Jump to content

User talk:Jimfbleak: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 152: Line 152:
==Decor Cabinets Ltd==
==Decor Cabinets Ltd==


Hi Jim. I see that you deleted the article I made for Decor Cabinets Ltd and I would like to know what did I do wrong, or what was perceived as "Unambiguous advertising or promotion"? I did not post product images or any other related promotional items other than mention their line of products (maybe this was the problem?) and I posted many references from reliable sources like the government of Canada. I would like to try to post the article again but now with your recommendations to avoid being mark for speedy deletion again. Thank you.
Hi Jim. I see that you deleted the article I made for Decor Cabinets Ltd and I would like to know what did I do wrong, or what was perceived as "Unambiguous advertising or promotion"? I did not post product images or any other related promotional items other than mention their line of products (maybe this was the problem?) and I posted many references from reliable sources like the government of Canada. I would like to try to post the article again but now with your recommendations to avoid being mark for speedy deletion again. Thank you.--[[User:PsytranceGuru|PsytranceGuru]] ([[User talk:PsytranceGuru|talk]]) 20:26, 1 May 2014 (UTC)


== ''The Signpost'': 30 April 2014 ==
== ''The Signpost'': 30 April 2014 ==

Revision as of 20:26, 1 May 2014



Please add your message to the bottom of this page, give it a heading and sign it using four tildes ~~~~.


Hello Jim

Hi Jim. As you know I am recent changes patroller, monitoring new pages and fighting against vandalism and reporting them on WP:AIV from some time. I am quite fine with this job. Now I want to perform some Admin tasks such as deleting pages, blocking users( Including vandals) and other Admin tasks assuming good faith. I am quite familiar with deletion policy and blocking policy and other important policies regarding admin. If you grand me such rights, I can assure you I will perform my best without using inappropriately such admin rights. Thank you A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 10:09, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Page Deletion - Prashant Ranade Recreated

Dear Jim,

I have recreated the article for Prashant Ranade as per the revisions and guidelines. Please refer the link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prashant_Ranade

Kindly check the content of the page and let me know if any changes need to be done.

Vishal Yajnik 12:11, 23 April 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishalyajnik (talkcontribs)


Page Deletion - Dariush Ashoori(film editor)

Dear Jim,

I have contested the nomination for speedy deletion but that was seems to be deleted as well as the webpage, Could you please inform me what steps should I take to re-create that webpage and submit it for review ?

Best,

Amir https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Amir_jamez — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amir jamez (talkcontribs) 13:09, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FA congratulations again again...

Just a quick note to congratulate you on the promotion of Fulvous Whistling Duck to FA status recently. I know you know all about WP:TFAR and the "pending" list, so this is just a reminder to use them as and when suits you.
You (and your talk-page stalkers) may also be interested to hear that there have been some changes at the TFA requests page recently. Nominators no longer need to calculate how many "points" an article has, the instructions have been simplified, and there's a new nomination system using templates similar to those used for DYK suggestions. Please consider nominating an article, or commenting on an existing nomination, and leaving some feedback on your experience. Thank you.

One for 1st April 2015, perhaps? Must be some scope for an amusing blurb there - whistling ducks...?! BencherliteTalk 13:52, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

precious again: that "odd wood pigeon really" that we see on the Main page now, and - to my delight - that you consider to improve a bird called invisible, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:25, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

hai jim I just need an information from you. an article named voptimise was created yesterday by someone but it was deleted due to some reasons but again want to create an article for voptimise. what should I do? in my account I have made contribution to voptimise but it was not displayed in the list of articles pending for acceptance by Wikipedia. what to do now? I want that voptimise article in Wikipedia . I have all the sources. please guide me creating the article.

(Voptimize (talk) 09:13, 30 April 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Hello Jim, this user has started vandalism in Seminole article at 1 and 2 including final warning. User were blocked many times before, now started vandalism again. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 18:34, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here is this one also. 166.216.165.75 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Continuous vandalism at 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 in same page upto final warning. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 18:55, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

The Original Barnstar
Hey Jim, you really helped me and guided me alot. Couldn't have done my work without your suggestions. Its unconditional Barnstar for you! A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 19:50, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uncertainty

Hello Jim,

I noticed you removed my addition to "One for Sorrow". I really don't mean to be rude, but since what I added is a reference in popular culture, I have replaced it. Perhaps you could explain why you removed it? Do I need to add some sort of a cite? The name of the album on which that particular song appears? As I said, I really don't mean to be rude, but I am rather confused.

Best regards, Pitsligo (talk) 01:39, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jim,

Thank you for your explanation for removing my edit. That all makes sense. Sorry if I overcomplicated your day.

