Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Nikoma 93 (talk | contribs)
31 edits
No edit summary
Nikoma 93 (talk | contribs)
31 edits
Line 669: Line 669:
*{{revisions|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jozef Matejka}}
*{{revisions|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jozef Matejka}}
''I, Nikoma 93, request the undeletion of this [[WP:AFC|Articles for creation]] submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]]. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' [[User:Nikoma 93|Nikoma 93]] ([[User talk:Nikoma 93|talk]]) 20:50, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
''I, Nikoma 93, request the undeletion of this [[WP:AFC|Articles for creation]] submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]]. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' [[User:Nikoma 93|Nikoma 93]] ([[User talk:Nikoma 93|talk]]) 20:50, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

== Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jozef Matejka ==

*{{revisions|Jozef Matejka}}
I wish to edit the article and re-submit it -[[User:Nikoma 93|Nikoma 93]] ([[User talk:Nikoma 93|talk]]) 20:51, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:51, 28 February 2015

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases
float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Il Giardino dei Semplici (band)

I, Giallino83, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Giallino83 (talk) 13:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Giallino83 This was previously restored back in june and it slipped back into G13 eligibility and deletion again. How are you going to prevent that from hapening again if the page is restored again? Hasteur (talk) 14:04, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Giallino83 The band is clearly notable, so I'm inclined to restore the draft. We do need some assurance that you are going to do something to make the article acceptable though. There is no point to restore it if you aren't going to do any work (like the last time it was restored). --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I'm Italian and just checked the Italian WIKI day by day, not the American one. I did an huge mistake. I thought the page had not been "accepted" for some reason. Pity on me! Restore the page. I'm ready to add an English bio for the band ASAP. Giallino83 (talk)

Done --ThaddeusB (talk) 22:32, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Added the article. Hope you like it. Will add new contents and picture within days. Giallino83 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:53, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The page appeared to have a copy of a blog entry. And now you have blanked it. Does that mean you want it deleted again? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:28, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, the page was restarted at Draft:Il Giardino dei Semplici (band). I deleted the confusing redirects and blank pages (someone accidentally moved it from wikipedia talk to draft talk instead of draft). --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:11, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Easter (Director)

There is now no reason to keep deleting the page. -Mrspeeks (talk) 00:36, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done And will never be done. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:39, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sarodiya

We Sarodiya are the group of some social workers. We are real group/NGO. We want some interested people to join us thats why we need a wikipedia page. Thank you.ArnabADG 11:10, 21 February 2015 (UTC) -ArnabADG 11:10, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia is not a platform for your recruitment, it is here to cover topics that have been covered in reliable sources. Tarc (talk) 14:36, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mr_Alahan

Someone want to deleted my article .But I am real Mr Alahan.I am post it .But some request to delete it.It is very bad .because i am Comedy Actor ,Founder ,Project Direct "Save page" button below -Alahanvirtual (talk) 12:23, 21 February 2015 (UTC) Please don't delete it Please help me.[reply]

 Not done. @Alahanvirtual: Merely existing isn't a reason to include an article on you. See Wikipedia:Golden rule and WP:NACTOR for an overview of what is expected for a subject to merit an article here. Furthermore, you should not write an article about yourself; see Wikipedia:Autobiography. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:24, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Channa

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ali (talk) 16:44, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request to Restore Entry on Steve Vining

I have the proof you are looking for. Please let me recreate it.What about a squirrel? (talk) 18:49, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kacart

i need to update my site and company details in kacart page so requesting wiki team not to delete this page -Kkirank86 (talk) 19:41, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yilin Zhong

writer's general profile -Emptynow (talk) 21:59, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Yes, we know it's a profile. So what? That isn't a rationale for restoration. Furthermore, the article is ineligible for restoration by request on this page because it was deleted as the result of a deletion discussion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yilin Zhong. You would have to appeal to the deleting administrator, Shirt58. After that, you may take the case to Wikipedia:Deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:32, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ronald Gonzalez (Sculptor) (2nd request)

I, Jpspano, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jpspano (talk) 22:10, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:34, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
...and deleted again by Fuhghettaboutit as a copyvio. Good catch, I missed that it had been requested and denied previously. Renamed this section accordingly. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:00, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Forman Mills

Deleted for failing WP:CORP but I suspect the tagger and admin did not do any WP:BEFORE, as I've found a few sources -Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:18, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@TenPoundHammer: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:36, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Best Arcade Script

I, Kireerike, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kireerike (talk) 01:19, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kireerike: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:28, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

learnme2

This progect is so importment to our student -sanjit khulal magar 03:24, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

I placed it in your user page per your talk page explanation that it is a teaching project, not an article attempt. It can be found at User:Sanjit.khulal/Learnme2. --ThaddeusB (talk) 04:10, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Sanjit.khulal: Please don't engage in move-warring with administrators. That article is not fit for main article space, and would be speedily deleted. I have re-moved it, this time to Draft:Learnme2. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:48, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

arvind rai

there are some importent information about indian vastu shastra- for understanding -VyaasJi (talk) 07:47, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That may be, but a religious lecture in a biography article is not appropriate. Furthermore it was written in a promotional tone. So  Not done. You may appeal to the deleting admin Randykitty if you believe the deletion decision was not aligned with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. If Randykitty declines to restore it, you may appeal to Wikipedia:Deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:32, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image:KATE_ANDERTON.jpg

