User talk:STATicVapor

Your GA nomination of Sanctified (song)

The article Sanctified (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sanctified (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DepressedPer -- DepressedPer (talk) 17:42, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Owner

You need to stop changing the ownership section of WWE, the McMahon Family is the owners because of there class B shares they hold togetherTorrian2014 (talk) 21:03, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

@Torrian2014: There is one owner, and that is Vince. He bought the company from his dad in the 70s and he is the majority owner of the stock. I am not sure where are you getting the 96% from, I do not see that anywhere. You keep changing it to your own WP:OR and that will be reverted. STATic message me! 01:25, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

You can report me all you want the bottom lime is that the content you are putting is misleading, and that's the bottom line — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torrian2014 (talk • contribs) 02:28, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Ed Sheeran – X mixed reviews

The Independent, Time Out and The Big Issue are all reliable, published sources – they are not small, unknown publications with low readerships; and definitely not WP:OR. Negative reviews by such publications which Metacritic hasn't taken into consideration shouldn't be ignored. If those negative reviews were from personal blogs etc then you would have a point about WP:OR, but that's not the case. I hope you can see the point I'm making. 87.81.143.227 (talk) 01:05, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Metacritic says reviews have been generally positive and now the article states the same thing. Just because the were some negative reviews, does not make the reviews generally mixed, unless you have a source for that it is WP:OR. You must not understand original research, so visit the link. STATic message me! 05:06, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

You've entirely missed the point. Metacritic says reviews have been generally positive, but it has only included a few mixed/negative reviews – there are many others by well known outlets and publications. Also, of the 19 reviews chosen by Metacritic, nine – or 47% – are listed as "mixed". I haven't reverted your changes, since it's accurate to say "Metacritic says reviews have been positive" while listing the many negative reviews not taken into account by MC. Also, your assertion that I "must not understand original research" and instructing me to visit the link is hugely patronising; I already did read the link, hence my prior quoting of "reliable, published sources". You must not understand how to be less condescending, so take time to learn. 87.81.143.227 (talk) 22:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank You (Busta Rhymes song)

Hi. Thank you for reverting my edits on the song "Thank You" by Busta Rhymes, but here's my explanation of why you reverted my edits: on the single cover of the song, it said "FEAT. KANYE WEST, LIL WAYNE & Q-TIP", not "FEAT. Q-TIP, LIL WAYNE & KANYE WEST". And also, E.L.E. 2 is still an upcoming album, so it has not been released yet. The track listing should have been okay when I put it there, and the part "(2014)" that you put back on the article is really unnecessary. It should also say that it "features additional vocals from fellow rappers Kanye West, Lil Wayne and Q-Tip" and also "released as a single on November 7, 2013, from his upcoming tenth studio album E.L.E.2 (Extinction Level Event 2)." The track listing for the digital download format should have also been alright with you since you put it out. Skylar3214 11:04, 14 July 2014

@Skylar3214: Well you should have said that, however do not change "and" to "&", it is not proper encyclopedia writing to use the symbol. As for ELE2 being upcoming, it does not really need to be said. I added the track listing back as you know. Go ahead and throw the release date info back in, but it should be its own sentence, not awkwardly lumped into the first sentence. STATic message me! 06:22, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Should I put the release date in another sentence? Skylar3214 11:29, 14 July 2014

@Skylar3214: Not in another sentence, it should be its own sentence, along with the format of release. STATic message me! 15:01, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

I saw what you put on the article. It's really perfect. Thanks, man. I would have done it myself, but I was away for a couple hours. ;) Skylar3214 10:38, 15 July 2014

Mike Will Made-It

I noticed you removed my changes to Mike Will Made-It. This morning Mike Will made a post on Instagram saying he will be releasing a new mixtape titled "Ransom". I don't understand how that's not a reliable source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Claudface (talk • contribs) 06:35, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

@Claudface: You did not cite the post, or better yet a reliable news source. Also you did not format the addition right, copy the format of the previous mixtape's listing and change the relevant entries. STATic message me! 15:06, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

