Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MYktm.com: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:31, 11 April 2006

MYktm.com

Apparently non-notable Nepalese website. 818 Google hits. Prod tag pulled (twice, actually) by the original author without explanation. Delete. DMG413 01:21, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:WEB and WP:SPAM. Alexa rank of 1 million plus. Royboy crashfan 01:23, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - I'm generally strongly in favour of deleting websites, but as far as Nepal goes, there is unlikely to be widespread internet access there, which might explain why the numbers are extremely low - when it may possibly still be very notable for Nepalese standards.ßlηguγɛη | Have your say!!! 01:41, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. Non notable website. regardless of it's google hit count, notability is not established IN the article.--Strothra 01:47, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete I agree with blnguyen, but I also agree with strotha that notability wasn't established. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 04:00, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Make that Alexa rating 1.8 million! - Gl e n ^T _C 08:44, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Speedy Keep. Let's please avoid systemic bias. Notability is established right at the beginning, it hosts Nepal's most popular chat room. Obviously a Nepal website will have a low Alexa ranking, from when is Alexa an acid test? Wikipedia is for people of all country, not for the rich countries with high internet access. This is even more notable considering the current political situation in Nepal. Let's look beyond our borders to the global picture, not everyone has the same kind of oppurtunities. Loom91 09:25, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Let's try this then; is there any verification for the article's claims that this is, indeed, Nepal's most popular chat site? My vote may change if I see some. RGTraynor 15:50, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
weak delete for the same reasons that Blnguyen stated above. It needs sourcing, and despite the systemic bias evident in this, there'd be something about it somewhere. RasputinAXP c 11:49, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per RasputinAXP Computerjoe 's talk 20:31, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 **'''Delete'''.  Let's try this then; is there any verification for the article's claims that this is, indeed, Nepal's most popular chat site?  My vote may change if I see some.  [[User:RGTraynor|RGTraynor]] 15:50, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 *'''weak delete''' for the same reasons that Blnguyen stated above. It needs sourcing, and despite the systemic bias evident in this, there'd be something about it somewhere. [[User talk:RasputinAXP|<font color="#FFFFFF" style="background: maroon;">&nbsp;RasputinAXP&nbsp;</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/RasputinAXP|<small>c</small>]] [[Image:Gadsden flag large.png|25px]] 11:49, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
+* '''Weak delete''' per RasputinAXP [[User:Computerjoe|Computerjoe]][[User talk:Computerjoe|<span style="color:red">'s talk</span>]] 20:31, 11 April 2006 (UTC)