Deleted as orphaned and unencyclopedic in 2008 but probably fits Katie Anderton and could also go at Blackburn Rovers L.F.C. -Målfarlig! (talk) 22:00, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Please place the image in the article(s). --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:05, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bompeh senior high technical school

This article should not be deleted because it is the profile of a senior High school which I would like the world to know about.There is more to be added to this article and I will add to it soon,I therefore plead with you not to delete it.Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Myraclera (talk • contribs) 09:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done This was deleted as WP:G11, unambiguous promotion, and as such cannot be restored. It was actually so promotional that it was to the point where it wouldn't even be something we'd restore to the draftspace. I have no problem with you creating a new version of the article, but it must be neutral and it should also not be written completely in uppercase letters. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

clonazolam

This is a notable benzodiazepine which is related to other similar ones in that class of drugs. It is appearing more frequently as a designer drug of the research chemical class though it wasn't explicitly synthesized to get around drug laws as it's creation was documented by Hoffman La Roche in the 1980s. If etizolam and phenazepam and the myriad of other benzos with unique effects this one is notable too. Also since people are using it it helps described the basic known properties and chemical structures in an accessible place. If you disagree, please tell me why every other obscure non prescription benzo gets a page but only a few you approve of. With forum posts I can prove that it is being use recreationally, but those aren't particularly notable sources. But for safety safe there is no reason not to have a page. -Wgfcrafty (talk) 12:40, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clonazolam, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Joe Decker (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Yunshui 雲水 14:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Our "notability" guidelines generally are based upon the availability of specific types of in-depth, independent source material, and what is specifically needed there, particularly for technical/medical articles, can sometimes be a bit opaque. You can take a look at WP:GNG for the policy specifics, but in practical terms, for a drug, I'd suggest asking at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. That group is active and knowledgable about resources that may, if you are correct, help show that this topic meets our notability guidelines. The general consensus of the discussion, as Yunshui points out, is that it does not, so the burden of proof is now on you to show it. Best of luck, --j⚛e deckertalk 16:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Option pool shuffle

The article Option Pool Shuffle [2] was deleted as considered "non-notable neologism". I contest this:

Firstly, non-notable: the Option Pool Shuffle impacts any startup or small company that is looking raise money from a VC. The Option Pool Shuffle can swing 10% of the value from one party to another (the VC to the Founders and vice-versa). Given that some $48 billion of VC investment [3] was made in 2013, and this has grown in 2014. The Option Pool shuffle has a c.$5 billion impact every year.

Secondly, neologism: the term has been in the use in the VC industry for many years. And a quick search yields the following articles that describe this directly: (1) http://venturehacks.com/articles/option-pool-shuffle (2) http://avc.com/2009/11/valuation-and-option-pool/ (3) http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/07/22/want-to-know-how-vcs-calculate-valuation-differently-from-founders/ (4) http://www.slideshare.net/WilmerHale/option-poolshuffle (5) http://www.reportally.com/cap-table-university/share-option-pool-shuffle

Please can you reinstate this article.

Many thanks -Swfindlay101 (talk) 15:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Swfindlay101, please add your sources to the article. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a few references to the article. Thank you ThaddeusB -- Swfindlay101

Draft:Zobe Records

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 148.129.71.41 (talk) 16:19, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jonathancbpowell/Frank Wright (rugby union)

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jonathancbpowell (talk) 17:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - there was no content at all at the page, just your request that your (blank) draft be reviewed. —Cryptic 18:25, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
For clarity, feel free to create a new draft (with content), but there is no reason to restore an empty page. --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Skylaark67/Glenn Patrick Buxton

I, Skylaark67, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Skylaark67 (talk) 19:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reasoning I am a direct descendant of the first recorded BUXTON in the American Colonies Jacob Buxton. My father Charles Glenn Buxton Jr. is his descendant and a decorated WWI and Korea Veteran. I am a retired Cowboy of the Southwest who went back to college after being severely injured to become an Educator (Professor). I attained an AA AS BA MA MAT ... my story is that of an American Viet Nam Era Veteran who made something of himself against great odds I have been in great pain and had medical problems that kept me from doing any editing or contributing for well over a year -Skylaark67 (talk) 19:36, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. However, it is unlikely you meet our requirements for an article, Skylaark67. This is not a judgement on you as a person, but rather a guideline that exists for your own protection. All our content must be verifiable by reliable sources. If we didn't have this rule, anyone could write anything they wanted about you , including highly negative lies. Also, writing about yourself is highly discouraged - see WP:Autobiography for a detail explanation. If after reading this advice, you agree it is not worth proceeding, you have have the page deleted by placing {{db-g7}} at the top of the page. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:38, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Haewoojae

I, 24.224.212.86, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 24.224.212.86 (talk) 19:24, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:54, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Botchamania