Hello Static,

I noticed you added the Speedy deletion tab to the Yung Stet artist page. I totally respect your opinion but I was wondering more in detail of why Yung Stet page was decided to be placed as unimportant artist? I noticed it was also reviewed by one of the Master editors also whom didn't place it for deletion. Its tagged with some great artist background information that shows importance for this artist/songwriter to be added. He has received major awareness from well known major brands and artists. His social media accounts including twitter are verified also. I was just curious because I reviewed other artists pages that didn't have as much background info as this page. Once again I am just curious of your decision. (Topdog2014 (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2014 (UTC))

@Topdog2014: At this point in time it looks like Yung Stet does not meet the notability creteria of WP:MUSICBIO. If you would like to have a copy to work on in your sandbox, ask the administrator that reviewed and deleted the page if they could userfy it for you. I will give you credit, you did write a pretty good article, but at this point it looks like he is just not there yet. STATic message me! 21:38, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Northstar

Why did you revert my Northstar edit? You're wrong. They weren't able to reattach it. Read the news... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommyrgd (talk • contribs) 18:27, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

You did not cite your edit with a reliable source, that is why. STATic message me! 18:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Money in the Bank (2011) peer review

Hi STATic, due to your experience in editing professional wrestling related articles (and other experience for GAs), I'd like to invite you to comment on the peer review for Money in the Bank (2011), which I have an interest to eventually push for Featured Article status. Thank you very much. starship.paint ~ regal 09:36, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry

Hi, it's me, THX4,444. I am sorry for that.But it's okay now. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by THX4,444 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Azealia Banks

Hello, I've seen your message about making changes on Azealia Banks' Wikipedia, but only shortly after I've edited it again. I'm very sorry that I bothered you, it won't happen again. I'm a proof fan of Azealia & I just wanted to make updates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RANDYLAMONT (talk • contribs) 23:54, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

@RANDYLAMONT: No worries, since the article is about a living person and genres cannot by WP:OR, just be prepared to cite reliable sources. Also the labels she has been signed to will always be listed in the infobox, no matter if she is or is not currently a artist for that record label. 00:19, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Summerslam 2014

You claim that there was not a credible source attached to my link. That link showed a Vimeo video that is a preview that shows that John Cena will be wrestling Brock Lesnar for the title at Summerslam. The final frame of the video shows that the commercial is from MTS, which is a Canadian PPV provider. The Vimeo video looks professionally made and has recent footage of Wrestlemania and Cena winning the title for a 15th time.

Here is the link to the Vimeo video: http://vimeo.com/100854216 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmack79 (talk • contribs) 00:05, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

@Dmack79: A reliable source needs to be provided for verification not a copyright violation video. For PPVs, we usually wait for WWE to announce it publicly. Just taking it from the poster would be WP:OR. STATic message me! 00:21, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

My edit to Brick Mansions

Hi, thanks for posting on my talk page. The reason I changed it to negative reception is because the film only received 26% on Rotten Tomatoes and most of the reviews are pretty negative of the film. I doesn't make sense to have it as mixed since the reviews are generally negative.XKid3202 (talk) 03:09, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

@XKid3202: That is just your original research of the reception. Rotton Tomatoes does not call 26 percent approval negative, so you cannot take that as negative. Metacritic supports saying that it received "generally mixed reviews", so that is why we say mixed. STATic message me! 03:15, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

No. What you are saying is also just original research of the reception. Just because one site states the it received generally mixed reviews doesn't make it so. Metacritic only takes a limited number of reviews and if you look at the majority of reviews for the film you will see that the majority of them are negative.XKid3202 (talk) 03:35, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

@XKid3202: Well I guess you just do not understand what original research is, try taking a look at WP:OR. That one site is the source, and you have no source for saying it received generally negative. Metacritic takes only the most notable reviewers, while Rotton Tomatoes includes every Joe Schmoe that writes for a random blog. Either way, RT does not call the reviews generally negative. STATic message me! 04:08, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Edit to List of Wu-Tang Clan Affiliates

Hey, just a quick question. You reverted my edit to the article based on a good faith assumption. I didn't do it in good faith and did my research instead. Although there are no definitive sources on the web, there are sources in the world. :-) The best source I could provide was the interview I posted, also there are some tracks on youtube, one of them featuring Bomshot & Holocaust, Ghostface Killah and Straight. Also, a member of the German chapter is a co-worker of mine. (He asked me whether I could do the edit.) Before doing so, I made him show me the contract, which in fact exists and seems legit.

