Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CK Morgan: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:07, 12 January 2014

CK Morgan

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

first of all how can he have an album puplished when his first debut Album aint even out yet that dont make sense at all and just cause his name is not on the router doesnt mean his not signed remmeber his an upcoming artist not a popular artist get it right — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.223.91.102 (talk) 10:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article created by and primarily edited by SPAs; only sources consist of press releases reprinted in secondary sources of questionable reliability. Doesn't even come close to meeting the requirements of WP:ENT. Coretheapple (talk) 18:35, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Userify. I've found that a large portion of the content of this article is not verifiable, in large part because a Google search doesn't present any reliable sources. Joe Schmedley^T* 21:44, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note also that Barbarajohnson1 seems to be creating multiple articles with similar titles, so maybe the article title needs to be salted should it be deleted. Joe Schmedley^T* 21:40, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Thinking about this some more, it seems that the article is of questionable verifiability and notability, but I don't want to rule out the possibility of it being improved further, so userifying under User:Barbarajohnson1 would be a less radical solution. Joe Schmedley^T* 20:01, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'm not explicitly against moving the article to userspace but where? Who is going to bring the article up to snuff and is there any indication that the subject will be notable in the near future? I'd rather not have a WP:FAKEARTICLE sitting around userspace of a user who doesn't understand our policies and guidelines, doesn't clearly state that they're going to bring the article up to snuff, and may not even have that kind of control based on the lack of notability of the subject of the article. I'd support moving the article to userspace if someone just needed to do a little work but I don't think that's a possibility here, let alone probable. OlYeller21^Talktome 17:37, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 21:56, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

this article shouldnt be deleted okay maybe i made another wikipedia because i wanted it to a german language aswell but please keep this CK morgan page because i have removed everything u asked and made it to reliable story thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barbarajohnson1 (talk •contribs) 07:36, 4 January 2014 (UTC) — Barbarajohnson1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
this article shouldnt be deleted at all

he has removed mot of the information that doesnt require the needsof ikipedia

pease keep this artice thanks

i dont think this article shoud be deleted because its about an upcoming musician and as i checked the person has added reference too to prove that he has got some work out there so i think this article :shouldnt be deleted

let be fair and face fact this article meets requirements — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.82.118.79 (talk) 18:50, 4 January 2014 (UTC) — 82.82.118.79 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Comment The above two comments appear to be from the same person. Coretheapple (talk) 19:00, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- While that's highly probably, it's probably moot point. Both are WP:SPAs and neither gave an argument against deletion that pertains to any policy and guideline, let alone one that relates to notability. OlYeller21^Talktome 19:15, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
im not argueing just saying facts maybe the page ck morgan was created many times but i think the person was trying to put in a another language and maybe did it wrong so i dont think this page should be deleted. This template must be substituted.

Delete Very poor quality sources do not persuade me that this singer is notable 94.194.24.46 (talk) 04:01, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 13:38, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of any notability presented. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 13:47, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Raykyogrou0, that argument doesn't really bring anything to an AfD. Please check out WP:ASSERTN. OlYeller21^Talktome 17:32, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Based on content in the article, WP:GNG, WP:MUSBIO, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:ARTIST would apply. Subject seems to fail WP:GNG with no hits in a Google News search or a Google News Archive search. Outside of that, I couldn't find any indication that the subject has played a major role in affecting or changing his industry. While I did find significant coverage from modernghana.com, all of those sources are written by the same person and I'm having trouble assessing the reliability of that source since one of the articles mentions that he's signed to Atlantic Records and that doesn't appear to the be true. Also, if the source is reliable, and if we take WP:GNG literally, it requires significant coverage from independent and reliable sources (sources is pluralized) and this is only one source. If he is signed to Atlantic, he doesn't have multiple albums published under that label to satisfy point 5 of WP:MUSBIO. I also don't see any evidence of being on a major tour or winning a major award. OlYeller21^Talktome 17:32, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]