Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gazing at the Moonlight
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Hopsin. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:07, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Gazing at the Moonlight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Google News archives proves that it exists. But those aren't sources that allow this album to pass notability standards. According to WP:NALBUMS, this should be, at best, a redirect and I would have made it one, were it not for the fact that I think there's a couple of fans who would simply revert and revert again, and they outnumber me. Mindy Dirt (talk) 14:44, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Hopsin#2007-2009:_Struggle_with_Ruthless_Records - Aside from the two Google News archives results, I found another brief mention here. I haven't found any reliable sources to confirm this but it seems the album only sold 42 copies so it probably received minimal attention. SwisterTwister talk 19:09, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you kidding? How did you find that? You wouldn't have guessed from Hopsin's article that he's not a superstar. Is Hiphopdx a reliable source? Mindy Dirt (talk) 23:12, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:11, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete why bother with a redirect? It is not a notable album. --Bejnar (talk) 06:35, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:25, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 05:35, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Hopsin. Not notable, but it's a plausible search term. DoctorKubla (talk) 11:32, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.