Jump to content

User talk:ClueBot Commons: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m Reverted edits by Majblood (talk) to last version by 111.251.194.52
No edit summary
Line 97: Line 97:
==Less links is seen as vandalism==
==Less links is seen as vandalism==
I read [[Rice#United_States]] and I find it having too many links to irrelevant topics. There are even links to general concepts such as [[profit]] and [[port]]. I trimed some links and got reverted. I don't think this is vandalism.[[Special:Contributions/111.251.194.52|111.251.194.52]] ([[User talk:111.251.194.52|talk]]) 13:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
I read [[Rice#United_States]] and I find it having too many links to irrelevant topics. There are even links to general concepts such as [[profit]] and [[port]]. I trimed some links and got reverted. I don't think this is vandalism.[[Special:Contributions/111.251.194.52|111.251.194.52]] ([[User talk:111.251.194.52|talk]]) 13:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Get fucked. I can edit if I want.

Revision as of 21:09, 25 January 2011


This page is for comments on the bot or questions about the bot.
Report false positives on the false positives page, not here.
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the [edit] link above each header to edit that header.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
ClueBot's owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page unless you request otherwise.


Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.
ClueBots
ClueBot NG/Anti-vandalism · ClueBot II/ClueBot Script
ClueBot III/Archive · Talk page for all ClueBots
Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

archiving this page

This talk page gets archived so quickly that it's difficult to have a serious conversation here. Could somebody please slow down the archiving bot? —Stepheng3 (talk) 04:41, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The archiving bot archives after 3 days of inactivity in a particular thread. If 3 days without any response, then it is unlikely to be continued. -- Cobi(t|c|b) 05:09, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with your probability assessment. Some people prefer a slower pace of discussion. —Stepheng3 (talk) 20:06, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's quite fine. If a conversation is inactive for three days, it's most likely to be forgotten about. If it just so happens you do not have the time to check in within three days, it is trivial to raise the issue on the talk page again, and link back to the archive if necessary. -- SnoFox(t|c) 00:56, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks so much for your intervention on page Women in Judaism. --Geneviève (talk) 16:07, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. ;) -- SnoFox(t|c) 00:50, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

ClueBot, can you archive my talk page for every 25 messages I get? Also, why is your user page fully protected?--The Master of Mayhem (talk) 09:33, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ClueBot III archives talk pages based on time since last reply to a section. The archive run is every 12hours due to bandwidth usage from the bot. So the simple answer is no you cannot make it archive based on message count. All the ClueBot user pages are fully protected to stop them being vandalised; they should never need to be edited as the pages are all transcluded. DamianZaremba (talk • contribs) 16:54, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ClueBot III can archive every 25 sections by setting the "maxkeepthreads" option to 25. However, ClueBot III only archives every 12 hours, as DamianZaremba said, therefore it is impossible to archive the very instant you get 25 messages. -- SnoFox(t|c) 00:46, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you take a wee look at this ANI thread pls

here cheers Egg Centric (talk) 18:14, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I am aware this could be done using a post processing filter (it is what is used to stop the bot reverting edits that have already been reverted etc) but it would be up to Cobi as far as implementing this is concerned. I'm sure that he will have some input for this when he gets change to review it. DamianZaremba (talk • contribs) 18:18, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ClueBot

When is the first ClueBot coming back? WAYNESLAM 00:31, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The original ClueBot has been made obsolete by ClueBot NG. It will not fully return, if at all. -- SnoFox(t|c) 00:33, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What will happen to all of the original ClueBot pages if it doesn't come back? WAYNESLAM 00:38, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"... all of the original ClueBot pages..."? Meaning, User:ClueBot and its documentation? -- SnoFox(t|c) 00:51, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Will it be deleted or redirected? WAYNESLAM 00:52, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I assume it will stay as-is for historical reasons. -- SnoFox(t|c) 00:53, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Will there be a bot that succeeds ClueBot NG too? WAYNESLAM 00:54, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Most the talk pages, user templates etc are shared between all ClueBots, there is very little tied directly to User:ClueBot ;) As far as replacing ClueBot NG I cannot see any need for it, the bot will be maintained and updated but probably not replaced. DamianZaremba (talk • contribs) 00:56, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) I highly doubt it. So much I can confidently say, "No". If there is, it will be way, way, way, in the future. ClueBot NG seems quite future-proofed, however. -- SnoFox(t|c) 01:01, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What about ClueBot's warning templates and whitelist for example as well ClueBot's optin and angry optin? WAYNESLAM 01:00, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ClueBot's configuration templates will probably remain as well. There's no reason to remove them. -- SnoFox(t|c) 01:01, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm serious

http://www.bungie.net/Forums/posts.aspx?postID=55659854 scroll to bottom. Then you'll know. 70.163.57.150 (talk) 22:56, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the bot makes thousands of edits a day, no, I don't know. Try linking us to the article in question, not some forums. Even better, report the false positive here. -- SnoFox(t|c) 00:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The IP can't link to the article, it's been deleted under G1 for nonsense. 70.163.57.150, if you would care to expand more on what you posted above, we may be able to advise you.--5 albert square (talk) 01:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

difference btw pinscreen and pinscreen animation

Hi ClueBot, yes, i am new to WP, but i am in the process to improve the information been posted. why my edit on Pinscreen page had been reverted??? i am in the process to improve the accuracy of pinscreen, / pin art. i have many reasons to clarify the difference between pinscreen and pinscreen animation!!! please read the fact of ward fleming and his patented invention, which i added in the origin section in pinscreen animation. thank you! Nip888 (talk) 04:37, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nip888, you blanked the page, and you re-directed to another page without explanation, that's why your edit was reverted. It could also be that the edit has set off one of the Bot's triggers. ClueBot is not able to read what you've asked it to read as ClueBot is a Bot editor and not a human editor.--5 albert square (talk) 00:14, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possible vandalism on Mani Ratnam by 203.153.223.80

Hi, User with the IP Address 203.153.223.80 is section blacking on the Mani Ratnam page. I saw one of your reverts on the revision history. Please do the needful. Thanks. Vivvt (talk) 18:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Please do the needful"? Do you require the bot operators to do something or did the bot do something wrong? Thanks, -- SnoFox(t|c) 00:26, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm new with the vandalism, so I do not know who can do what. Please guide, if required. Thanks.Vivvt (talk) 03:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ClueBot NG will automatically revert all the vandalism it can. We encourage you to delete any vandalism that ClueBot misses, or is not allowed to revert (due to whitelists or 1RR). Here is a Wikipedia page regarding vandalism.. -- SnoFox(t|c) 03:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What bit of that edit was vandalism? The edit or the summary?

Huh? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Oriffice (talk • contribs) 23:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, good question. I think ClueBot NG takes both into consideration when judging vandalism. Regardless, it should be sent to the report interface. I'll do it for you. -- SnoFox(t|c) 00:25, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ClueBot removed my warning

What's up with this? Corvus cornixtalk 03:39, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I read Rice#United_States and I find it having too many links to irrelevant topics. There are even links to general concepts such as profit and port. I trimed some links and got reverted. I don't think this is vandalism.111.251.194.52 (talk) 13:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Get fucked. I can edit if I want.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ClueBot_Commons&oldid=410039938"