Of course, you are way more important to this project than me and more experienced with all this, too. So I can only ask, whether you want to look into the this yourself. Anyways, keep up the good work and have a nice weekend! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Action Boo (talk • contribs) 10:40, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Your opinion

Hi, I don't like to bad mouth people but User:ShawnMichaels11223344 has been nothing short of an nuisance since they have started editing wrestling articles making bad punctuation edits adding unofficial artwork/taglines amongst other things, what do you think the best outcome should be? Lukejordan02 (talk) 20:27, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

@Lukejordan02: If they continue for a long time WP:ANI would be an option, but not at this point. They have already received two warnings this month, so if keep adding unsourced content warn them, or notify me and I will warn them. STATic message me! 01:33, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

OK thank you for the advice, kind regards. Lukejordan02 (talk) 02:05, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Drake infobox

I've launched a discussion at the talk page, which you should have been notified of, but I wanted to say a few more things here on your talk page aside from that discussion. While I think it was perfectly fine to revert my changes per WP:BRD, I would be very careful with leaving edit summaries like the one you left, which imply that discussion is a necessity for any change, no matter how seemingly uncontroversial. I'm not completely sure if that's what you meant, but the implication seems to go against WP:BOLD. I personally wasn't offended, but you might scare off other editors who may be newer or less familiar with Wikipedia and just want to make contributions with such edit summaries.

Also, other changes were made to the infobox outside of the mere change of type, such as a new image that showed the subject more clearly and the removal of an excessive laundry list of "associated acts" that mostly have no significance to the artist's career, and it would have been helpful if you explained why these were changed, in your edit summary or elsewhere. No hard feelings, just wanted to let you know. Cheers, –Chase (talk / contribs) 02:32, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

@Chasewc91: I was doing the revert on the base of WP:BRD, there was no problem with making a bold change, it is just that infobox changes should be discussed. As for the changes, feel free to change the image back, I personally felt that one looked much better, but another reason for the revert was you removing the associated acts. The limited amount ones that were listed have been very significant to Drake's career as someone who follows it would know and they all met the guideline. If I do not jump in that discussion immediately, it is because I want to see what others think. STATic message me! 16:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, it's been over a week since I launched the discussion and no one has replied. I would appreciate it if you leave your input. Thanks. –Chase (talk / contribs) 23:26, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring on Babymetal article

Hi there, I know you are often busy but on a certain article I need you expertise. Several Wikipedians have been editing in against template guidelines and have been formatting against them, and while I have been following these templates and guidelines I just keep getting my work reverted simply because they disagree, they don't reference any reason why they just disagree and while I would have back up on any other page this particular page is watched by what appears to be many fans and want it in a particular way that is not in accordance to Wikipedia and I may have snapped one or two times just trying to justify my edits so I am coming to you for some help, even if somehow my edits are wrong it would be great to hear from you since you're a professional so your opinion is of great value. I hope you help us with your better knowledge one way or another. SilentDan297 talk 09:56, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

@SilentDan297: No problem, glad to help you SilentDan297. Instead of me combing through the talk page, could you detail in what sections are these edit conflicts are taking place? Just from a quick view it looks like there are way to many genres and the discography has some weird format. STATic message me! 16:50, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, the current discussion is taking place here: Talk:Babymetal#Once again justifying my edits - SilentDan297. Apologies for the mass amount of text but I kinda lost it after being reverted many times before, I went through the trouble of replying to every point he made against me after he/she replied so the discussion looks incredibly disorganised, thank you for your help though it is very much appreciated! SilentDan297 talk 16:59, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Since this argument I have calmed down I started another discussion with a much better structure here: Talk:Babymetal#Fresh discussion, hopefully you can still contribute since we are waiting for the opinions of others before we make any more edits, thank you for your time. We are currently discussing;

• • What genres should be in the infobox and what should be removed.
  • What details should be mentioned in the Members section, more specifically whether their birth dates would be mentioned here and the roles of the two younger singers.
  • The layout of the discography and how it should be presented.

