User talk:SwisterTwister

Please sign your messages with four tildes ('''~~~~''') and please be as specific and concise as possible. If I reviewed your Articles for Creation submission, please read the message(s) at the draft page clearly before adding a message here. As this has happened multiple times, please ensure your message is only posted here once (not doubled).

PLEASE ADD YOUR MESSAGE AT THE BOTTOM and generally, I will reply here so please watch this page for a response. Unless it's an AfC page, where I'll usually comment there and you will get a notification for that. If I have taken time reviewing your draft, please be patient and I will get to it as I am quite busy with other tasks but am certainly willing to look at it and will not need reminding.

New users: If you want to learn the basics of Wikipedia, my page for new users here contains useful information. Information such as citing sources, submitting images and changing & deleting username. If that page hasn't answered your question(s), contact me here.

• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 1 (2008-May 2012)
• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 2 (May 2012-November 2015)
• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 3 (November 2015-March 2016)
• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 4 (April 2016 - present)

Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #265

As promised

The soft bunny of happiness and tranquility.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:19, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hakka Americans

ST, I'm a bit curious about this. Shouldn't this have been closed as a "no-consensus" rather than a clear keep? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

The basis overall was to keep though, it would have been NC had there been equal amounts of delete. SwisterTwister talk 15:21, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

I'm a bit curious about this ST. I'm not sure about the equal "keep" and "delete" reasoning. A redirection is essentially a kind of deletion - it is proposed more as an alternative to deletion. A similar one Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hokkien and Hoklo Americans was closed as NC. If you don't mind, could you reclose this as NC? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 12:54, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thanks for reviewing my article Legend Cinema, request you to suggest best practices to make it better. Contibutions are invited too :) Thank you. NutJob12 (talk) 16:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

01:36:02, 2 September 2016 review of submission by Mothrbrain

• Mothrbrain (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Sanford Hinderlie (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there, just wanted to say thanks first and foremost for your review and for your feedback. I've taken it on board and significantly expanded the third-party criticism and sources section, adding just what was requested to the point that it is now the longest section in the article. Hopefully that should satisfy the reviewer. If it's possible to proceed with the re-review, I'd be grateful. Thank you!

Request on 16:38:12, 2 September 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Jhannafin

• Jhannafin (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Logan Sandler (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi! Looking for help on why this page keeps getting rejected. The page I created for indie director and writer Logan Sandler's first feature film, Live Cargo, was accepted. All the sources I use in Logan Sandler's page are independent from the artist himself. What is lacking in notability? Thanks!

Jhannafin (talk) 16:38, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

20:14:49, 2 September 2016 review of submission by 92.238.62.98

• 92.238.62.98 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Polo Piatti (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am requesting a review as the source material is unavailable online from an independent source. The only existing material is a scan from a newspaper article taken from the subject's own website. I have outlined where the original article was first published but all attempts to verify it from an independent source have met dead ends. Please advise on the exact steps needed to get this article approved. I appreciate your help with this matter. I look forward to your response. 92.238.62.98 (talk) 20:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

92.238.62.98, perhaps I can help out here. The simplest way to put it is that, based on the available sources, he is just not yet notable. There is no real chance of an article until his performances or recording have been reviewed in major publications of national reputation. ' DGG ( talk ) 07:19, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

The prediction...

... absolutely nothing will happen on Julius Gbabojor Pondi and the substandard article will stay forever. The Banner talk 20:08, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

call for help

hay swister, i called for help because, as i said its way too late for me to be editing. additionally i'm not planning on doing any editing just now but don't want to leave this article. i've a neuro disorder & not real confident with my old & barely functioning computer. i simply don't want to spend 3 hours trying to delete a sentence only to get scolded. & yes, it can take me 3 hours. so i wanted a second opinion. its disheartening to think someone has responded to find that i've been told to ask my question somewhere else. i have done some reading & added more info at the treahouse. if you're able to help, thnx in advance.Mausbug (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Help for creating page

Hello dear,

I have just this information for Ermine(Organisation) which is:-

"Ermine is a British educational management organisation.