This article was previously deleted under guideline A7 in 2009 by an administrator who has retired from Wikipedia. Since then, Botchamania has exploded in popularity, even becoming recognized by mainstream and independent wrestlers alike. I have reason to believe that this is both credible and significant. -Sasukemario (talk) 20:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done I have restored the most promising version of the page to Draft:Botchamania since it did legitimately meet A7. Once it has been revised with sources, feel free to move it back to mainspace yourself, Sasukemario (or submit through AfC if you prefer). I won't scold the page protecting admin since he is no longer around, but let this be a good reminder to other admins that indefinitely page protection is not necessary and is counter-productive: things can gain notability over time. Instead, protect the page for a year or so (that is what I do). Such protection is sufficient to discourage 99% of problematic users while leaving the door open for legitimate recreation if the subject gains notability later. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:49, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cancer Hope Network

I, Wandasd, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wandasd (talk) 20:43, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The page isn't deleted, it is simply at Draft:Cancer Hope Network now. You can edit it there. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:51, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cancer Hope Network

{{subst:refund|1= ==Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cancer Hope Network==

I, Wandasd, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wandasd (talk) 21:05, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2= Requesting to undelete Talk:Cancer Hope Network. Have new reliable sources to include. Please restore asap or contact with instructions for next steps. Thank you

@Wandasd: Again, there is nothing to restore - it isn't deleted. The page formerly at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cancer Hope Network is now at Draft:Cancer Hope Network. You can add your source there. We simply changed the name of "Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation" to "Draft:" to make it easier to find pages - nothing has been removed. Talk:Cancer Hope Network never existed, nor do you have any deleted contributions whatsoever. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:36, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Michigan Urban Farming Initiative

The Organization is nationally recognized, runs through thousands of volunteers a year and operates one of the highest yield urban farms in the country -129.9.75.246 (talk) 21:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --ThaddeusB (talk) 02:25, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara Kaalnerg

She asked me to make a page for her. She is my source. I am semi new to this and didn't mean to violate any regulations. -Hendersonfan (talk) 23:22, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The article was deleted as the result of a biographical article proposed deletion ("sticky-prod"). Article deletions via sticky-prod will not be unilaterally overturned; reliable sources need to be provided in order to overturn the deletion. Note that we need sources that have no connection to her to satisfy our notability criterion for inclusion, and that you cannot use her as a source for anything but the most uncontroversial information. Also see WP:Identifying reliable sources. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Lyon

I added seven links to the talk page, article was deleted before bringing those in as refs that establish notability. Happy for this to be taken to AFD for more time to improve article --- Aronzak (talk) 04:50, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • If GB fan has no opposition, I have no true issue with this being taken to AfD as opposed to a speedy deletion. However I do have to caution you Aronzak in that you only put WP:PRIMARY sources in the article, meaning that you used sources that are written by Lyon or one of his representatives. Primary sources cannot show notability regardless of what they assert- you need to show coverage in independent and reliable sources like newspaper articles about Lyon in order to show notability. Showing GB some non-primary sources would go a long way towards helping prove that Lyon could survive an AfD. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A different editor created the page, I just wanted to fix it with RS sources (1 2 3 4 5 6 7) -- Aronzak (talk) 06:13, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Tokyogirl79: Left a message on GB fan talk page. -- Aronzak (talk) 06:36, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I do not remember deleting this. I have restored it for further development. -- GB fan 11:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Connor Dawes Fund

I recently attempted to create an article on Wikipedia on the Robert Connor Dawes Fund. As it was my first article I wasn’t sure how to go about it and published it before I had finished in the hopes that I could edit it later. I know this doesn’t seem like a smart idea but I just wanted to see if it worked first. As I finished typing it up in Word I saw the notice that it was going to be deleted. I have fixed up the article and added plenty of reputable third party references, which is what it was missing. I also proved that it was definitely a notable organisation. How would I go about getting it reviewed and possibly getting the page back up? Would I be able to send it to someone? -124.190.117.53 (talk) 05:28, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE According to WP:G7, blanking in the userspace is not considered a deletion request. Also @Wtmitchell: as the original deleting admin. -- GB fan 12:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Brent

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -86.187.101.195 (talk) 09:09, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Channa (2nd request)

[[{{{1}}} A.F.C.|{{{1}}}]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ali Graphi (talk • contribs)

Not done - see the response to your first request above. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:25, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11 London

Fully referenced from 3rd party sites, non-promotional language used, similar posts exist for other agencies, client base is of international standing e.g. clients include multi-billion dollar turnover pharmaceutical companies -Hunter190676 (talk) 15:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - sources such as linked in are not independent of the subject and the reason for deletion was no indication of importance, not prmotional language. As a company that just launched this month, 11 London is VERY unlikely to meet our inclusion requirements. You may request that the deleting admin (User:Deb) restore a copy for you in draft space if you like, but it would almost certainly be a waste of your time per WP:TOOSOON. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:31, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The company name may be new, but it is a relaunch of one that is 8 years old. If we remove references to social networks and just leave the other citations would that stand give the article a better chance? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hunter190676 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • No, removed linkedin and the company's website (which combined accounted for 4/6 references) won't help. The remaining 2 sources are routine "company launches" announcements and don't establish notability per WP:CORPDEPTH. I can restore the article to draft space (where it will have to be approved by a third party editor before it can be returned to mainspace) if you want, but again it is almost certainly a waste of time. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marcius Melhem

