Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MYktm.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. bainer (talk) 07:34, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MYktm.com

Apparently non-notable Nepalese website. 818 Google hits. Prod tag pulled (twice, actually) by the original author without explanation. Delete. DMG413 01:21, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:WEB and WP:SPAM. Alexa rank of 1 million plus. Royboy crashfan 01:23, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - I'm generally strongly in favour of deleting websites, but as far as Nepal goes, there is unlikely to be widespread internet access there, which might explain why the numbers are extremely low - when it may possibly still be very notable for Nepalese standards.ßlηguγɛη | Have your say!!! 01:41, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. Non notable website. regardless of it's google hit count, notability is not established IN the article.--Strothra 01:47, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete I agree with blnguyen, but I also agree with strotha that notability wasn't established. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 04:00, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Make that Alexa rating 1.8 million! - Gl e n ^T _C 08:44, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Speedy Keep. Let's please avoid systemic bias. Notability is established right at the beginning, it hosts Nepal's most popular chat room. Obviously a Nepal website will have a low Alexa ranking, from when is Alexa an acid test? Wikipedia is for people of all country, not for the rich countries with high internet access. This is even more notable considering the current political situation in Nepal. Let's look beyond our borders to the global picture, not everyone has the same kind of oppurtunities. Loom91 09:25, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Let's try this then; is there any verification for the article's claims that this is, indeed, Nepal's most popular chat site? My vote may change if I see some. RGTraynor 15:50, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
weak delete for the same reasons that Blnguyen stated above. It needs sourcing, and despite the systemic bias evident in this, there'd be something about it somewhere. RasputinAXP c 11:49, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per RasputinAXP Computerjoe 's talk 20:31, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per Rasputin (and Bln and Swat, too; share the wealth...). Joe 03:46, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.