Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clonazolam (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. CSD G4 Randykitty (talk) 11:23, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clonazolam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Only source is patent application, just deleted for notability failure. MicroPaLeo (talk) 04:12, 23 February 2015 (UTC) (categories)[reply]

Currently a research chemical for sale recreationally. Wgfcrafty (talk) 05:23, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete under G4 if the article is similar enough. We already had an AFD debate on this like not that long ago, why isn't it eligible for G4? — kikichugirl ^speak up! 07:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know what G4 means, so I can't answer. Every conversation on Wikipedia is an alphabet soup; if I clicked on every link, I would never do anything else. MicroPaLeo (talk) 07:28, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, found G4, now what do I do with this? Again, instruction pages on Wikipedia are not easy. Can I just close this, or, now the G4 will be protested, and we're on to AfD3 for this? I don't have another fiver hours of instruction reading time handy.

Withdrawn for G4. MicroPaLeo (talk) 07:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.