There is a page entitled Marcelo Adnet on an actor. If this page has significant importance, Marcius Melhem page also has. I know Marcius Melhem page has little information, but I am here to develop it. -Jhonas Boeno (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - While the article technically met A7 as written, FreeRangeFrog could have exercised some discretion here given that 1) the subject is clearly notable and 2) there was a template at the top of the page requesting a translation from the Portuguese Wikipedia (which has plenty of sources). I'm sure he won't object to the page being restored to draft space and so I will go ahead and do so. The page can now be found at Draft:Marcius Melhem. Feel free to move it back to mainspace after it is better developed, or submit it the articles for creation to have an experience editor review it first. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:37, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know that I'd characterize that as clearly notable, but I have no objection to it being restored if the creator feels the subject meets the inclusion guidelines. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Snug Gables

I, AndyEich, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AndyEich (talk) 16:44, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:13, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

XCC

This entry could contain #REDIRECT[[Machine-readable_passport#Official_travel_documents_.28e.g._identity_cards.29]] -Apokrif (talk) 19:59, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, revised the original heading and redirected to Machine-readable passport#Official travel documents. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:23, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) It looks like HJ Mitchell locked it down after a completely unrelated article was created a few times. Probably a good reminder why a page generally shouldn't be locked indefinitely, especially such a generic title that could probably stand for dozens of things. (A year is almost always sufficient to ward off spammers.) I've Amatulic has recreated it as the requested redirect. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:24, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Richard Herman (lawyer)

I, NewAmerica101, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. NewAmerica101 (talk) 22:04, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@NewAmerica101: The draft has not been deleted, only declined. It will be deleted if it is not edited for six months. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:30, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify, it was deleted at one time, but was restored about 2 weeks ago as per a previous request here. Please edit the article to address the concerns raised in the previous AfC reviews. --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:42, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Philip Boyd

I, KMWNJ, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. KMWNJ (talk) 23:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@KMWNJ: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Also please make sure you examine WP:GNG and/or WP:NACTOR. Otherwise it will continue to be declined. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:22, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robin N. Hamilton

I, Techtacular, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Techtacular (talk) 02:42, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I had stopped working on it but I am ready to resume. -Techtacular (talk) 02:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 04:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hanif Ullah Khan

www.hanifkhanartist.webs.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanif Ullah Khan( Hanif Khan) (talk • contribs) 06:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hanif Ullah Khan( Hanif Khan): - what is the exact name of the page that was deleted. Hanif Ullah Khan has never existed, nor have any plausible alternative capitalizations in mainspace or draft space. Alternatively, what is the username of the person who created the page. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:38, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

y.srihari

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Naaga 100 (talk) 07:40, 25 February 2015 (UTC) dr .srihari is president of global medical association. nearly 40,000 doctors are participating in this association, he is also member of indian medical association,2,50,000 doctors of india participating in this associations. wikipedia articles clearly states the importence of indian medical association and global medical association. so the article y.srihari is good . so i am requesting you dont delate it.............................naaga[reply]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -115.241.109.31 (talk) 11:38, 25 February 2015 (UTC)dr y,srihari is member of indian medical association,2,50,000 doctors participating in this association,wikipedia article confirms this. so this article is nice, .....mani[reply]

Not done This article has not yet been deleted, This is not the venue to argue for keeping of an article currently up for deletion. If you wish to plead your case for keeping this article do so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Y. Srihari, where the deletion discussion is currently ongoing.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ashram Dera Brahamgiani Sant Baba Tota Puri Ji Maharaj Jogi Majra

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Shrishri1008santtotapuriji (talk) 10:49, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - the page had various problems: its subject was unclear, part of it wasn't in English, it looked like an ad, and it looked like text copied and pasted from another source. Please read WP:Your first article for straightforward advice to editing on Wikipedia and start over from scratch if you think you have something encyclopedic to contribute. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

प्रकाश पाटील

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Prakashpvasai (talk) 11:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC) I will be responsible for any wrong information. Information provided is true.[reply]

I went ahead and created the redirect. Prakashpvasai, please keep in mind this is the English Wikipedia. If you wish to write in Marathi, you can do so at the Marathi Wikipedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:50, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Asociaţia Ghidelor şi Ghizilor din România.svg

bad edit broke wikilink, making it seem unused -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:19, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done I have restored the image and fixed the article it was used in. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:54, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Stormy Atmosphere

Good day,
On 20 February 2015 my article was deleted due to a suspicion of a copyright violation.
This is the link to an article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Silverray123/sandbox

About the copyright violations - It was a huge misunderstanding actually. The text in the link http://progresja.com/events/mike-terrana-usa-2/?lang=en
was actually taken from the original biography of the band. The owners of the website were the ones who copy-pasted it when making the advertisement for the bands' tour with Mike Terrana in December 2014. They don't own the copyright on that text, it's the band's original bio text. I thought it's okay to citate few words from the original bio of the band, when I write about the band.
Hope that this explains the issue, therefore my article can be brought back from deletition and resubmitted.
Thank you in advance,

