User talk:Sanaza

Your submission at AfC Frank Kasper phases was accepted

Frank Kasper phases, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:20, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Overall good enough to get published and on a roll. It has several "tags" pasted at top for things you'll want to fix though. As a reviewer I'm just looking for format/phrasing/sourcing, not at all a subject expert, so I had no idea how to apply WP:Categories to this. Please read the guidance page on cats and try to apply applicable ones, and/or find a similar article and base your categorisation on that example. My other main concern is that as a layman I couldn't understand anything in your introduction. Can you please modify it a bit so that a layman can get at least a basic idea of even what field of science this is in, and why this is useful to know? As a minor example, look at Hydrogen, where a layman can at least read it and recognise in the first sentences "chemical element... periodic table... most abundant element... single proton". Even without a chem background I can at least vaguely understand most of the intro paragraph there. I realise your topic is more complex, but to whatever degree you can put a little more context in (chem term? bio term? engineering term?) that would really help. Nice work though; we're backlogged by weeks on Article Reviews, but when I see one pop up brand new that's "good enough to start" it's nice to give it a quick publish so we can move on to more problematic articles that need help. Nice work, just needs a little polishing. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:27, 18 December 2013 (UTC)