User talk:Smirkybec: Difference between revisions
New Message (simulated automatically as part of The Wikipedia Adventure) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 401: | Line 401: | ||
-- 13:41, Saturday, February 14, 2015 ([[UTC]]) |
-- 13:41, Saturday, February 14, 2015 ([[UTC]]) |
||
{{Wikipedia:TWA/Navigation2}} |
{{Wikipedia:TWA/Navigation2}} |
||
== 19:18:45, 16 February 2015 review of submission by 80.195.9.42 == |
|||
{{Lafc|username=80.195.9.42|ts=19:18:45, 16 February 2015|declined=Draft:Loha_Vete}} |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/80.195.9.42|80.195.9.42]] ([[User talk:80.195.9.42|talk]]) 19:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
thank you for your message regarding my article, I would like to know why articles from Press magazines and websites are not suitable for my article? I have provided links to the articles that are online and seemingly you think this is not a reliable source? Please explain. |
|||
Revision as of 19:18, 16 February 2015
Test Kaffeeklatsch area for women-only
Since WikiProject Women as proposed at the IdeaLab may take some time to realize, and based on a discussion on the proposal's talk page, I have started a test Kaffeeklatsch area for women (cis, lesbian, transgender) only. If interested, your participation would be most welcome. Lightbreather (talk) 19:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks! Will do :) Smirkybec (talk) 20:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
UPDATE: The MfD for the Kaffeeklatsch was closed with the result page kept,[1] and this notice[2] re the WMF non discrimination policy was put on my page by Harej. (In a nutshell, the klatsch does not violate the policy.)
I don't know how the proposed WikiProject Women at the IdeaLab will fare, but one step at a time, I guess. Lightbreather (talk) 01:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Alice Perry
See, somebody notices your Facebook posts! Philafrenzy (talk) 23:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- Indeed! Now I have to figure out which one you are :P You might also be interested in the bit of work on Aleen Cust I did this evening :) Smirkybec (talk) 23:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- I will take a look. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- Why not nominate them both at Template talk:Did you know. They appear to meet the criteria and would then appear eventually on the main page of Wikipedia. Each would get 5-10,000 views as a result. You don't have to review someone else's nomination for DYK for your first 5 DYK nominations. Check out Mary Brodrick which appeared under the teaser ("hook") "Did you know that when Mary Brodrick applied to study Egyptology at the Sorbonne in Paris, she was told, "But we do not take little girls here"?" Philafrenzy (talk) 23:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- Oh I will! I was delighted to get Maude Delap one, so I will submit these two, thanks very much for the encouragement! Smirkybec (talk) 23:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- A strong hook and a picture are the key in my experience. It's not so different to writing a headline for the newspapers really. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- Oh I will! I was delighted to get Maude Delap one, so I will submit these two, thanks very much for the encouragement! Smirkybec (talk) 23:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- Why not nominate them both at Template talk:Did you know. They appear to meet the criteria and would then appear eventually on the main page of Wikipedia. Each would get 5-10,000 views as a result. You don't have to review someone else's nomination for DYK for your first 5 DYK nominations. Check out Mary Brodrick which appeared under the teaser ("hook") "Did you know that when Mary Brodrick applied to study Egyptology at the Sorbonne in Paris, she was told, "But we do not take little girls here"?" Philafrenzy (talk) 23:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- I will take a look. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks for your work on the Alice Perry article. Sharonlflynn (talk) 12:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC) |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:50, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi Smirkybec! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 13:40, Saturday, February 14, 2015 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi Smirkybec! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 13:41, Saturday, February 14, 2015 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
19:18:45, 16 February 2015 review of submission by 80.195.9.42
- 80.195.9.42 (talk · contribs)
80.195.9.42 (talk) 19:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
thank you for your message regarding my article, I would like to know why articles from Press magazines and websites are not suitable for my article? I have provided links to the articles that are online and seemingly you think this is not a reliable source? Please explain.