I'll try to finish the whole review by the end of the week. — Hunter Kahn _(c) 07:57, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey, I really appreciate your patience in working through the GA items I've identified. I wanted to let you know I've struck almost everything by now. It seems all that's left are the items about Raoul Levy, the five television documentaries, the La Prisonniere/L'Enfer thing, and Krasnoludek's question about Inès de Gonzalez. Once those are done, I think we're ready! — Hunter Kahn _(c) 02:22, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS November Newsletter

The November 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Big Momma's House

Hello Andrzejbanas. I saw Big Momma's House 2's page, and thought a page could be on wikipedia that has all of Big Momma's House's Characters.Leave a comment on My Talk Page to contact me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Narnia2514 (talk • contribs) 23:42, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

White Zombie

Hello, Andrzejbanas. You have new messages at Laurinavicius's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Orphaned non-free image File:Dontsweatthetechnics.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dontsweatthetechnics.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGa^talk 18:53, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats!

I've passed Henri-Georges Clouzot as a GA! Congrats, and thanks again for your patience and hard work! I'm not sure if you're planning to see this through as for a featured article nomination someday. If you decide to do so (and I'd encourage it!) I left you some advice on the GA review page that I'd urge you to look at and consider. Also, I wanted to make this offer to you: if you were willing to make stubs or start-class articles about all the subjects that are redlinked in the Clouzot page, I would give you a barnstar for the effort. :) Congrats again! — Hunter Kahn _(c) 22:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I see it's been some time since you nominated White Zombie for GAN, so I think I'm going to review that one as well, if you don't have any objection? — Hunter Kahn _(c) 22:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great job on the Clouzot article! -Krasnoludek (talk) 22:54, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and if you need another eye/help on the White Zombie article, I've actually seen that movie so I might be more assistance there than I was with Clouzot (I know, I know, I really need to see his movies!). -Krasnoludek (talk) 22:56, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Andrzejbanas, I didn't realize this article was already being reviewed because it wasn't marked as such on the WP:GAN site. Obviously, I can't put myself down as an article reviewer if it's already being reviewed. However, I can peek on that review and drop in some suggestions if need be. I'll try to do that in this case. But I'd be happy to review The Testament of Dr. Mabuse for you instead, as I see that has no reviewer yet! — Hunter Kahn _(c) 02:35, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Wait...now I'm confused...has LittleMissWikipoo been blocked as a banned user sockpuppet? I'm confused...who is conducting your White Zombie review right now? lol Could you straight me out here Andrzejbanas? — Hunter Kahn _(c) 02:40, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, it seems like this LittleMissWikipoo situation was quite a mess! lol. After doing some research here, it appears that LittleMissWikipoo indeed has been banned for creating multiple accounts, leaving your GAN in limbo. As such, I've decided to take over the review myself (meaning I'm not reviewing the Mabuse movie for now). I made a post over at the GAN discussing how I'm going to handle the review... — Hunter Kahn _(c) 05:20, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thewolfmanposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thewolfmanposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:38, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Testamentofdrmabuse.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Testamentofdrmabuse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:40, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SpyNextDoor.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SpyNextDoor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Myscienceproject.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Myscienceproject.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:56, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Newbarbarians.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Newbarbarians.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:00, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Criesandwhispers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Criesandwhispers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:07, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thevanishing1993poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thevanishing1993poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:18, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Psyouloveme.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Psyouloveme.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Theactionpackedmentallist.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Theactionpackedmentallist.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Whostillkillsound.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Whostillkillsound.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Resiliencekid606.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Resiliencekid606.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:53, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GQontheEQ++.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GQontheEQ++.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:53, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Prettygirlsmakeraves.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Prettygirlsmakeraves.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:53, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lovepeacepoetryjapan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lovepeacepoetryjapan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:53, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: White Zombie

