Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Mulligan: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 09:08, 14 December 2015

Andrew Mulligan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searches overall found nothing to suggest solid independent notability and only finding passing mentions for the TV shows, I found nothing to even suggest a redirect to one of the listed shows. WP:TNT at best if ever notable. It's also worth noting there's some serious vandalism here (see history) that emphasizes how this is simply best deleted. I suggest it would be best if deleted. Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 23:25, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Part of this message is actually from my PROD, "Searches overall found nothing to suggest solid independent notability and only finding passing mentions for the TV shows, I found nothing to even suggest a redirect to one of the listed shows. WP:TNT at best if ever notable. It's also worth noting there's some serious vandalism here (see history) that emphasizes how this is simply best deleted." with which I still confirm and echo supporting as there's simply nothing obvious to suggest better notability and improvement here. Notifying tagger Gadfium. SwisterTwister talk 23:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have found some sources and have updated the page. Not sure if this helps or not! --TheDomain (talk) 02:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of those new sources help. Those sources, taken together, don't meet WP:BASIC, and I quote: "trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability" Schwede66 18:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, lacks non-trivial coverage. AddMore der Zweite (talk) 09:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 *'''Delete''' None of those new sources help. Those sources, taken together, don't meet [[WP:BASIC]], and I quote: "trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability" '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Schwede66|Schwede]]</font><font color="#FF4500">[[User talk:Schwede66|66]]</font>''' 18:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:49, 14 December 2015 (UTC)</small>
+::'''Delete''', lacks non-trivial coverage. [[User:AddMore der Zweite|AddMore der Zweite]] ([[User talk:AddMore der Zweite|talk]]) 09:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)