User talk:Missionedit: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary Tag: wikilove |
||
Line 281: | Line 281: | ||
Bye bye Anna........................................................... |
Bye bye Anna........................................................... |
||
See you................................................................... |
See you................................................................... |
||
== A kitten for you! == |
|||
[[File:Kitten (06) by Ron.jpg|left|150px]] |
|||
SORRY IF I HURT YOU................................. |
|||
[[User:DURYODANAN|DURYODANAN]] ([[User talk:DURYODANAN|talk]]) 12:48, 13 August 2014 (UTC) |
|||
<br style="clear: both;"/> |
Revision as of 12:48, 13 August 2014
HELP!!!!!!!!!Dear Missionedit,
Dear Missionedit,
So the title of this message is Help and you can minimize the amount of space that it takes up. How do you do that???
User:Dedlen followup questionI went ahead and used the submit button for my draft and followed the suggestion to move it to Draft:Dedlen for consideration. Is there a way for it to be assigned to you since you're already familiar with it? Thanks again for your help! Dedlen (talk) 14:54, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Dedlen: 99% of the time a reviewer will not review the same article again, for many reasons. One of them is that there are so many different reviewers. Another is just preference. Unless you ask your reviewer (or any reviewer, see the reviewer list) to review it specifically, someone else will review it instead. FYI your article was only reviewed so quickly because I asked someone to do it :) ~ Anastasia (talk) 17:20, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
01:02:45, 19 July 2014 review of submission by NileFlores
NileFlores (talk) 01:02, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply] QuestionThanks for reviewing, but I have an honest question. I'd like to edit and submit for a re-review, but I'm a tad confused. Is not WordPress.org, Mashable, Matt Cutts, Go Daddy (yep- the web host, on their blog), and The Guardian not noteworthy enough? I've cited those sources. I mean, I could listed hundreds of URLs from lots of resources. WordPress Powers 20% of the entire Internet and this guy and his company is responsible for creating a SEO tool for WordPress (actually 2) that is well known all over the world. His plugin is referenced in SEOMoz, Neil Patel of QuickSprout and KissMetrics mention his plugin, WPBeginner, and much more. How much notable are you looking for? I don't want to sound rude, but I honestly need to know. :) NileFlores (talk) 01:02, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
TalkbackHello, Missionedit. You have new messages at Talk:Solomon_ben_Jeroham#Copyright_problems.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Debresser (talk) 22:41, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply] A kitten for you!Thanks for the approval about Soheir El-Qalamawy page :) Bluemix (talk) 10:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes? :)Pythonessofdelphi, Please continue your questions here. ~ Anastasia (talk) 04:28, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Auto duplicate page creation for 1 topicHi, I created a page named LensKart. In first attempt it got live with removing 90% content and when i edited new content and updated. The updated content got approved but it created a new page with new URL. Old page-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenskart New page- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LensKart I updated fresh content on old page which got approved but it got live with separate new page. I want https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LensKart page live and remove this one- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenskart
03:47:36, 2 August 2014 review of submission by Bodrad
Thank you kindly for the very quick review and response to my draft submission. I think I understand your concerns and the changes required. I have attempted to address each of your suggestions, and also have a clarifying question. Again, I appreciate your assistance with this process and I hope that these changes are along the lines of what is necessary to publish this article. Clarifying QuestionYou stated that I need to "improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable...". I am a bit unclear as to the best way to address this concern. Shall I include more references and citations? Or do I simply need to place the ones I already have more frequently throughout the article's sentences rather than at the end of paragraphs as I have done? Addressing NotabilityIt seems to me the biggest issue with the article in its current form (and I do plan to flesh out the other sections more fully in the next weeks), is its notability. I have reviewed the Golden Rule and musician notability guidelines that you were very helpful in passing along. Golden RuleSignificant Coverage I've included over 15 unrelated and independent references from sources including newspapers, magazine articles, well-known music corporations (e.g., ProMark and Zildjian), other musicians' websites, and online music stores. Nearly all of these discuss the topic directly and in detail. I understand these may not be enough, and I actually have other print sources that I have not yet had a chance to include as I was saving them for additions to the topic. I've listed these below to hopefully bolster the significant coverage requirement:
Reliable Sources As mentioned on the Golden Rule page, these sources are newspapers, periodicals, and media stations, which fall under example categories of reliable sources. Please let me know if those listed above and those referenced in the current article are not up to standards. Independent Sources All of the articles referenced and those listed above were generated by independent authors or interviewers. None were paid advertisements or otherwise arranged by the topic. Verifiability I am a bit confused by the statement listed: "Non-independent reliable sources can be used for verifiability". Either way, I hope the sources I've already used and those listed above are considered verifiable. The answer to my question above will help me understand more clearly how often sources should be included/referenced. Notability
It is my contention that the listing above and those already referenced fall under this category.
The interviews and articles listed above cover this topic regarding several major festivals Abbey performed at in Europe
Two of Abbey's albums were released by Cadence Jazz Records, which contains notable musicians and is a leading label for independent jazz music.
Abbey played for John Handy and Mal Waldron in several ensembles during the 70s and 80s, both independently highly notable jazz musicians.