Best regards, Pitsligo (talk) 15:02, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Jim: Thank you for your guidance. Please review my article on Judicaël Perroy and let me know if it meets with your approval. Thanks. Zinjanous (talk) 02:56, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jim. User User talk:Diesscamomot who is creating article on unused images having no good resolution, some of his/her recently created pages on images has gone deleted. But again, user created an other page on Greogorio Y. Zara.jpg that I have tagged for CSD#F1. Please do have a look. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 14:35, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Along with this, user Francooregano has created the page on his own Biography that is Frank beilfuss. I have tagged it under A7. Have a look at this user too. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 14:39, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Jim and thanks again. This was one of Judicaël's students, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Viloteau, who is less notable than Perroy in the world of the classical guitar, has had some of the same teachers as Perroy, has won less competitions, yet has an article about him in Wikipedia. I read it, re-read it and don't find any difference between what I wrote and the article about Viloteau. The "child prodigy" is referenced to the publication "The Classical Guitar: Its evolution, players and personalities since 1800" and to the page in the publication (223) and this is why I left it there. I should have linked Alberto Ponce because he is mentioned elsewhere in Wikipedia but I didn't and it is my mistake. I did not use ANYTHING from Perroy's blog or website or Youtube, and I am not trying to promote him. He is very big in the world of the classical guitar today but I am not even writing this article to prove it. I am not trying to be argumentative but I simply am puzzled by the fact that the French Wikipedia has him, that his student is in the English version with an article that seems to me to be similar, and that even a referenced quote is not acceptable (by the way, the article about Julian Bream has exactly the same quote). Please help and yes you are right: I am struggling.Zinjanous (talk) 15:16, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jim, I just want your suggestion about this article. It is tagged for merge and looks like advert. I searched for the sources, but it didn't seem to pass through the criteria of WP:NONPROFIT, WP:BRANCH and WP:LISTED (Commercial organizations). So what do you think, would it be better for AfD discussion under these issues ? A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 17:58, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jim, user Jasonstacy1970 created the page on The Councilor: A Journal of the Social Studies which seems to be non-notable journal (Not even in Thomson reuters list, no citations or impact factor when I searched) to be notable and I think page is written only to promote the Journal. I have tagged it for CSD#G11. Do have a look. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 18:26, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Along with this, worth a look at two users Azhar ul Aalam and Khuder who has created autobiographies Azhar ul Aalam and Khuder Kamal respectively. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 18:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for your help Jim. I did what you asked me to do and the article was rejected by yet another reviewer. Zinjanous (talk) 22:43, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jim: my tone for the piece is no different than the tone for the Viloteau or the Bream pieces. In fact, it is so bland and "factual" (your Adelaide link backs me up on this) that it makes me yawn when I go over it again and again. I thought you could let it pass but maybe I got it wrong. Does it really have to be a new struggle with every new reviewer?Zinjanous (talk) 05:52, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jim: Thanks for the effort. You gave it your best shot. I think that the outlook for the piece is ....bleak! Have a good one.Zinjanous (talk) 06:18, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jim, I'm surprised that you CSDed this article. I had already denied G11 as the article is not written in a promotional way. The rest of your delete rationale was "no independent sources, no evidence of notability", which basically boils down to A7, but academic journals are not A7-eligible. In addition, an AfD was started. It does look like the journal is probably not notable (there's nothing on their website that indicates notability), but the journal has been around for 75 years, so I wouldn't be surprised if there are sources somewhere out there. In any case, if you really think this is promotional, I'm fine with it staying deleted, but then you should close the AfD, too. Cheers. --Randykitty (talk) 06:34, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning Jim: Would you please have another look at Judicaël Perroy and give me your opinion? I have added additional links. It is in my sandbox Thanks.Zinjanous (talk) 15:08, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hello Jim. Thanks for barnstar. I just want to tell you that user Diesscamomot started uploadinga files again such as File:Gregorio Y. Zara.jpg and File:Most Rev. Teofilo B. Camomot D.D..jpg that are denied due to non-free content(Copyrighted) but user didn't seems to get the point. Do have a bit of look once again. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 17:35, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jim: Thank you so much for your assistance. You are a prince.Zinjanous (talk) 18:18, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jim, user Surya Datta Sudhakar has created a page on his bio Surya Datta Sudhakar , do have a look. Thanks A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 06:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do have a look at this page Paradise Watersports which seems to me as spam. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 06:18, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

psipred article for creation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Demi_lion/Psipred

Above is the link to the article i have submitted for review. I was hoping if u could give me your opinion about the article and any suggestions are welcome. i wanted to have some people or authors from wiki to go through to help it improve before it is reviewed if that is possible.Demi lion (talk) 12:42, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

re: psipred article for creation

Hello, Jimfbleak. You have new messages at Demi lion's talk page.
Message added Demi lion (talk) 15:25, 28 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Disclaimation

Disclaimation
Hi good day to you! First of all thank you for acknowledgement to me as a contributor of Wikipedia. First i want to contribute all lacking information's in the article. like sourcing uploading or anything else to do here. Then thank you for convincing me this site to help us. I`m waiting you to block my account to associate this site. I don`t want to push myself. Because this is not the way to help myself. I`ts useful and outstanding. But I want to leave this site Thank you. I`m waiting to block my account. This is not usefull to me.
Diesscamomot (talk) 02:41, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Non-(talk page stalker) I can only say what? :-O --220 of Borg 05:26, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jhangail

Things are looking bleak. ;-)
Yes, Jhangail is back! Looks like Imranjhangailkhosa (talk · contribs) waited about a day after their block to recreate it (fifth time by my count). You've already 'zapped' it twice, third time lucky? --220 of Borg 05:26, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreement for Blocking

Agreement for Blocking
Yeah, this is not important and useful to me Diesscamomot (talk) 06:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Westernb

Want to restore my edits to Koshari page. I understand you believe that the only thing defined as "Koshari" is "Kushari" but you are inaccurate. Koshari also happens to be the name for a band since 2001. The band definition I posted is NOT copyright material - it is factual information so deleting under that pretense is silly. Is there any way to show two listings for Koshari - your forward to "Kushari" and my paragraph defining the band Koshari?
Westernb (talk) 18:23, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decor Cabinets Ltd

Hi Jim. I see that you deleted the article I made for Decor Cabinets Ltd and I would like to know what did I do wrong, or what was perceived as "Unambiguous advertising or promotion"? I did not post product images or any other related promotional items other than mention their line of products (maybe this was the problem?) and I posted many references from reliable sources like the government of Canada. I would like to try to post the article again but now with your recommendations to avoid being mark for speedy deletion again. Thank you.--PsytranceGuru (talk) 20:26, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 April 2014