Ermine's Motto: δῶς μοι πᾶ στῶ καὶ τὰν γᾶν κινάσω

It is distinguished affiliate of The Pimley Foundation, UK and also the Institutional member of the College of Teachers, UK and abides by their Code of Professional Practice.

It has been founded by Mr. Colin Wrigley, MBE and Lt. Col. The Hon. Osborne Wrigley-Pimley-McKerr III.

Ermine Owns and manages Pimley School, Austrey School and Albert Polytechnic."

Please help me for creating Ermine's wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aopsermine (talk • contribs) 06:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

{{subst:nac}}

Thanks for tagging your AFD close as (NAC) on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julius Gbabojor Pondi. But many folks won't know what NAC means. The template {{subst:Nac}} (or {{subst:Non-admin closure}}) is better to use, as it will display the full wording "non-admin closure" on the page and will help stop any misunderstandings. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 08:23, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

19:24:36, 6 September 2016 review of submission by Jackguitarfan

• Jackguitarfan (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jack Pearson (musician) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister I have made the corrections you suggested. Could you please review them and allow me to resubmit this for approval.

Thank you, Jackguitarfan (talk) 19:24, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Aaron Chang Draft Update

Hi SwisterTwister! I did as you suggested and kept digging for more notable references for Aaron Chang, and I found out that he is indeed featured in a permanent exhibit in a museum! The bathing suit from his clothing line, Aaron Chang Clothing, that he gave as a gift to Bethany Hamilton, famous surfer and shark attack survivor, is featured in the exhibit titled Courageous Inspiration: Bethany Hamilton at the California Surf Museum. So this totals 3 exhibits, 1 permanent, and 1 art critic review of one of his galleries, along with multiple other references including his entry in the Encyclopedia of Surfing. I also found the article on Forbes about him, but I don't think it has relevant info to add to the Wikipedia page specifically, so I just included it as an addition. Could you take a look at the draft and see if you consider him notable now that I've added the new info?

Thanks! Explorethatstore (talk) 22:55, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Susan Hawk (district attorney)

Susan Hawk resigned as district attorney today. Should her Wiki article name be changed to "Susan Hawk (attorney)" or "Susan Hawk (politician)"? 208.44.84.138 (talk) 00:03, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

User talk:Amili1313

I note your comment on the above. There still seems to be an issue, wondered if you could take a look? Thanks. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 12:25, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

17:57:20, 7 September 2016 review of submission by Sbjumper21

• Sbjumper21 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:18Birdies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister,

I understand Wikipedia's notability guidelines but wanted to present the below argument on why our references should be considered significant, given that a competitor of ours, GolfNow, has been granted a Wikipedia page.

Within the golf industry, the biggest golf publication has under one million unique visitors a month. We've been covered and interviewed by major publications such as The Examiner (2.5 million unique visitors a month), USA Today affiliate, Argus Leader (120K+ unique visitors per month), Dujour Magazine (47K+ unique visitors a month), GolfNewsNet (55k+ unique visitors a month), ESPN Radio, CBS Radio, Golf Channel Sirius FM and Golf Channel (video). These are major hits within the golf industry, but they aren't going to be covered by the Huffington Post/Forbes, which I believe what Wikipedia is looking for. The Huffington Post also mostly covers the professional game and lacks golf technology coverage.

Lastly, I wanted to mention that a majority of the coverage that GolfNow received from major publications (Forbes/GolfWeek - no longer active/Business Insider) was about either their competition with a slight mention to GolfNow or acquisition by Comcast. They have no coverage other than that in major publications. Their Forbes piece was focused on EZLinks and had some mentions of GolfNow being a competitor.

Comcast Buying GolfNow.com: http://www.businessinsider.com/2008/3/comcast-buying-golfnow-com Booking Golf Tee Times Gradually Shifting To Online Marketplace (focused on EZLinks): http://www.forbes.com/sites/darrenheitner/2013/06/15/booking-golf-tee-times-gradually-shifting-to-online-marketplace/#cbbf061646e1

I'm hoping to discuss this further, and I would be happy to jump on the phone and explain this further. Let me know if you need any further info.

