Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Episcopia (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 19: Line 19:
:Good point. Mind you, the removal of material was in June and it's not been contested. Anyone else care to comment? [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 13:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
:Good point. Mind you, the removal of material was in June and it's not been contested. Anyone else care to comment? [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 13:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
::Even if the old unreferenced information was included he still is just a minor gangster that does not meet [[WP:CRIME]]. - [[User:DonCalo|DonCalo]] ([[User talk:DonCalo|talk]]) 13:37, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
::Even if the old unreferenced information was included he still is just a minor gangster that does not meet [[WP:CRIME]]. - [[User:DonCalo|DonCalo]] ([[User talk:DonCalo|talk]]) 13:37, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
:::Was it unreferenced, or was it actually referenced by the books listed? Referencing doesn't have to be from the internet. It makes our lives easier if it is available online, but there's nothing that says it must be. [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 17:54, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:54, 18 September 2011

James Episcopia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CRIME, insignificant gangster - DonCalo (talk) 18:17, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Vic49 (talk) 21:42, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Vic49 (talk) 21:42, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. Mind you, the removal of material was in June and it's not been contested. Anyone else care to comment? Peridon (talk) 13:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Even if the old unreferenced information was included he still is just a minor gangster that does not meet WP:CRIME. - DonCalo (talk) 13:37, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Was it unreferenced, or was it actually referenced by the books listed? Referencing doesn't have to be from the internet. It makes our lives easier if it is available online, but there's nothing that says it must be. Peridon (talk) 17:54, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]