Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Waenceslaus: Difference between revisions
Ricky81682 (talk | contribs) →Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments: bit weak here |
|||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
* As an admin who's probably involved here, I'd say it's a bit weak to use ''a single'' AFD discussion as evidence. There's probably two dozen or so discussions found at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People/Article alerts]] that have similar patterns with possibly the same individuals. Note though that ARBCOM discretionary sanctions are available for any uninvolved admin which may be a better method of dealing with the more aggressive editors. -- [[User:Ricky81682|Ricky81682]] ([[User talk:Ricky81682|talk]]) 11:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 11:56, 24 November 2015
153.151.83.197
153.151.83.197 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Please note that a case was originally opened under Waenceslaus (talk · contribs) but has been moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/153.151.83.197. Future cases should be placed under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/153.151.83.197.
24 November 2015
– This SPI case is open.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Inception2010 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 930310 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- LC-Barti (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Fiskje88 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- White Eaglet (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Ollie231213 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
All of these are WP:SPA bent on protecting article Anna Eliza Williams. They are !voting Keep in this discussion about it:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Eliza Williams. If these are not sockpuppets, they are at least meat puppets. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- This is the most ridiculous crap I have ever heard. Just because someone votes "Keep" in an AfD doesn't mean that they are a sockpuppet. Why not nominate the people who voted "Delete" as well? How can you be sure that they aren't sockpuppets? I am myself and almost every single account you can find on the internet with the username "930310" is associated to me, not someone else. 930310 (talk) 09:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- As an admin who's probably involved here, I'd say it's a bit weak to use a single AFD discussion as evidence. There's probably two dozen or so discussions found at Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People/Article alerts that have similar patterns with possibly the same individuals. Note though that ARBCOM discretionary sanctions are available for any uninvolved admin which may be a better method of dealing with the more aggressive editors. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 11:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)