Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Codyfinke: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Comments by other users: something definitely wrong with them
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


* {{checkuser|1=Neji56565onyoutube}}
* {{checkuser|1=Neji56565onyoutube}}
* {{checkuser|1=Tassedethe}}

Tassedethe


<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts-->
<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts-->

Revision as of 03:33, 7 July 2013

Codyfinke

Codyfinke (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Codyfinke/Archive.


17 June 2013

– An administrator or SPI clerk has placed this case on hold pending further information or developments.

Suspected sockpuppets

Tassedethe

I've dealt with Cody on numerous occasions, and know his particular behaviors rather well. This user "feels" like Cody in the pattern of edits he makes, his behaviors on talk pages (including his own) and the subjects he is editing. There are so many edits, it is hard to sing out single diffs. It is the very pattern of edits on retail shopping establishments, media companies and finally restaurants that leads me to think this is him again. This is the exact same pattern of behaviors that Cody engages in. The Main missing element is him incorporating his name in the user, however he has done this on a few occasions. Jeremy (blah blahI did it!) 04:51, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I don't know about sockpuppeting but I just reverted and edit of thirs to CMT (Canada) ‎ and had a look at a ew other of their recent ones and reverted CPAC (TV channel) ‎ and Univision tlnovelas and stopped looking further back. These were all cases where they said another slogan was now in use of a logo was now out of use. Especially the last case it is a bit much to say a TV channel no longer uses a logo when their home page quite obviously does uses it. So even if they aren't a sock there's something definitely wrong with them. Dmcq (talk) 11:27, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
  •  Clerk note: We really need diffs here. If there so many edits, it would take an impossible amount of time to go through and make the connection since we aren't familiar with the editor as much as you say you are, and we depend on your giving us more direction than this in order to investigate. Without more info, I can't investigate. Dennis Brown |  | © | WER 13:47, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]