Again thank you for your time and hope to hear from you on the talk page. SilentDan297 talk 09:01, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry for the lag man, I was about two-three days behind on my watchlist and I was trying to get the majority of it done. I'll comment there now. STATic message me! 09:33, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

808s & Heartbreak

Nah cuz, I was removing the persons edit but you did it before me but it was still showing up as hip hop/rap when I saw it. HackneyE8 (talk) 16:56, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Breathe Carolina

Hi! I just wanted to ask you (you are one of the most notable editors in Breathe Carolina's page) if you think that would be more appropiate to change electronicore instead of post-hardcore because their post-hardcore sound is heavily influences by electronica, electropop and that kind of stuff. What do you think? Thanks! :) Justasaddream (talk) 15:39, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Danagog

Hello Static,

Trust you're having a great day, I noticed you placed a Speedy Deletion Tag on article Danagog. I have gone through the criteria and the article in question has independent references and also speaks of an artiste with direct affiliations with one of the foremost record-labels in Nigeria, also this artiste has been on rotation on both local and international TV & Radio stations, a comparison with peer artistes also shows that similar references were provided. It turns out these still didn't meet your criteria, kindly make the article available for further editing in order to further conform to the stated criteria.

Many thanks

@Damilae: Danagog is not notable. Just because he's a member of Davido's HKN Gang doesn't make him notable. B-Red and Sina Rambo are not notable as well. Please do no try creating articles for these artists. Versace1608 (Talk) 19:12, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fragile (Tech N9ne song)

The article Fragile (Tech N9ne song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fragile (Tech N9ne song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DepressedPer -- DepressedPer (talk) 23:01, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Ludaversal

Look, I looked up like 6 links, producers and read several articles to edit that Ludacris album because of it's lead single that's supposedly dropping soon. You don't have to be a total jerk and say "good to know you can copy paste". I didn't copy paste anything, I restored the old information from 2 years ago and added everything i could find to make it relevant to present time. I get it, you think I ruin every hip hop article. Why don't you take 5 seconds out of your day to relax/understand and stop belittling everyone. BlaccCrab (talk) 09:55, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

@BlaccCrab: Okay? The album still does not meet WP:NALBUM, if you would like me to restore it and AFD it I would be glad to. I get that you got mad you were blocked for your disruptive editing again, but do not waste your time ranting on my talk page, it won't help anything. After all the uncivil remarks and insults you have made towards me, you are not the one to complaining about anyone else's behavior. STATic message me! 10:27, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

I got blocked for 3 days because wikipedia didn't allow my link to get posted on a weekly chart table. Yeah bud, super disruptive. Uncivil insults? Better than hiding the insults behind passive aggressive shots taken out on everyone who barely do anything to warrant it in the first place. Next. BlaccCrab (talk) 03:15, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Hudson Mohawke

The edits made earlier today were accurate please don't remove good edits without researching

Retired and American

I don't have a preference for putting either adjective first, but I notice you and a few others do. So no problem. Just curious, what's the difference? InedibleHulk (talk) 08:34, July 24, 2014 (UTC)

@InedibleHulk: I am confused at what you are getting at Hulk. STATic message me! 09:07, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

This. Why's "American retired" proper English, but the other way isn't? Or did you mean the "the ring name" part?InedibleHulk (talk) 09:09, July 24, 2014 (UTC)

@InedibleHulk: I know what edit you were talking about, my proper English comment was more related to the poor structure of the sentence in general. From what I have seen in BLPs their nationality is always what comes first, before saying what their known occupation(s) is. He is not a retired American after all. Personally I think we do not really need to say he is a "retired" professional wrestler, but with the recentism of the issue, someone is sure to add it back. STATic message me! 09:14, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

That bothered me just up until I noticed Flawless Viper's summary after pasting the diff here. Punk's eyes said he was kidding, but the words came out of his mouth. "Never ever" getting "back into a squared circle". Verifiability, not truth.