Thanks Sbjumper21 (talk) 17:57, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

About Victor Anoul

I just edited a draft you accepted on August 30th, Victor Anoul, and I just wanted to give you some unsolicited bits of advice, if you don't mind. I'll try to make this as painless as possible.

1. Always fill out the living= parameter of {{Wikiproject Biography}}. As a specific example, if the person isn't living, put in living=no. This reduces the workload on people like myself who go through Category:Biography articles without living parameter, and also helps us keep track of how many BLPs we have.
2. Biographies have to have more information than non-biographical articles to not be considered stubs.
3. If someone isn't alive, make sure categories like Category:Living people and Category:Date of birth missing (living people) aren't on the article.

Thanks in advance,

 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 08:25, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

02:54:33, 9 September 2016 review of submission by 221.237.112.154

• 221.237.112.154 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:MiniTool (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Question about short film drafts

Hey, as you're a draft guru, I wanted to shoot you a query. I have a draft under development at Draft:Cul-de-Sac (2016 film), which concerns a brand new short film by an Oscar-winning film crew and a cast featuring an A-lister. Though I personally don't believe it is suitable for mainspace inclusion yet, I wanted to hear your thoughts for when it would be suitable. I anticipate it will win a vast multitude of awards and may even be an Oscar contender, so please give me input! I hope you're doing well! :) DARTHBOTTO _talk•cont 21:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Partial AN/I close on ibans

Hi SwisterTwister, I have closed this section of the ongoing AN/I discussion with the following warning:

User:SwisterTwister is prohibited from trying to impose "interaction bans" or "keep-away orders" against other users, and from implying that such interaction bans exist unless a ban has been formally enacted through a community process. This does not apply to requests that users not post on SwisterTwister's user talk page (see WP:NOBAN). Violations of this will result in temporary but escalating blocks.

If you need any clarification or have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me personally. While reading the comments there I got the impression that there were editors "in your corner" who want you to succeed, but who couldn't support you saying that bans exist when they don't. Best of luck in your editing, and I hope you have some less-stressful times ahead of you. ~Awilley (talk) 01:53, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rupak_Kulkarni

Dear SwisterTwister,

Thanks for reviewing my article.

I need your help to understand why my article does not match the notability criteria. I have given the reference link from below

1. References of books where his name is mentioned. 2. Reference of news papers where he was in focus. 3. Reference of his all international concerts is also given. 4. Also note that achieving "Pandit" title itself is greatest achievement in Indian Music. 5. His name is also referred in other Wikipedia articles but I understand this does not match to your criteria. 6. Wikipedia also has database of flue players which are less notable than him in terms of achievement. but I understand I can not use this as a argument to publish the article as per Wikipedia guidelines.

Please let me know what exactly I have to do to proceed with my article. I found your comments are very useful and helpful in many other articles. So looking for your help in fixing errors in my article.

Looking forward for your reply and help.

Best regards, Amit Wikiuser music (talk) 15:18, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Could you take a look?

Hi SwisterTwister, I reached out to Sh33na, who recommended I contact you. I'm new to wikipedia and found Sh33na's name as an editor on the Duodenal Switch page - as someone who had the DS, I'm curious to help edit medical articles too. I just got my start with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Surgical_Care_Affiliates and was wondering if you could check out my work? I would really appreciate it. Thanks so much!! --Lisacatherine (talk) 03:26, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Gala Wilton F.C. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gala Wilton F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gala Wilton F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joe Roe (talk) 12:33, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Software MacKiev prod

Hello SwisterTwister, I'm informing you that an article you nominated for proposed deletion, Software MacKiev, has been restored as another editor contested the deletion via PROD. Please feel free to offer your input at the AfD discussion if you wish to do so. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 17:38, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Article for review

Rattan1912 (talk) 00:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi David,

How is it going? Rattan here again. Can you please review this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:1-day.co.nz for me? This is one of the very popular online shopping website of New Zealand based on daily deals concept. Let me know what changes need to happen in order to get this approved. I hope the references from news websites would be enough for notability.

