Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Pena

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 10:01, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adrian Pena

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. This player is non-notable because he has never appeared in a fully-professional league (therefore failing WP:NFOOTBALL), and has not received "significant coverage", therefore failing WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 13:58, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 13:59, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per membership on the U-17 Canada men's national youth soccer teams and clause 1 of WP:NFOOTBALL.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gosox5555 (talk • contribs) 23:07, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clause 1 of NFOOTBALL states "any officially sanctioned senior international competition" - youth caps do not confer notability. Giant Snowman 23:16, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

True, as above, change to delete. ^~Gosox⁽⁵⁵⁾₍₅₅₎ 23:18, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you possibly strike out your keep !vote then - it looks like you're contradicting yourself otherwise! Thanks and regards, Giant Snowman 23:24, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:41, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment; the article appears to say that he has debuted for a fully professional side. Is the Canadian Soccer League not professional? And if not, is it the highest non-professional league? Ironholds (talk) 01:56, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The CSL is not fully-professional, as confirmed by WP:FPL, and playing in a semi-professional level is not enough to meet WP:NFOOTBALL. Regards, Giant Snowman 02:35, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting; they've changed the guideline (it used to be that the top semi-professional league would also be considered notable). Just making sure to check I wasn't missing anything; taking this into account, I would suggest deleting this article until such an occasion that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:ATHLETE. Regards, Ironholds (talk) 03:06, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. J Mo 101 (talk) 10:23, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no reason for this player to pass WP:NFOOTBALL Spiderone 11:14, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 08:07, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.