Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CK Morgan: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:42, 4 January 2014

CK Morgan

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article created by and primarily edited by SPAs; only sources consist of press releases reprinted in secondary sources of questionable reliability. Doesn't even come close to meeting the requirements of WP:ENT. Coretheapple (talk) 18:35, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I've found that a large portion of the content of this article is not verifiable, in large part because a Google search doesn't present any reliable sources. Joe Schmedley^T* 21:44, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note also that Barbarajohnson1 seems to be creating multiple articles with similar titles, so maybe the article title needs to be salted should it be deleted. Joe Schmedley^T* 21:40, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 21:56, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

this article shouldnt be deleted okay maybe i made another wikipedia because i wanted it to a german language aswell but please keep this CK morgan page because i have removed everything u asked and made it to reliable story thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barbarajohnson1 (talk •contribs) 07:36, 4 January 2014 (UTC) — Barbarajohnson1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

this article shouldnt be deleted at all he has removed mot of the information that doesnt require the needsof ikipedia pease keep this artice thanks i dont think this article shoud be deleted because its about an upcoming musician and as i checked the person has added reference too to prove that he has got some work out there so i think this article shouldnt be deleted let be fair and face fact this article meets requirements — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.82.118.79 (talk) 18:50, 4 January 2014 (UTC) — 82.82.118.79 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Comment The above two comments appear to be from the same person. Coretheapple (talk) 19:00, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- While that's highly probably, it's probably moot point. Both are WP:SPAs and neither gave an argument against deletion that pertains to any policy and guideline, let alone one that relates to notability. OlYeller21^Talktome 19:15, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
im not argueing just saying facts maybe the page ck morgan was created many times but i think the person was trying to put in a another language and maybe did it wrong so i dont think this page should be deleted. This template must be substituted.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ===[[CK Morgan]]===
 {{Not a ballot}}
-im not argueing just saying facts maybe the page ck morgan was created many times but i think the person was trying to put in a another language and maybe did it wrong so i dont think this page should be deleted:{{la|CK Morgan}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CK Morgan|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 3#{{anchorencode:CK Morgan}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/CK_Morgan Stats]</span>)
+:{{la|CK Morgan}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CK Morgan|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 3#{{anchorencode:CK Morgan}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/CK_Morgan Stats]</span>)
 :({{Find sources|CK Morgan}})
 Promotional article created by and primarily edited by SPAs; only sources consist of press releases reprinted in secondary sources of questionable reliability. Doesn't even come close to meeting the requirements of [[WP:ENT]]. [[User:Coretheapple|Coretheapple]] ([[User talk:Coretheapple|talk]]) 18:35, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 *'''Comment''' The above two comments appear to be from the same person. [[User:Coretheapple|Coretheapple]] ([[User talk:Coretheapple|talk]]) 19:00, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 **While that's highly probably, it's probably moot point.  Both are [[WP:SPA]]s and neither gave an argument against deletion that pertains to any policy and guideline, let alone one that relates to notability. '''[[User:OlYeller21|<font style="color:#827839;">Ol<font style="color:#FBB117;">Yeller21</font></font>]]'''<sup>[[User_talk:OlYeller21|<font style="color:#827839;">Talktome]]</font></sup> 19:15, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
+*im not argueing just saying facts maybe the page ck morgan was created many times but i think the person was trying to put in a another language and maybe did it wrong so i dont think this page should be deleted. {{SPA|82.82.118.79}}