Talk:Source Code: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:49, 16 December 2010

Chicago Stub‑class

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Film Stub‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Science Fiction Unassessed

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Spoiler

Deleted the following lines

"In his final trips, Captain Stevens begins to suspect that he -- or more specifically Sean (whose body he inhabits) -- is the bomber."

Seemed like a spoiler to me, not a very good idea to have it in the article, especially with the movie release so far away. 188.200.73.137 (talk) 09:53, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:SPOILER. Wikipedia does not avoid spoilers. If people don't want the plot revealed, perhaps they shouldn't read the plot section of the film's article on an encyclopaedia. Geoff B (talk) 16:51, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For an unreleased movie, I expect to read enough of the plot for me to make up my mind about whether I want to keep it on my radar to see it when it comes out. That doesn't seem unrealistic. How many other upcoming movie listing sites spoil a key part of the story for a movie that isn't due out until next year? Furthermore, I don't think Wikipedia's spoiler policy is thought out enough for unreleased media. What are the authoritative sources that reveal the full plot of the story, if there's no book to go by e.g.? How do we even know that this ending will be part of the movie? Maybe if it's posted to prominently on Wikipedia, the producers decide to alter it? Consider what the intent of the majority of the visitors of the page is. They didn't come here to be spoiled. They came to be find out if an upcoming project is interesting. Jschuur (talk) 08:08, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok, thank you for pointing out. Do you think a "spoiler warning" should be added? 188.200.73.137 (talk) 23:28, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 [[Special:Contributions/188.200.73.137|188.200.73.137]] ([[User talk:188.200.73.137|talk]]) 09:53, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 :See [[WP:SPOILER]].  Wikipedia does not avoid spoilers.  If people don't want the plot revealed, perhaps they shouldn't read the plot section of the film's article on an encyclopaedia.  [[User:Geoff B|Geoff B]] ([[User talk:Geoff B|talk]]) 16:51, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
-:: For an unreleased movie, I expect to read enough of the plot for me to make up my mind about whether I want to keep it on my radar to see it when it comes out. That doesn't seem unrealistic. How many other upcoming movie listing sites spoil a key part of the story for a movie that isn't due out until next year? Furthermore, I don't think Wikipedia's spoiler policy is thought out enough for unreleased media. What are the authoritative sources that reveal the full plot of the story, if there's no book to go by e.g.? How do we even know that this ending will be part of the movie? Maybe if it's posted to prominently on Wikipedia, the producers decide to alter it? Consider what the intent of the majority of the visitors of the page. They didn't come here to be spoiled. They came to be find out if an upcoming project is interesting. [[User:Jschuur|Jschuur]] ([[User talk:Jschuur|talk]]) 08:08, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
+:: For an unreleased movie, I expect to read enough of the plot for me to make up my mind about whether I want to keep it on my radar to see it when it comes out. That doesn't seem unrealistic. How many other upcoming movie listing sites spoil a key part of the story for a movie that isn't due out until next year? Furthermore, I don't think Wikipedia's spoiler policy is thought out enough for unreleased media. What are the authoritative sources that reveal the full plot of the story, if there's no book to go by e.g.? How do we even know that this ending will be part of the movie? Maybe if it's posted to prominently on Wikipedia, the producers decide to alter it? Consider what the intent of the majority of the visitors of the page is. They didn't come here to be spoiled. They came to be find out if an upcoming project is interesting. [[User:Jschuur|Jschuur]] ([[User talk:Jschuur|talk]]) 08:08, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 Oh, ok, thank you for pointing out. Do you think a "spoiler warning" should be added? [[Special:Contributions/188.200.73.137|188.200.73.137]] ([[User talk:188.200.73.137|talk]]) 23:28, 27 November 2010 (UTC)