Regards, Rattan

22:43:19, 14 September 2016 review of submission by 2600:1012:B04E:C7D4:7C28:B3C4:2D98:5368

• 2600:1012:B04E:C7D4:7C28:B3C4:2D98:5368 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jihan Zencirli (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there,

Thank you for reviewing my submission but I do not accept this. Jihan is first and foremost a proven notable artist, and designer. Her balloon designs have sparked many companies all over to copycat her. Her company Geronimo has now become a coined term for her particular balloon design as well. If you google Geronimo Balloons you will not only find her company but also a multitude of online stores selling "Geronimo balloons", not on behalf of Jihan's company but as the style of balloon. I am happy to add more references to support her and her companies notability but if that is not enough would you suggest I develop a page for the company with a section on the creator that is Jihan instead? I do not believe her talent is not acceptable under Wikipedia Standards.

2600:1012:B04E:C7D4:7C28:B3C4:2D98:5368 (talk) 22:43, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your help with Kai-Tai Fang. 162.250.169.162 (talk) 09:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Gregory Bernard

Hello SwisterTwister :) Thanks for reviewing my article. You said that there was nothing to suggest the GB's independent notability - please can I just confirm what you need to resolve this? I submitted a couple of interviews with him around film's he's directed, is it that you need something that is not film-related or something that is in relation to him in general and not just one thing? How about this? http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/04/12/on-rubber-wrong-and-reality-producer-gregory-bernard-discusses-working-with-quentin-dupieux/ Thanks very much for your help LittleGold (talk) 12:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Recent article

Hi I was Curious why the article I posted was not accepted. There were no notes written on it. Sports0516 (talk) 21:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

About Rashad Bukhash

Thank you for reviewing the article, your comments are well noted, wikipedia source has been removed and more citations and references were added as well, thank you for your support. Laithabdallah (talk) 12:55, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Please Reconsider: Durreen Shahnaz

Eddie Hartman (talk) 13:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC) Durreen Shahnaz, whom you rejected for lack of notability, won the Asia Game Changer award today: http://asiasociety.org/asia-game-changers/durreen-shahnaz

Would you please give me some indication of what would stack up to notability?

Request on 15:02:17, 17 September 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Hrosato

• Hrosato (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Theresia Gouw (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please provide more specificity as to why the article about Theresia Gouw was declined for lack of notability backed up by significant sources. Theresia Gouw is widely considered one of the leading venture capital investors in the technology industry. In an industry with few female investors at all, she is a standout regardless of her gender. The sources used in this article are highly reliable--New York Times, Fortune, Forbes, CNBC, Time, etc. There are other Wikipedia pages about similar people in the tech industry--Aileen Lee (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aileen_Lee), Diane Greene (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diane_Greene). Please provide some insight as to how these profiles meet the notability standard whereas Theresia Gouw's does not. I appreciate any specific guidance you can provide. Thank you!

Hrosato (talk) 15:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

18:16:46, 17 September 2016 review of submission by Sbhagwandin

• Sbhagwandin (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Leanplum (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hey, just got your feedback on the Leanplum page. To clarify, are funding rounds not relevant to the notability criteria? I've seen many other tech startup pages whose main citations are funding rounds and product announcements (see Appboy, Apteligent, Mixpanel, etc.), so I was under the impression that these citations were valid.

