Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Episcopia (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 13: Line 13:
*'''Delete''' or '''redirect''' to [[Bonanno crime family#Former members]]. Article subject fails [[WP:CRIME]] and is not notable enough for his own article.--[[User:Slon02|Slon02]] ([[User talk:Slon02|talk]]) 15:51, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' or '''redirect''' to [[Bonanno crime family#Former members]]. Article subject fails [[WP:CRIME]] and is not notable enough for his own article.--[[User:Slon02|Slon02]] ([[User talk:Slon02|talk]]) 15:51, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Episcopia does not pass WP:Crime. --[[User:Cox wasan|Cox wasan]] ([[User talk:Cox wasan|talk]]) 19:48, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Episcopia does not pass WP:Crime. --[[User:Cox wasan|Cox wasan]] ([[User talk:Cox wasan|talk]]) 19:48, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
*'''<sDelete</s>Opinion on hold - see below''' If that's all there is to say about him, rub him out... [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 23:23, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
*'''<s>Delete</s>Opinion on hold - see below''' If that's all there is to say about him, rub him out... [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 23:23, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' not notable [[User:Rogermx|Rogermx]] ([[User talk:Rogermx|talk]]) 23:48, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' not notable [[User:Rogermx|Rogermx]] ([[User talk:Rogermx|talk]]) 23:48, 17 September 2011 (UTC)



Revision as of 13:38, 18 September 2011

James Episcopia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CRIME, insignificant gangster - DonCalo (talk) 18:17, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Vic49 (talk) 21:42, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Vic49 (talk) 21:42, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. Mind you, the removal of material was in June and it's not been contested. Anyone else care to comment? Peridon (talk) 13:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Even if the old unreferenced information was included he still is just a minor gangster that does not meet WP:CRIME. - DonCalo (talk) 13:37, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]