Silverray123 (talk) 12:04, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

<moved here from Wikipedia talk:Requests for undeletion> --- Ed (Edgar181) 13:13, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Silverray123:, no it is not acceptable to copy text from the band's official biography. I restored the page since there is definitely some original work there by you, but it will need to be completely rewritten to be acceptable as an article. Copying even one sentence from another source is a copyright violation. You must rewrite everything in your own words. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:04, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CloudOpting

This article represents a publicly funded European project. -Boryanastamenova (talk) 14:32, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As you say the page was "an attempt to widespread the objective of the project". Wikipedia is not a place to promote projects no matter how noble and non-commercial they are. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that summarizes what reliable sources have written about in detail. That does not appear to include the CloudOpting project. Please see WP:Your first article for straightforward advice for editing on Wikipedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:20, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suvigya_Sharma

Today, after 4 month survival on wikipedia, my page having URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suvigya_Sharma get deleted. It was really very shocking for me after reading "promotional material". Suvigya Sharma is my brother and he is renowned artist who got lots of national and international prize for his great artistic work. According to Wikipedia policy i had not put any promotional links instead i had kept links of renowned news channels in reference section which is supported by Wikipedia.

Even my page was patrolled by Wikipedia Team with green signal "Suvigya Sharma was patrolled by DragonflySixtyseven". It's not my intention to force you to change your decision after all you are senior authority of this prestigious online media. However as a user its my curiosity to know what is basic reason or where i lack.

I dare to post the short bio of my brother as i read several biography for renowned people. That's the main reason behind the publishing not for any promotion.

Thanks in Advance for your generous support. I am waiting for precious support which resolve my curiosity. -Atulkumar.1990 (talk) 16:46, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (Yunshui (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. Please note that you should not be writing about a subject you are close to, and that all Wikipedia editors are volunteers, not paid staff (i.e. there is no formal "Wikipedia Team"). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:29, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Atulkumar.1990: The amount of time the article had stood (6 weeks, not 4 months for the record) is not relevant. It looks like you started the article in draft space and when it was declined you copied it to mainspace. That is within your "rights", but it does mean the relevant history is not 4 months and also means at least one user found it unacceptable as is. That said, I do rather disagree with Yunshui's conclusion that it was unambiguous advertising, but do agree that it was promotional. I am going to restore it and return it to draft space. Jeremy is correct that writing with a conflict of interest is highly discouraged. However, if you use the draft process whereby a third party provides input and ultimately moves it to mainspace if it meets the requirements, then a COI can be tolerated. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:46, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dalene White

I have my reference ready to add to the article. I did not know it would be deleted so quickly. Ash, Mary Kay (2003) Miracles happen: the life and timeless principles of the founder of Mary Kay, Inc. Quill, New York, Harper Collins Publisher, page 37, paragraph 2. ISBN 0-06-057461-5 -Taccol (talk) 20:57, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (FreeRangeFrog (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. Note that we need more than one source to establish notability, especially for a biographical article; see WP:Notability and WP:Notability (people). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:37, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Taccol: Please use Articles for Creation to create a draft and submit it, after you evaluate the subject against the inclusion guidelines. Unfortunately the article as written: Independent Elite Executive National Sales Director Emeritus Dalene White... ...led to a career filled with many successful moments and a legacy of leadership that has spanned 51 years read like a vanity bio and is therefore unacceptable for Wikipedia. Also, please read this if it applies to you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:09, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:BuyAssociation

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) JamesDearsley (talk) 00:03, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:17, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Moataz

The Information in the first is like my Signature not to make person page but i continue down my article about cars -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmed.Moataz7 (talk • contribs) 00:34, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Note that A7 speedy deletions will not be overturned here, and that Wikipedia is not a social media site or a place to tell the world about yourself. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 02:23, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One Click Download India

One Click Download is fastest increasing users it has jumped about 5,167,965 rank in Alexa. This site does not support adware and malware based advertisement. -Dkinred (talk) 03:56, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Note that A7 deletions will not be overturned here. The userbase and Alexa rank of any website are irrelevant to whether or not it gets a Wikipedia article. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:17, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Being the world's 5 millionth most popular website is far from notable enough for inclusion. Please see WP:Your first article for straightforward advice to writing on Wikipedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:42, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rudra Infotech

because another person has mistakenly delete the content -Akchodvadiya (talk) 06:44, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done It looks like the content was not accidentally or mistakenly deleted, it was deleted per WP:A7 as an "Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject". As such, it cannot be restored through REFUND and you will have to ask one of the deleting admins (Verrai and Deb) if they would restore the content. If they refuse, you will have to go through deletion review to seek restoration. Offhand I can see why it was deleted, as the article did not show how the company passed WP:CORP. It also somewhat comes across like you were trying to create a LinkedIn or CrunchBase type database entry, given the slight promotional phrasing and the links to all of the company's social media sites. I do have to warn you that we're WP:NOTLINKEDIN in that we cannot have an entry on every company, only the ones that pass notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:49, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Magnetic_Gear

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Ozykiss (talk) 07:53, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Draft:Magnetic_Gear&action=edit&redlink=1

