Talk:Diving duck: Difference between revisions
m Talk page general fixes using AWB (9521) |
|||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
[[Goldeneye (duck)|Bucephala]] is mentioned in the article text, but missing entirely from the systematics section. --[[User:Arkuat|arkuat]] [[User_talk:Arkuat|(talk)]] 00:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC) |
[[Goldeneye (duck)|Bucephala]] is mentioned in the article text, but missing entirely from the systematics section. --[[User:Arkuat|arkuat]] [[User_talk:Arkuat|(talk)]] 00:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
:It's Merginae (or Mergini): seaducks, not diving ducks. [[User:Dysmorodrepanis|Dysmorodrepanis]] ([[User talk:Dysmorodrepanis|talk]]) 02:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC) |
:It's Merginae (or Mergini): seaducks, not diving ducks. [[User:Dysmorodrepanis|Dysmorodrepanis]] ([[User talk:Dysmorodrepanis|talk]]) 02:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[[Special:Contributions/75.187.45.179|75.187.45.179]] ([[User talk:75.187.45.179|talk]]) 14:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:50, 3 January 2014
Untitled
Tony, is there a reason why the pic isn't in the taxobox? Just asking. I can do it for you if you wish but I didn't want to go ahead if there was a reason why you put it where you did.
Adrian Pingstone 12:20 7 Jul 2003 (UTC)
It mentions that they're part of the Anatinae family twice.. Should it say this?
I thought this article was about 'diving ducks' and not 'dabbling ducks'. At the bottom of the systematics, this can be found:
FAMILY ANATIDAE Subfamily Aythyinae: dabbling ducks
I'm not knowledgeable on the subject so I don't want to edit it but it doesn't seem logical. Regards, --ogenstein 02:39, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Genus Bucephala not treated in systematics section
Bucephala is mentioned in the article text, but missing entirely from the systematics section. --arkuat (talk) 00:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- It's Merginae (or Mergini): seaducks, not diving ducks. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 02:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC)75.187.45.179 (talk) 14:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)