No problem at all, take your time. I've been a bit busy myself recently. I'll try to continue forward with the review this weekend, but you can respond as you're able. — Hunter Kahn _(c) 15:25, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've finished my run-through of the article. Let me know when you can get to it! — Hunter Kahn _(c) 02:12, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Just wanted to let you know I'm back from my long weekend now and I've responded to several of your changes at GAN. Many of the objections are already struck, but there are still a few outstanding, so let me know after you get to them. No rush! :) — Hunter Kahn _(c) 03:30, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hahahhaha they have decline your requests

LOL chill out dude, and accept that matrix is an adventure movie, just because it is science fiction and action doesn't mean it can't be also an adventure movie —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.43.36.157 (talk) 15:54, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Adventure films

Thank you for the message you left on my talk page. You are correct that I looked at the List of adventure films: 1990s and List of adventure films: 2000s redirects ... however that is because you asked to have exactly those pages protected [1]. — Kralizec! (talk) 17:45, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another gentle ping from WP:VG

Dear Andrzejbanas,

You are receiving this message because either [[Category:WikiProject Video games members]] or {{User WPVG}} is somewhere in your userspace, and you are currently listed in the "Unknown" section on the project's member list.

The member list is meant to provide a clearer picture of active membership. It is recommended that you update your status if you plan to regularly:

Edit video game-related pages in the Article namespace
Participate in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Members listed in the "Unknown" section will be removed from the membership list and category at the end of January 2010. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

Sincerely, the Video Games WikiProject (delivery by xenobot 21:41, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Andrzejbanas. You have new messages at Shirik's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 21:43, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of adventure films of the 1990s. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Q ^{T C} 21:48, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vanishing saskia.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vanishing saskia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:33, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films December 2009 Newsletter

The December 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

White Zombie

Hey Andrzejbanas. I see it's been almost two weeks with no movement at the White Zombie GAN. Do you still need more time because you can start working on that one? Perhaps we should fail it for now, but since the GAN review comments will still be intact, you can address them at your own pace and renominate it for GA in a few weeks or months? If you go that route, I'll obviously be willing to review it again when you renominate it. Or we could leave it on hold for a while longer, but I don't think it's best to have it lingering for too long. Let me know... — Hun ter Ka hn 23:16, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I hope you understand that I'm not trying to bully or pester you or anything. It's just that the GAN backlog is growing every day. lol. Another week is not a problem at all. — Hun ter Ka hn 04:08, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hey, hope you had a good holiday. Could you do me a favour and message me what Spin wrote about Fleetwood Mac's Rumours? It's a near-future FAC. Cheers. PRB88 (T) 13:25, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's alright. Managed to find 10 after all. Thanks anyways. Have you got any albums you particularly want to get to FA? PRB88 (T) 18:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

White Zombie (film)

Congrats! That's a pass! — Hun ter Ka hn 22:42, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Raising Arizona page

Sorry for being such a lout about this article in the past. I had been preparing to do some research on the supposed influences on the film and thematic motifs, and then you (I believe justifiably) deleted the unsourced material. For some reason it got under my skin, and I have to say I apologize for reverts and smarmy edits of your work on that article.

You really do do good work around here. :) Artemisstrong (talk) 04:23, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is time

Uh-oh. Drewcifer (talk) 13:49, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films January 2010 Newsletter

The January 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:41, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Film posters

Could you PLEASE consider using {{Film poster fur}} from now on?

If you use FURME it's simple to add rationales, using it, all you need to do is use the film cover option, don't select a type (ie. don't select DVD or VHS) and replace 'cover' with 'poster' at the appropriate point in the generated text.

I would strongly suggest you start to convert your previous uploads over to this template as well.