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:44, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yilin zhong

please undelete the article after delete the advert part if there is any. -Emptynow (talk) 11:23, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Emptynow: - The page wasn't actually deleted (a previous version was under a different title), but was actually inappropriate (advert-like). I have moved it to draft space for you. You can now find it at Draft:Yilin Zhong. I'm afraid no one is going to do the cleanup work for you - you'll have to do itself. As a starting point: remove adjectives meant to compliment the subject, text that implies you should buy her works, and stick to what other sources have written about her, not your personal opinion. When you feel the article is ready, use the "submit your draft button" on the template at the top of the page and an experienced reviewer will take a look and either accept it or let you what need fixed. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:57, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Midasuno

The page met with WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG guidelines, unsure why it was deleted -188.164.228.38 (talk) 13:51, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - The article was deleted under the proposed deletion mechanism whereby an editor can nominate a page for deletion and if no one objects after 7 days it is automatically deleted. Pages deleted as such can be restored upon request, which I have now done. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:02, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paulo César Silva Martins

A footballer who has made his debut for the national team and thus passes WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Have no idea why the author decided to blank the page, perfectly notable article Inter&anthro (talk) 14:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ThaddeusB I have contacted Paulo personally and he is not happy with my work. He wants someone else to do it for him. Alhosniomani20 (talk) 16:53, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I thought this was an odd deletion request, as the article looked pretty good to me. However, it was a valid G7 request.--Mojo Hand (talk) 16:59, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Alhosniomani20 really? In that case I'll see if anyone else will be willing to re-start the article if possible. Inter&anthro (talk) 21:24, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If Alhosniomani20 requests restoration, I'm happy to do so. Just ping me.--Mojo Hand (talk) 04:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Mojo Hand No Sorry I don't want to restore the article. If anyone wants to then they are free to do so. But they must make sure that they don't copy the same content. Alhosniomani20 (talk) 10:48, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cathedral School Student Council

I need help in editing the page, but people need to know about the council so we need to keep it up. -Tripple343 (talk) 15:34, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tripple343:, the page cannot really be listed here. As it has not yet been deleted, you cannot request that it be restored. Also, if it is speedy deleted under WP:A7, the correct forum for apeall would be first taking it up with the administrator who did the speedy deletion and then adding it at Wikipedia:Deletion review. (Also notifying @C.Fred: of this discussion). --Samuel J. Howard (talk) 16:33, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Manchester Historic Association

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Dchauvette58 (talk) 16:09, 26 February 2015 (UTC) I was looking through a page that listed local historical societies in the US and noted that New Hampshire did not have any societies listed. Having worked at the Manchester Historic Association (MHA) before, I edited the page and included MHA in the list. When I searched for the MHA in Wikipedia I did not find any listing for it. I have created a page for the MHA so that when someone looks for it, they can find it. I intend to add the sidebars including name of director, website, etc. when I can figure out how to do it. I was attempting to figure out the process when i published the site.[reply]

I do not know of any references yet for the MHA that I could make. I liken the site to many that I have seen concerning say a local high school or college. It is my belief that at some point those who know more about the MHA will begin to edit and add. Let me know what I need to add to make the site acceptable and more importantly, add the specific links showing me how to do it and I'll be happy to comply.

Dave Chauvette

  • Not done - the page was blank. There is no reason to keep a blank page around. If you or anyone else wants to write about MHA in the future, they can create the article at that time. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:56, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dchauvette58: Actually the page wasn't blank and did contain content, but the issue was that it was a copyright violation of the official website. Please understand that we cannot accept copyrighted material at Wikipedia and in order to use the text you must file a ticket at WP:ORTS that gives us permission to use this material. However even if the MHA is willing to give permission the material would still need to be substantially re-written because of how it was written. Phrases like "Conscious that the achievements of its past leaders were becoming fast fading memories" do not fit the neutral point of view policy on Wikipedia and can be considered promotional. This is kind of the catch of using copyrighted material- in most cases the material was written in order to promote the topic on their/its own website and as such isn't considered to be appropriate for an encyclopedic entry. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CardFlex,_Inc.

Thousands of companies have Wikipedia entries, and we created ours in the same format as these other entries. There is no marketing or promotional copy in the text - merely some basic history and background about what this company is and what it does. Please let us know specifically why we are not allowed the same privilege to be part of Wikipedia as the other companies now listed on the site. -71.170.193.227 (talk) 16:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • @71.170.193.227:, well the first problem is that you shouldn't be writing about your own company (see, WP:COI). I took a look at the article and arguably it didn't meet G11 (advertising), but it definitely did meet the other deletion reason, A7 (no indication of importance). CardFlex may be notable based on my search, but mostly because the FTC sued them. If you insist on creating an article, you can start over in draft space at Draft:CardFlex and submit it for review through the articles for creation process which reduces the problems with conflicts of interest by having a third party review the article for neutrality. However, any unbiased article on the company must cover the FTC lawsuit, so perhaps you would be better off not having an article. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:53, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Expressway Productions

I, Expressway, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Expressway (talk) 17:29, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Expressway: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please also consider changing your username. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:33, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Houston Wrestling