Abbey Rader is the one of the only, perhaps the only, musician playing this style of music in South Florida. There are several newspaper articles and online mentions of his work in Miami that allude to this, many of which I have already referenced. However, I have found another: http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/crossfade/2011/08/abbey_rader_john_mcminn_pax_miami_august_24_2011.php Bodrad (talk) 03:47, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Missionedit. You have new messages at Bodrad's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Fundación AladinaHi, I´m working on the translation for a new page on the Fundación Aladina, I´m working on the spanish article and decided to translate it. Could you help me out checking the links? They told me the format is ok, but that the reviewer couldn't check the links because some are in spanish. Thanks.--FMateos (talk) 09:02, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Reverting at your talk pageI usually only revert really nasty stuff at others' talks, but I went ahead this time. I hope that was okay. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply] Thanks for the welcome -- now what?Hi // Thanks for the teashop welcome! I'd love to get started as a wikipedia editor, but I'm not really sure the best way to get going. There are certainly topics I know about, but it's not clear to me the best place to get going. Are there lists of tasks that I can work through, preferably starting with fairly minor copyediting or other straightforward activities while I get the hang of it? Thanks! Breandank (talk) 09:33, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I KNOW YOU! ANATASIA. I HOPE THE SPELLING IS RIGHT MISSIONEDIT. DON'T YOU REMEMBER ME? LAST TIME YOU TRIED TO HELP ME. BUT IT WAS A FAILURE. AFTER THAT I DELETED MY ACCOUNT. WHEN I RECREATED IT I WAS SEARCHING FOR YOU MY DEAR FRIEND. AT LAST I FOUND YOU AT TEA HOUSE. HAPPY TO MEET YOU AGAIN. NOW I'M IN TROUBLE. COULD YOU PLS HELP ME BY ANSWERING A TRICKY QUESTION.IN THE LAND OF THE BLIND, THE ONE-EYED MAN IS THE KING. WHO IS THIS OR WHAT IS THIS? I HOPE YOU WILL HELP ME. I HAVE A LOT TO SAY TO YOU. BUT NO TIME. BYE BYE. HERE ARE SOME GIFTS FOR YOU.DURYODANAN (talk) 14:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your suggestions. Why did you say that you know me? It's a lie. I know you and you know me but you know me with a different name. Do you remember what was my old name? I have one doubt. How can we change our username on Wikipedia? How can I find my friends who are in Wikipedia? I am a school girl. I am from Kerala,India. I know Malayalam,English,Spanish,Russian,Tamil and Kannada. Are these qualities enough to qualify me as your friend? Bye, my dear friend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DURYODANAN (talk • contribs) 12:32, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply] Can you also help me to create a cool user page?
Pls reply at DURYODANAN'S TALKPAGE.Cite error: There are 14:42:50, 11 August 2014 review of submission by SalmaawakeningI need to understand a small point. Is it rejected because the subject is not notable, or because there is not enough references that he is? Salmaawakening (talk) 14:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the F.E.D. wishesHave an amazing day! - Dspradau → talk 15:39, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply] AfCs.Your help with AfC reviewing is greatly appreciated. Perhaps I might make some suggestions on the basis of experience; much of this is not as simple as it may seem. 1/Please be aware of the actual requirements of WP:PROF. The basic requirement is to show the individual an authority in their subject. The way people accomplish this is by publishing work that is highly cited . There are also some simple unambiguous ways this status as an authority can be demonstrated: holding a named chair at a major university, receiving a major national or international prize, election to a major national level society, being editor of an important journal. Proof of any one of these is fully sufficient for notability. We accept a published curriculum vitae or biography on a university web site as sufficiently reliable proof for this, tho additional sources are desirable. I have consequently accepted several of the afcs you have recently declined. (There are often problem with promotionalism or copyvio which require rewriting, but this is distinct from notability) 2/ Remember also that being a member of even a state or provincial legislature, or a national cabinet minister , is enough for notability. Nothing more needs to be proven if this can be shown from either news reports or official sources. 3/Although the prebuilt templates do not provide for this, there is a key difference between an article which needs better evidene to show the possible or probable notability, and one where there is no chance of showing notability at all. It's necessary to leave a specific comment to this, in order to discourage people from hopeless efforts at rewriting that will never be accepted. I find that at present the only way is to place a specific warning to that effect on their talk page. In extreme cases, where the material would be a clear A7 if it were it mainspace, the article should not be allowed to remain--I have nominated a few you declined for MfD, though speedy as a test page is also available for the worst of them, especially Facebook-style BLPs. (You may have noticed twinkle is currently not doing this--it has to be done manually. I've filed a bug report. ) 4/The accepted standard for accepting an article is that an article will probably pass AfD. An acceptable stub is enough. If the submission can be reduced to a stub and accepted, I sometimes do that. It can be developed further later, like all articles. 5/it is probably very confusing to new users when you sign your name as Anastasia, but the edit is recorded as being by Missionedit. I'm not in the least a new user, but I thought I was seeing two different people, one accepting or rejecting an afc, and the other commenting. I'm very willing to help you deal with problems--just ask me on my talk page--it's the only place I'll see them. (or use the notifications system--I do now see these also). DGG ( talk ) 04:51, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply] A barnstar for you!
Sorry, if I hurt you. I want a special userpage with some good information and photos. My previous username was Dridarashtran.Now, do you remember me? Will you teach me English? I hope you will. Are there any grammar mistakes? I saw a video today. It was about Spoken English. I loved it very much. Can I call you Anna? I think that you are my chechi. But I will call you as Anna.DURYODANAN (talk) 12:46, 13 August 2014 (UTC) Bye bye Anna........................................................... See you...................................................................[reply] A kitten for you!SORRY IF I HURT YOU................................. |