User talk:Sanaza

Your submission at AfC Frank Kasper phases was accepted

Frank Kasper phases, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:20, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Overall good enough to get published and on a roll. It has several "tags" pasted at top for things you'll want to fix though. As a reviewer I'm just looking for format/phrasing/sourcing, not at all a subject expert, so I had no idea how to apply WP:Categories to this. Please read the guidance page on cats and try to apply applicable ones, and/or find a similar article and base your categorisation on that example. My other main concern is that as a layman I couldn't understand anything in your introduction. Can you please modify it a bit so that a layman can get at least a basic idea of even what field of science this is in, and why this is useful to know? As a minor example, look at Hydrogen, where a layman can at least read it and recognise in the first sentences "chemical element... periodic table... most abundant element... single proton". Even without a chem background I can at least vaguely understand most of the intro paragraph there. I realise your topic is more complex, but to whatever degree you can put a little more context in (chem term? bio term? engineering term?) that would really help. Nice work though; we're backlogged by weeks on Article Reviews, but when I see one pop up brand new that's "good enough to start" it's nice to give it a quick publish so we can move on to more problematic articles that need help. Nice work, just needs a little polishing. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:27, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]