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:37, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Drag Me to Hell

Why did you remove the paragraph about the interpretation of comedy horror and then add the category for comedy horror? This has not been verified by any of the cast or crew. It's just some critics' opinions. ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 17:16, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No. If anything the paragraph can be removed. As I said above, this is just some critics' opinions. ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 17:28, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where are the video sources? ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 18:13, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

True enough. Feel free to add the cat etc. ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 18:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Blob

Template:The Blob has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:02, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Rookie (1990 film)

Hi, I noticed you've been making changes to the Rookie page. I welcome any supplemental help. However, I noticed a few times you removed the genre's of "Thriller" and "Drama" films from the page. On IMDb, it lists this film in those categories. Thats why I placed them there. I took out the redundant categories which you suggested. That was my mistake. Now as far as the plot is concerned, it was discussed numerous times on the FA page. It had been shorter and more concise in length but people felt it hard to understand the individual details. Therefore, I slightly lengthened it. I'm trying to keep it as short as possible. Trust me, there are many more details which I did not include. I tried my best to keep it to a bare-bones minimum. Mike Tompsonn (talk) 17:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Rudolf Klein-Rogge profile contributions

Hey,

That was really good material you put on there and I'm glad that someone is taking the time to work on a profile for this actor here - I sure don't know enough about Wikis to do that!

I have a request, though: Could you remove the image you posted for the actor on his biographical page? The original physical image belongs to me, I had it posted on my own website originally and someone stole a digital version of the image and reposted it without my permission. He did this to a whole collection of images on my site and now I can't get him to take them down, but I'm hoping that I won't have the same problem here at Wikipedia. I know the rules of Fair Use and all that but is it really fair to use someone else's property without permission?

Hope you understand and comply to this request.

Die Filmdame (talk) 04:02, 21 February 2010 (UTC)Die Filmdame[reply]

Awesome! Thanks for hearing me out! Well, I have some other photos, not necessarily out of copyright, but that I'm more willing to deal out for free use. They're from postcards I have and quite a few are great for profile images. Could you message me your email so I can them along?

Die Filmdame (talk) 02:07, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Die Filmdame[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:ADULT. albums

Fair use rationale for File:RKR wiki pic.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RKR wiki pic.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fred the Oyster (talk) 02:49, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:RKR wiki pic.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RKR wiki pic.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fred the Oyster (talk) 16:43, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rescued by Rover

Hi there, I think I've addressed all the issues in the GA review for Rescued by Rover. Thanks for reviewing. :) Miyagawa (talk) 14:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films February 2010 Newsletter

The February 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:32, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of action film actors

Hi andrzej, I'd like you to an edit at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_action_film_actors and remove some actors that are not action movie actors, such as Natalie portman, Dakota Fanning, Heath Ledger, Al Pacino and Robert de Niro. I can't find sources mentioning them as action movie actors, and they really didn't appear to be action starts like arnold schwarzenegger or stallone. 201.43.205.174 (talk) 02:46, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Criterion

For sure man, we should definitely renominate it. I was waiting until my schedule freed up a little bit, but I'm not sure when that's going to happen. So if you wanna co-nom it yourself, I'll definitely poke my head in whenever I can and see if I can help with the process. Drewcifer (talk) 22:38, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you change a poster

Could you please explain this your edit. What was wrong with the old cover?--Tired time (talk) 09:36, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, of course everything is cool. I asked because I wanted to learn what I can do better. I am a mass uploader of film posters and covers and i didn't know that posters are preferred to covers, so it was a very valuable information, thank you very much :) --Tired time (talk) 18:35, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Lord of the Rings

If you remove ROTK of the action movie list, I will remove your low-action film TDK. You have won this time, But I will be there in 27 March to readd lotr. 201.68.136.53 (talk) 20:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do not recommend this kind of persistence as the page will just continue to be blocked again and again. Cheers. Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:07, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have lots of ways to make you waste your precious time requesting for page protection, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.68.195.130 (talk) 23:11, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RudolfKlein-Rogge.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RudolfKlein-Rogge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:16, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rudolf Klein-Rogge.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rudolf Klein-Rogge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 16:38, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Abettertomorrow.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Abettertomorrow.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:08, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shaolinsoccerposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shaolinsoccerposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.

