Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Episcopia (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Just an ordinary criminal.
Line 20: Line 20:
::Even if the old unreferenced information was included he still is just a minor gangster that does not meet [[WP:CRIME]]. - [[User:DonCalo|DonCalo]] ([[User talk:DonCalo|talk]]) 13:37, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
::Even if the old unreferenced information was included he still is just a minor gangster that does not meet [[WP:CRIME]]. - [[User:DonCalo|DonCalo]] ([[User talk:DonCalo|talk]]) 13:37, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
:::Was it unreferenced, or was it actually referenced by the books listed? Referencing doesn't have to be from the internet. It makes our lives easier if it is available online, but there's nothing that says it must be. [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 17:54, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
:::Was it unreferenced, or was it actually referenced by the books listed? Referencing doesn't have to be from the internet. It makes our lives easier if it is available online, but there's nothing that says it must be. [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 17:54, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' - Just an ordinary criminal. --[[User:Gelobet sei|Gelobet sei]] ([[User talk:Gelobet sei|talk]]) 18:07, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:07, 18 September 2011

James Episcopia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CRIME, insignificant gangster - DonCalo (talk) 18:17, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Vic49 (talk) 21:42, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Vic49 (talk) 21:42, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. Mind you, the removal of material was in June and it's not been contested. Anyone else care to comment? Peridon (talk) 13:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Even if the old unreferenced information was included he still is just a minor gangster that does not meet WP:CRIME. - DonCalo (talk) 13:37, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Was it unreferenced, or was it actually referenced by the books listed? Referencing doesn't have to be from the internet. It makes our lives easier if it is available online, but there's nothing that says it must be. Peridon (talk) 17:54, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]