Houston Wrestling was viewed and loved by millions and deserves a page -66.60.247.180 (talk) 19:33, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:08, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nasty Little Man

This is a full-service public relations and marketing firm which represents some of the biggest names in music including Paul McCartney, U2, Foo Fighters, Beck, Radiohead, Arcade Fire and Jack White among others. Nasty Little Man's clients have landed coveted placements on Saturday Night Live, Rollings Stone, The Tonight Show, Billboard and many other high profile media outlets. -69.203.104.4 (talk) 21:19, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I do have to warn you that notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by the company having worked with notable persons (it's generally assumed that firms of this nature will work with someone who is notable), so it's still entirely possible that the page may be nominated for deletion in other formats. The best way to prevent this from happening is to find sources that focus on the company and not on the people they've represented. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 02:56, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Romolo Del Deo

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Tatianajug (talk) 04:17, 27 February 2015 (UTC) A page with this title has previously been deleted.[reply]

If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below.

17:00, 17 February 2015 Mike V (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Romolo Del Deo (G13: Abandoned AfC submission – If you wish to retrieve it, please see WP:REFUND/G13) wish to make edits and resubmit -Tatianajug (talk) 04:21, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Roundtop Mountain Resort

I'm presently typing up the history and contents in another window. Please do not delete. -Sam Krepps 12:26, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

@Saamhimself2: Hey Sam. This page is only for requesting undeletion, that is the restoration of article that have already been deleted; a request to not delete a page that exists but is tagged to be deleted has no place here. When you saw the speedy deletion template placed in the article, it had a button in the middle center that said "contest this speedy deletion" and linked to the article's talk page. That is where deletion should be contested and I see you actually used it. In any event, the speedy deletion was declined.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is a good opportunity to remind Flat Out and anyone else reading that it is not a good idea to tag articles with A3 within a few minutes of creation. Quite often, new users hit save to make sure it works and a quick tagging for deletion can discourage them finishing the article or even cause them to give up on Wikipedia entirely. There is no rush to delete a blank/near-blank page (it does no harm) - it is much better to wait for at least an hour of inactivity to make such a speedy nomination. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:36, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@ThaddeusB: I created {{Uw-hasty}} for informing patrollers. It doesn't get enough use so since you (like me) are concerned with this issue, I thought I'd let you know about it, if you weren't already aware. (We also have in our arsenal {{hasty}}, which I created for use when a page has been tagged but has not yet been deleted, and {{CSD5}} which is for when you are going to possibly fix the initial entry yourself.) Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:40, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Peak Saver

I, User:Richard416282, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Thanks to the Auto-delete message getting lost in SPAM, from Jan 15, I was unable to act upon it earlier. I hope all editor will understand these things, even though, there is no good excuse for not following up sooner (talk) 13:53, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Richard416282: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:25, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Richard416282: One hopes you actually will work on it this time, as opposed to the last time you pledged to but did nothing. —Cryptic 18:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

dr y.srihari

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -101.63.189.213 (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2015 (UTC) dr y.srihari article is usefull , he is a famous doctor of andhra pradesh , it is good article .........sekhar ... This article usefull for doctors and patients,,,,,thanking you sir,,,,,,,aruna[reply]

Not done. This page is only for requesting undeletion, not asking for something nominated for deletion to not be deleted. If you want to contest this deletion, please visit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Y. Srihari, but please read Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Please also note that if the article is ultimately deleted through that discussion, its undeletion cannot be requested here. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You were told the same above. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:15, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joe (Joseph) Brent

I, 96.250.17.120, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 96.250.17.120 (talk) 15:09, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The page was not yet deleted. To stop G13 deletion, you just needed to edit the page. I have now done so for you. please continue your work on the article ASAP. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:39, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MASTER KUMAR

THE ARTICLE WAS DELETED BEFORE I COULD PROVIDE A REFERENCE TO HIS NATIONAL AWARD WINNING -Saisundarlatha (talk) 17:26, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Saisundarlatha:  Done - restored to Draft:Master Kumar where you can work on it. The only claim of WP:Notability seems to be as an actor, and I doubt whether he meets the requirements of WP:NACTOR. A lot of the gossipy personal material and promotional language needs to be cut - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a social-networking or gossip site. Good referencing is required - see WP:Verifiability, summarised as "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source". JohnCD (talk) 15:19, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Falls of the Ohio Museum.jpg

All revisions not properly transferred to Commons. -Kelly hi! 17:39, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kelly: Do you just need the file revisions or the page (i.e. description) revisions too? I assume you only need the older ones and not the most recent. Is that correct? --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just looking for the original versions uploaded by Bedford so that they can be moved to Commons as well - then they can be re-deleted under F8. Unless they were corrupted by the old image bug from a few years ago...in that case never mind. Kelly hi! 20:06, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done - I restored just the original version of the file. Let me know if you need anything else. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:15, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copy complete - please re-delete both files under WP:F8 - thanks! Kelly hi! 21:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

plastidip

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... We are just starting this page and we plan to make it a full source of information for Plasti-Dip users world wide. The first sentence was just a test since we have never created a WiKi page before.