If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 20:20, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Xtort GA Review

Thanks for reviewing Xtort. I went through your comments, and I think I've addressed all of them. Please update your review and let me know if there's anything else I'm missing. Thanks again! Torchiest (talk) 04:57, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still working on getting more information into the history and production sections, but I was wondering if you could go to the talk page and read about a disagreement between myself an another editor about the history section. Do you think it is appropriate to include sales stats for KMFDM's previous album, Nihil, as a way to show the band's increasing popularity, or is that something that should be left strictly on the Nihil page itself? Thanks for your input. Torchiest (talk | contribs) 00:45, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe we've ironed out our differences, and I think the page is basically complete at this point. I look forward to your review. Torchiest (talk | contribs) 04:24, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I made the last few changes you requested. I think the article is good to go. Torchiest (talk | contribs) 04:42, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:I Love You But I've Chosen Darkness albums

Coordinator election discussion

A new discussion has started about the next term coordinator election. Please join in with your thoughts so we can quickly get this moving along. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:10, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Les Visiteurs.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Les Visiteurs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:50, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Allmovie is not reliable

Allmovie is not a reliable source, as it is also a user-contributed site, It was me who added the action genre to "the dark knight" it it weren't for me, there would be no action in the TDK Allmovie page, all I said was "The Dark Knight is also an action movie", seeing that the movie was considered an action after it was released, the webmaster agreed on putting action on tdk. Just because Allmovie doesn't list LOTR as action films doesn't mean they are not action films. Also, the list of crime and thriller films have no sources, so why do I have to add sources to the LOTR films as action and the matrix as adventure? 200.158.246.102 (talk) 22:33, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where to start...Allmovie is not a user-contributed site. I'm curious how you added it and why would you add genres you disagree with. Also, I have more than one source citing The Dark Knight as an action film. The list of crime films does have sources, or at least it's getting them as we speak. The list of thriller films should have sources but obviously it does not. You need to add sources per these rules at WP:OR. If you have situations with these rules, I'd suggest you bring them up at WP:FILM. It's not that you need Allmovie as a source, but you need something there that can be considered valid. I do not consider the Rolling Stone one valid as they do not even have a genre for Fantasy which is a big flaw on their part. I reccomend you to read over the rules of editing before you venture into edit warring again. Cheers. Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:39, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. _Xeworlebi ^(t•c) 20:02, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films March 2010 Newsletter

The March 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:44, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Phantomposter.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Phantomposter.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 15:16, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Classetousrisquesposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Classetousrisquesposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 03:08, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks

Hello Andrzejbanas. I wanted to drop you a thanks for updating the List of Criterion Collection DVD and Blu-ray releases page regarding the Studio Canal films going out of print. I somehow missed this on my watchlist on the day that you did the update. Then, when I got a newletter from the Criterion Collection today, I went to the page and found that you had already taken care of the situation. Good job, cheers and happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 19:26, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Love Hate

I am having an issue with User:Louis Taylor about the genre(s) on this album, as well as Love vs. Money; the user has kept adding synthpop (which u removed b4 from this article) and hip hop. I wont revert him again as it will violate the 3-rv rule, but maybe u can help. As I stated in my discussions with the user on the article's talk page, R&B already signifies any hip hop influence on the album as R&B is defined on wikipedia as incorporating hip hop elements, but the reviews for the album do not mention hip hop. Also, I agree with your removal of synthpop, even though elements of it are present on the minority of the tracks. Anyway, if u can help thanks, if not, thanks for taking your time with reading this. Dan56 (talk) 00:57, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added sources in the article indicating that its primarily an R&B/pop album; looking through the reviews/articles about the album, I found no mention of hip hop or synthpop. Dan56 (talk) 01:26, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Troubleinparadiseposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Troubleinparadiseposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:32, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rififi

Hi! I've thought about it, and I've added a variation on the translation in the intro page. Take a look and tell me what you think. I think it will suit both our views on the topic. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:43, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. That is an improvement. I still think you should put that in the lede someplace in the English wiki (perhaps as a very last one-sentence paragraph?), but anything in the lede is better than nothing. S B H arris 19:43, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Babyblood.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Babyblood.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 16:09, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

