Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julius Gbabojor Pondi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SPEEDY and SNOW Keep considering WP: POLITICIAN (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 18:56, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Julius Gbabojor Pondi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertising and fluff, with half the article unsourced. I suggest WP:TNT The Banner talk 20:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The subject is a Member of National Assembly,[1] passing WP:POLITICIAN. If nuke and pave is called for, why not stubefy? • Gene93k (talk) 21:31, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. - the subject basically passes WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN per the sources, although it lacks inline citations and looks promotional. TNT should be applied. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 06:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but remove unsourced material and that based on non-RS - almost unintelligible open letter from a student etc. - Arjayay (talk) 10:22, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Article definitely needs improvement, but a person who is verifiable as having served in a national legislature is kept and flagged for cleanup, not deleted — for all the article's problems, not a single one of them can't be adequately handled through the normal editing process. Keep and flag for cleanup. Bearcat (talk) 23:20, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.