Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Schultz: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::Agreed, save for the redirect to Pigface part. Yes, he's an early contributor to Pigface but nobody who happens to be looking for info on Schultz is really going to find any by reading the Pigface article. |
::Agreed, save for the redirect to Pigface part. Yes, he's an early contributor to Pigface but nobody who happens to be looking for info on Schultz is really going to find any by reading the Pigface article. |
||
*'''Keep''' Not sure why the user proposing this is focused on articles they themselves created and previously successfully defended from deletion, all related to Matthew Schultz and [[Lab Report]], but that's what seems to be happening. At best, I could see a merger of the related articles but a total purge of all related information seems severe. [[User:NJZombie|NJZombie]] ([[User talk:NJZombie|talk]]) 03:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' Not sure why the user proposing this is focused on articles they themselves created and previously successfully defended from deletion, all related to Matthew Schultz and [[Lab Report]], but that's what seems to be happening. At best, I could see a merger of the related articles but a total purge of all related information seems severe. [[User:NJZombie|NJZombie]] ([[User talk:NJZombie|talk]]) 03:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC) |
||
*A merger would be a good idea. The ATG wikipage covers the intrument used in Lab Report and Pigface. The Pigface page covers his envolvment in Pigface and the Lab Report page covers his involvment in that project. Would you support a merger? |
|||
Revision as of 14:24, 7 January 2017
AfDs for this article:
- Matthew Schultz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:BIO it is "not notable" - Reference 1 is a review of the band. Reference 2 (Although maybe from the NYT) is still a review of a band. Reference 3 does not exist. Reference 5 Does not refer to schultz at all. Rudolph Steiner (talk) 01:28, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/<topic>|list of <topic>-related deletion discussions]]. <RudolphSteiner>
- Keep or redirect - Keep, or redirect to Pigface (or Lab Report). --Jax 0677 (talk) 03:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- Agreed, save for the redirect to Pigface part. Yes, he's an early contributor to Pigface but nobody who happens to be looking for info on Schultz is really going to find any by reading the Pigface article.
- Keep Not sure why the user proposing this is focused on articles they themselves created and previously successfully defended from deletion, all related to Matthew Schultz and Lab Report, but that's what seems to be happening. At best, I could see a merger of the related articles but a total purge of all related information seems severe. NJZombie (talk) 03:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- A merger would be a good idea. The ATG wikipage covers the intrument used in Lab Report and Pigface. The Pigface page covers his envolvment in Pigface and the Lab Report page covers his involvment in that project. Would you support a merger?