		WP:FILM Silver Reel
		This is to acknowledge and thank you for your participation in tagging and assessing 400 articles in WP:FILMS' Tag & Assess Drive 2009-2010. You have helped to ensure our project has a better idea of the articles under our scope. I appreciate your efforts in further helping the project! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:29, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS April Newsletter

The April 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:44, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Hybrid albums

CfD nomination of Category:Hybrid albums

DYK for Liliom (1934 film)

On May 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Liliom (1934 film), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:04, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Balletdraculasilent.png

Thank you for uploading File:Balletdraculasilent.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:09, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nightmare Legacy

You may wish to return to Talk:Never Sleep Again: The Elm Street Legacy and re-evaluate your position on the article. MichaelQSchmidt has sourced some information for the documentary and would like everyone to review the page again. My opinion remains the same, as everyone on that page is already on A Nightmare on Elm Street (franchise)#Documentary, with the exception of the IMDb cast list for everyone interviewed. You may feel otherwise, and it would be only right for anyone who has cast an opinion of the previous version of the page to review it and either alter their opinion or reaffirm their choice. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 23:25, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Splice categorizations

Just wanted to let you know that I started a discussion at Talk:Splice_(film)#Categories in regards to categorizations. I'm not sure if there's even a style guide rule on categorization but especially on a movies that span multiple categories we should probably be clear on what the movie falls under. In lieu of a consensus or style guide though I'm fine with leaving it as is at least until it can be figured out and/or the movie is released and properly categorized by outside sources. Cat-five - talk 03:26, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:New Wave/Post-punk revival albums

Orphaned non-free image File:Thekillerposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thekillerposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Killer

Hello, Andrzejbanas. You have new messages at Peppage's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

WP:FILMS May 2010 Newsletter

The May 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:50, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTY

Hi, I saw you haven't yet voted for Picture of the Year. You are eligible to vote, so support your favorite! Also, if I was you I would do a login unification, so I wouldn't have to log in separately. Best Hekerui (talk) 12:21, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Slider