Hello Sbhagwandin, thanks for showing me those articles, I have now listed them for deletion as not only was the news simply for company activities such as funding, but I was unable to find any actual better sources; the thing is that for a Wikipedia article, there needs to be better coverage aside from funding, because funding usually means (and this is common here) that the company is still so new that it's searching to gain and establish capital (which includes the company obtaining news to search for said capital) therefore it's not yet established and notable. If you find any other articles, please let me know so I can examine them. Thanks. SwisterTwister talk 18:30, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

No problem, glad to have a better idea of how this works. What would you say about a more established company like Optimizely, in that case? Many of the citations are the usual press releases and (possibly) paid news coverage, but the founders were listed on places like the Forbes 30 Under 30, and I see that the company was on some sort of "Best Places to Work" list. Are those the sort of citations that establish credibility? Sbhagwandin (talk) 15:23, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Request on 18:36:37, 17 September 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Ekay514

• Ekay514 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Credico (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Ekay514 (talk) 18:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello David, I would first like to thank you for taking the time to review my article. With that being said, I'm finding it difficult to believe that the information provided does not sufficiently account for Credico's notability. It's, of course mentioned in the article, but in terms of its size and controversy, Credico is a 400 firm company, spanning 19 countries, with a current class action involving hundreds of opt ins, and an extreme level of notoriety in the UK. Aside from this I believe, I believe the article is rather unbiased and factual. As a point of reference, the Cobra Group, a direct marketing firm of almost identical construction, save its East Asian base of operations, achieved publication and its size and controversy were not really as notable from an objective point of view. Again thank you for your review, but I feel you are have a difficult time understanding the scope and influence of the company.

Thanks! Elijah Kay Ekay514 (talk) 18:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Request on 00:15:17, 18 September 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Mek457

• Mek457 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Daniel Noah (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello David. Thank you for your review of my piece on Daniel Noah. I know you receive this question all the time, but I would appreciate some advice. Respectfully, you say Mr. Noah is not notable enough to receive his own Wikipedia entry, yet the movie (Max Rose) he created, wrote, and directed has its own page, and the company (SpectreVision) he co-founded has its own page as well. I am truly at a loss as to why Daniel is not deemed worthy enough as the projects he created. I would truly appreciate it if you could share the thought behind this, and if there is a way for me to revise that might make you reconsider. Sincere thanks, Michael.Mek457 (talk) 00:15, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Mek457 (talk) 00:15, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Review of ThreatModeler page

ST,

Please note that the section entitled "Additional Outside References to ThreatModeler" does, in fact, contain a press release. It is mostly filled with outside/non-related mentions of ThreatModeler from verifiable secondary and tertiary sources. Overall there are 21 references used in the article, 15 of which are outside / verifiable / notable sources. I was in the process of making the links in the "Additional Outside References to ThreatModeler" live when I received notification that the article was declined. Since you didn't notice the press release about ThreatModeler or notice that the article was about Argawal's contribution to threat modeling, I am resubmitting in the hope that you will actually take time to review the article and its references. This is not, as you suggest, an advertisement. It is an article about moving the field of threat modeling forward. If you have specific, helpful comments I would be very happy to receive them; the general template comments I've received thus far simply do not seem to apply in a helpful way....

Thanks Bbeyst (talk) 18:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Brian

Thanks for the specific input. I'll see what I can do to address the noted issues in a timely manner. Bbeyst (talk) 19:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Review of Draft:QForm page

Hello Dear, You have declined the article i've prepared with the comment "the company is not yet notable because there's simply not yet enough substance for a convincing notability". But in fact, the page isn't about company, it is about one of the mostly used FEM (CAE) software on the plants around the world. So, please, put me on the way i should edit the article so it could be published. Thanks a lot, have a nice time. Mskpetrov (talk) 08:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Request on 10:27:13, 19 September 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Slim cop

• Slim cop (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Andrew Watts (countertenor) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi - I'm struggling to understand what else I need to do in order to have this article approved. You say "For the best enhancements, this would still need all [sic] additional amounts of in-depth third-party news sources overall which also includes reviews; please no press releases, interviews or trivial passing mentions." Yet I have included citations from Time Out, The BBC, The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Spectator, and the Evening Standard - are these not "third-party news sources"? As for reviews, the word 'review' appears six times amongst the citations! So please, can you tell me clearly and specifically what more I need to do to get this article published?

Thanks.

simontcope (talk) 10:27, 19 September 2016 (UTC)