I'd get your point if you read American as a noun, but that's "professional wrestler". He was an American one, and a retired one. Also an American American and a retired retiree. But it works for anyway you read it this way, so it's all good.InedibleHulk (talk) 09:29, July 24, 2014 (UTC)

Discography/mixtape tracklist

Hey, I was looking at Young Chris discography, and I noticed that it's got a list of all his mixtapes like a normal discography, but it also had every tracklist for them all. So I'm just wondering should I delete that? Or should I start doing that to everyone's discography page?

--ChuckT187 (talk) 18:35, 24 July 2014 (UTC)ChuckT187

@ChuckT187: No, the tracks are trivial and they should be removed. It was probably just a huge fan that added that. STATic message me! 02:52, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Charts for "Calm Down"

Hi. Can you fix the charts on Calm Down (Busta Rhymes song)? Apparently, the box for them are really messed up. I'll thank you for your recent edits, if you do so. Skylar3214 6:06, 24 July 2014

Or actually, a text from the eighth resource is being ignored. Skylar3214 6:10, 24 July 2014

@Skylar3214: The second two of your three edits should not have been made, I restored it. STATic message me! 02:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, but it's a text that's being ignored, and it's "11" for the eighth source that you might have put on the article. Skylar3214 7:58, 24 July 2014

@Skylar3214: Okay thanks for bringing it to my attention again. I fixed it now. STATic message me! 03:07, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

That is WAY better, Static. I shall thank you for the edit now. Skylar3214 8:11, 24 July 2014

Your GA nomination of Fragile (Tech N9ne song)

The article Fragile (Tech N9ne song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fragile (Tech N9ne song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DepressedPer -- DepressedPer (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Ant-Man revert

Uh...why did you ask for a source on this revert? I would've reverted it to, but your rationale is a little confusing. It's not like these people aren't confirmed for the film, we have several sources saying they're in it. Sock (The Editor Formerly Known as Corvoe) ^{(be heard)} 10:15, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

@Sock: Is there anything saying they are starring in the film? That is what I meant. STATic message me! 16:51, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Ahhh, okay. Got it. Thank you! I was just a bit puzzled. Sock (previously Corvoe) ^{(be heard)} 16:58, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

SummerSlam (2014) Poster Delete

I was the user who originally put that poster up onto the page only for it to get promptly deleted. So when another user puts it on there, it stays up? I call dick on that situation Linkiscool99 (talk) 16:57, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

@Linkiscool99: Whoever deleted it the first time was warned for removing it too. You just removed it again, do you have a reason? Or is it only because someone else added it? STATic message me! 17:03, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

*Curious*

Hey are you only writing about hip hop? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.130.4.71 (talk) 20:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Can you please write about Bandz a Make Her Dance? I really would like to have more info about that song but unfortunately i don't know how to find the background and other details :S — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.130.4.71 (talk) 21:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry I really do not have the spare time to do that. This might help somewhat. STATic message me! 21:35, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Question for ya?

Obviously when I edit I do with the intention of making pages better or clearer, and I'm not a big tech-guy so some logo may escape me. What exactly did I do wrong on Lucy and Hercules pages that may get my blocked from editing? Thanks, man.— Preceding unsigned comment added by TropicAces (talk • contribs)

@TropicAces: Reliable sources must be cited for all content additions and Wikipedia cannot accept your own observations of things per our policies of WP:V and WP:OR. STATic message me! 04:33, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Drake vs. Lil Wayne

You should create a page for the drake vs lil wayne tour — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.120.68.241 (talk) 05:43, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Sounds like something that should have an article, feel free to create an account so you can create it. See WP:Writing your first article. Sorry I do not really take requests, I hardly write articles anymore. STATic message me! 05:48, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Revision of my edit on Mad Decent

No citation is needed, so thank you for your revision, but why does he claim that he is independent and unsigned if Mad Decent's website lists him? Thanks. WikiWinters (talk) 22:27, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

@WikiWinters: I have no idea, Mad Decent is an independent label after all, but did he just start saying this? STATic message me! 23:22, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: No, he's always said it since he first started putting tracks out on SoundCloud, but if you look at the page of Snoop Dogg, you'll find that the record labels list in his infobox includes Mad Decent, so I don't know if it's an independent label. WikiWinters (talk) 23:30, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