Thanks for your input on that Andrzejbanas. However, as I edited, the Thunderwing issue (The Slider Recordings) is in fact an entirely new collection of out-takes and NOT another reissue of the album, as is Rabbit Fighter. As it is currently shown as simply 'bonus tracks' it is not at all accurate. I do think both albums warrant inclusion in their entirity on the page. And I always fail to see why Discogs is cited as unreliable though, especially when scans of the album in question are there to verify. As to 'user generated' - isn't every article on the worldwide web?. Anyway, let me know what you think about the inclusion of The Slider Recordings and Rabbit Fighter. Thanks! Davidkt 16:14, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi Andrzejbanas, many thanks for your reply regarding the article. Following your input I've re-entered the details regarding the Rabbit Fighter album, using the Allmusic review reference and repaired the error showing for the Thunderwing reference. I've also removed my superfluous details and have ommited any track listings. I'd appreciate it if you'd cast an expert eye over this and see if this is now okay? (I'm sure it is!) I have to admit, I do tend to add far too much detail to these things so another opinion always helps. Thanks again! Davidkt 15:16, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Silence of the LambsYou removed adventure cats in LMS describing you can't find sources mentioning it as an adventure film, yet I can't find sources mentioning Silence of the Lambs as a horror film yet I don't see you removing horror from silence of the lambs. It's well agreed that Little Miss Sunshine is an adventure film and that Silence of the Lambs is not a horror film. I have a source listing LMS as adventure film before IMDb listed it as an adventure film. So, if you have sources citing Silance of the Lambs as horror films, show me, if not, you can remove horror from Silence of the Lambs, that is, if you can remove adventure from a clearly adventure movie, you can remove horror from an obviously non-horror film. Thank you. Cheers. 201.95.48.234 (talk) 17:05, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]Personal Attack redactedHi Andrzejbanas, I don't know if you saw them, but 201.95.48.234 (talk · contribs) made personal attacks on you at Talk:Leon, Talk:Inglourious Basterds and an even worse one at Talk:Little Miss Sunshine (which I have redacted). I gave a lv1 NPA warning for Leon but went to lvl 4 immediate when saw this diff at Talk:Little Miss Sunshine. I have also made a report to wp:AN/I —HERE. --220.101 (talk) ^\Contribs 17:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]Re: Little Miss SunshineYou're Welcome, glad I could help. :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • 19:02, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]Horror sources for The Silence of the Lambs?Do you have any sources refering SOTL as a horror film? 201.68.136.228 (talk) 21:52, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]Yes, I found a good amount. The most predominant genre I found was thriller however. Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:15, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]You Tube - Whale 'Hobo Humpin'The video is a primary source. We must take care as per your direction on WP:RS, of course, but I'd be surprised if you are arguing that this clip has been doctored in any way! 3RR as this is neither BLP nor contentious nor inaccurate. Please discuss on the, er, discussion page why you feel this RS is invalid. Thanks, --80.192.21.253 (talk) 00:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] 'In some cases, video clips published on YouTube may be acceptable as primary sources if their authenticity can be confirmed, or as a secondary source if they can be traced to a reliable publisher, but even then should be used with caution. They may also be used as a convenience link for material originally published elsewhere. Be careful not to link to material that is a copyright violation.' I can find other sources for the video if you like but the authenticity of this video is not really in question. Arbitration? --80.192.21.253 (talk) 00:07, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]Regardless the information is pure trivia. Who cares? It isn't a big deal that the person has braces. It's simply not notable. You might as well say it's important that she licks someone's armpit in this video as well. Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:20, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]The Evil Within (film)The Evil Within (1971 film) differs with Baby Blood (1990 film). Newone (talk) 05:26, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Richard_ElfmanYou are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Richard_Elfman. Stacey Doljack Borsody (talk) 21:27, 28 June 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})[reply]WP:FILMS June 2010 NewsletterThe June 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:28, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Orphaned non-free image File:Crossbowatari2600.jpg⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crossbowatari2600.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again. If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page. If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Dance in the Dark

