Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Pena: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 08:07, 15 January 2011

Adrian Pena

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. This player is non-notable because he has never appeared in a fully-professional league (therefore failing WP:NFOOTBALL), and has not received "significant coverage", therefore failing WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 13:58, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 13:59, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per membership on the U-17 Canada men's national youth soccer teams and clause 1 of WP:NFOOTBALL.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gosox5555 (talk • contribs) 23:07, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clause 1 of NFOOTBALL states "any officially sanctioned senior international competition" - youth caps do not confer notability. Giant Snowman 23:16, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

True, as above, change to delete. ^~Gosox⁽⁵⁵⁾₍₅₅₎ 23:18, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you possibly strike out your keep !vote then - it looks like you're contradicting yourself otherwise! Thanks and regards, Giant Snowman 23:24, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:41, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment; the article appears to say that he has debuted for a fully professional side. Is the Canadian Soccer League not professional? And if not, is it the highest non-professional league? Ironholds (talk) 01:56, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The CSL is not fully-professional, as confirmed by WP:FPL, and playing in a semi-professional level is not enough to meet WP:NFOOTBALL. Regards, Giant Snowman 02:35, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting; they've changed the guideline (it used to be that the top semi-professional league would also be considered notable). Just making sure to check I wasn't missing anything; taking this into account, I would suggest deleting this article until such an occasion that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:ATHLETE. Regards, Ironholds (talk) 03:06, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. J Mo 101 (talk) 10:23, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no reason for this player to pass WP:NFOOTBALL Spiderone 11:14, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk(P) 08:07, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 *'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:J Mo 101|J Mo 101]] ([[User talk:J Mo 101|talk]]) 10:23, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' - no reason for this player to pass [[WP:NFOOTBALL]] [[User:Spiderone|<font color="#996600" size="2px">Spiderone</font>]] 11:14, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
+*'''Delete:''' fails [[WP:NFOOTBALL]]. <font face="Antiqua, serif">''[[User:Hrafn|Hrafn]]<sup>[[User talk:Hrafn|Talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Hrafn|Stalk]]</sub><sup>''('''[[M:Precisionism|P]]''')</sup></font> 08:07, 15 January 2011 (UTC)