Please do not delete this page. I will keep updating the content as much as I can. "Save page" button below -PlastidipS (talk) 19:18, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done @PlastidipS: There are a number of problems here. First, the article declared it was aimed at helping users of Plasti Dips. That isn't what Wikipedia is for - this is an encylopedia, not a how to guide. Second, the article said where to buy the product - that will almost always be considering an attempt at advertising whether or not it was intended as such. Third, your username implies group ownership and will need to be changes. Finally, if you have a conflict of interest here, you should read WP:COI and strongly consider not proceeding. If you understand all of the above, I suggest you create a new draft article at Draft:Plasti Dip and use the articles for creation process to get input from experienced editors without the threat of rapid deletion. (I have verified the subject is likely notable; that is, it fulfills our requirements for inclusion.) See also WP:Your first article for straightforward advice about writing on Wikipedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:09, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@PlastidipS: The article's content was also a blatant copyright infringement of the product's website. If you do create another article, you must not copy and paste copyrighted text again (yes, this is true even if you own the copyright – because we would require you to release the text to the world under a suitably free copyright license or into the public domain, before it could be used here, even if it was text that was appropriate for pasting here, which it was not).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:25, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GRITtv

The article was well sourced, and there are locations to find information about the show without finding it from the website. -Cdemere (talk) 19:51, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Groundwork Milwaukee

Enter your I am trying to write this article and I did not mean to publish it yet only save it as a draft because I am not done with it. here and then click the "Save page" button below -Factfanatic3000 (talk) 20:27, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that drafts have their own dedicated space. I can remove the speedy-deletion tag and move it to draft space for you (it would be at Draft:Groundwork Milwaukee), if you wish. Looks like it has already been done, and since A7 deletions cannot be overturned here, this is moot. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:48, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Factfanatic3000:  Not done. I would have moved this to draft space, but it is a copyright violation from the organization's website. Wikipedia cannot hold copyrighted material without a formal copyright release, and in any case this is not a place for organizations to tell the world about themselves by posting copies of their own material. JohnCD (talk) 15:07, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yandi Munawar

Article was deleted on the basis it failed WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL, which it did at the time but the player has made his debut in a competitive match (2015 AFC Cup) for a professional team Persib Bandung, so the article would meet the notability requirements. Source: 1 & 2 back up the fact that he played that competitive match for a professional team. Thank You -Inter&anthro (talk) 00:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G4, which means the page is a near-carbon-copy of a page previously deleted via deletion debate. Pages deleted via deletion debate will not be restored here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator who closed the deletion debate instead. You will need to either rewrite this article from scratch or argue for restoration at WP:Deletion review. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:47, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Droneward

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -AlikaJaff (talk) 02:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC) I was mid-editing the article to explain it's importance when it was flagged for deletion.[reply]

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Bbb23 (talk · contribs)) instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:49, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yessine Farhat

Enter your Yessine Farhat is a well known musician in my town and i want to put his informations in this awesome website to show to my country what he can do , as a musician here and then click the "Save page" button below -Dis Pater 24 (talk) 04:04, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Bbb23 (talk · contribs)) instead. Note that Wikipedia is explicitly not for spreading the word about something; at best that's a (sometimes unintended, sometimes unwanted) side effect. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:51, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Dis Pater 24: Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.
Sorry, but it is much too soon - see WP:MUSICBIO for what he needs to have achieved before he can have an article. JohnCD (talk) 14:50, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

dr y.srihari, again

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -101.63.146.196 (talk) 13:06, 28 February 2015 (UTC) this article is very nice[reply]

 Comment:: this article has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Y. Srihari, and that is where you should comment, but read WP:DISCUSSAFD and WP:Notability (people) first.
This is the third time you have been given the same advice. Please read the replies to your requests. JohnCD (talk) 15:26, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually this would be the 6th time they have posted here, if I were online when the last 2 requests had been posted I would have reverted as Vandalism again. Warning have been left on all socks pages.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:31, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

National Forum for Biological Recording

The NFBR is the only organisation supporting biological recording in the UK and is referenced on the Biological Records Centre and National Biodiversity Network Wikipedia pages, but has no entry of its own, I was redressing this omission -Salticus (talk) 14:53, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Salticus: Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Bbb23 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
Wikipedia's inclusion criterion is called Wikipedia:Notability, and is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 17:21, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Motorsports Park Hastings

I was hired by the track to make a wikipedia page for them, i was notified that it has been marked for deletion yesterday. I am new to this and have read somewhat of what to do, all i did was copied Barber Motorsports Park and changed the information to fit this race track. As i have said i am new to this and i did not know exactly what i did wrong for it to be flagged for deletion, please let me know or help me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbtran72 (talk • contribs) 16:58, 28 February 2015‎

@Bbtran72:  Not done. Please read, carefully, Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use ("Paid contributions without disclosure" under section 4) to declare your interest in any edits where you have a COI, and should not edit directly but may submit a draft. Read WP:Your first article, WP:Notability and WP:Notability (organizations and companies for advice. JohnCD (talk) 17:10, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jozef Matejka

I, Nikoma 93, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nikoma 93 (talk) 20:50, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jozef Matejka

I wish to edit the article and re-submit it -Nikoma 93 (talk) 20:51, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=649278118"