@WikiWinters: Well maybe he recently signed, I am not that familiar with the genre and have never heard of him before this. Snoop is a different story, he signed to Mad Decent and RCA Records for a one-album deal to release his Reggae album last year. Sometimes they do deals with high profile acts and major labels (such as the guy that made "Harlem Shake"), but the majority of their artists are independently just signed to them. STATic message me! 23:58, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Bone Thugs

Just curios, but why was my edit reverted on the Bone thugs n harmony page? Bino5150 (talk) 15:36, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

@Bino5150: The addition was lacking a cited by a reliable source and random fan votes are not notable. STATic message me! 18:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

notice

I only removed my own edits. Why did I get a warning for that?

Curren$y edit

STATic VaPor, I saw that you recently edited the "Curren$y" page, overriding my previous edit where I changed the tab current artists under Jet Life Recordings. I took the information regarding which artists were on the label directly from the Jet Life site, and I don't exactly understand why you would revert my edit. I am open to hearing your perspective, so please explain your reasoning to me. If I am wrong, then I stand corrected. Thanks for your time. Jon'sfrontlawn (talk) 01:07, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

@Jon'sfrontlawn: We have a lot of editors that add fake artists, or formerly signed artists to the section. You need to use citations to the artists section of the website or another reliable source so we know that you are adding factual official signings, or if they have officially left the label. STATic message me! 19:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Bizarre & Seven the General

Hello,

I mean no disrespect to you or the forum, However before I made the edits to Bizarre (rapper) page I asked first and then did the proper research and referencing. The issue initially was that "Seven the General" is notable but has not enough biographical info for stand alone article, I was instructed to improve any article that I could prove through ref's that he belongs in. I thought I did this properly? based on my references and articles Seven the General is managed by Bizarres Red head records per Bizarre interview Murder Dog #17. Thus warranting the update in information to the article, GjonPreni (talk) 13:31, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

@GjonPreni: But it is clearly undue weight to have entire paragraphs about this not notable rapper in Bizarre's article. Just because he is managed by his label hardly makes him that related. Sorry to be reverting you, but this rapper you keep trying to press into Wikipedia is just not notable enough. STATic message me! 15:36, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Gazing At the Moonlight

Hey, I was just wondering if there's a specific reason why there isn't an actual page for Hopsin's Gazing At the Moonlight album. Thanks --ChuckT187 (talk) 18:33, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

@ChuckT187: That is only because it received basically no coverage at all. See this AfD about it. STATic message me! 19:24, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Do you think if I gathered enough information and sources and all that other shit, I could create the page, or do you suggest I just leave it? --ChuckT187 (talk) 16:50, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

The Game

Hey thanks for changing the link to The Game instead of just game. The only reason I set it like that in the first place was because Celebration was listed under (game song) and I didn't want to complicate things even though I know he's gone back to using The ever since Jesus Piece came out. BlaccCrab (talk) 18:47, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

@BlaccCrab: No problem, I can understand why you did that. STATic message me! 19:31, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

keto page

Hi STATicVapor, thx for all your work reviewing different hip hop pages. I was about to post a smallish bio and noticed you'd opened a deletion discussion this June (I'm assuming for this copyvio version at wikibin?). The new version has some refs the old discussion missed, so if you had a moment, I was curious about your opinion. I'll post sometime soon so you could renominate it then, though if you think passing #1 on WP:MUSBIO is impossible I might just wait till the sophomore album (I don't spend much time in afd, so I'm inclined to lean on your experience.) Thanks! Earflaps (talk) 01:58, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

@Earflaps: In my opinion, your version of the article has to be much better. It clearly demonstrates coverage in reliable sources, indicating meeting WP:GNG, which is the first point of WP:MUSICBIO. I do not think you will at all have to worry about an AfD in this case. Another well-written article Earflaps! STATic message me! 19:36, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: Right on; I always try to act above it, but tbh I have the same reaction to red tags as I do police sirens, so thanks for setting me at ease. And a compliment! yay! Not lightly taken, since I've learned a lot from your editing the past year. You know, you're making it difficult not to do this:

	The Badass Barnstar
	For being a generally badass Wikipedian. Earflaps (talk) 16:21, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

@Earflaps: Haha, good one. Don't mention it, that is great to know, glad I could provide any knowledge to you. Thanks for the barnstar also :D. STATic message me! 17:57, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

burning gold

It is confirmed that "Burning Gold" will serve as the second single on Christina Perri's album, Head or Heart. I even cited. Please stop reverting my edit. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.88.233.90 (talk) 02:54, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

DYK for No Mediocre

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:39, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Song Notability/Deletion

How come all these songs that have been tagged as Fails Notability haven't been merged or deleted by an administrator yet? Jingalin should be by now and I believe When I Feel Like It should be as well. Just seeing if you can give me some insight as to how long it normally takes for them to decide or if it's even a concern. BlaccCrab (talk) 19:02, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

@BlaccCrab: Administrators do not patrol pages that have that maintenance tag on it. If anyone sees a song as not meeting WP:NSONGS, they may nominate them at Articles for Deletion or boldly redirect them. I would not suggest you not doing the latter, since you seem to not understand WP:GNG or WP:NSONGS, judging by your tagging of "When I Feel Like It". It is more then clear from looking at the references that it was significantly covered in reliable sources. Being old is not a criteria for deletion. STATic message me! 19:17, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Why are you being rude again? I Literally just asked a question. And how exactly is that song not up for deletion? Despite being scrapped (hence old, which wasn't even my point) it didn't make it past the bubbling under r&b/hip hop chart nor rhythmic/hot 100 or any relevant chart. What major publication covered the song? It's probably the only song featuring 2 Chainz that no one even knows existed let alone all the things I just pointed out. BlaccCrab (talk) 05:59, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

@BlaccCrab: I am not, apologies if you took it that way. I just told you, being tagged with a maintenance tag does not make the article up for deletion. That can only happen if it was placed at WP:AFD. Being scrapped from the album is also zero reason for deletion, I have asked you to see WP:NSONGS and understand what it means. Chart positions do not immediately make songs notable, and songs that chart low or do not chart are not immediately not notable. If you would look at the references section you would see the coverage, but you do not understand WP:N. I have it in iTunes, enough people bought it to make it chart, and it has been viewed 2,000+ times in the last three months, so there are people that certainly know it exists. Why are you refusing to listen to anything I tell you? STATic message me! 16:49, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Dreams Worth More Than Money

Appreciate the clean up bro, It has been a while since I done this. Some other editor tried to delete the page because there wasn't enough "information," but anything else i add if you want to clean up and make it look nice...go for it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay2020 (talk • contribs) 17:54, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

@Jay2020: No problem bro. STATic message me! 19:59, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Nicki Minaj feuds

Refer to Talk:Nicki Minaj for proof if you don't believe me. There is still an ongoing discussion about the feuds and issues in regards of a separate talk page that has yet to meet an agreement. ChocoLantern88 (talk) 18:50, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

@ChocoLantern88: Of course I saw that discussion. However, it does not have anything to do with their being a separate article at all. If you think there shouldn't be one, WP:AFD is the venue. STATic message me! 19:58, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

MTV VMA's BFV

Hey there. As i see you're interested in hip hop music and sometimes you're editing Juicy J's article. Can you tell me should i put MTV VMA's Best Female Video category at his Awards and nominations section? This year "Dark Horse" is nominated for that award. Just the little problem is that the category is titled "Best Female Video", but when they announce the nominees during the awards they also reveal the featured artist's name (if there is one). Thank ya, waitin' for ya answer --Eurofan88 (talk) 20:22, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

@Eurofan88: IMO I do not think we should, it would look weird and it is not that major of an award for him anyways. STATic message me! 02:59, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Turn Down For What

Hey,

Just wanted to ask why my edit claiming that "Mad Decent" released Turn Down for What was removed. If you consider the actual ISRC, it was released under Columbia but also as well from Mad Decent which you know is another division of Jefree's publishing. Is there any reason why my revert was edited other than the one I have posted above? If so, please do let me know

Thanks SwervingStyle