Hello, Andrzejbanas. You have new messages at Talk:Dance in the Dark. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.regards, Lil-unique1 (talk) 12:04, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Dance in the DarkIf you didn't read the introduction, Dance in the Dark is a mixture of synthpop and has new wave influences! So stop thinking that it's not new wave because it is! Omenacommeth (talk) 10:41, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Orphaned non-free image File:The Public Eye.jpg⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Public Eye.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:54, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]The Public Eye (film)Re better image...oopps did not mean to to that, sorry ... yes, better image. Luigibob (talk) 04:17, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Stab in the dark here. . . but given your love of Eno, would you possibly be interested in collaborating on something Peter Gabriel-related, either with solo or with Genesis? I have his official biography checked out from the library at the moment. WesleyDodds (talk) 11:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]WarningHi there ANDRZEJ, VASCO here, Regarding the message you sent to User:Zombie433, i'll just fill you in: he removed it minutes before receiving it, without replying to you i see. He edits massively in soccer as myself, and has had confrontations with several users because of this attitude he has (he has been friendly tipped about several stuff - very poor language, overlinking, questionable sources, over-categorization, etc - by several people, he removes messages and moves on, doing what he wants when he wants), treating WP like his personal website. Don't let the level four in English on his user page fool you, he is a level 2 at best. Still, no excuse for this behaviour, some messages he receives are very easy to understand, he just does not care. Just wanted to let you know man. Hopefully, everything will work out for you, keep it up and happy editing, from Portugal - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 03:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Spider-Man 3I see you deleted 2000s thriller films rom Spider-man 3, just to let you know that your so loved allmovie sources lists SM3 as Action Thriller —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.43.208.201 (talk) 16:14, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]So put action thriller there. what's your problem? Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:58, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Orphaned non-free image File:Insomnia-poster.jpg⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Insomnia-poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again. If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page. If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:19, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]...For the Whole World to SeeI really don't understand why you're being so difficult about the changes I'm attempting to make to this article. I assume that since you're watching the article that you have some knowledge of the subject, so you must know that that the changes are accurate. And even once valid sources were cited you still disapprove for some reason. I am attempting to improve the article, and your hindrance is a bit baffling. Freshfighter9^talk 17:59, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]WP:FILMS July 2010 NewsletterThe July 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]source discussionSince u assessed the article The Root, would u help in this discussion about one of its sources? Dan56 (talk) 13:41, 7 August 2010 (UTC) |[reply]Orphaned non-free image File:2000 AD-Poster.jpg⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2000 AD-Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again. If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page. If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:16, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Gearslutz discussionI am having some opposition at this discussion, and apparantely one of them has threatened me w/blocking for the recent edits I made to Voodoo (D'Angelo album) and The Root concerning a video interview source and the Gearslutz source (only for Elevado's info on his own individual work). User:Jrod2 said "U cant use what Elevado said about Hunter at gearslutz or any other place period. It makes no difference if ya find another source; ya just cant add that type of content regarding LP". I would really appreciate some help. Dan56 (talk) 23:03, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Ray of LightThank you for your contribution to Ray of Light, but the album is stated under the genres of electronica, trip hop and ambient music, not pop rock. Also, please refer to Musical and literary genres, because while musical genres are classed as nouns, proper nouns refer to places only so therefore they should have a mixture of capital letters and single case letters. 11:07, 11 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.138.100.154 (talk)Orphaned non-free image File:PoliceStoryPoster.jpg⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PoliceStoryPoster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:25, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Mic Neumann, Kung FauxI see you have been come across the up 68.XX.XX.XX, if he's not employed by the company or is connected in some way I'll be surprised. --Cameron Scott (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Image tagging for File:High-Risk-Poster.jpgThanks for uploading File:High-Risk-Poster.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. For more information on using images, see the following pages:Wikipedia:Image use policy Wikipedia:Image copyright tagsThank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:07, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Image tagging for File:City-Hunter.jpgThanks for uploading File:City-Hunter.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. For more information on using images, see the following pages:Wikipedia:Image use policy Wikipedia:Image copyright tagsThank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:06, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Orphaned non-free image File:Audition (film).jpg⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Audition (film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hugahoody (talk) 20:31, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]WP Horror in the SignpostI noticed that WikiProject Horror has fallen into semi-active status, although you continue to update the project's page and at least three other members regularly edit articles about horror films. A couple years ago, a request was made to feature the project in the Signpost's WikiProject Report. I would like to fulfill your project's request if you and some of your fellow members would be interested in trying to revive the project. The publicity from the Signpost would definitely help a revival effort as well as bring attention to the accomplishments you and your fellow project members have already achieved. If you're interested, please let me know by leaving a note here or on my talk page. -Mabeenot (talk) 02:53, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Zombie433Not sure if you are aware, but Zombie433 is being discussed at WP:ANI here about his contributions to footballer articles. In addition, Zombie433 was blocked for a month for spamming dreadcentral.com. I'm aware that Zombie433 has edited lists of films, and honestly, I think we should revert all his contributions. Erik (talk | contribs) 16:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Ray of LightYou keep changing the Ray of Light article, and you are gonna pay for it loser

@@ Line 758: / Line 758: @@
 Not sure if you are aware, but Zombie433 is being discussed at WP:ANI [[WP:ANI#User:Zombie433|here]] about his contributions to footballer articles. In addition, Zombie433 was blocked for a month for spamming dreadcentral.com. I'm aware that Zombie433 has edited lists of films, and honestly, I think we should revert all his contributions. Erik ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 16:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
+==Ray of Light==
+You keep changing the Ray of Light article, and you are gonna pay for it loser